im on the fence about buying these shoes
Convince me why i should/shouldn't buy them.
>>10694956
They're pig fucking disgusting, I MEAN FUCK ARE YOU ACTUALLY SEEING THOSE SPIKES, you will regret this shit the moment you pull the trigger.
>>10694956
If you like them, get them.
Personally I like them, but I'd rather get SLP then!
/fa/ doesn't like them tho
>>10694957
b..but the spikes make them edgy right?
If you want all red shoes get the RAF Simons Ozweegos
What kind of outfit are red shoes best rocked with?
just get stan smiths in that case lol
>>10695048
all black if you want to be 2016-3 core
>>10694956
Please post such queries in >>10685932
Thank you!
sage
They're swagfag sneakers. If you're pic related they're a grail necessity for "stunting" at the club and posting pictures of your BMW on "the gram"
>>10694957
fucking poorfag detected, peep my collection jelly peasant.
>>10694956
Don't
unless ur a rich fob chink who only relates to rich fob chinks
>>10696404
man, do those people TRY to be as gaudy as possible?
>>10694956
looks like knockoff scene kid vans they sell in journeys. Save your money.
>>10694956
So gay. Buy if autistic and you want people to know.
I think the spikes are kinda gimmicky tbqh, trademark or not.
Also Louboutin is way too popular with new money niggers for my liking
As for red shoes you can do much better.
>>10694956
look like shit
if you really like louboutins just get the high top all black ones
>>10694956
wtf mate
>>10696404
lmao new money chink detected
what about in taupe? Less gay? More daily-usable?
>>10694968
He probably doesn't want to look special-needs.
generally speaking you're a decade late with the Louboutin mens sneaker trend.
you're better off buying something else for now
