Whenever I search for futa related porn a lot of the time I get girls with vaginas AND dicks. I find that repulsive.
Is there a word for dick-only futas? Are they just called trap/shemales with respect to hentai?
Also, trap/shemale fucking men thread. No vaginas. The one receiving the cock must be regular dudes and not a cd/femboy
>>6761609
>>6761614
>>6761615
>>6761616
>>6761617
>>6761618
>>6761609
newhalf?
>>6761624
never heard that
are futas just an umbrella term for girls with just dicks and girls with dicks and vaginas?
or exclusively girls with dicks/vaginas?
>>6761609
The artist is Anasheya if anyone needed to know
>>6761609
>Is there a word for dick-only futas?
Yeah, they're called shemales.
Futas, by definition, have to have a vagina and a dick. Only the balls are optional.
>>6761630
>>6761627
Thanks anons.
>>6761636
>>6761609
dudes
>>6761665
beat me to it. damn.
just to mention it SHEMALE is a slur, just like faggot or gay males.
>>6761725
No one gives a fuck
>>6761999
>>No one gives a fuck
>>6761609
Yes.
Men.
>>6761609
>people use the word futanari as an umbrella term to post herms, shemale, newhalves, traps etc. in the same thread
>now a minority wants to come up with a term that includes everything except herms because they can't into pussy
Welcome to the Gay New Worl/d/!
>>6762167
Now, now, let's be fair.
Men with fake tits.
>>6761625
Google Futanari.
>>6761609
Men?
I usually don't like this sort of stuff, but for some reason this is really nice right now, and now i wanna fuck a guy :P
>>6763988
All you need to know: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/futanari
>>6761609
Its called Shemale m8.
>>6761609
A lot of sites just use 'futa' as the catch-all term for girls with dicks, but if they do have separate tags for the variations what you'd want would most likely be under 'shemale', 'newhalf', 'tranny' and occasionally 'dickgirl' (though that's also sometimes used as an umbrella term for girls with dicks).
>>6761609
Yeah, "MEN".
>>6761627
Futa just means dickgirl to be honest. There's no rule that says they have to have a vagina.
>>6761725
sjw pls go
>>6764793
bro
futanari is the japanese translated word for hermaphrodite.
so futa means herm, which means both genitalia.
>>6764797
Nah. Well, yeah, but no. Futanari means it has aspects of both sexes. It doesn't mean it has a vagina.
But it also doesn't mean shemale.
The whole "must have both genitals" is western fancanon.
>>6761609
The real terminology is:
Futanari (2 forms in japanese): pussy+dick OR pussy+balls+dick
Full package futanari: pussy+balls+dick
Shemale: dick+balls+boobs
Trap (feminine dude): dick+balls
Sadly, ppl are dumb and mix it all together so it's hard to find the right shit these days.
>>6764799
shemale means shemale, faggot. futa means herm.
now stop making up your own definitions.
>>6764806
Futa is used for generic dickgirls, stupid. Not shemales usually, but they don't have to have a vagina. Actual man shemales are newhalves.
>>6764799
>The whole "must have both genitals" is western fancanon.
You couldn't be more wrong. If you take a look at what is labeled as futanari in Japan, you will find hardly anything that doesn't have both genitals. For example, in pixiv Chinbotsu tags pictures of Poison as newhalf and/or shemale, but never futanari. The same goes for mikoyan who draws futanari and traps, none of his trap pictures are tagged as futanari. Western artist who tag their stuff as shemale and futanari obviously don't count. The fact of the matter is, you will have very hard time finding a Japanese artist who considers anything that doesn't have a pussy futanari.
The whole "futa stands for dickgirls in general" mantra is a bunch of rubbish the western artist are campaigning to spread because they can't stand the fact that they are into men with tits unlike people who like futanari and thus are into girls with dicks.
>>6764814
Because Chinbotsu or Amanoja 9 work with SHEMALES. They specify they're shemales. They're not dickgirls, but SHEMALES. So they're not tagged futanari.
But if it's a gitl that just happens to have a penis instead of a vagina, then it's futa.
>>6764816
>But if it's a gitl that just happens to have a penis instead of a vagina, then it's futa.
Why is that girl not shemale or trap when both fit the definition of having feminine appearance with male genitalia? Because you say so?
>>6764818
>Because you say so?
Because they're not crossdressing or transitioning MEN, they're women. With dicks instead of vaginas. Funny how fiction doesn't need to match reality.
>>6764819
>Because they're not crossdressing or transitioning MEN
>they're women. With dicks instead of vaginas
Yeah that's fine except that the vast majority of hentai doesn't explain the backstories of characters at all, and if they do they usually don't cover that aspect. As far as the actual fap content is concerned there's no distinction between the two. Just about any given dickgirl image with no vagina posted here could either be a transitioning male or "woman with a dick instead of a vagina",
But using the terms interchangeably does make things both harder to find and filter, and makes content bleed between tags. Am I the only one that gives a shit about everything having neat, proper, and strict categorization?
Some people don't want dickgirls with vaginas, some people don't want them without, why the fuck do we want to turn futanari into an ambiguous term when so much shit is already tagged under the assumption that there's a clear distinction?
>>6764830
>Yeah that's fine except that the vast majority of hentai doesn't explain the backstories of characters at all, and if they do they usually don't cover that aspect.
Are you sure you read hentai? Majority of the time, if it's a shemale, they make a big deal out of it. Pretty much guaranteed to have references to how it's a man etc.
I get it, shemales are icky and futa are great. But it's just a fact that futa is a fairly general term for any kind of girl with a dick.
>>6764819
>Funny how fiction doesn't need to match reality.
Dude, I fap to futas with cocks so big they would pass out from getting erection and violently kill everyone they shove their one-eyed panty snake in. Screw reality!
However, I'm more or less a grammar nazi and find the loose definition of futanari extremely irritating. I do understand and accept that you can fantasize a girl that has only male genitalia without any other male qualities. Technically such a girl won't be a trap or shemale, but technically she isn't a futanari either if hermaphroditism is required. Ultimately there isn't really a word for such a special girl that everyone would agree upon.
But you must understand that there are people who simply don't want to let go of futanari meaning girls with dicks and pussies, me included. So I'm asking you, why change a system that works well? Simply because it doesn't work for your fantasy? Isn't that rather selfish?
>>6764830
>Am I the only one that gives a shit about everything having neat, proper, and strict categorization?
Nope, I like orderly things too.
>>6764845
>However, I'm more or less a grammar nazi and find the loose definition of futanari extremely irritating.
And I understand that, but it's a fact that it's correct. And it would be wrong to call a girl with a dick and no vagina the same as a shemale, because shemale implies they were men first. Some people are into that, others aren't. So for the sake of correctness, futa must refer to "female" dickgirls. All kinds.
Just search dickgirl it's what you want.
>>6764847
Call them dickborn.
But lets assume we agree on calling all female dickgirls futa. Should OPs of /d/ be allowed to specify whether their thread is only for futa with vaginas or futa without vaginas or should all futa threads be free for all by default? And would you respect their preference if it contradicts with yours?
>>6764854
I don't see why they couldn't specify what they want, excessively specific threads about dickgirls are a time-honored /d/ tradition.
>>6764862
Then I see no fundamental problem with using the word futa as an umbrella term. It's up to OPs to be specific enough to mention if they accept herms only.
>>6764835
I was talking more about the stuff posted here. The majority of posts aren't comics and are just single images with zero story or background.
And just about every doujin I've read hasn't really said anything at all about how or why they have dicks, hell most just treat it as if its a common occurrence. At most they're slightly surprised that some particular character has a dick (usually followed by something along the lines of "she's just like me!")
Maybe we just read different things though. I usually don't go for the long "story rich" stuff anyway. I'm there to fap, I don't need 100 panels of dialogue between the gross sex. The sooner I can get to the post-orgasmic shame the better.
>>6764874
The main problem I have is that it makes boorus and such harder to navigate when people use terms loosely. If someone only wants non-vagina dickgirls on sites like sad panda there's the shemale tag. Right now a lot of (but not all) dickgirls with vaginas are tagged under futanari. If you use it as an umbrella term you fuck over the people that want vaginas by including shemale stuff in searches and you fuck over the people that just search for shemale stuff by potentially excluding new content from their searches.
I wouldn't care if it was common for people to use herm as a descriptor, but its not so it just muddles things up. You have one group of people that uses it as a very specific term and another that uses it as an umbrella term and all it does is cause confusion and pointless shitposts like this one.
>Hey son, you playing Nintendo?
>No dad this is Playstation, not every video game is Nintendo
>Hey son, you jacking off to futanari?
>No dad these are shemales, not every dickgirl is a futanari
>>6764888
Boorus have the luxury of highly versatile tagging system so they can keep using their well-define tags to make specific searches possible. Personally I have no problem with the "futa or shemale but never both"-scheme that Boorus rely on.
My concern is simply related to how thing are here in /d/. I'm tired of seeing the debates on the definition of futanari and people posting herms in shemale threads or vice versa just to piss people off. I believe /d/ should be a place where people present topics and everyone posts their best related images without arguing whether there should or shouldn't be a visible vagina present. Quite often you can't even tell whether there is a vagina or not and excluding all of that just in case is just silly.
But that's just me, I'm fine with both herms and shemales so I'd rather see everyone get along and post stuff.
I do love newhalfs though, best when they have huge cock and it's fucking male ass. I am thinking of going to Thailand to find a big cock ladyboy to bone my ass just to live the fantasy. I could never consider sleeping with a man, but the feminine ladyboys there are a dream. Third gender is op. I cannot believe the people arguing over the terminology and semantics involved with trans and traps and herms and shemale and TV and CD and faggot and asexual and yiffing and sissy and domme and pegging. Fuck it all, I love women and I consider myself straight, love tits and pussy and you know, maybe I like the idea of a big titted dolled up bitch with a oversized cock that likes to play on top. Men gross me out though. Thailand. Yeah only way its going to happen.
Men with tits. Call them whatever you want but that's what they are.
>>6761609
Yeah, men with some plastic glued to their chest
>>6764923
You're not straight. You're bicirious if you are considering getting fucked by a man with tits
>>6761609
Yeah, they're called trannies.
>>6764923
Nothing wrong with being bisexual anon.
Its called being a fag.
>>6761630
Newhalf is just the term that japs use for shemales/MtF trans
