/Chelsea/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
Planning on copping a pair of rm Williams within the week. Anyone here have experience? What's the sizing like?
>>10624583
don't cop docs. save up a little you have better options.
It's a chelsea ffs, you need to be picky and wiser.
>>10624597
This
>>10624597
>>10624715
wtf are you talking about?
>>10624583
RM Williams are really good. They are TTS
I've been debating whether to get a pair in suede or leather. the suede ones are $90 and the leather $220. I could get either but idk if the suede ones would look just as good or if I should shell out the extra cash. Thoughts?
>>10624931
no suede, goddammit
>>10624931
Sauce on left?
>>10625119
Jack Erwin Chelsea
do brown chelsea's look weird with denim?
>tfw your chelseas are made of shit leather but no one can tell from standing level so you wear them anyway because the silhouette is great
>>10625404
W2c on the left
>>10625411
I thrifted them. I honestly have yet to figure out who makes them. There's barely any tagging apart from a few numbers on the insides.
>>10625420
Rip my heart
>>10625404
What are the chelseas they look nice
>>10625391
as long as they are suede absolutely not, leather brown looks weird and too formal imo
>>10625738
again, thrifted.
the brand is miu miu which supposedly is the female-oriented offshoot of prada which is really fucking weird because i have size 14 mens feet (size 16 in womens) so i really doubt they're actually female boots.
>>10625743
Damn, anybody know a nice entry level nlsck leather chelsra boot i can get? I just wanna try em out to see if i like them.
>>10625775
So far just looking at asos..
>>10624583
if you want a more sleek look, get the screw on sole not the stitched sole. You want to get a set up that is /fa/ not /farm/
>>10625775
whats entry level price for u?
>>10625911
I can spend up to 200 i suppose
Tan suede or black leather?!?!
>>10626784
whats ur style?
slp? - black leather
not slp - tan suede
WHAT ARE THESE W2C NOBODY KNOWS WHERE TO GET THEM BUT THEY ARE SO GOOD
>>10626817
No idea really, I have some thrift shirts that I wear with black jeans that makes it look like an SLP inspired fit, but I wouldn't say that is my goal necessarily. I feel like the black leather would be more versatile across styles than tan suede, but I don't want $250 worth of buyers remorse...
>>10624583
If you're buying RMs (gr8 choice btw), I'd seek out a place to try them on first (bit hard if you're not in Australia though). If you're in Aus get someone in store to help, theyre really great. I went almost a full size down and I can still wear them with thick socks because the leather stretches out a bit with wear, so yeah defs try them on if you can.
r8 my chelseas
If you've got wide-ish feet then get the wide version ("w", can't remember the suffix). As >>10626867 mentioned the leather does stretch (sorry can't remember by how many sizes) I picked some slim ones, and now there's a toe poke on the side (I like it but yeah).
>>10626835
They're Saint Laurent western boots/cowboy boots
>>10626956
are those the zara chelseas?
>>10627239
Nah, Barneys from a couple years ago.
>>10624597
Can you read? These aren't docs
>>10624583
Real dope, heard great things. Certified ethically made too which is cool.
Going to pick some up myself.
>>10627160
WTF, no. Those abominations aren't Saint Laurent.
