Low rise or regular waist?
Fight!
>e pants.
The iconic low-rise fashion emerged in 2001, particularly among youth; Britney Spears is most credited with popularising the fashion in the US after she started wearing it in 2000.[5][6] Although its popularity also increased among women and men of other ages, the major focus of advertising is still directed at teenage girls and boys, with typical teen stores selling low-rise jeans in different styles and colors.
Personally like high rise on both men and women more because it enhances the taper.
>>10817861
>the fat jew actually has a book published
hope you had fun stealing all ur content from here and tumbler you... fat jew. i know ur here.
>>10817894
the rise of a pair of jeans has absolutely nothing to do with the taper of the leg
>>10817861
midrise is goat
most skinny fits are sold in lowrise though
personally i have no problem with lowrise since i like my shirts to fit around or just above the crotchpoint
>>10817914
>the rise of a pair of jeans has absolutely nothing to do with the taper of the leg
i think what he was referring to is the shorter upper block high rise pants offer you when you tuck your shirt, creating a more "tapered" silhouette
>>10817861
this image is from an urban outfitters book section
source: i work at one
b
u
>>10817885
mcqueen had been doing it since the mid 90s
>>10817861
Paleontologists look at bones, not archaeologists?
AM I ATTRACTIVE
>>10819085
this
>>10817861
High rise. I just love the feeling when jeans fit ot the belly button.
Too bad most jeans are sold low-rise.
>>10819126
STOP FCKONG ASKING THIS IN EVERY THREAD AND GO OUTSIDE AND ASK A GIRL ON A DATE OR A BOY ON A DATE I DONT GIVE A SHIT BUT NOBODY IS UGLY ON THE SURFACE ITS ALL ABOUT THE THINGS THAT YOU DO, THATS WHAT MATTERS
Regular waist makes your legs look longer which generally looks better. Low-rise jeans were meant for girls wearing bootcuts over their heels thus making their legs look longer than human, which the lower rise then compensates for.
>>10819126
only to gays
