That's my budget, shoot.
What style watch do you want?
>>10683865
>>10683982
Op you don't have to follow this list. Make your own choices.
>>10683964
Leaning toward minimalistic
Brathwait
>>10684413
No those are try hard hipster shit
>>10684309
http://www.mvmtwatches.com/
>>10683865
Seiko SKX007/009
Literally the best watch in this price range.
Not even debatable among anyone who knows what they're talking about.
>>10683865
More like OP's where the only numbers are the hours (and not in roman numerals)?
I like the clean and practical combination there. A black face would be good too.
>>10684513
>Seiko SKX007
Any other decent Seikos around that price?
I'm not a fan of the diver look at all.
anyone have any experience with komono? thinking of getting pic related as a daily/semi casual watch.
>>10684587
1000 times no. Bad quality. Shitty, inaccurate movement. Battery will die after 3 months. Pretty chunky looking (though aesthetically, it is admittedly decent).
You could literally get a Casio with 5x the function for 1/5th of the price. Look elsewhere.
>>10684598
shame, I really liked the look of them. thanks for the warning!
>>10684615
No problem! I did too... But I guess someone had to fall for the meme.
Are all Timex watches really loud? I've owned two now (extremely cheap ones to be fair) and they were both loud.
>>10684574
SNZG15J1
>>10684574
For dress watches I'd go Orient
I personally like the Sun and Moon but I hear great things about the Bambino
>>10684413
This
My friend has one, looks really good and it's better quality than those shitty DW watches
>>10684587
>angled crown gimmick
B I N N E D
>>10684587
i picked one up on a mad sale and its honestly not that bad, movement is definitely not inaccurate havent needed to touch it in the 8 months ive had it, that being said i wouldnt spend more than 70 usd on it
>>10684574
SGG727
>>10683982
this image is terrible and does not deserve to be reposted this often
