It's not in any way. That infographic was made by a bitter poorfag who can't afford to buy half the brands in that tier.

seeing herschel in one of the top tiers was enough for me to disregard the entire thing.

>>10645707
>>10645711
White middle class girls upset that their #basicbitch brand got called shit.


>>10645779
Agreed, it doesn't belong in that category.

Because the devil wears it

That entire tier list can be summarized with a fedora tip.

Any tier list, for any subject, on any board, is designed solely to be bait.

If these are shit, what are the good ones?
Where can I find the full list?

>>10646033

That entire list was bait to begin with. 90% of the shit in the high tier spot would get you laughed at in public

Stop relying on tier lists made by fuccbois and autists to tell you what you should or should not buy.

>>10645707
Nike, lv, burberry, mcqueen, raf.

What? I mean you can dislike some or most of their items but these are just objectively not shit brands.
what a fucking mong

>>10646689
It was made by someone who knows nothing about McQueen beyond the skull scarves

>>10646689
>but these are just objectively not shit brands.
>Burberry
Mhh

Ralph Lauren and Guess are literally okay

>>10645707
yeah i'm pretty sure this was made with obvious irony. and if not don't worry, it's retarded anyway.

0/10 lads, don't get roped into this shit

>>10646719
>Burberry is only their shit tacky tartan crap
>mfw retards like you have probably never even seen real Burberry London/Prorsum outerwear

>>10646968
Both of them are the reason why Burberry is so trash. Might wanna check the garments origin, which is laughable considering the price tag. Both construction as well as design of Burberry items are atrociously bad, and I am saying that as someone who buys equally expensive (partially even more expensive) labels than Prorsum.