Thinking of getting CDG x Converse, Lowtop or hightop? I'm getting white http://shop.doverstreetmarket.com/us/comme-des-garcons/play/footwear
I really like the lowtop mang
High
do you enjoy being a physical, living meme??
if so, then cop away
Cop cream Chuck IIs instead
http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/converse-chuck-taylor-all-star-chuck-ii-high-top-sneaker-men/4047803?cm_mmc=Google_Product_Ads_pla_online-_-datafeed-_-men%3Ashoes%3Asneaker-_-1125623&%3Bcountry=US&%3Bcurrency=USD&mr%3AreferralID=13c6cc17-ad1a-11e5-b0f7-0050569451e5&gclid=CjwKEAiAtf6zBRDS0oCLrL37gFUSJACr2JYbX3cok3mmjnZxNpMWIdfMf3cDOvPQJrmNkgqSKhpXPhoCBOjw_wcB#select-gallery-thumbnail-1
>>10767769
You should definitely kill yourself, faggot.
Wow
>>10767769
Do you want them so everyone knows just what brand your wearing? May I suggest getting them with a big Hollister sweater and some true religion jeans to round off the fit
>>10767878
they're also cute and grils like them
I like some CDG shit, and I love the logo personally.
But is there literally any fucking difference between this shit and a regular pair of converse shoes?
>>10767884
the $80 price difference
cdg is rape
>>10767884
Quality is a bit higher. The sole and rubber cap or a lot sturdier. But they're also more shiny.
>>10767916
Where are you getting all stars for $20? Everywhere I've seen them has them for $50 or more.
>>10767884
Converse sole and rubber lining are separate so the sole will fall out easily, on cdg plays this is one piece. The canvas is thicker on cdg play converse and has metal eyelets as opposed to plastic eyelets.
>>10767829
Got em yesterday, monochrome too so no obnoxious all star logo.
Cream looks a lot nicer than the CDG's i think too.
>>10768512
<3 palewave dream <3
>>10767769
w2c this outside US?
>>10767769
>play tshirt with heart logo cost $120+
Why is this allowed?
by fakes
i wanna cop some but i dont want normos to think i'm wearing girls shoes
>>10770149
It's actually because of import taxes.
In Japan play doesn't cost anywhere near as much as it does outside of Japan.
>>10770174
thanks trump
these are the coolest ones op
>>10770174
Are you talking shit out of your ass?
Try shopping in Japanese website and the price is still the same.
>>10770191
I own a play longsleeve and the tag on it says 6000 jpy. The longsleeve costs like 99€ at dsm london.
would these look good on a chick? im thinking about getting them for my girlfriend.
Bought mine off Selfridges. After searching for like a week for a place with shipping to Sweden, I had to settle for a size slightly too small.
Personally prefer the highs in cream and lows in black
help should I cop the cream converse II's? Or the Shoes Like Pottery (pic related) The latter is like 100 bucks more, does anyone know if theres a major difference? Right now I'm leaning towards the Like Pottery's, but idk. I'm gonna be wearing them with APC petite new standards if that makes a difference
>>10770181
yes
>>10770349
anything looks good on a qt
>>10770181
this i would buy them if they werent overpriced for no reason
>>10770439
i really dislike the gay blue sole on these
>>10770203
That means it's overpriced not because of taxes but because of resellers.
>http://item.rakuten.co.jp/blender-online/cg-az-t076-051/
>>10770181
been looking everywhere and cannot find them
w2c (uk btw)
I really wanna cop the lows
>>10770730
>blue sole
it's a white sole and i think it's straight
>>10768512
W2c?
>>10770744
dover market street
located in uk so even better
Cop?
>>10771066
Converse Chuck Taylor II (Parchment/White)
>>10770907
nigga no
>>10767988
>>10768391
I'm not sure if you guys are autistic or something but I own both CDG converse and normal ones they're literally the same material,cut,and thickness. These aren't the "1970's" or whatever chucks that have a thicker sole and better canvas. These are regular ones and they both have metal eyelets and sole.
The newer ones look gross imo
>>10771350
Do those have the branding?
>>10771353
that's pretty cool
>>10770744
this is where i saw them
http://shop.doverstreetmarket.com/us/comme-des-garcons/play/footwear/new-play-converse-all-star-white
>>10771484
yeah I'm actually considering getting them for siqq palewave fits
>>10768512
>>10771450
They are monochrome so you can't even notice the logo.
Here's a better pic of the instep.
>>10771632
Thanks. Have you been able to keep them clean?
>>10771726
only wore them a handful of times, the canvas is a lot tougher then regular converse so I think they'll be easier to clean, I like them a bit roughed up anyhow.
>>10767769
Personally I own the highs.
people who buy cdg play
>>10771840
Ok. What do you clean them with?
>>10771384
Was literally in Nordstrom's yesterday and compared them...the CDG ones were clearly higher quality. Maybe not enough to actually warrant the 120 price tag compared to a normal pair of 40 dollar chucks, though.
high if you're male
low if you're female
>>10773973
>>10773973
wrong