How can Inditex get away with shit like this?
>pic related, Zara sneaker for $18
and some more
>>10924456
$18?! It was like £30+ over here. Might as well buy a real pair of KD7's for that
>>10924465
end of season sales
>>10924465
Correction, £39.99
>>10924475
these actually look better than yeezys
anyone got fit pics? kinda curious to see what these look like irl
>>10924467
these remind me of my zx flux kek
>>10924456
>buying zara
>>10924456
are OP's pictures supposed to be copying another shoe design? Please post.
What are they getting away with?
in the end you are getting nice sneakers without obvious branding for ridiculously low price
do you still think it is bad just because you didn't got cucked by some company over half of your month income? pull your head out of your ass then
>>10924677
>>10924456
>>10924465
These actually look better than the KD7's
>>10924492
are these supposed to be 350 copies?
>>10924634
look more like nikes to me
>>10924715
are there any Adidas that look like this?
Zara Yeezy 750s
i think it's good if you want to put in a piece
otherwise i heard zara sneakers are of dubious quality
>>10924725
here top left and bottom right wins
>>10924738
bottom left looks better than the yeezys
>>10924712
Roshe's you dum dum
>>10924475
haha wtf that's the worst thing I've ever seen.
I always wonder what sort of person shops at zara. who is their target demographic? poor people who wanna look rich I guess?
>>10924739
i dont like that stitching, looks like hybrid between yeezys and some reddit boots to me
>>10924677
Nike Air Presto
>>10924749
>>10924677
Flyknit Racer
>>10924746
people who wanna get a decent compromise of look/quality/price and doesn't care about fags like you
>>10924677
KD7
>>10924677
Aand Roshe Run
>>10924756
>a decent compromise of look/quality/price
you could wear just about anything else and it would look better. ditto for quality.
>>10924746
people who cannot buy 2000 dollar yeezy sweatshirts
>>10924738
> top left
enjoy your rubber twink faggot socks
>>10924788
their shoes are shitty quality but clothes are not
about looking better, uhm yea /fa/ will definitely tell me ..
>>10924474
ayy
Left: W+H, Raf and Air Yeezy
Right: Zara
>>10924939
how are they not sued to the ground?
>>10924746
Just your average person. That's how it is in the UK anyway, there's one on every high street. Probably 90% of young guys shop at Topman, ASOS or Zara.
They've always had shit shoes but some of their clothes are pretty great looking desu. Quality is hit and miss. Some feels Primark tier, others COS tier.
>>10924475
looks pretty good to me
>>10925019
Fashion has historically had very little IP protection
The only time something happens is when the brand's name is being counterfeited
>>10924456
Honestly, for $18 this would be a great beater
>>10924475
this is giving me flashbacks to when visvim was the dominant meme shoe
Does Zara make bootleg 350s?
It's too obvious
Bought pic related
Yay or nay?
>>10924456
>brand loyalty
you fucking cuck faggots
>>10924475
>Yeezy by Visvim
>>10925155
congratulations you bought the most bland and basic shoe i've ever seen in my entire life
>>10924475
Wallabees x Kanye
>>10925123
Isn't the Rothco shoe just a pretty standard desert boot? I have one from a german company and it looks exactly the same
>>10925331
basically, yes
>>10924683
>>10924703
>>10924756
> people emotionally defending low quality pseudofashion stores which only target the cheap masses of fuccbois and hypebeasts
nope.
>>10925695
hypebeasts? their marketing strategy isn;t based on those copied sneakers at all
![2406102091_2_6_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/roCnYhM.jpg "2406102091_2_6_1[1].jpg")
Pls talk me out of buying these
>>10928529
only good if indian
>>10928609
w2c his watch
>>10928830
gaudy ginder garage
What's the quality like for Zara?
>>10924746
Manlet fashion victims
