What does /fa/ think of MK? Too basic bitch? How is the quality?
>>10830841
its always been decent quality even if its meme-tier. they sat unrecognized all those years thanks to trying to market their products at low prices. now that they upped their prices they are getting all hyped.
I had a kors belt. Cost me 80 bucks. Broke in 2 weeks.
So Michael Kors costs 20 bucks per wear.
>>10830841
My girlfriend bought one of their watches against all my advice. Terrible build quality, looks cheap and didn't last a year.
I got this for $30. Originally $250. Just like the face more than anything
Terrible. It's shocking to think that 10 years ago, the brand was considered "luxury"
I'm-midwestern-and-I-think-things-plastered-with-labels-like-I-slather-mayo-on-food-constitutes-as-"hot-cotter"-core