>common projects
>SLP
>sketchers
what do all of these have in common? they all tried to replicate stan smiths. Yet you cancerous faggots say that they're shit and not worth buying
>>10828935
Yet the Stan's are built like shit and won't last.
>>10828935
>comparing sketchers to SLP and CPs?
>thinking stan smiths are better and more original than SLP and CPs?
lurk more
>>10828938
>>10828943
samefag detected, if you knew anything of sneaker history it's kind of obvious that OP has a point, these brands did try to replicate the silhouette of the Stan Smiths. Btw I've had mine for 2 years theyre still rocking fine and look great, please try harder next time i'm sorry you're probably a dipshit who stomped around in yours dragging your pleb feet everywhere and ruined them quick
>>10828956
Or living in a city commuting on foot and not a fat fuck from the Midwest.
>>10828956
>>10828935
real samefag detected
Common projects are actually inspire by Rod Lavers, not stans.
SLP sneakers are overpriced AF.
Also Stans/Lavers are built like shit. Crappy leather and construction. CPs will outlast them for years. CPs also have a high resale value, which cheap adidas trainers do not.
>>10829000
holy fuck anon do you know that there is more to common projects than the Achilles low?
