>>10706624
Uniqlo is top tier for poorfags. Material is quite comfy and decent and style wise they're very basic and versatile. You'd probably be better dressed than most people.

>>10706629
Any particular items you'd recommend? I'm missing most essentials.

>>10706647
Assuming you're a guy, I'll let someone else take place and give recommendations, but their supima cotton shirts are very comfy and I think they're good for the price.

how about their black selvedge skinny jeans? are they worth the price. I'm like the only faggot in here who doesn't own one. Should I just buy a levis 510 instead

>>10706647
Their basic cotton T's are GOAT, it sucks being a canadafag

Uniqlo general?

How are their jeans?

>>10706663
Yes I'm a little boy.

What about their coats?
I want to get a pea coat, field jacket, parka, something like that but I don't wanna get memed and it has to be cheap.

Their $6 shirts are probably my favorite daily wear. Socks are meh tier, but at least they have some interesting colors. Supima boxer briefs have a really nice feel to them, but one of my two pairs rides up quite a bit. I also have the relaxed fit wool pant lemaire collab; the lining is itchy, but the outside material feels pretty nice. It's really loose in the seat but then tapers down a lot. It wasn't worth the $90 original price, but I think it's on sale now.

Probably gonna buy some sweat

>>10706737
they don't really have a good selection of clothing. id suggest going to a place like nordstrom rack or tjmaxx instead

>>10706742
But Patrick Bateman said that Nordstrom is bad.
And I was more inquiring about brands than what's at uniqlo specifically, thanks.

>>10706678
>are the worth the price
yes

>>10706647
trousers, polo shirts... solid 4 mainly evergreen stuff