What's the most effay political view, and why?
>center of compass
>liberalism
What has the world come to
nihilism
>>10825789
>>10825745
obv marxism
>>10825807
and why?
anarcho-communism
/thread
>>10825807
>Browsing /fa/
>A board which encourages capitalist lifestyles and viewpoints
>Marxism
>/fa/ AT ALL
>>10825745
>politics
>effay
>ever
I'd say anything along y=-5
Individualism and liberalism go hand in hand
But then again, /fa/ is so full of meme masters that individualism has died
Ofc, the answer is Hereditary Monarchy.
>>10825772
Classical Liberalism
This is the worst fucking chart I've ever seen why the fuck is national socialism on the left? Why is conservativism so much more authoritarian than liberalism? What the fuck is ultra-anarchism? Since when is fundamentalism a system of government?
>>10825772
>i dont have basic uni freshman-level political knowledge
>>10826056
>Why is conservativism so much more authoritarian than liberalism?
??? are you trolling
obviously authoritarian means are required to conserve a system
>>10826056
Please read more
>>10825772
this is possibly the dumbest political compass ive ever seen
>progressivism is a centre-right economic ideology
Fascism, duh.
>>10826056
>not understanding that natsoc is a politically left ideology
Fuck some people are retarded. Think, for once in your life please.
for sure fascism. everything being gray and minimalistic is effay as fuck.
>>10826056
>why is socialism on the left
The most /fa/ ideology is fascism but if you're into politics for the aesthetics please just don't be involved in politics.
>>10826199
nat socialism isn't actual socialism. more like fascism
>>10826056
Nazism is fairly anticapitalistic
Liberalism is the most authoritarian of any ideology, without exception.
Italian fascism
>>10826225
not really
>>10826231
>>10825807
>>10826161
Natsoc is a right wing ideology. It's not a form of socialism because it doesn't actually advocate for worker ownership of the means of production. u r th dummy
>>10825745
I'm an anarcho-communist but Im willing to admit that the fascists were more fashionable than us commie degenerates. Hopefully radical leftists wil put a stronger emphasis on aesthetics in the future.
>>10825745
>center
>liberal
lmao
>>10826750
>tfw your a socialist nationalist
I think im more right than everyone else because im under the perception that my ideology is most adherent to human nature and the requirements needed for an advanced society
all the same I do not believe in morals
but yeah watch this if you want to be a little more informed on my differing perception of reality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQVIeTLqgOw
>>10825745
Ultra Capitalism, people who have money have nicer things because they can afford them.
>>10826810
>your a socialist nationalist
>your
>socialist nationalist
makes sense
>>10826056
are you retarded ?
>>10826841
Can't find peronism
>>10826829
well you just made yourself sound like a dumb piece of shit
my vote goes to social democratism
it seems to be the only system that acually works out
>>10825745
fascism because of baller aesthetics
>>10826056
This.
Anyway the answer is anarchism, bow to Jun Takahashi and Errolson Hugh but whatever you do don't obey them.
anarchotranshumanism
National Communism of course
HAIL STALIN
>Tfw didn't grow up in a militarized country bred and raised to be a soldier since birth
>No group of soldiers to punish you because you "accidentally" stayed out after mandatory curfew
I've always wanted this, is it effay?
>>10825772
autistic
>>10826056
>why is national SOCIALISM left wing
>why is conservationism more authoritarian than liberalism
>what is ultra anarchism
>what is fundamentalism
>>10826205
why? aesthetics is actually very prominent and important in fascist philosophy
>>10826231
>the idea of giving people more liberty is authoritarian
>>10826810
more like you're just an autist
>human nature
>doesn't believe in morals
>>10827463
It's pretty eff[in g]ay
The day when people choose political views based on how "effay" they will be considered is the day my faith in humanity decreases by five percent
>tfw classical liberalism is almost dead in the states
also national socialism is underrated and sadly stained by the whole ww2 thing/radicals
conservatism makes the most sense to me
>>10828046
This.
>>10826741
>Government dictating economy.
>Government owning many/most of factories.
>Government controlling the production of private industries.
>Government creating transfer payments.
>Government demolishing individual rights.
>Natsoc isn't socialism.
Pls.
Liberalism comfycore/minimalistic asf
>>10828116
No it isn't, stop being retarded
>>10826199
national socialism is as socialist as north korea is a democratic people's republic
fundammentalism obv
structuralist neo-kautskyian centrist marxism is by far the most effay
classical liberalism and neo marxism are pretty fa tier
any lesser known, intellectual and anti-rural urban centric ideology basically is good
>>10825745
right-wing ulta fashist is the most effay.
everything else is degenerate.
>>10826233
prolly this
>>10828154
>>10828158
Really? Please tell me what is socialism? From what I've heard and from what dictionaries or wikipedia tells socialism is a system where the state controls economy. So instead being a free market economy, socialism is a way where state collects (heavy) taxes and uses that money to fund expenses, which are created when the state creates more tasks to itself. Also in socialism, by contrast to free market, state usually controls or even owns many facilities, such as power plants, hospitals, schools, and in extreme case, companies, factories, farms, etc. Also one way for the state to control (or try to) economy, is to maintain tolls, though this is protectionism, it is usually present in socialist states. Everything from that list was done my the Nazis and is in the agenda of every natsoc party that I've ever heard of.
In oppose to that, is right wing, which upholds market economy and is supposed to keep the state away from economy. This being said, there really aren't too many right wing parties anymore. Those, that identify themselves as right wing, are usually much more conservative than they are pro free market.
>>10825745
Anarco capitalism ofc
a sober and academic non-normie level of knowledge of neo and orthodox marxism is pretty fa
>>10828269
Even if I admit your definition are correct(which it isn't), in Nazism/Fascism the State controls the economy but the big corporations controls the state, nothing less socialist than that.
>>10828398
Do you want to name just a few of the companies that controlled the states? Besides, whether the state is being controlled by whom or whatever, it is still defined by its actions. Socialist state can be democratic, monarchy, despotism or what not, its still socialist state.
Also:
>which is isn't
[citation needed].
The only correct answer is a noncommittal neutral position.
why the fuck is anarcho-communism on there
is that even a real thing
leftism, and by extent democracy, is an inherently slave morality, propagated by the weak in order to gain power over the strong. while national socialism, monarchism and similar ideologies can be successful under a strong leader and with a strong population, only under fascism can the strong truly rule.
just remember that communism, anarchism, modern socialism, etc. as well as opting out of ideologies through "centrism" or "neutralism" is solely propagated by weakness and inferiortity. putting the weak in positions of power can only bring decay and weakness in society.
>>10828116
That's not how it was in the beginning and some people argue the war was a cause for most of this control over private industry. I'd like to think they would eventually chill out a little about it if they won the war
right-wing obviously cause left-wing is wayyyyyy overplayed
This whole thread seems to consist of people who don't even understand what the fuck it is they're promoting.
>liberalism is authoriatarian
>national socialism isn't socialism
>democracy is slavery
please never vote
>>10828926
Oh and I forgot to add that the most /fa/ ideology is fascism, atleast if we're talking pure aesthetics.
Fascist architecture is really fucking cool, see example from Italy;
>>10828926
>>10828934
this guy gets it
You're all a bunch of uninformed, vain faggots who should never, ever vote. Your mothers didn't abort any of you, though, so that may very well be something to hold onto.
>>10825745
Right ultra capitalism is the right choice but fascism is clearly the most /fa
>>10825745
lmao this is so fucking bad
>progressivist centre right
>activism as an ideology
>nationalism as authoritarian as fascism
>>10825789
not even politics you manchild
>>10828934
this is pretty much unarguable. /fa/ is about image and fascism is the most aesthetic ideology.
>>10829284
Nazis were sharp AS FUCK Hugo boss head to two sprinkle in some Louis and a Volkswagen or two.
>>10825833
its edgy u cuck
>>10826056
>Why is conservatism more authoritarian than liberalism?
Conservatism:
>Gays are bad
>minorities are bad
>sex/porn is bad
>disagreeing with patriotic sentiments is bad
>disagreeing with the teachings of the bible is bad
>Scientific critical thinking and "questioning things" is bad
How else do you stop people from partaking in all of those things? The market is free and unregulated under conservatism, but in order to maintain the social status quo there needs to be a lot of authority.
-
>>10827400
This.
>>10827463
sounds good tbqhwy
>>10828715
>implying a system where people are arbitrarily placed in positions of power according to racial ideology is somehow promoting the 'strong' as opposed to meritocracy which is somehow for the weak.
>>10825745
Space authoritarian nationalism desu
>>10828715
>hawking an utter shit, utterly discredited interpretation of Nietzsche
Dude come on.
>putting the weak in positions of power
But then if they have power then they're no longer weak. Liberatory, left wing politics, done right, and not aimed the creation of a liberal custodial state, are fundamentally about making everyone powerful.
>>10831724
Also this.
>>10833375
Or, to put it like Ella Baker, "Strong people don't need strong leaders." They need material resources and social infrastructure to facilitate what they want to do, and they need to control it.
Strong rulers need weak people, and it's been that way for far too long, and it's holding all of us back and destroying the planet.
>>10826741
Stop using right wing wrong. Right wing is a stance in favor of heirarchy over egalitarianism. "Some men are born to rule others", etc. It has nothing to do with economic policy. Nazi Germany was socialist but also deeply right wing.
>>10827411
nope
