>>10868095
people around here will call you basic for shopping at j crew but the quality is much better than uniqlo, hm, zara, etc.

a bit pricier but j crew is nice for basic sweaters and such

>>10868275
thanks!

Something to keep in mind is that their shit tends to fit very slim

>>10869217
only if you're an obese ameriburger lol

if you can actually fit into effay clothes j crew will be somewhere between about right and too loose for you

>>10868275
This is more or less accurate.

J.Crew's main line is fairly decent quality. There are some hits and misses like any brand in their category, but most of their stuff is surprisingly nice. J.Crew "Factory" doesn't fall into this category, as it's a discount brand sold at outlet malls.

I honestly like a lot of their stuff, even if it is kinda basic. It's more or less what Polo Ralph Lauren should be.

>>10868095
It's comparable to Banana Republic. Clothes for yuppies and people in the "upper middle class". The clothes are nice and held up well. Don't buy full price.

>>10869217
Not really

>>10868095
I wished they had something similar in europe

>>10868095
idk what ur all talking about - knitwear seems like its fine quality but everything else is poo poo quality and overpriced. their shirts are actually unforgivably bad - the fact that you can get brooks brothers at the same price for shirts makes it completely retarded to shop at J. Crew for that shit. the khakis are fine tho

>>10869424
their shirts are actually unforgivably bad - mine have only lasted about 5 years

>>10869386
They Ship to Europe!

>>10869589

Yeah they do but the pricing is ridiculous, say a shirt is $105 then it's just £105 there's no conversion

>>10869443
only 5 years?? what a rip off!