I have a few hundred bucks to spend on clothes and I'm looking towards Lacoste for a few sweaters and maybe a pair of shoes. Should I spend my money on other things or is this brand /fa/ approved?
>>10649989
>is this brand /fa/ approved
No, it is not.
wannabe ralph for poor bois
>>10649989
lacoste is one of the most shitty brands of clothing ive ever bought and worn. I spend a LOT of money on clothes, and lacoste is always my last choice. Go with Ralph Lauren, Hilfiger, or Tommy Bahama if your not a poorfag. Also Vinyard Vines, and Patagonia are really nice
I like the polos.
>>10650010
>vineyard vines
All those that you mentioned are shit brands, please leave
>>10650223
he just listed equally pseudo-richboi brands bro. he's being polite to the OP instead of railing him for his poor choices
>>10649989
Shit brand for plebs with no taste
T b h
>>10649989
Shit brand only worn by wanna be prep poor italians
>>10649989
Lacoste stuff isn't particularly bad in any way, but it might be a bit silly to invest everything in one brand, particularly where Lacoste is incredibly limited in terms of design.
Why not spread your money out more broadly towards other preppy brands, if you really wanna lean into prep that hard? Like, I'm sure you could stretch your money further if you hit up good sales from multiple brands.
>>10650288
this
check out old navy and nordstrom online sales or try your hand at black friday sales tomorrow.
FRED PERRY
R
E
D
P
E
R
R
Y
>>10649989
Paul Smith
No problem.
