>>10856819

I mean... Its a utility thing. The context of the article of clothing is utility.

To wear it casually would just seem like a plea for individuality.

I suppose the situation would really be key. If you were a person that was working a vocation that required one it could end up being sort of your schtick. But to wear it when it isn't remotely needed seems weird in my opinion.

Kinda curious what others will say.

>>10856819
this is the second apron topic in a week
go be a bearded barista if you want to wear one.. now fo

>>10856864
shut up, aprons are cool.

But seriously I'm surprised this hasn't become some weird hipster thing already

>>10856885

Why are aprons cool? I'm not him.

>>10856897
not only do they have giant pockets but they create a sense of easiness. It makes me feel really at ease when I talk to someone with an apron.

>>10856902
autism/10

>>10856902
Hmm... Yeah I could see that. It might be because apron suggests service worker just subtly.

Could also be the posture that comes with using those pockets. I'm trying to think of other clothing articles that have that posture, it could end up being your sort of trademark.

>>10856921
overalls do the exact same thing and dont make you look like a retard that just got on break for his machine shop job, jesus people

>>10856926
wearing overalls at all looks exactly like a retard that just got on break for his machine shop job you fucking retard

>>10856952
well there is no winning is there???? overalls or aprons, if you are wearing either casually your a retard, sorry!!

>>10856966
but it's 2016, come on