All kinds of bondage, rape, domination etc.
ok maybe not if image posting is broken.
>>6819327
>sexualising a nichijou
>ever
kysf f am, tbqh
>>6819355
That's a niche-joe? I thought she looked familiar but I not in that direction.
Does anyone know if there is a chat similar to sleepychat, but BDSM oriented? A random chat for fetish peeps?
>>6819228
How about no rape you sick fuck
>>6819838
>implying there's anything wrong with rape
>>6819838
Not the anon you replied to but holy fuck, just shut up, It's /d/. Get off your high horse. Rape fantasies are normal and just because someone fantasizes about raping someone doesn't mean they'll actually do it, in fact, the majority of rape fetishists wouldn't ever actually attempt rape. Don't be a faggot and fuck off or post pics
>tfw someone on your friend's list shares this on facebook thinking it's supposed to represent the abuse of cows in the american cattle industry
I've never laughed harder before in my life. Should I say something or just leave it be?
does /d/ still do dare threads?
I have a box of toys/basic bdsm gear that I want to play with.
>>6820429
I dare you to maintain good safety practices and have fun with your sex toys, Anon.
>>6819838
As we learned in the last thread rape can definitely be a part of BDSM.
In case you forgot, here's the screenshot. It was the most sensible and educated post out of all. We agreed on this.
>>6819838
Where the fuck do you think you are sunshine?
>>6820295
Nah man let it go. Also holy shit capped. My fucking sides.
>>6820849
>Taking a screenshot of your shit tier argument doesn't validate it
Literally no one agreed with you cunt
>>6820934
It wasn't my argument. It in fact invalidated my point.
It depends on your definition. If OP requests rapy BDSM he gets rape and BDSM. It's not mutually exclusive IF you use this definition.
Since there's no universal definition anything goes. If BDSM and rape don't go together for you that's fine, but it doesn't make other definitions incorrect.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as BDSM, is in fact, Rape/BDSM, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Rape plus BDSM. Rape is not an fetish unto itself, but rather another free perversion of a deeply depraved BDSM fetish made useful by the BDSM handcuffs, ball gags and vital system components comprising a full fetish as defined by POSIX.
Many penis users get off to a modified version of the BDSM fetish every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of BDSM which is widely used today is often called “Rape”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically a BDSM fetish, developed by the SNU-SNU Project. There really is a Rape, and these people are doing it, but it is just a part of the fun they have.
Rape is the dominance: the act in the system that allocates cock to the other participants that you violate. The dominance is an essential part of the fetish, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete fetish. Rape is normally used in combination with the BDSM fetish: the whole system is basically BDSM with Rape added, or BDSM/Rape. All the so-called “Rape” distributions are really distributions of BDSM/Rape.
>>6820934
Don't be a bitch, kink shaming is wrong.
>>6820958
Not as wrong as being a rapist
>tfw I want to abuse someone who can easily kill me
>>6819838
>anti-rape waaaah
I HAVE BEEN SUMMONED
>>6821894
I love it when they're forced to comply at the point of a weapon.
Her eyes are on the blade. She knows she better suck his cock for all she's worth, or she's dead.
>>6821673
Do you ever just shut the fuck up?! There's a MASSIVE difference between having a rape fetish and being a rapist. If you're going to spew bullshit, then at least post content
>>6820956
glorious. and now post that to /g/
>>6822920
I don't have anything against photos that imply it.
Just issues with fags in denial they're rapists when they promote bdsm without consent
>>6823243
OP wanted rape bdsm and you criticized him although rape as we already discussed is a part of BDSM for some people who like it.
Instead of complaining, post pictures of rape BDSM.
>>6819360
Source? Chastity belts are hot.
>>6819228
http://www.nipple-fuck.com/nipfuvideo/bondage.php
>>6820958
W-what if I want to be kink shamed?
>>6824084
That's sick, dude.
>>6824084
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hussULBctJM
>>6824099
Don't shame him for wanting ki107nk shame
>>6823286
Rape is not part of bdsm you mentally ill
>>6824162
Not for you personally, but for others.
You have no authority to tell others what BDSM is.
>>6824177
What about hand holding? Aren't you holding your lover in a bond of love?
>>6819987
>Her hand
>So tiny
>>6824177
But you have authority to say it is part of bdsm?
Double standards mother fucker
>>6824177
Well, rape fantasies can be a part of BDSM. But not rape. Then it's not at all BDSM, just disgusting. (IRL at least, have whatever kinks you want in fantasy.)
I don't understand how BDSM doesn't imply rape, or why consent matters to you people. I am proud to be a rapist who routinely drops pills into other people's drinks, and carries them home.
>>6824944
Of course you do.
>>6824944
>rejecting social contract
Sorry anon, I suppose you can be raped too now.
>>6824944
Because it can be, and usually is, between two consenting adults. Some people just enjoy being tied up and fucked, for one reason or another.
>>6824841
If it isn't part of bdsm for you then no, I can't tell you it is.
No double standards here.
>>6824847
It doesn't even matter whether it's rl or not. Check out this post >>6820849
As you see BDSM and rape are combinable and it's not up to you to determine that it doesn't go together for other people.
But if you feel like discussing this whole topic again from the start we can of course do so.
>>6824944
WTF?
>>6824944
>and carries them home.
Aww, you're too kind.
Had my first 8 point tie-down last night. It was incredible and completely overloaded my brain. Though I will say that anytime my mistress started to play with my dick, it very quickly slipped into super sensitive mode, which was just too much. No "about to cum" sensitivity, I mean straight into what felt like post orgasm sensitivity. Dafuq is that all about? This has really only happened when other people handle my junk.
>>6825643
Combinable is different than being part of. You've indicated it is a separate entity that can be added (sick freak)
>Confirmed bdsm doesnt involve rape
>>6826256
>Confirmed bdsm doesnt involve rape
It can. There is no universally applying definition of BDSM.
>>6827131
No, it doesn't...
>>6823292
Discode is the hentai
(There is a dick under that belt)
>>6828015
You don't have any proof to substantiate your claim.
>>6828754
Bitch please
>>6828759
There's no universal definition of BDSM yet. The definitions are very diverse and if BDSM includes rape for some people there's nothing you can do to change that.
>>6828759
Saying "no it doesn't" doesn't constitute proof breh.
>>6826256
>>6827131
>>6828767
Interjecting into your slap fight for a moment (but not about GNU/linux) generally speaking in any definition of BDSM consent is what separates it from similar activities otherwise considered socially undesirable such as torture, slavery, and rape. One would not generally consider rape to be a part of BDSM, though you might have a grey area in consent to nonconsent type scenarios but even then I don't really think the world rape really applies.
All that said, rape fantasy and simulated rape are common in BDSM and you'd have a hard time finding someone who'd tell you they have absolutely no place in it even if they personally find it distasteful. Which brings us back around to the OP topic including rape illustrations, which I think is perfectly reasonable. If it's not your cup of tea scroll past. It's not like they're pictures of real people who were really raped.
>>6828790
>Interjecting into your slap fight for a moment (but not about GNU/linux) generally speaking in any definition of BDSM consent is what separates it from similar activities otherwise considered socially undesirable such as torture, slavery, and rape. One would not generally consider rape to be a part of BDSM, though you might have a grey area in consent to nonconsent type scenarios but even then I don't really think the world rape really applies.
Non of this proves that rape can not be a part of BDSM. If a person defines rape to be part of BDSM this paragraph doesn't disprove them either.
It is something you have to accept. You can't talk yourself out of it. There isn't a universal definition of BDSM. Unconsensual BDSM can still be BDSM depending on the definition.
There has yet to be an authority to universally define BDSM unmistakenly and clearly.
>>6828797
>>straw manning someone
>>when they literally agree with you
C'mon man...
>>6828790
The reason SSC is a part of BDSM (the community) is to distance itself from the allegations. Like, sadomasochism is officially a paraphilia. The issues of consent can be technically pretty iffy too, like, many situations can be easily interpreted as coercion or somesuch.
There's a thing such as prior consent, like you agree with your partner that you can punish her, and you do so even if she doesn't want it, but isn't that similar to the idea that marital rape is impossible because you're already married and thus consent?
Overall, rape is definitely not a part of BDSM on itself, but one must remember that it's a social contract.
>>6828869
>SSC
>Not RACK
>>6828869
>Overall, rape is definitely not a part of BDSM on itself, but one must remember that it's a social contract.
You're implying there is a definition of BDSM which is universally accepted and comprehensively applicable. Can you prove this?
If I told you some people might still call a BDSM session BDSM even though it's unconsensual and rape, would they be wrong?
No, because their definition is just as valid as yours.
>>6828913
now don't you start a fight over that of all the silly topics....
>>6828923
>Can you prove this?
perhaps he can, you see, by interviewing a sufficient number of practitioners of BDSM. if the response is near unanimous that rape CANNOT be part of BDSM then he has the closest thing to a universal statement regarding BDSM.
>would they be wrong?
yes, because then it's illegal improsonment, assault, battery, sexual assault, and willful endangerment.
with the consent it's just two people having fun in a dungeon.
Something I've been meaning to write for a while, a BDSM fapfic. It'd be about a beautiful young princess from a nation that'd recently been defeated in a war.
Naturally, the conquering nation wants to establish legitimacy for their puppet government; to put the new nation under their direct control. So they set up an arranged marriage between one of their princes and the captive princess.
A huge, lavish wedding is arranged. The princess is dressed in a beautiful, insanely expensive wedding gown... but hidden under the long sleeves of her gown, her wrists are lashed together, with the base of the bouquet in the middle. Her ankles, hidden under the long, flowing fabric, have been hobbled with a short chain. The long train from her headpiece hides the bindings keeping her elbows tight to her sides, and the veil, of course, hides the gag in her mouth.
Controlled, crippled, and silenced, she is marched down the aisle slowly, and stands mute as she is given away to her enemies. When the part comes for her to say "I do," the priest just nods as if she said it too quietly for anyone else to hear.
Anything to do with royal marriages is serious business; as any doubt on the claim can mobilize armies vying to seize a throne. It wasn't unusual for royal births to have spectators in those days.
Naturally, the captive princess can look forward to an audience for the consummation of her "marriage."
It's a formal, exclusive event, of course, so she's dressed to the nines again; in a beautiful, expensive outfit that showcases her natural beauty. She's strung up in a way that looks appealing, and makes it easy to see everything that's about to happen to her.
The serving girls take care of the basics of preparation, the dull foreplay the prince can't be bothered with. The princess whimpers and struggles not to cry as her enemies watch her being humiliated.
But she was a sheltered, innocent girl, as most princesses are - so when she sees the prince stride in, naked below the waist, his cock stiff and erect - she panics.
The audience laughs and jeers as she writhes and screams into her gag, trying to evade her captor. He lifts her leg, rubs his cock against her wet snatch a few times - and then plows in viciously, without regard for her. The crowd claps with satisfaction as she yelps, lifting up on tip-toe, the blood of her burst hymen trickling down the prince's dick.
This becomes the cycle of her life. Dressed up and tied up like a pretty doll, to sit motionless and silent at big social functions. And at night, the young, callous prince rapes her over and over, using her as his own personal toy.
And often, during the day, she's taken away by the kingdom's spies, and led deep into the dungeons...
... where they torture her to within an inch of her life.
Hidden armories. Evacuated treasuries. Rebel bases, sympathizers in the countryside. Even hidden passages in the castle itself. Every time, they have more questions of the former princess, things she might have heard at her father's elbow. Every time, she cannot answer - and every time, they make her pay a terrible price before they're satisfied she's telling the truth.
The prince eventually grows a bit bored of her.
So he gets a bit rougher, to keep things interesting.
The torturers, frustrated, start dragging the princesses old serving girls out of the dungeons, raping and abusing them freely as the princess is forced to watch, telling her that it's her fault they have to suffer.
Eventually, the prince impregnates her. The torturers stop with their abuses, because they don't want to risk the baby.
But now, they can rape her freely.
On the prince's orders, they teach her how to debase herself. How to suck a cock...
How to hump one, when she's put on top...
How to wiggle her ass, just right...
How to please. Because once the baby's born, she's just a liability - a symbol, for possible resistance. With an heir in hand, the kingdom will want her disposed of... unless the Prince wants to keep her around for other uses.
So to maybe level out all the rape and hardcore pics (that's fine, at least you people are uploading content rather than bitching about shit), can we get some cute/light pics in here?
You dumbass racists are as ignorant as the blm fucks
>>6829962
the fuck?
>>6822055
Anything else like this? Tears, the threat of violence, the sheer fear. Mainly revolving around fear and tears.
>>6830023
Don't respond to bait
>>6828923
>You're implying there is a definition of BDSM which is universally accepted and comprehensively applicable. Can you prove this?
There's a BDSM "community" which is unusual for most other fetishes. They go to munches, have their own fetish sites, and came up with SSC.
>>6829277
>perhaps he can, you see, by interviewing a sufficient number of practitioners of BDSM. if the response is near unanimous that rape CANNOT be part of BDSM then he has the closest thing to a universal statement regarding BDSM.
Come back when you did this study then.
>yes, because then it's illegal improsonment, assault, battery, sexual assault, and willful endangerment.
So? How is it not BDSM anyway? The legal consequences are not what we're discussing.
>>6830598
Let us for a moment assume the BDSM "community" has the right to determine for every person on the entire planet whether they practice their fetish correctly or not like you imply.
Show me the definition which is accepted by all subcommunities of which the BDSM "community" consist and which they all go by. This universal definition also has to explicitly deny the compatibility of rape and BDSM.
Protip: You're not going to find it, because definitions are just as diverse as the people who practice it.
>and came up with SSC
Which is a safe way to practice it.
The concept of a safe practice is not a universal definition excluding rape. 2 different things.
Also you guys need to take a break and think about how you're literally telling artists they're doing it wrong. You're either liars who try to make BDSM look good to people who don't like you anyway or just dumb.
>>6831122
Stop trying to make rape acceptable
You're a disgusting human
>>6830123
>Anything else like this? Tears, the threat of violence, the sheer fear. Mainly revolving around fear and tears.
Yer fuckin goddman right there's more like this hooyea
He's already attempting to justify rape. It's a lost cause.
>>6829398
Great story man!
>>6831957
Here's your (You)
>>6831478
Can you stop insulting me? My feelings are very fragile.
>implying there's literally anything wrong with rape
>>6832110
You mean, aside from being against the law?
>>6832217
p. bad argument given that bdsm is illegal in britain.
>>6832245
>point out that rape is against the law, and thus it's bad
>"LOL! But BDSM is against the law in Britain so your point is moot!"
>Not actually debating my point about rape being bad
Nice deflection there, guess I didn't really need to argue since you don't have one.
>>6832245
>britain.
Yeah, so are pointy butterknives, what's your point?
>>6832258
>Not actually debating my point about rape being bad
smhtbhfam disproving the argument that supports it is p. much debating it. i wasnt even the first guy though. dont get mad just because you cant argue.
>>6832322
If you want to be raped, that's cool, but don't apply your personal tastes to everybody.
>>6832332
>want to be raped,
So you do think rape can be consensual.
>>6832340
By definition it can't be. You're confusing rape fantasy roleplay with actual rape.
>>6832347
Wanting something definitely makes it consensual.
>>6832217
>equating legality to morality
Give me a single reason that there's anything wrong with rape aside from B-BUT IT'S WRONG
>>6831478
That isn't what he is trying to do at all... '
He is making a rational argument and you are getting triggered by it like the despicable waste of space you are.
Kill yourself my man, you don't fucking belong here. This place will never be your safe space.
>>6833562
I'm not the same guy, and agree that technically rape can be included in BDSM from a purely pedantic standpoint, but here I go.
In order to gaurrentee your safety, the upholding of the law must be universal. To make exception, is to put your life and the lives of others in danger.
So, if you care about the lives of others, you will find it morally wrong.
If you care about society, you will find it morally wrong.
If you care about the guarantee of safety to yourself, then you will find it morally wrong.
Of course we are not safe, so this is in more philosophical terms.
The point is that leaving others alone, which is the fundamental precept of liberty, is the best way to guarantee that you can exist to a potential within liberty's guidelines, as opposed to having your life snuffed out.
If you are too autistic to understand this then look at it this way. Liberal society is the reason we are all wealthy, relatively speaking. It is the only ideology compatible with the growth of the entrepreneur, and of the capitalist system which has delivered everything to us. Judge liberty by it's fruits, and don't rape people.
>>6833816
You're so defensive of rape you want someone to kill themselves?
You really are the scum of the earth
>>6833823
Bdsm isn't rape.
Rape is forcing sex on the unwilling.
Bdsm has roles that are agreed upon between consenting individuals.
Bdsm is consent not rape
>>6833851
>Bdsm isn't rape.
Well, it's not the same, but depending on the definition BDSM can be rape.
>Bdsm has roles that are agreed upon between consenting individuals.
It's your definition, but there are others.
>implying the weak don't deserve to be raped, BDSM or not
MORALFAGS GET OUT REEEEEEE
>>6834328
in cases where a concrete definition doesn't exist community consensus can be taken as the debating definition.
the majority definition here insists that you are wrong, therefore you are.
now begone you foolish waste of clean air and drinking water.
>>6819427
Sauce please?
reminder
>>6834435
That's not a reminder, that's a fucking history book.
>>6834328
BDSM is not rape in the same way that paintball is not war. They can be superficially similar, but they are fundamentally different types of activity. One is recreation. The other is serious conflict.
>>6834328
No, it can't
You dense motherfucker
>>6819838
htps://www.4chan.org/facebook
>>6835454
Doesn't work for me.
>>6835456
.......... thats.. the joke..... ?
>>6834400
>community consensus
I believe the community consensus here is that rape is bad, not that BDSM can not take place in the form of rape.
>>6834610
I'm not saying BDSM is always rape, it's theoretically possible to rape someone by performing BDSM.
>>6835513
no, the community consensus is that BDSM is separated from rape by being consensual.
you're just refusing to see that point
>>6835518
>the community consensus is that BDSM is separated from rape by being consensual.
Can you prove this to me?
>>6835518
+1 to this
>>6834432
Seikon no quaser.
>>6835522
>Can you prove this to me?
Look up any definition/explanation of BDSM. If it goes beyond just saying what the letters stand for, it will talk about consent.
>>6835522
Gee maybe the fact that nobody discussing BDSM does so without emphasizing SSC
>>6830123
I'M BACK
>>6836238
Is there something like a guro end to this :3
