[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
So ive been looking for a new blade for my 12" miter saw.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /diy/ - Do It yourself

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
File: 81LG-c3Z7zL._SL1500_.jpg (187 KB, 1500x1500) Image search: [Google]
81LG-c3Z7zL._SL1500_.jpg
187 KB, 1500x1500
So ive been looking for a new blade for my 12" miter saw.

Looking at the diablo blades, because they are in my local hardware store and seem to be decent for the price.

Looking through them, the 3 "general purpose" blades all have deep gullets. From what ive been reading up on, that is for ripping wood.

All 3 of them clearly say only for miter saws on it.
All the other ones that dont have the deep gullet are like 100t and double the price or specialty non ferrous metal blades.

Am I missing something? You dont need that ripping ability on a miter saw right?
Most of the other cheaper 12" blades dont have them either.

From what ive been reading, the combination blades cut shittier than full on ripping blade or a full on crosscut blade.
Whats the reason?

Anything is going to cut better than my crappy 32t stock dewalt blade that I have abused, but am kind of puzzled by this
>>
Gullets only serve to eject saw dust so I wouldn't worry about the deep gullets, they may prove to be beneficial. You definitely do not need a rip blade on a miter saw. Ive had good luck with the Diablo combo blades.

Dedicated blades have different tooth configurations and different grinds so that's why they cut different. A rip blade should be around 24T while a xcut blade will be anywhere from 32T on up depending on what youre cutting (plywood, softwood, hardwood).
>>
Basically, more teeth are used for finer finishes like trim, moulding, etc. Lower teeth counts are used for basic carpentry like cutting 2x4 to length or ripping plywood.
>>
>>919757
Is a 60t one like in the OP suitable for crosscutting 2x4s?
It should give a cleaner cut right?

I cant decide how many teeth I need, but in all reality I pretty much only cut cheap 2x4s
>>
>>919824
60t would be overkill imho. >>919824
If you're only cutting 2x4s for framing or stuff like that I'd go with an even lower tooth count simply because it's cheaper, though technically you could use a 60t if you wanted a mixed use blade.
>>
"General purpose" blades are only for table saws, which are expected to perform both rip and cross cuts.

Miter saws can only crosscut. You are right. If you want the highest performing blade for a miter saw, you want to avoid anything that is general purpose and get one with 80+ teeth. The cuts left behind are glassy smooth.
Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.