TECHWEAR GENERAL
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion
n7 x Stussy collab
>>10588852
w2c
>>10588944
w2c pants?
w2c this jacket
>>10588944
wow what boots
>>10589048
nike sfb 8 ince sage
Zara
http://www.zara.com/us/en/man/shoes/view-all/high-top-sneakers-with-technical-details-c734091p2835085.html
>>10588944
What blogs do you follow for this stuff?
>>10588848
w2c pants and jacket?
>>10589191
techwearist, havenshop, hypsterism are a few big ones
>>10589251
pants are levi commuter cargo
>>10588858
>hey can you take a photo of me real quick
hood on
check
hands in pocket
check
Slightly leaning forward
check
stoically looking at the ground
check
Urban environment
check
>internet bros aren't ready for this fire i'm about to post
>>10589019
Looks to be Acronym.
>>10589358
>jealous because you don't look good enough to have photos taken of you
>>10589646
Just wearing one gyak piece isnt tech
Very sad I slept on this gaiter.
I think I'll buy some shoes from the collection
>>10589646
aint even tech, what
this shit is literally the trenchcoat and fedora of our generation
>>10590033
isn't the trenchcoat and fedora the trenchcoat and fedora of our generation?
>>10590038
truth
>>10588968
Undercover iirc
>>10589669
>gyakusou technical jacket
>asian inspired top knot
>sneakers
>urban colorway
how is this not techwear??
>>10590212
that only works if you're asian. He looks like a pasty whiteboy
Kek senpai desu
>>10590212
how fucking blind are you to think that's tech? how can you seriously look at others pics in this thread and then that pic and seriously think "yeah that totally fits right in"?
>>10590046
w2c jacket
Whats the point of all of this?
Why do you need so many pockets?
Why do you need to cover your face with a hoodie or some kind of mask or beanie and sunglasses?
Whats the functional aspect? What are you actually doing in this clothes that requires them?
>>10588869
Would look so much better in black, navy or a really beige/brown color.
I overheat in every single waterproof membrane jacket. Tried Gore-tex, Windstopper, Dermizax...they all suck.
Any suggestions on Etaproof/Ventile pieces that don't look like I'm going on a hike?
>>10589019
Glenn is alive!
can we start calling techwear scumwave, it's better clickbait
>>10589283
Have theese, they are great
>>10591160
Get Pro, Shesh
Where can I get pants similar to the old Levi commuter cargos?
>>10590523
>he doesnt get irony
>>10588994
This is so solid.
>>10589385
Doesn't something look off about it, though?
>>10589669
Lol the tshirt is made of a special cashmere-alpaca-aramid twisted yarn fabric by a nameless anarchist rock climbing collective that lives in a geodesic dome in an isolated part of Ishikawa Prefecture and the pants are Outlier.
Or probably not. Does it matter? People post images for inspiration, not to dictate what is and isn't in a particular style. You could easily assemble that fit out of pieces with useful, interesting fabric and patterning.
As for the fit, it's okay, solid lowkey daily fit, nothing hugely impressive but yeah.
>>10590046
Probably controversial opinion: TNF backpacks, especially the bulky, complicated things with embroidered names you see people walking around with all the time, are not interesting or appealing in the slightest.
>>10591160
Acronym, Howies, Private White VC, Claymore (custom British style motos), and SEH Kelly, which is a really special that brings the kind of attention to detail, fit, and function hiking-look stuff usually has to more traditional forms.
Pic related, although it's not what you want - it's insulated, but check out the feature rundown because it's so cool.
http://www.sehkelly.com/shop/jackets/car-coat-in-black-navy-ventile-ripstop/
You also probably don't want Ventile. It does what it does, but it's heavy and stiff, both qualities exacerbated when it wets out, and it's slow to dry. You get Ventile for the history and tactility and a membraneless synthetic softshell if you want more breathability.
Any particular recommendations for gloves that would work in a techwear fit?
>>10589019
Acronym J1A-LP from fw 1415.
>>10592344
The previous line of Arc'teryx gloves before they decided to place their logo on the back of the hand.
recommend me some fucking techwear pants.
bonus points if its around $100.
What are the most important elements of a techwear lifestyle? I'm guessing running, listening to electronic music, urban exploration... what else? Also, what kinds of things should always be taken with you? Water bottles, headphones...?
>>10593214
W2c shoes
>>10593370
Why so you can look cool and people will think "man that guy is such a cool guy"?
>>10593397
not really, im just curious. i dont really understand what the point is to techwear, only that it looks neat. i wouldnt really wear this stuff in public
>>10590862
>>10593370
can someone please answer these
Planning on dropping $135 on a HS flat pack. Thoughts? What color
PSA - if you're looking to get into techwear direct your attention to this:
http://dressed-down.com/blog/2013/5/13/intro-to-techwear-part-1-the-bas
>>10590033
>>10590862
>>10593370
>>10593404
don't like sharing personal info on 4chins but here ya go:
>what got you into this dumb shit in the first place?
i'm a "graffiti" person.
>why all the weather protection and expensive materials? you planning for WW3 or what?
i go out at night in the city, on foot or sometimes bicycle. i get hot and sweaty from all the activity. it gets cold and rains on occasion. i've gotten sick many times doing what i do.
>seriously, all black and face masks? you're depressing me. are you gonna blow up my school?
i do illegal things. i've climbed buildings, billboards, all that nonsense. don't really want to be seen. i've tried impersonating construction/security but i can't wear that stuff all the time.
>why all the futurism and cyberpank nonsense? can't you be tech and dress like a normal fucking person?
i'm an artist at heart. we're all on /fa/. shouldn't we all have an appreciation for "artistic expression" to some degree?
>>10590862
>Whats the point of all of this?
The aestheticization of functional clothing.
>Why do you need so many pockets?
You don't.
>Why do you need to cover your face with a hoodie or some kind of mask or beanie and sunglasses?
You don't.
>Whats the functional aspect? What are you actually doing in this clothes that requires them?
Whatever you want it to be. You don't need *these* specific clothes to achieve a functional wardrobe, or to do a certain thing. The allure of techwear, at least in my eyes, is to use technologies implemented in clothing to your benefit, while looking a certain way. See the dressed-down link I posted above. There are many styles that you can achieve while combining them with whatever functional aspects you may need.
>>10593371
this sucks dick
>>10593370
this is good except for the boots
>>10593402
It looks silly. But I doubt exploring a dirty city will be fulfilling at all. You'll probably just get mugged anyway.
>>10593514
>i'm a "graffiti" person.
it's 2015
techwear seems similar to sadboys
>>10594277
it really isn't
>>10593514
>>10593547
Thanks for that.
>>10588994
w2c shoes?
Is this Jacket /fa/?
>>10593514
>we're all on /fa/. shouldn't we all have an appreciation for "artistic expression" to some degree?
yeah right, most of /fa/ are tryhards.
>>10593557
>this is good except for the boots
For me the boots are the best part of this.
link pants please anyone'
Does anyone have any recommendations for pants during the winter months? It's very cold and windy where I live and things like denim be leavin a nigga with cold nuts. I might just do thermal base-layers but then my balls get sweaty when I'm inside. water resistance would be nice. I'd like a slimmer silhouette as opposed to something baggy.
My budget is around $200 give or take.
>>10589646
That jackets nice, w2c anyone?
>>10594630
they are also completely not techwear heh
>>10594676
Nike gyakasou 2014, you gotta find it 2nd hand at this point
Somebody really should add a disclaimer that techwear clothes are usually very limited
>>10592344
I'm really fond of mechanix gloves.
>>10588869
whats this bag?
>>10594666
http://snarkynomad.com/soft-shell-jeans-the-worlds-greatest-invention/
Might have something useful.
Kvlt numbers.
>>10595813
stone island x porter yoshida
>>10595779
you wear these on a normal day just walking around? god what the fuck
>>10596088
I wear those when I'm riding a bike. I have another, less bulky pair that I wear just for cold weather.
>>10590016
W2c?
i feel like this carharrts pretty techy
>>10596195
Clash parka? As far as parkas goes i suppose this is as tech as you can get. Nike has some good jackets for winter rn
>>10596459
Yea i really like the way the clash looks
>>10594521
wtc jacket?
>>10596510
http://www.farfetch.com/shopping/men/y-3-hooded-wind-breaker-jacket-item-11147810.aspx?storeid=9495&size=21&ffref=pp_osb
where can i cop some techwear pants
>>10596508
>>10596459
It's made of coarse cotton and thinly lined/quilted. Unless you layer well underneath and don't plan on being in any severe conditions this won't hold out too much. It's an alright Parka though, very standard
>>10589358
kek
w2c techwear gloves?
w2c women's wear besides gyak
>mfw Acronym pricing
Where do people get the money for this shit?
but, if I could afford it, I'd buy it.
>>10598913
>Acronym pricing
It's funny. I saw a gentleman with a Canada Goose parka the otherday, and googled it and it cost about a grand.
So, 1,000 euro for a parka. I have no idea how good of a parka that is.
>>10598922
Well Canada Goose looks purpose built for actual arctic conditions- I'd wager that's the stuff they recommend / issue to people messing around in Antarctica.
Acronym, | feel like is certainly high quality, and certainly probably very weather proof, is a high fashion / technical wear brand.
Their pricing is on par with ArcTeyrx however, so who knows?
>>10593514
post some work dude
also if you actually wrote you would realize going out in full black techwear is how you get caught
dress normal and casual
anyone have any experience with the champion windstopper sweats? they look p good, was thinking they'd make a good pant for winter, not into the whole cargo pant thing
>>10598924
Still, I just have no fucking clue how good the quality jump is between CANADA GOOSE and whatever fucking mall brand parka you can get for less than 200.
>>10598922
Canada Goose is overpriced, yeah, but the down filling and materials used are top quality. Sadly the brand has suffered an all too common fate of a decline in quality with an increase in popularity...
still makes more sense for a 1k parka rather than a 1k shell, however I would still buy acronym if I could afford it shits sick
>>10598952
Canada Goose will keep you alive in a -40 snowstorm, mall brand will not.
If you're actually going to either pole then it's a good cop
>>10588874
rakuten
>>10588852
get me the ALLTERRAIN x N7 parka and we're talkinh
>>10588845
>>10588845
New ACG is a fucking mess,how Errol gets away with this deus ex cosplay is hilarious
>>10598948
Get out of the techwear thread with that shit.
>>10598879
NikeLab x sacai: http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pw/nikelab-x-sacai/nmb
Really anything Nikelab for women (dri-fit, aeroloft, tech fleece, etc) for mid-priced stuff.
acronym now sells clothing for women
If you're a poor faggot then shop H&M sportswear
Or just wear boys clothes. If you're cute and buy slimmer clothing that fits it may flatter you.
>>10599730
Any suggestions for /fit/ males?
I'm looking for some pants
>>10599812
Really any techwear brand. Being /fit/ flatters the techwear aesthetic more. Unless you're asian you're gonna look goofy as fuck wearing running shoes and sports/hiking/military gear when it's clear you couldn't run a mile to save your life.
Read to get the basics:
http://snarkynomad.com/techwear-at-its-finest-10-stylish-travel-outfits-that-look-as-good-as-they-feel/
http://dressed-down.com/blog/2013/5/13/intro-to-techwear-part-1-the-bas
Realistically what's your budget?
nice fuckin thread. wow.
Anywhere i can get boots for the winter that aesthetically resemble
>>10589114
I get the feeling that shit ain't waterproof but if it's thin i could always just wear thick socks
I realize that's some knockoff and i'm too pleb to know what it resembles so be gentle desu
>>10598913
i stopped splurging on food and learned to cook, a twice a year drop makes it easy to budget and anticipate when you can get the next cop
>>10599878
~$200.00
I've been trying to find Levi Commuter Cargo Pants, but I suppose I missed out. I'm really poor but I tend to save up my money until I can cop a nice piece.
>>10593514
>i'm an artist at heart. we're all on /fa/. shouldn't we all have an appreciation for "artistic expression" to some degree?
holy shit this, it seems like everyone here is too preoccupied with how other people think of them to express themselves and dress how they want, if you're that scared of what other people think of you just dress like a normie
>>10600405
What size are you looking for and how much would you pay for a pair?
I got a grey pair in great condition.
W2c black techwear winterjacket for under 600$?
>>10600625
Also contributing..
>>10600625
>winter
what temperatures are we talking about here?
>>10600625
>>10600626
>>10600628
ugh anything that wont make me look a school shoote or ninja cosplayer?
>>10600625
It's fucking techwear
Get a hardshell and layer up you moron
>>10600637
They only look like ninja cosplayers because of how theyre styled in photoshoots, wearing one piece isnt going to make you look like some radicalised slav anarchist
This might seems strange, but... any good ski mask, neck warmer, or smog mask? The ones I find always never follow the neck line and shit bothers me.
>>10588848
This is dope
>>10600625
Wait for ACG on Dec 3
bump
>>10601452
>>10602485
this wannabe shit needs to stop
>>10602491
"wannabe shit" ?
Are you seriously coming into a techwear inspo thread and whining about people posting inspo?
Damn fucks on this site have literal autism. Go shitpost somewhere else fag.
>>10602549
whats so tech about any of those two pics? the first guy is literally wearing just a t shirt and rolled up cargos and fucking roshes in a forest. back pack aint special
what about the second guy? whats so tech about that? you can barely see anything he is wearing. is it wearing flyknits on inappropriate terrain? or is it wearing a windbreakers, a scarf, hat and gloves trying to imply that its windy and chilly yet wearing flyknit, which is one of the most breathable fabric?
literally whats so tech about any of those two fits?
>>10588944
w2c similar boots?
Seems like nike isn't selling these in my country anymore, and I could use some combat boots that don't look bulky. Something autumn/spring friendly.
>>10602588
It's fucking fashion you fuck. Not every little piece needs to literally be functional and perfect for whatever the weather or terrain is going to be that day. It's just a way to look cool and express yourself through a style you enjoy.
You are being so fucking try hard and it's so fucking laughable.
>>10602814
That's the idea of tech wear though. It has a technical and functional aspect.
>>10602833
It's inspired from a technical and functional aspect. It isn't literally like you have to tailor every fucking piece of your fit to the exact corresponding condition outside.
Do you fucks seriously not see how pedantic you're being? Whining about the shoes in a fit being too breathable? You have got to be fucking kidding me.
>>10602843
What do you mean inspired? The main brands in tech wear all have real functional and technical aspects in their garments. Laser cut, gortex, 3m, ventilation cuts etc.
>>10602843
Also the technical and functional aspects is what literally defines it. Without the tech it's just some whatever ninjacorewear
>>10602864
No shit. You're missing the point. It's not like the fucking techwear gods are gasping in horror each time someone wears flyknits with a windbreaker because they don't perfectly match the weather outside.
When I say inspired, I mean that real functional aspects were used to design and create the clothing. But it doesn't mean that you have to literally wear the clothing under the specific conditions the clothing was designed in mind for.
It's fucking clothing. Wear it how you want to.
>>10593371
any clue for jacket or jogg. ?
>>10602880
Yes you can wear clothing however you want and with whatever you want but that doesn't mean it's a "techwear" outfit.
>>10602894
Okay right if I'm wearing a techwear fit in rainy weather and then the next day it's not raining it's changed and is no longer a techwear fit thanks got it.
fuckin retards.
>>10602909
No, there is still a technical aspect to the garments
>>10602913
>going urban exploring today so I got to dress techwear.
>put on entire techwear outfit
>oops I left my techwear urban exploring shoes at my friends
>put on techwear clothes I only wear hiking
>UH OH THESE ITEMS CONFLICT BECAUSE THEY'RE FOR DIFFERENT TECHWEAR SCENARIOS
>suddenly whole outfit is no longer techwear
>>10602919
What are you trying to say? BIG GUY's main complaint was that there wasn't any technical aspect to those two outfits. You're getting worked up over the fact that he doesnt like the shoes. You're trying to say that you can wear anything and call it what ever you want because of how you feel.
You're wrong on that. You can't wear head to toe Rick Owens and call it prep.
>>10593514
>i'm a "graffiti" person
>i do illegal things. i've climbed buildings,
holy fuck i think i just got cancer
>>10601452
is he not wearing socks outside
>>10602947
That's not at all what I was saying. Don't try to apply a straw man fallacy here.
I had beef with BIG GUY whining about that particular model wearing flyknits with a windy-day oriented fit.
I'm not saying you can wear anything and call it anything. I'm specifically stating that the pedantic level people take techwear to, the level where they whine about one article that's techwear (but maybe doesn't mesh with the rest of the fit) is absurdity.
>>10602970
The minute (technical and functional) details are what defines the style. Asking where such details are, isn't unreasonable.
all you had to do was point out what was so tech about them. but instead you had to read my post to a pedantic level of autism
lmao
>>10601452
>>10602947
In the first pic the guy is wearing levi commuter cargos. They're treated to be water, dirt and odor resistant. If that isn't tech then I don't know what is. The t-shirt is probably just cotton, but it could also be merino wool. Most running shoes are probably made from some synthetic quick-drying material, but if the whole idea of techwear is performance and resistance to elements then running shoes would be well suited for running. All in all his fit seems designed to wick away moisture, dry quickly, or resist dirt/moisture. It looks casual as fuck, but you don't have to be full on urban stealth street-shinobi to be techwear. Most hiking/camping gear is tech by default but looks rather plain.
The second pic the guy is wearing a hard shell jacket (water/wind resistant) and what appears to be soft-shell pants that are probably water resistant. I don't know what kind of shirt he is wearing but assuming that's polyester or merino wool that works too. The only thing that really seems out of place is the maybe the hat and socks which could be wool.
Is it even possible to get Levi's commuter cargos any more? Something similar?
>>10602588
I like the idea of "summer tech". You can't wear a jacket all of the time.
>>10601452
This reminds me of Tom Cruise in MI:4
>>10603113
Have you tried ebay?
>>10598932
>dress normal and casual
Not him but that would be less /fa/.
>>10603020
>BIG GUY /fa/'s town idiot acting like he knows anything.
Anyone got an idea for new boots?
>>10603020
quit namefag'ing, it just makes you look like an idiot. Why bother coming to an anon based board?
>>10603154
not the same person but yeah I have and there's not much.
>>10603020
>trunks
>calling other people autistic
no
sorry your attempts at techwear suck dog dick dude, no need to vent on other people who are just shooting shit with their friends online
chill
>>10601452
>someone actually using techwear in the outdoors
>get's shat on by everyone
i don't get it guys, it looks pretty nice and oh my god, is he actually using that stuff for what it was designed to do?
summer techwear how
its hot as fuck
>>10602833
Kek, you seriusly? None of this TECHWEAR brand are doing functional or technical clothing, transforming your jacket in to piece of shit doesnt mean functional. Its almost unweareable outside your room or big city, because materials on this pieces are shit most of the times. The bigest joke is acronym, of course. Chines low quality shit that was hyped even more than rickytricky.
>>10600259
It seems to be a mix of Article Number high-tops and Jordans.
They also remind me a little of the Kenzo Sonic
What the fuck do I search for when looking for techwear pants?
I really want some highly functional cargos that aren't quite as intense, for lack of better words, than these >>>>10593370
Something a touch more normie, I guess
>>10593514
>This style of effay is for the vegan fair-trade solar powered graffiti enthusiasts from native land just down the path from me. Anyone who does not have an artistic inspiration influencing their clothing is literally satan, amirite guys?
>Curious though: Do others who support the graffiti subculture drink their own urine? Because I've tried it a few times, but I fear my unfounded smugness was adding too much tartness on the back-end. I've enjoyed whiffing my own farts and sucking my own dick for years, but have now found the perfect "artistic expression" so that I can complete my masturbatory lifestyle.
filtered
>>10604139
What do you mean by highly functional? Pockets? Water Resistant? Look into Maharishi or G-Star if you want budget. Also look into certain water resistant membranes eg. gore-tex
>>10603898
>unwearable + Chinese low quality shit
Have you handled an ACR piece before? They're highly breathable and rarely ever restrict movement. Also I'm fairly sure Errolson had wearing ACR within big cities in mind, especially considering that he's lived in Toronto and Berlin for most of his life.
inb4 you call me a fanboy dickrider
yeah, I am, because the quality and obvious innovation he and the ACR team has put in is there
>>10604276
>Pockets? Water Resistant?
Both of these are huge pluses. Flexibility is another as I am a network consultant that often does facility installs am always running up stairs, bending low, crawling under desks, etc..
Will look into the ones you mentioned, appreciate the info!
>>10604283
Flexibility shouldnt be too much of an issue with any pants, just make sure it isnt too tight among the knee and crotch areas, if anything you could by straight fit tradesman cargos and just get them tailored
>>10604292
Right on thanks f.am
I like these for tech fits
http://world.muroexe.com/gl_en/catalog/supercell-hp-white/
ITT: autism
>>10603862
Cropped running tights, some sort of either drop crotch sweat short, Nike Flyknit racers or Preston or air rifts, merino wool t-shirt
>>10603113
I found mine on eBay about one year ago and inventory was spotty then. They make a non-cargo 511 commuters. Idk what the actual cut is like though.
>>10604405
Can anyone recommend pants like these?
Don't know shit about Guess clothing but these (pic related) are kinda what I'm after. Are these decent or can anyone recommend anything in the same price neighborhood ($50-100)
>Inb4 not all black
>>10604773
I don't really have a problem with it not being all black, but there are just too many colors imo
>>10604804
Thats just my running outfit, it is cold and dark when I go running so I can look like a rainbow. I was just wondering if it is techwearish enough
>>10604819
slippingonicecore
>>10590046
What kind of Nikes are those?
>>10604825
Looks like free run 5.0
>>10604773
This is so cringe worthy.
>>10604773
>>10604839
Do you know the pants?
>>10593370
being asian
>>10604984
Possibly zanerobe sureshot in black.
>>10604773
>>10604910
i'm fucking dying over here
>>10604773
>straight fit tradesman cargos
Your top knot looks like shit.
So many random colors everywhere clashing. It's not about having all black it's about having some coordination.
2/10.
Also ugly fucking headphones.
>>10605112
Thanks that's a nice pair of pants.
>>10604773
outfit is ok, looks cheap but it fits the aesthetic i think
hair needs to change, buzz or caesar cut maybe
head phones look bad. get a smaller in ear pair. those dont look like you can exercise in them without them falling off
hope that helps. look forward to more fits in the future from you and others posting itt regularly
>>10604773
JET SET RADIOOOOOOOOO
>>10605112
Those look dope, might cop but I don't think I have anything that would suit them
>>10602588
I keep seeing you in every single thread, big guy. You need to either get a real hobby or simply a life at all
>>10588845
is this jacket tech?
>>10592334
>Or probably not. Does it matter? People post images for inspiration, not to dictate what is and isn't in a particular style
this is techwear general????? so obv people are going to get called out for posting non techwear shit like that garbage you're awkwardly defending for some weird reason
>>10606059
w2c?
>>10606105
It's this Junya Watanabe jacket that's on grailed right now. I'm still fighting with myself if i should cop the jacket or not.
https://www.grailed.com/listings/271117-junya-watanabe-transformable-parka-fw-04
>>10606105
https://www.grailed.com/listings/271117-junya-watanabe-transformable-parka-fw-04
>>10606249
nah dnc
Can anyone ID these pants?
>>10606516
I think i remember similar undercover ones
>>10606249
i'd cop it looks nice
>>10593214
w2c panties
W2c a neck gaiter that wont fog my glasses???
>>10608370
ID on the backpack?
>>10608370
>Shinguards
Why?
Ex-Techwearer here.
I used to be techwear back in 2013.
Then I realized Rick and Yohji were my mentor but not my future.
I'm tired of all the black.
I'm starting a new trend. dressing like Splatoon characters.
w2c tech boots for winter conditions?
I love SFBs but they would be horrible in the snow
>>10608534
in my experience that's pretty much unavoidable.
>>10608674
i feel it man i feel it
that's pretty much how i buy clothes now. "would this look cool on an inkling?"
>>10589358
upset because you dont have a qt3.14 to take fit pics with.
>tfw I am too
>>10608674
damn b... i usually try to look like an animal crossing character but i bet if i picked up splatoon i would be in the same boat as you. this guy's fresh btw
>>10608647
it looks cool though
>>10588858
would be so much better if the bottoms weren't so skinny from the knee below
>>10589646
Find some other shoes for that set pls. So much potential
>>10598932
can't post work, sorry. and really, i just need the black for doing a few particular things in the dark when i'm "working".
>>10600460
i try to take all opinions on /fa/ less seriously than the posters intend. no need for anxiety within such a trivial hobby.
>>10600835
truth
>>10602549
>>10602588
>>10602814
>>10602833
>>10602843
>>10602864
>>10602876
>>10602880
>>10602894
>>10602909
>>10602913
>>10602919
>>10602947
>>10602970
>>10603003
>>10603020
>>10603021
>>10603793
>>10603898
>>10604276
>>10606083
i know you guys are at each other's throats but this is GOOD conversation. please, keep the debate up :)
>>10602957
>>10604245
>>10604349
mad?
>>10590016
Anyone got the full-res pic?
Recently copped some total orange flyknits to go with my techwear fits, do they work or nah?
>>10610149
That looks incredibly stupid. It's not even the shoes. Everything else doesn't work.
Jacket is okay, the shirt doesn't fit the look, the shorts make you look like a clown, the under pants just accentuates your pencil thin legs.
>>10604773
Those cheap ass headphones LMAO.
>>10610411
should i stick to regular length/cut t shirts?
Whats wrong with the shorts? they are regular mil surp cargos, should i invest in some better shorts?
ACG hypu
>>10609201
Fuck
>>10610876
Pants are too loose that this outfit to me is just streetwear
i would suck a dick so hard to cop this jacket in a small
>>10602485
dose he use some sort of gaiters ?
>>10610149
the color of your shorts already ruins the outfit, adding more below makes it look more fucked up
>>10610954
Pretty sure its coming back in Dec alongside the white version.
Might cop that longer coat though.
>>10610876
id on the shoes?
Can anyone recommend me a nice techwear sweater?
>>10612239
black y-3 qasa high. Nigga do you even /fa/?
>>10612328
Anything merino,
bump
>>10610876
top is ok. bottom and shoes are cringeworthy
>>10589088
Id on shoes?
I have always loved these shoes, but was wondering if high tops would look weird with the aesthetic of techwear?
>>10613014
Nike x acrnm lunar force 1
>>10612056
hnnnnng
>>10613095
well, I would say yes, due to the clumsiness of the look. techwear is about looking ready for anything, but you couldn't even run well in geos.
>>10599058
W2c dog?
>>10601452
W2c pants? I couldn't find anything under Levi commuter cargos
>>10608617
Got'em, it's a Burton Day Hiker 20L.
>>10614788
They already sold out. Your best bet is Ebay or grailed.
I was looking for a replacement myself, and saw that I Love Ugly's Bobby Track Pant or Military Pants are pretty similar.
anyone have a sufu account that can help me out?
>>10613095
I wear them with acrnm
>>10604405
are all the commuter cargo's straight leg or did they make a slimmer/skinnier fit of them?
nike or adidas?
(for shoes)
>>10616622
adidas for sure
