Hi there,
I was just wondering, would you accept the Watch threads currently infesting /g/?
They aren't technology and watches are really only for consumerist fashion statements - so it'd pretty much a perfect fit for /fa/.
What do you think?
technology doesnt have to be electronic senpai
also a lot of the watches they talk about there arent fashionable
but we have watch threads here all the time, it would be better to just let both board have watch threads
>>10891812
it does on /g/.
/g/ does not imply anything that can be called 'technology', it only implies electronic and computer related related technology.
Watches are not /g/.
A HP5061A on the other hand is Technology, even though it's also a timepiece.
>>10891824
well no one is gonna discuss smartwatches and shit here because they arent fashionable
>>10891836
lmao when has something not being fashionable prevented its discussion on /fa/?
i thought this the place where people bought bin liners from japan to wrap their legs in to pretend to be bladerunner extras?
>>10892045
It's called avant garde you pathetic plebian psuedo intellectual. Most digital watches are unfashionable so why would we discuss them in the first place?
