depends on the price and quality

I was also wanting too keep everything at the lowest price point possible so I can sell too a broad spectrum of people.

>>10653322
Shirts around 50
Raws 60ish
Sweaters and hoodies 20-40
Tees 5-6 depending on material

>>10653329
Probably not. At that price point the quality and the country of origin are going to be questionable. The latter is fungible to an extent, but the former isn't.

>>10653346
I see DESU I want this to be for the average joe who wants to look good but is afraid of the pricing. The man who wants things in a decent quality but doesnt have to spend ledbury or grand frank price points to get it you know.

>>10653376
People who fit in the former category already buy from the likes of uniqlo, zara, H&M, asos, etc.

>>10653395
true, I was thinking more of a Tie Bar for shirts... before tie bar sold out and raised their rices to hell.

>>10653376
Cool. You do you then. I'm in agreement with Annie Leibowitz: clothing is too fucking cheap. I don't think the world needs another cheap brand, but consumers want shit, so why not shovel more their way.

>>10653415
Well the idea was provide the best for a mid level price of course I would not have bespoke tailoring and mother of pearl buttons but I want something I can help the average guy with. 10% cotton, silk knit ties, pocket squares and such not being overly priced (20 for a decent pocket square seems reasonable)

>>10653329
I could just order from Uniqlo or something.

i don't have access to a uniqlo, so i would be into this if the quality was actually good

>>10653427
The prices you've listed aren't mid level. They're not Zara tier, but they're still pretty low.

But, beyond all that, I just don't think you're going to offer anything worthwhile quality-wise at those prices. Let's take the raws as an example. Assuming 100 percent retail markup (I'm being very generous in doing so), those raws cost under $30 to make. Do you think you're going to offer a decent product? You might, but judging by brands currently operating at that price, I think the chances are slim. So, now we have a brand just like a few dozen others. You're trying your damnedest not to brand these products, so why would anyone want to buy this stuff?

>>10653455
This. I read a particularly illuminating reddit post about how there are no decent leather bags in the middle range - you can choose two from among low price, good workmanship/quality of final product, and quality of base materials.

Turns out companies like saddleback and copper river skimp out on workmanship to sell goods made with nice materials at a relatively low price - sure, that bag might be made out of the toughest cowhide known to man, but it'll weight as much as a motherfucker, have unfinished edges, and awful stitching.

>>10653628
>>10653455
Well this makes sense...