>>10957588
no one?

Fruit of the Loom makes good plain t-shirts (seriously). They're one of the few that don't balloon at the waist.

>>10957659
people on amazon complain about their quality, not sure about fruit of the loom. Any other suggestions?

http://www.shirtsupplier.com/

also Gildan

GAP have really solid shirts, uniqlo feels flimsy in comparison to gap

uniqlo is goat

>>10957588
James perse, dior homme, rag & bone, margiela depending on season and if the pick stitches are appropriate for your lifestyle.

On the cheaper end John varvatos, and Elizabeth and James...yeah that Mary Kate and Ashley brand has a small but somewhat decent menswear lineup.

Then you have the street wear designers but these are shirts you'd find on like Justin bieber, Balmain, givenchy

>>10957588
yes uniqlo is way better than h&m. H%M t shirts may seem okay when you buy them but after one wash they lose their shape and just look bad

If you are taller/broad shouldered/athletic you literally can not beat Mossimo. Amazing price, great quality and fit, I fucking swear by them.

Gildan also has some good 50/50 poly/cotton blends but I hate their regular cotton.

AA is pretty overpriced but if you don't mind that the shirts are of decent quality.

I really really like Everlanes tees