What's everyones preference when it comes to futa?
Proper terminology aside, I'm just using futa for "girl with a penis" in general.
Balls are a must imo. There are a few exceptions (Bosshi and Red-Rum come to mind), but it just feels like something is 'off' without em. I also personally don't care for them having a pussy or not.
I've also never really been a fan of magical dicks(where the dick is glowing or its obviously its own separate thing).
As far a everything else goes, I prefer big tits and a thick hips/big butts.
My favorite body type would have to be /fit/ but thick in the right places.
Pic somewhat related
>>6726426
Well, I too prefer them with balls, and I like it better when they do it with men (Not shota).
I prefer them being either thick/bubbly or thin bust with curves... Makes me wish I was like that.
>>6726426
I've searched every single image I've seen of this and I still haven't found it. What's the source on it?
But I prefer muh futas to have balls. That thing where their clitoris turns into a dick or it just flies out of their vagina really bothers me.
>>6726426
I'm not too much of a stickler on where the futa grows from and what particular accessories she might have.
It's not a total dealbreaker but I'm just not too fond of when a futa has her penis and vagina stimulated at the same time.
>>6726426
I have been kinda off and on with futa porn in general. The appeal incites me: a beautiful woman with a gorgeous cock plus carressable balls (for me at least, futas must have balls even though I know that's technically newhalf.) She understands what it is like to have a cock and the pleasure of stroking until orgasm. Both you and her are similar but very different and are easily capable of enjoying each-other anally. Also, if you wish to include prostate massaging into the mix, she could have a prostate too which makes anal sex more pleasurable. Men don't do anything for me and I've seen yaoi enough times that if I wanted it, I would've masturbated to it. But a woman is still a woman and sometimes maybe you want more variety in your hentai, at least for me. Pussy is great but I'm not into the whole penis/vagina combo. My general woman turn ons outside naughty bits are of course the breasts but I'm a huge fan of long legs especially with stockings. Latex stockings on beautiful legs would send me into arousal overload. Of course, I like feet and a good footjob is enjoyable but it's more amazing with latex stockings.
It's worthless without balls.
I can usually go without the vagina.
>>6726426
I have none. Balls, vag, or any combo is fine for me. I love all futa, though the more feminine they look (big ass, tits, shapely etc.) the better.
I use "futa" as an umbrella term. People who get all bent out of shape because the term "degrades trans women" should be sprayed with a water bottle.
The futa must have balls and be circumcised. No vagina.
If the female becomes futa through magic, I'd rather not see the dick grow out of the vagina or form from the clit. Looks nasty. I'd rather have it be a instantaneous *poof* sort of thing.
Huge dick, tits, and ass, and wide hips and thick thighs too. All is good.
I always draw them with the full set but really any combo is fine.
>>6726636
>>6726684
>>6726673
Yeah I think its more about it being a relatable feeling. Balls to me make it complete.
Though there are people who find balls to be gross, so I imagine for them its an issue.
>>6726708
That's not really what I mean't when I said proper terminology. Futanari/futa implies there has to be a vagina present, that is the definition of the word in Japan, dual form, or whatever. but nowadays futa is just an umbrella term for "girl with a dick", regardless of if a vagina is there.
I just didn't want people going full autism on me with "THATS NOT FUTA ALL FUTAS HAVE VAGINAS THOSE ARE DICKGIRLS/NEWHALFS", so I clarified that in the OP.
Also I agree with you mostly, but why a preference for them to be circumcised? I'm just assuming you are and maybe thats why?
I know some people find foreskin unsightly but those people tend to be circumcised themselves or females living in a country/location where circumcision is the norm.
As long as the futa has boobs and a vagina, the rest really doesn't matter that much to me. I usually can't fap to futa without vaginas.
For me a futa with balls and no vagina isn't futa. All I see there is a well done trans man. Ideally for me, futa have an average sized cock and tidy vagina (not too much lips). Body type is Mrs. Incredible with a just a bit bigger bust. (Roughly how my wife looked when we met and before our kid)
I love both vaginal and anal sex and making my wife cum hard (only in missionary anal twice so far). I would love to also stroke her cock and feel her pussy clench on mine and feel her cock twitch in my hand as she has the most explosive orgasm of her life. She likes for me to use a toy on her pussy during anal. Fuck, it would be incredible to be balls deep in her ass while pumping her with a dildo and stroking her with a pocket pussy. I'd cum buckets.
But that's just me.
need to have tits and a vag to be a futa for me. Anything less is either a trap, or a shemale type crap and I dislike that crap immensley
I prefer smooth and clean futa sans balls.
It feels like they just get in the way to me.
>>6726908
I also like traps, so for me balled futa seems redundant, doesn't really 'slot in' to what makes me attracted to either one.
>>6726890
You don't recognize Niku Ringo?
http://exhentai.org/g/58753/e270c90874/
>>6726426
vagOOO is necessary, otherwise doesn't even really count.
Balls or no balls, doesn't matter, as long as pOnOs and vagOOO at once.
Not to say I don't like traps and tranny content also, but it's separate from futa.
>>6726921
For example.
>>6726426
I'm picky.
First off, penis, vagina, no external balls.
Secondly, I don't particularly enjoy pictures where either the penis is in its usual place on the mons with a big gap (where the balls should be) between in and the vagina, nor do I like it when the penis is growing out from between the labia.
What I do like is pictured, a delicious blend of penis and vulva. The penis takes the place of the clit, but the labia merge smoothly into the base of the penis like the scrotum normally does.
Failing that, I'll take the full combo of a reasonably-sized penis and balls, and a pretty vagina in place of the taint, with the futa laid back in a position where her pussy isn't hidden.
As far as shemale/newhalf/no vag goes, if it's originally a lady character and I just can't actually see a vagina, I can use my imagination. Or if "she" is paired with a cis-lady or vagina possessing futa, that's fine too.
>>6726426
My preference is for the futa to be the dominant partner, whether they're fucking men or women.
Other than that, I'm pretty open. I despise futa on futa though, I have no idea why.
>>6726921
>vagOOO
>pOnOs
Why?
>>6726758
>>6726874
>>6726921
If in some rare event someone developed normally with full breast, an overall feminine frame and face, but had a penis and balls, how are they any more male than female? The genitals are not the only thing that separate the male and female anatomy.
Shemales and trans/newhalf get their appearance through drugs and surgery. Traps usually have little to no tits unless they've taken drugs.
It's pretty different.
I prefer with balls and no pussy as I like to imagine they're MtF transsexuals.
>>6727399
Biologically speaking it all comes down to what sexual organs they have and what chromosomes they have.
In a medical sense it wouldn't matter if they looked like a grade-a female pornstar, if they have a penis but no womb or ovaries they are male.
Now whether you think sex and gender are separate is another matter entirely but leave that stuff in /lgbt/ or tumblr, /d/ is for fapping.
Is it weird that I really like male to futa?
>>6727480
You're on /d/ asking if it's weird that you like something?
>>6727447
Sure, but my point was that calling all vag-less futa shemale or newhalf doesn't make sense at all. Those were people who used drugs or surgery. Unless otherwise specified, a futa just is that way naturally.
>>6727480
Male to futa as in transformation? I don't think thats weird, then again we're on /d/ so.
desu i like futa without balls since it's unrealistic to the feminine body chemically. also the vagina under benis is silly too.
so i basically i like trap style but it get be full girly hips and ass if done nicely. external balls are silly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testicle#External_testes
the shills on wikipedia cry about being 'better' but it's simply a matter of metabolism and placement.
just imagine the aesthetic possiblities...
>>6726426
Don't really care about balls much but I generally prefer them to have pussies. Clitdicks a shit.
As long as they don't fuck a dude idc, but yeah thicker = better
>>6726426
I like futas without vaginas. I prefer dick/balls and boobs as I empathize with that a lot.
I am a man who wants to become a woman with no intention of losing my dick though so I'm not sure how much bias that has.
I think futa porn had changed me over the years
>>6726708
> uses futa as an umbrella term
> the futa must have balls...no vagina
the reason people use specific terms like Newhalf or Shemale is because it makes it easier to find that specific thing. A term like futa is useless of it just becomes anything anyone wants it to mean. That's why it bothers me when people missuse those terms. I prefer a big tits, curves, and a cock and balls with no vagina.
>>6727616
there's futa in manga that magically or scientifically grow a penis in hentai all the damn time! how they got to a specific genital arrangement is a completely separate matter than what you call that arrangement.
besides, that vagless futa bs is pure fantasy anyway. For that matter, at a young age there'd literally be nothing to differentiate them from males, but in your scenario they'd just get feminine as they developed, while still having male genitals. That's the exact same thing as a newhalf or shemale!
And as someone that prefers balls with no vagina, I'd rather it be called either of those terms so that I don't have to trudge through a million futa doujin to find it.
>>6726426
They've gotta have balls for me, I'd rather see a woman with a strap-on than a Marky Mark without its Funky Bunch. Vagina I can take it or leave it as long as it's done well, I totally understand some artists not adding it in out of personal preference or because there's just not a lot of real estate to work with down there.
As for general body types I prefer thick and tall women with hair either long and sultry or short and punky. The recent fashion of women getting undercuts/Hitler Youth/pompadours gets me diamonds.
Really no for balls, yes for vagina.
Although I'm not that much into futa, its more like occasional dinner at fancy restourant you decided to visit because your home food is really boring that day.
>>6726426
none personally. not a fan of futa.
>>6727068
lurk moar
Hey, >>6726921 here.
>>6727399
>If in some rare event someone developed normally with full breast, an overall feminine frame and face, but had a penis and balls, how are they any more male than female?
That's not the argument. I'm not saying that "if no vagina then its a dude hurr durr"
The contention here is that the term "futanari" has traditionally referred to a very specific combination of features - specifically, both male and female genitals. Given that people clearly seem to have varying preferences on what sort of genits are present in their lewd drawings, I believe it's helpful to maintain a distinction between those with both sets and those with only one.
As I mentioned in my post, the line between shemale/trans/newhalf/traps can be very similar content and is (in my own opinion) also worth looking at, but I just wouldn't use the word "futa" if there's no female genitals involved.
>>6727616
>Those were people who used drugs or surgery. Unless otherwise specified, a futa just is that way naturally.
Then find another name for it if it rustles your jimmies so bad.
does their naturally exist futa's?
specifically vagina and cock?
balls of course, should be there, but thats a lot to put in one place.
>>6728055
>>6728099
I know all about the definitions, I addressed it briefly here >>6726727 I already knew this subject would come up
You guys are saying futa shouldn't include x but then you also disregard the actual definitions of shemales/newhalfs with the argument being "Well its close enough.". That's a bit hypocritical.
The issue here is that futa hasn't been held to its literal definition for years. It has been an umbrella term ever since the western scene adopted the word. So while yes I agree unless they have both sets of genitals they are not technically futa.. you'd have to first convince people to re-label the thousands upon thousands of vag-less 'futa' art that have been posted over the years.
So yes, I use the word futa as an umbrella term, because there really isn't another word for vag-less futa outside of dickgirl which follows the same issues as futa.
>>6728104
From what I've seen it's nothing like in hentai/porn. it surely isn't 'attractive'. Imagine a barely functional penis with a deformed vagina and there you go.
hermaphroditism in humans is more of a medical condition than anything else.
I mean, I'm sure there someone out there with it that's lucky enough to have both parts functioning normally.
>>6726496
Search Niku Ringo Chun Li
>>6727759
Having both a dick and a clint makes no sense, youre crossing the anatomical streams egon! Never cross the streams!
I like my futa to have dicks big enough to crawl in and setup a bedroom, or at the very least that i can dock with. Also I become diamonds if they have a horse cock.
>>6726426
>Balls are a must imo.
>it just feels like something is 'off' without em.
OVOTESTES, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU EVEN?!
>>6726708
>The futa must [...] be circumcised
McFucking kill yourself.
>>6728154
> because there really isn't another word for vag-less futa outside of dickgirl
Shemale and Newhalf are both words for feminine body, cock and balls, no vag, you fuckwit.
>>6728154
>The issue here is that futa hasn't been held to its literal definition for years. It has been an umbrella term ever since the western scene adopted the word.
Asserting your hot opinions dont make them facts.
>>6729352
Sure, as applies to real people. But we're not talking about real people here. We're talking about fantasy people.
Shemale and newhalf refer to characters with feminine bodies, cock, balls, and no vag.
Futa used to refer to characters with cock and vag, balls optional, but now it's just a blanket term for everything with a feminine body and a penis, vag or no vag, balls or no balls.
Shemale/Newhalf fans have terms they can search for unambiguously, but classic futa fans do not because their terms have been expanded.
>>6729237
You know this seems in a way something could happen if we teach the DNA to naturally do this organization, at the same time, it seems like something can go wrong, what will the body decide? Eggs or Sperm?
>>6726426
Futa don't have balls. They need a vagina where the balls should be, or else you're just watching shemales fuck.
>>6726951
penis and vagina is pretty disgusting... maybe because it's just not found in nature
What I look for in futa is basically just straight sex but without any guys or fake dicks. Ideally, that's dick, no balls preferably, and vag is a must.
It seems like people either enjoy what I described, or the exact opposite, which is a girl with balls/no vag usually fucking a guy. That's basically just shemale on male. And I don't care if you go "but muh sexuality", that's basically gay. Like, that's purely anal, barely any qualities of a female aside from breasts and maybe face... There's just nothing there for me.
In terms of preference, what I'm interested in is primarily vaginal. Like, physically speaking I've got no interest in anal, and it does nothing for me. So it's basically a waste of space if I search for futa and get hentai with purely anal in it.
I don't care if there's a flame war because of this because odds are I'm not gonna check this thread again after I post this, but it seems to me like if you're attracted to women, you prefer futa on female or futa on futa, vag guaranteed on all of them, and if you're attracted to men, you prefer futa on male or shemale on male. Quit lying to yourself and go get a dick up your ass.
>>6730478
excuse me sir, do you have any fucking clue where you are right now?
>this fetish is pretty disgusting, maybe because it's not found in nature
>pretty disgusting
>disgusting
>d
jesus fucking christ
small futa cocks and balls
thick and at least 8 long
huge balls
no weird clit-hybrid thing
no hair
i'm easy to please
>>6729498
Theres plenty of posts in this thread alone that confirm what I've said though. We are indeed talking about fantasy, but that doesn't stop people from looking at them from a real world perspective(even if basic human biology shows us its pretty much impossible for a male to develop full breasts and an otherwise female body naturally). The bottom line is that the word shemale and newhalf will always imply they are male, even with drawings.
Big, muscular, stinky, sex craved and powerful.
cute girly futa's, vag a must have,no balls or balls but not really huge ones, big tits like DD - H cup age about teens to twenties, hair in twintails always a bonus, a big cock 10" - max of 18 inches with enough cum to fill a belly up.
Futa with male giving or taking, futa on female, futa on futa, not into humiliation and hurtful stuff.
>>6726426
must have a vagina and a cock. i preffer futa on female and futa on futa over male on futa or futa on male, simply because I don't care as much for anal when vaginal is an option. male on futa is okay, and in that respect, oral for etiiher/both of them is also fine,
I also like futa that is a female who sudenly has a dick and just doesn't know how to deal with it (tilt mode is the prototypical example) and also really aggressive but non-violent futa on female rape. I also due to reasons have a thing for a few specific characters as being futa.
>>6726426
I prefer normal to large dicks, nothing insane, circumcised, prefer balls but I don't mind no balls as long as it the base of the dick isn't really small (not sure why ball-less futa does that so much).
Also if it's a lineup or group of futas they should have different sized dicks
No pubic hair either.
Balls are good cause i like pictures of furans cumming and it has to come from somewhere, and I'd rather not do some mental gymnastics about I descended testes or hybrid ovaries ir whatever. I honestly would prefer no vagiba or the vagina not being visible, but I realize it's not true futa then. I feel like furans have different usual aesthetics than traps though, and that's more what I'm into when I'm in the mood. All penis sizes can be lovely if they aren't drawn to look smelly or grotesque.
>>6732525
>Also if it's a lineup or group of futas they should have different sized dicks
nothing triggers me more than seeing 4-5 futas and they all have the same sized dick.
>>6726951
10/10 taste man
>>6732530
What is a furan? a flat-chested girl?
>>6732533
For real doe, it's no fun unless there's different shapes and sizes.
I only really look at futa if it's futa-on-female in some aspect or solo futa (in which I generally imagine they're thinking of a woman or a woman is in the scene, out of the shot). On occasion, but rarely, I will look at something with multiple futas, but I generally prefer either intimacy or one-dick group sex.
In actuality, while I use the term "futa" for simplicity, I would say my favorite kind of futa falls under Tranny/Shemale territory, since I really don't care for a vagina on them; as a guy who's attracted to women, I really don't care to see anything inserted into the party with a dick in a situation.
As for the dick itself, depending on the tone of the porn I'm looking at, there's two ranges I prefer: Above-Average Realistic (6.5-12") and Low-Mid Hyper (13-30"). I prefer simple, clean dick shapes, nothing grotesque or extremely veiny. I prefer circumcised because I'm circumcised, and I prefer balls. In fact, I very much enjoy big balls in futa porn because of my fetishes involving gentle teasing, condom filling and cum inflation. Balls bigger than the dick itself are very nice, in the right context. These same fetishes also bring me to prefer when a futa is small when soft, but undergoes a noticeable growth as they become more aroused, both in dick and balls size.
As previously stated, I like Futa-on-Female the most. I use it basically as a fantasy scenario where a man is not involved, but there is still male orgasm empathy. I hate looking at porn with a guy that I can't identify with (plus I hate voyeurism), so futa alleviates that. The women I like in these scenarios are the ones I like normally: tall and mature, with very thick asses/thighs/hips, gently dominating, and oftentimes passionate and loyal. The futas can range from not having much of a figure to being as thick as the women; doesn't matter quite as much. I also love cum inflation so long as it isn't painful; re-appropriation of cum to ass expansion is ideal.
>>6726426
Thin but tall with c cups and a good ass (like I prefer my girls), balls, cock that's about 4 inches and thin, pussy is underneath balls
>>6732154
This guy gets it
>>6726426
Male on futa then futa on male then solo then the other combinations.
Man has equal or larger oh ally's than the futanari. Being Japanese I only consider futanari as having a current body with vagina and penis especially feminine as that's how it's been used since almost forever in Japan. Makes searching what I want difficult in the western sites as I don't prefer masculine bodied Herms, shemales, traps, and the newhalf compared to futanari. I honestly don't like how shemales count as "futa" even though the only difference between them and traps are breasts because of the numerous amounts of flat chested futanari. Ok to balls and no balls. Dislike male to futanari. I prefer equal relationship that shifts in dominance from time to time. I dislike how one sided masculine the shemales and futanari are in the West when paired with males. I mean I like futa on male but I wish there was more male on futa. I just dislike it when it's too emasculating and one sided. Futanari has both genitals and butt for a reason and males have penises and butt at the very least use them occasionally.
>>6733805
and the same could be said that the only difference between a drawn shemale and futanari is the vagina. Not all 'shemale' are drawn masculine, most are drawn just as feminine as others with vaginas. Furthermore you're implying futanari are never drawn masculine lol.
I think really you're just comparing western and eastern art, which obviously yeah, there will be some differences.
I prefer mine with balls, realistically sized dick, and without a vagina, or at least vagina not visible. I understand it's technically not a real futa but a shemale/newhalf instead, but close enough. They all have to be feminine though, I can't stand the muscular shehulk masculine ones.
As for scenarios, I'm a sucker for male on dickgirl action. Not too keen on hard femdom, especially the really nasty ones. I prefer it vanilla, light femdom, or maledom. NTR is fine depending on the situation and how well it's written. Transformation will also get bonus points.
>>6726426
Regardless, never a hugge dick.
If possessing balls, then
>no vagina
>no huge cock
>no sudden overt lustiness
>submissive
If having a vagina then
>no balls
>normal size to small
>submissive
I used to like futa on male a lot, but I hate the frequent humiliation/humongous cock aspect. At the same time, I really like the idea of a girl gaining a dick still wanting to get fucked, so male on futa is perfectly fine.
In any case, I'm fine with magic or science growth, but sph/humiliation is a no-go. Also, the bigger the dick, the less the rest of the endowments (ala Askray), and the smaller the dick, the bigger the rest of the feminine endowments (ala uno makoto).
I dislike it with alls and a vagina because it looks painful. Without balls it's marginally less, like it's representative of a different creature that operates under different biological standards, as opposed to 'Let's just combined all the things!"
>>6735105
>the smaller the dick, the bigger the rest of the feminine endowments (ala uno makoto).
What do you consider small? A lot of makoto's futas are pretty well hung.
I know this is kinda off-topic but anybody know what those japanese bimbos are called? You know where they have dark skin and light eyes and shit.
>>6726426
For me, futa are cock and vag, generally can both knock up and get knocked up. External testes optional.
As for futa-specific preferences: Plump pussy with small-ish labia minora, realistically proportioned medium to somewhat large sized cock, realistically proportioned medium sized nuts if external.
Ion't have any pref for visible nuts or circumcision.
>>6729237
>>6730453
Much as I've liked that pic for quite a few years, the biology wouldn't work. Sperm cooks at the same rate regardless of species, it's just that most animals have workarounds. My own thinking is to have separate ovaries testes, with the testes being capable of descending into the labia often enough under certain conditions.
>>6735740
Ganguro? I think
>>6734998
I don't think you understand female/male secondary sexual characteristics.
I also don't think you understand that futanari to easterners are feminine hermaphrodites. Feminine as pertain to female secondary sexual characteristics.
>Furthermore you're implying futanari are never drawn masculine
Masculine in sexual role is the implication not masculine in body. It was also referring to the disproportionate tendency.
>Not all 'shemale' are drawn masculine, most are drawn just as feminine as others with vaginas.
Was referring to sexual behavior/role.
>not all
Wasn't disputing exceptions, but degree and proportion.
>and the same could be said that the only difference between a drawn shemale and futanari is the vagina.
Untrue, the lack of a vagina effectively gets rid of more sexual fetishes and positions. It gets rid of possibility and changes certain contexts. Futanari also has tons of art dealing with flat chests. Do shemales? No, they don't. those are mostly considered traps without boobs or feminized men. Imagine Loli futa. Now imagine loli shemale. You're likely thinking of traps at that point.
Overall, my preference isn't only the physical bodies between west and eastern. It's also the context, behavior, tags,and etc. on how futanari act and behave on tendency. But I find both important.
It's not just an East vs West but it does influence. Older Western futanari artists drew futanari pretty well in my terms of body and behavior/role. While the quality wasn't that great, it was in a better direction. Now days, shemales got pretty popular in the West due to a number of factors ranging from quality, political, social, artists, etc. They particularly got especially popular in masculine roles in most cases. I theorize that the reason is due to the popularization and westernization of futanari in the west and the want to place femininity in more masculine roles (and the reverse).
>>6726426
mao is pretty much perfect.
for me a vagina is a must and preferably no balls
then again I think my attraction to futa might be slightly different from the norm (heh), in that what gets me off is imagining that it's a regular girl that now has a penis and is unable to deal with the stimulation, like suddenly being reduced to teenage boy levels of horniness because of it
Appearance wise, feminine with big (but not oversized) dick and balls.Vagina optional.
I prefer futa on male, but not the overly aggressive/dominant type that is common. The role reversal of a cute girl lovingly filling her boyfriends ass is best.
I like DFC with a normal sized penis and balls, no vagina.
>>6737908
>pretty much
Only because she doesn't have balls the size of grapefruits. All that cum has to come from somewhere.
I prefer more realistically sized dicks that are in proportion with the girl that they they are attached to, i.e. no tiny girls with 10 inch dicks.
I prefer no balls+pussy but just a full package normal dick and balls can still be quite okay too.
I really really really like it if the girl's dick is physically similar to my own in appearance, just scaled up a bit.
In general, genitals are just kinda ugly. I find I like looking at futas who have a dick similar to how mine looks. And I like dicks that look MORE similar to how mine are. Artistically speaking, there are dicks that can look more feminine (rounded, little-no veins) and those that look more masculine ("muscular", veiny). Of course those who believe in the concept of a feminine dick are given zero credibility. Fair enough, I suppose.
>>6726496
>>I've searched every single image I've seen of this and I still haven't found it
Nigga I literally just reverse image-searched this in Google, using the built in option on this website, and it found the source on the first page of results.
Are you blind?
I have a thing for size, so it's really easy:
My perfect futa is taller than most men and muscular with huge breasts and large nipples. Very large, unrealistic cocks with low hanging balls full of cum.
She'd be naturally dominant, very used to getting what she wants, self assured, VERY experienced, etc, etc, etc.
Here's the kicker, though. Aggressive, sex crazed, will make sex hurt futanaris aren't a thing I like.
The perfect futa is all I've already describe but also a gentle person who could dominate you using her superior size and strength but chooses to let you submit.
So yeah, a gentle dom semi giantess with a humongous dick who can function as a regular human being when she's not fucking you.
Pic related:
http://imgur.com/zhcrloT
Huge in a lot of places. Muscular (a little more than toned), twelve feet tall, Milena Velba proportioned tits, wide-ish hips and a gelatinous big ass. Strong but soft feet (not too lean, long-ish toes with flat and wide nails), wide areola, deep chocolate skin and hair reaching the back of her knees.
Two cocks, heavy, four inches thick and two feet long, uncircumcised but knobs as dark as the rest of her, thick but subtle veins making the surface almost smooth.
Lead weight nuts, cantaloupe-sized, and a bit saggy.
Tight pussy, pronounce labia majora.
Utterly virile. If you're barren you get pregnant anyway, no less than twins but usually triplets. Already pregnant, then they're getting company.
Hyper musk, switch, lactating, tons of cum, solid arm-thick shits, deepthroats like a goddess, thick groomed hair everywhere.
I like Futanaris with big balls and huge cocks as well as a hatred for human males!
>>6726426
Tall and strong, broad shoulders and hips with a tight waist. Not excessively defined, with large firm natural breasts. Big but not ridiculous cock, 9-10 inch or so - big balls.
Either that or slightly less tall, supermodel skinny, cock pierced and chaste, equally large fake boobs.
For me it's penis+balls+tits. Shemales/newhalfs and titless cousins trannies/traps/sissies all the way.
They are modified/augmented males who adopt traits generally monopolized by females in culture.
S are not only hot but they are the only kind of futa/herm that makes sense and is actually possible in the real world. They are considered 'pre-op' but the truth is there is either no intention or as of yet no viable means of replacing a penis with a vaj.
If it were even possible, they wouldn't even need to identify as trans, they would just identify as female. (Because that's simply what they would be)
Apart from some of these shemales/newhalfs who would like to become actual females, many wouldn't go for it because having a penis and balls is just too awesome.
They are effectively committed faggots, who are transcendent in their faggotry to emulation traditionally feminine traits.
You also much more often tend to see shemales/newhalfs and trannies/sissies/traps being interested in other men.
Then, there's female-based futanari/full-package futanari. These are basically females with magic flesh strap-ons.
These do not exist in the real world as it is, except as profoundly rare mutations, when the embryonic development fucks up and goes half-assed on clit Vs dick and pussy lips+ovaries Vs balls.
The people who actually still like these after understanding what these futanari actually are, are guys who like getting pegged, or having sex with a girl who has a strap-on.
But much more appropriately you have lesbian girls who like futanari and enjoy relating to them because 'what if my strap-on was real' and all the futa on futa that exists. This is especially true for the 'futa with dick+vag, but no balls' variety. Lastly included is a minority straight girls who would like to peg guys.
>>6742399
(Cont.)
Shemale/Newhalf and tranny/trap/sissy is male-based and gay. Liking it means you like something that is gay, though that doesn't mean you are completely gay. Just embrace it.
Full-package futa, and especially cock+vaj yet ball-less futa is mutant lesbian strap-on territory. It's nowhere near as gay but nowhere near as satisfying because it's basically pure fantasy.
That is, until science masters gender transition.
It's not really legitimate at present beyond an illusion given by hormones. Namely, trans at this stage can never have a properly and completely functional opposite gender physiology. (no mabbies for mtf and no sperm for ftm)
But as alluded to earlier, for it to be achieved that successfully would remove any real non-political/non-legal documentation need for them to be termed trans. Analogous to people who live into adulthood before changing their name. Old name still on books somewhere etc. It'd be more like "male-born female" if anything.
In any case, shemales have the edge - they are present in the real world, they have male virility, they are massive faggots in the best way, and have the greatest motivation to be sexy sluts.
>>6742399
>S are not only hot
*Shemales
I don't really have a specific preference to futas but I guess I do like penises in the shape of pic related.
I can't really explain it, but I like very long, strong almost cylindrical-shaped penises. I don't know why but I think its hot and it turns me on more than other penises.
>>6743250
>>6737908
Why hasn't MIX been scanslated yet?
>>6742399
>>6742415
This is the way to go.
At least you have an actual chance to experience your fantasies of feminine-penis IRL.
>>6728090
Been here for like ten years and that's the first time I've ever seen anyone type "Penis" and "Vagina" so fucking stupidly. Maybe you should lurk moar.
>>6745367
It's part of some really old memes from /a/ that come from a poorly translated Fate/Stay doujin from over 10 years ago.
I hate to link KYM, but Lurkmore doesn't have any entries on it.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/jam-it-in-you-lost-me
>>6732154
>>6733047
I'm with you guys.
>>6726426
I just stopped caring eventually and learned to jerk off to all of it. Actually I went to /d/ today because I have a question to propose regarding this very issue. Ignoring fetishes if I had to categorize sex it would be based on the sexuality of those involved as I see it. This would be a spectrum from Feminine->Masculine which seems simple enough.
Women->Pre-Op, passing MtF/Traps/Femboys/Futanari->Pre-Op, passing FtM->Men
But something odd happens when I expand this to sex between two people.
(W-W->W-MtF->MtF-MtF)->W-FtM?->MtF-FtM?/(W-M)->[MtF-M->FtM-FtM FtM-M->M-M]
() Is what I find arousing
[] Is what I find not arousing
? I'm trying to get a grasp on
So I ask you /d/ what's your gray area and can you even think of examples of mine that you've looked at regularly?
>>6728099
>>6746805
Very relevant but I find your diagram flawed anon. Would you really put loli/dfc in the same category as Pre-Op FtM Tranny?
>>6742399
I see, you too are a man of culture.
>>6738738
Never forget how insane you sound when you say a dick looks more feminine. I understand what you mean though. Sometimes a less rigid, less veiny trap or futanari being penetrated is more arousing. Sometimes two futanari with baby arms is more arousing.
>>6726426
>>6742415
You know what I never get enough of? Penetration involving a giant clitoris which is clearly not just a penis above the vagina.
Some people have said they prefer more normal looking dicks for futanari >>6738738
And others have said the over the top ones >>6743250
I like the odd ones that more resemble an exaggeration of female anatomy than a male member on a female. Of course I'm not picky.
>>6746862
I like the ones that pop up and embarrass the girls when they are in class or in public somewhere. They try to hide it, but then it spurts everywhere. I kind of know how they feel.
>>6735782
Why are you bringing real world science into this?
>>6735740
Pretty sure it's called Gyaru.
>>6748242
...it is my fetish.
Dick + vagina - balls for me.
My main preference is for futanari with everything (tits, penis, balls, vagina). No huge exaggerations. I'd accept the same but without balls too, but in that case I'd prefer separate penis and clitoris - that way, they can appreciate the full experience of having sex both ways.
I have an interest in enlarged clitorises too, though; not replacing them with a penis, just enlarging them. Not too big for that, though.
>>6746901
Definitely. I do so like unwanted/inconvenient erections and orgasms, particularly in public and/or in clothing (male/female/futa/anyone). If I had more of that material, I'd make threads for it.
>>6742415
>they are massive faggots in the best way
And the funny part is most of them prefer women.
>>6749359
Untrue.
The minority which you describe to prefer women are actually transbians. Would-be 'straight' male traps (Not quite committed shemales) who almost certainly only identify as female to satisfy emulating the fantasy that they are literally a woman, with a penis.
These tend to exist in life as (by far most commonly part-time) crossdressers who wish to indulge in their sexist idealism of femininity (Being pretty, dainty, etc) and through mental gymnastics want to believe what they're doing is 'girl on girl, except I also get to have my penis in this.' They prefer to think of the sex they engage in as lesbianism, and want acceptance from women above all because they have issues with their being male.
Most shemales/newhalfs (basically surgically augmented, committed traps) vastly prefer men and mostly have sex with women in porn to satisfy the circle jerking market of transbians and 'straight' cis males who see shemale on female and mistakenly assume it's lesbianism.
Transbians are basically straight males who feel ugly as cis-het scum and typically have some kind of internalized misandry.
The other way you get these faux shemale transbians is entirely in fantasy RP chatrooms where pathetic frustrated RL females pretend to have penises and attention whore to each other like women at a cringeworthy hen's party passing around dildos and feeling adventurous for it.
Shemales by and large tend to prefer men.
Many shemales often prefer to identify as female for convenience either because they want to trap or otherwise not put off homophobic 'straight' men, or they have internalized homophobia and feel like there's somehow greater legitimacy in being a faggot with fake tits who adds the caveat of calling themselves a girl.
They're trying to get away with 'being the girl' in a 'guy+girl' relationship with a cis-'het' guy.
>>6751125
Of course this mostly boils down to a fucked up mix between misandry and/or internalized homophobia, which is why in my first posts >>6742399
>>6742415
I endorse shemales who embrace their male identity and gay/bi orientation. Those who do so are able to achieve a real sense of sexual fulfillment that pretty much every other form of trans is presently incapable of.
Big sweaty balls are the best, with a nice thick dick.
It should have a good thickness to length ratio, with the thickness at least remaining somewhat believable that it could actually be used for anal sex. Too thick and it's not good.
So not too long either because it'll either be too thick or throw off the thickness/length ratio.
>>6753907
good taste
>>6738634
Come brother, let us fap with our superior preferences.
This is surprisingly hard to find and it frustrates me. I really want to see more cute relationship futa-on-male stuff.
I like them to be fat (fat in my definition is probably fatter than your definition). I do not like them to have oversized penises. I like hermaphrodite style ones. If they have no testicles, they should have a small penis, if they have testicles, they should have normal size.
>>6729237
how do you suppose the testes would function if they were inside the body? they would just stop working entirely. the body is too hot and they cannot function properly, at least assuming they are anything like what people are equipped with in reality.
why humans devloped that way, i dont know. i think it would be great to just have my nuts inside of me where they cant get kicked, slapped etc.
this picture just wouldnt work for more than just that reason though, its ignoring alot of minor small anatomical things.
either way it would be cool if it worked like this in a perfect world, but i would be more interested in someone coming up with a design like this that would actually be realistic and possible IRL.
im just not certain how you would create a 'gonad' that would do futa-things if its based off of a testicle or whatever. what you would have to engineer would need to be compatible with the body, be internal, and not just be functionless and eventually atrophy because its out of its element.
i wonder if it would be more realistic to just create a chemical substance that interacts with how hormones interact with the body. if you take estrogen / anti androgens as a male your testicles and penis tend to shrink and alot of other problems arise-lethargy,headaches, mental fog,irritability,these are at least the minor side effects. if there were instead an analogue that could only apply the "TITS N ASS" effects of estrogen to the body you could potentially have some "hot dudes" walking around assuming you started prepuberty.
a better drug approach would be to have estrogen control the usual male functions in general, minus the male features of hair, hair loss, male body odor, male voice, etc, but this seems way less realistic.
the other problem is how to give a chick a penis that works... this comes back to the last thing i just brought up. i think its unrealistic to have estrogen affect penis growth, erection, sex drive (at least the sex drive of a male)
>>6758511
>If they have no testicles, they should have a small penis, if they have testicles, they should have normal size.
Why that arbitrary mandate?
>>6726426
I really don't care for balls, but I don't mind them much if they're fucking a woman. Mostly, though, I like my futas to be getting fucked silly by a man, with their dick serving as little more than a decoration or extra fondling point.
>>6732286
My nigga.
>>6758588
>how do you suppose the testes would function if they were inside the body? they would just stop working entirely. the body is too hot and they cannot function properly, at least assuming they are anything like what people are equipped with in reality.
That's not entirely correct, though. While the testes inside of the body would not be able to produce sperm, so you wouldn't be able to impregnate someone else, the mere presence of the testes in the body does not render them useless. The difference we're talking about here is hermaphroditism vs cryptorchism, the latter having a pretty normal hormonal balance. Obviously, no tits/vagina, though ;)
>>6726426
no vagina
Swimsuits with a bulge. Nice smooth balls. Average size cock
>>6738709
Semen isn't produced in the testes
>>6763652
Semen actually is produced in the testes. However, only a very small amount of cum actully consists of semen. Most of it is fluid produced by the prostate.
I'm not picky
I just like povs
As long as it's a girl with a dick that I'm supposed to suck, it's all good
>>6726426
i like fit brown tomboys with normal smallish cocks. but normal cocks is the important part.
>>6762725
That's not even futa, gaywad!
more realistic size, still an effeminate character with a softer/smaller/less veiny cock
not like shota cocks though, just like a more realistic size.
>>6766751
more
>>6766752
InCase is pretty good for this kind of stuff imo
also has to have balls, looks weird without it
could give or take a vagina underneath, I like anal anyways so for the sake of images it's pretty much the same to me either way
>>6726426
Really? This thread again?
>>6730478 I generally find that people who like that stuff are in some level of denial that they like women with cocks. sure intersexed is a thing but most of the organs are not fully formed. they'd be better off with a woman like myself. but of course then there's the "gay" stigma. it's quite fascinating to watch how the human mind deals with "dickgirls" though
>>6726426
Got a source on that comic series?
>>6735718
>A lot of makoto's futas are pretty well hung
Too right. I cited Uno Makoto because he makes the girls absolutely voluptuous. But to the question, Small would be about average or smaller, but only proportionally. With the huge tits, huge ass, wide, breeding milfy hips, the dick would look smaller by comparison and seem reasonably dwarfed.
This pic by dmitrys illustrates my point.
>>6768632
Another. The cock isn't necessarily small, but it's not unrealistically huge either. As it is, it's dwarfed by the feminine endowments.
>>6742415
>>6742399
>>6745319
my brothers, amanoja9 sometimes takes this to the extreme, but I love that his shemales still view themselves as men and only became newhalfs because 1. they like newhalfs and looking like girls and 2. they like getting fucking like a girl and this attracts more men.
>>6742399
is fantastic too.
Hiuna Hayami is another great shemale artist, but frequently keeps the male shape with them, very blocky with little curve to the waist and hips, but huge tits. Which, I suppose, is good if you're the type of yutz that complains about trap artists who draw a girl's body with a penis and calls it a boy, but I'm not. I like some curves to it all, which is why Incase's stuff >>6745319 >>6766754 falls flat for me usually.He's getting better. Lack of curve usually implies a degree of masculinity, but hey, both artists make up for it!
>>6768675
>>6768675
>frequently keeps the male shape with them, very blocky with little curve to the waist and hips, but huge tits
case and point
>small-medium size dick
>no balls
>vagina
>possible easy ejaculation or preamture ejaculation
>very high libido
>>6742399 actually a lot of us opt to keep it just because medical science isnt quite at the level that we're satisfied with. I'd like to be a mother one day personally.
>>6768566
Porn is porn. I've come to abandon any notion of sexuality I've previously had. Whatever makes my dick hard I'll fap to it. Think with dick not brains.
>>6769639
Exactly! I'm the same. Granted guys now smell really good because of the hormones, but I don't really have a preference. I find what I find attractive and I wish society cared less and thought more on whether a person is shitty, rather than if they like cock in their ass.
>>6726426
i luv the /d/
