I've got two basic rules of fashion in my head and I want you guys to add to it or talk shit about it.
Rule #1: every article of clothing must serve a function. Anything on your person must have practical reasons for being there, and fulfill its intended purpose. This eliminates anything like bracelets, hair dye, fedoras, clothing with no pockets, general "accessories", and anything that can constrict movement or must be maintenance moderately. Anything you wear strictly for appearance/attention invalidates an outfit.
Rule #2: bend rule #1 as much as possible, but never break it.
>>10683720
>clothing with no pockets
>Implying
Sasuga, fckin pleb
>>10683720
>Anything you wear strictly for appearance invalidates an outfit.
literally what
>don't have this stuff
>kinda use this stuff, but don't use it
........
>>10683720
So you never wear shirts with collars, right?
>>10683745
Does your scarf have pocket? What about your hat/beanie? I hope they do.
>Anything you wear strictly for appearance/attention
Appearance/attention would be the intended function of the item in this case.
>>10683755
>not using scarves and hats to keep you nice and toasty
It's like you hate being comfy
>>10683764
Pls, look at some inspo
More inspo! Thank you OP.
We should all strive for this particular look!
>>10683768
Beat me to it.
I hope you dont wear tech wear with that shitty rule because all the pockets and shit on an acronym jacket are attention grabbing as fuck. Sure they're useful but all clothing is fucking useful.If you don't believe in tailoring your clothing to a certain aesthetic then what the fuck are you doing on a fashion forum. Atleast admit that "muh function" is as much about looks and beauty over anything else in "your eyes" than fucking practicality. Tech wear looks fucking cool. Clothes with fun toy like features are fucking cool. Cool has never been about practicality
