>>10955761
I remember when this pic was first posted here a bunch of twinks started freaking out and talking shit about the the fit on the right

>>10955761
Is that a set of pictures of you?

You aren't super built but your proportions favor the right (tight) clothing because otherwise you look fat with too much fabric. "Lol baggy" only works for emaciated types.

Stop overthinking things, wear clothing that fits.

>>10955761
It should be more of a controlled bagginess, slim but not too skinny.

>>10955761

left shirt + right jeans

i think bagginess works well in conjunction with tight fitting clothes, but all tight or all baggy just looks bad with normal clothes.

>>10955784
>125 lbs
>able to lose weight on a pure sugar diet
>only slim clothes fit
>everything else looks baggy
>narrow shoulders to help
>low fwhr to help
>haha anon the first time we met I thought you was gay, you are so skinny


>>10955808
Thats usually what I dress. The problem is that it looks like they glued a smaller upper body to a bigger lower body. Quads are volumous.
What should I do when I need a business shirt? Slim fit oxford shirts are shit.

>>10955814
So skinny jeans + baggy shirt? Should I donate my slight baggy pants? I don't think baggy pants + slim shirt would work, please post a good example if you can find.