>>10783005
They're ok. Personally, I think it might be cooler to just keep them in the box or something because I feel like they might fall apart when you wear them if they're that old.

>>10783005
no they look retarded

They don't really have anything particularly cool or vintage to their appearance, it's hard to distinguish if they're old or just some thing from a nike outlet.

That said, they're not awful looking if it don't mind wearing the logo.

>>10783072
Looks don't matter as much as vintage and your mom kept you even though you look retarded

>>10783060
they likely will disintegrate.

>>10783005
OP, read this: http://www.wired.com/2015/05/sneakers/

Hope they don't fall apart on you.

>>10783094
Do you know when Nike started using polyurethane? These look like a rubber sole? Thanks

>>10783144
Did you actually read the article I linked? Apparently not.

If you had, you'd see that there are pictures of shoes from '88 with the same issues.

It's not the sole, genius, it's the midsoles. And looking at the pic, those look like PU midsoles.

>>10783162
Yes I did and it says there were some that weren't poly, like the j's I was wondering if mine were or not cause you seem to know what you're talking about

>>10783089
aye kek
>shitted my pants
good one

>>10783171
sigh

they look like they are, but you'll need to wait and see when you get them. nothing you can do about it now: if they fall apart when you wear them, they fall apart. Find another pair of modern shoes and do some surgery if they do.

>>10783183
Thank you for your time