old thread
>>5831920
poll time /d/.
>Growth or Shrink?
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
>Gentle or Sadistic?
>Aware/ or non-aware?
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
>>5837963
Shrink.
Both are good for different things though I tend to prefer the smaller side.
Gentle.
Unaware.
No.
Self-inserts.
>>5837963
Growth
Meaningful interaction
Sadistic
Aware
If I would become female as well while growing, yes.
Shrinking stuff being tagged as giantess.
>>5837963
I like both, but I think I'd rather have a shrunken woman that can ride around in my pocket everywhere I go. She wouldn't exactly be a pet to me, either. I'd still treat her as a human being, and take care of her until she grew back to normal. If she ever does, that is!
Meaningful interaction. 3 inches tall is probably my limit. As for growth, 50 feet is my general limit, though I'm comfortable with up to 100 sometimes.
Gentle, of course!
Aware! It's no fun if they aren't freaking out while they shrink/grow.
Not myself, no. The only thing that I would find appealing would be if a woman shrank me. I prefer her to grow, instead.
I hate when they're wearing clothes. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Where the hell did they find clothes at their size? If the clothes grew with the woman, that's fine, though I'm not that big a fan of that, either. There's also crushing, vore, etc. that I don't like. I generally avoid the size generals like the plague because of that shit. I wouldn't even be here if I hadn't seen your post on the front page.
>>5837963
Shrink
I like both
At times a little mix but not gory
Both
No
When at times there's not much sexy interactions between SW and GTS
>tfw you'll never see volume one but volume two is easily accessible and has disgusting trap shit
Fate is cruel
>>5837963
Growth
Both
Not always gentle, but never sadistic
Both
Kind of, yeah
Obsession with feet and stink
>>5838028
without having seen it, i can say with 100% certainty that it's somewhere between bad to shit, just every other book they've done
>>5838038
I'd rather make that distinction myself rather than have somebody else make it for me.
>>5838046
Well, it's only like 5$, just buy it if you're that curious about it.
>>5838067
I'm too poor though.
It just baffles me that the second one gets released IMMEDIATELY but there's some kind of thing against posting the first one.
>>5837963
shrink
meaningful interaction, absolutely
sadistic
aware, but treated nonchalantly and as if non-existent
absolutely
feet
Does anyone have the old I-raf-you games "when a mimosa blooms" and "In the Middle Of the Eternity"? Every single download link I found was dead.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink, but I could go either way. Depends on how well either is executed.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
This is a tough one... Depends on what you consider "meaningful" and "microbe" really. I prefer very small sizes (between 0.25 and 1 inch, give or take), but I still like there to be some form of interaction, even if it is one-sided. This is further complicated by unaware scenarions (see below).
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Almost always prefer gentle, but I could be swayed to the other camp with a good execution. Descriptions of extreme gore are a turn-off, though.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Unaware, with eventual discovery. Complete unaware is fine, too. Again, I could go either way.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Absolutely not. It's the equivalent of a heterosexual looking at gay porn or vice versa.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
- Insane proportions (e.g. breasts larger than one's head)
- The concept of the "foot slave." I know it's fantasy, but come the fuck on.
- Vore/Insertion. Once you enter the body, it stops being erotic for me. HOWEVER, the teasing/buildup that may happen beforehand I'm alright with.
- Braindead people in unaware situations. Most people can tell that an ant on the ground is an ant from standing height (unless they have sight problems), so mistaking a shrunken person for a bug should basically never happen. On the flip side, anyone that instantly runs toward a gigantic person is basically suicidal.
>>5837963
I like both, though I'm a bit biased with Growth
Not sure what that means, but size that's less than 1mm and over 1000ft I find uncomfortable
Varies on the person, but Gentle
I like both, though Unaware gives you a sense predicting on what's going to happen next
No, but that depends on the setting.
The shrunken protagonist dying at the end of the story. I can mostly handle other sexual interactions, but I hate it when the woman, whenever it was aware or not, kills the main character.
Anyone has the full translated version of this comic? I can find only the one half translated.
>作品がある英語サイトにて違法アップロードしていたので、
火山の楊のこれよりの作品はDL販売を公開することを停止します。
ご了承ください。 Orz
>Since had been illegally uploaded in English site there is work,
Work than this of Yang of volcano will stop that to publish the DL sales.
Please acknowledge. Orz
>>5838225
Pretty sure what happened was the people translating it only did half, then demanded payment for the second half
>>5837963
Shrink
Meaningful interaction (an inch or two?)
Oh god, sadistic
Aware
More and more lately. I'm actually kind of worried. It's one thing to imagine horrific sadism shit through these comics, distanced from it because I'm not imagining being the one doing it.. but lately I've started thinking about it and boy is it fucking easy to think up some grotesquely cruel/violent stuff.
Farts but I fully acknowledge I'm into enough weird shit that it looks exactly the same to the fartfags that don't like it. Gotta live and let live.
>>5837963
Shrink. Somehow seems more personal/meaningful to have a girl secreting away a bunch of tiny victims to torture and kill at her leisure, rather than having her grow large and just stomp around random city blocks.
Meaningful. No-brainer.
Sadistic. The more extreme, the better.
Both are good and have their merits, it all depends on the scenario. Unaware ara~ ara~ milfs are gods gift to this fetish however.
No, I'm all about self-inserting as the victim.
The fascination with "foot slaves" and other retarded concepts.
>>5837963
Growth, meaningful interaction, sadistic if I'm looking for something arousing and gentle if I want something adorable, aware, I would absolutely love to be a giant, and I really feel like unaware defeats the point.
![BONUS - Musikvideo Session 2.mkv_snapshot_00.55_[2014.11.17_15.01.58].png](https://i.imgur.com/NdoaEdr.jpg "BONUS - Musikvideo Session 2.mkv_snapshot_00.55_[2014.11.17_15.01.58].png")
>>5837963
Both
Meaningful interaction
Gentle
Both
Yes, though I'd specify it as someone shrinking on their own will or at least not by mine. I used to have fantasies of myself growing, long, long ago. Not really so recently.
I don't really care, really. If it's not to my tastes, I ignore it and move on.
>>5837963
> Both
> Both
> Gentle
> Aware
> Nope, if I'm not the smaller one, then it's a turn off.
> Foot fetish and Vore. Can't find the appeal of being stepped nor eating humans.
>>5837963
Growth
Either, though not so big that she's planet-sized. That's just silly.
Sadistic.
Aware.
Maybe, but only if a girl grew with me. And she's still the boss.
Shrink. It's too tame and boring.
>>5837963
Growth.
Both.
Sadistic mostly, but I also like Gentle too.
Aware.
Myself, no. If a girl/woman that I knew grew, or if I shrank then yes.
Feet and Fart.
>>5838240
Do Japs really assume its reasonable to expect non-Japanese speakers to purchase their text-heavy products at full price?
>>5838356
It's pretty reasonable if you ask me, the contents are the same.
What isn't reasonable is how scared people are of piracy that they'd cut their own profits to avoid it.
>>5838357
Well I don't think it's reasonable at all. I refuse to do it. I don't care if that means I go without it.
>>5838242
Fuck. Posting the full comic hoping some good fellow pick it up and finishes the translation.
>>5837963
Prefer Growth, but okay with both.
The former.
Gentle. I do not like Sadistic at all.
Prefer aware. Okay with unaware as long as it becomes aware at some point.
No. Not at all.
Plenty I don't like. I'm kind of squeamish so all the murderfag stuff really irks me. I'm not really into feet at all either. I find them kind of gross to be honest. I'm also not into vore and that sort of goes back to the squeamish thing I guess? I understand why people like them, I just don't.
>>5838398
Oh man, one of my favorites. Just something about this just does it for me. Thanks for that.
>>5838356
they're chinese, actually
>>5837963
Shrink
Both evenly
Non lethal toying, like trapped in a sock/mouth play but no swallow
unaware or uncaring, uncaring as in not really going crazy with the whole WOW A SHRUNKEN PERSON I'M GOING TO DO THIS AND THAT TO YOU AND YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE more just seeing the tiny and treating it like a sex toy or an everyday event
I would prefer to shrink a girl, or shrink and watch someone who is unaware of my presence but only if I can switch back at any point.
I love feet to death but I hate it when people force the whole foot worship thing, i'd prefer the larger party to either be unaware or just really horny, none of that fake domination crap. I also hate when people draw stench lines, specifically green ones, it makes things disgusting rather then appealing like a fetish should.
>>5837963
Shrink, it allows for a greater variety of scenarios.
I like both but probably lean more to a size that allows for meaningful interaction.
Gentle is great but I also enjoy non-gentle if it doesn't go for full sadism or gore.
Both, depends on the context and focus of the interactions, like unaware butt stuff.
Nope
City smashing, I could understand if it lead to more interesting interaction but often it doesn't.
Foot slave stuff, I don't hate feet but when it becomes the primary focus point of a story or something it sucks.
Tend to dislike Giga content, except for farting on cities.
>>5837963
shrink
microbe
sadistic
unaware
no
why the fuck are there so many interactives on writing.com with "DONT KILL THE MAIN CHARACTER" on them fuckin faggots
>>5837963
Growth
Microbe
Sadistic
Aware
Sort of.
Farts, scat and piss. (at least, the former seems common on this thread)
>>5838255
What is this from?
>>5838541
I think the people with both fart and size fetishes got kicked out of the fart threads so they came here.
>>5838240
It's a bit of an odd situation, I've uploaded things and added a translation request many times because that's simply the best way to get something translated that you want translated.
The alternative is paying someone to translate it for you(which is odd as fuck considering it's fetish material and also more money on top of the original product) or sending it to a known translator and asking them to post only the translation without the images(which they wouldn't do because it would make them look like a tool and get everyone upset).
This obviously doesn't make sense for something where we know someone like ydnkm is already working on an official translation, but unless it's ydnkm we don't have any clue what is or isn't getting a translation.
>>5837963
Growth, but shrink to include shrunken landscapes/ sufficiently scaled content is just as good.
I'd say right at the lower end of what could be considered meaningful interaction (1cm) and smaller.
Either, though not to the extremes of either cringe-worthy gore or SFW dialogue-fests.
Aware strongly. Unaware can work in a few situations, but only if it leads to awareness.
Nope, smaller party or literary observer status only.
Obviously don't like shit-tier dialogue. Absolutely detest stories or works which don't go anywhere. I actually find all non-explicit pieces to be pretty pointless, I prefer it to get to the point so to speak. So plot-heavy stuff goes here.
I dislike and also don't quite get clothed/shoe wearing giantesses, and find it pretty detracting when it shows up.
>>5837963
This poll has been very interesting, if only to see the wide variety of tastes (and distastes). Might have been interesting to put a gender question, but that may have been a bit of a can of worms. I think we did a poll once that ended up with like one of every six posters being female.
>>5837963
growth
both
I don't want gentle or sadistic, actually. I think what I'm interested in is more... I guess incidental destruction? like, people getting stepped on and shit but no "HAHAHA SUFFER TINY FOOTSLAVE BUGS, PROSTATE YOURSELF BEFORE ME AND LICK MY FOOT FUNGUS" type shit, and no meek moe cutelumps either.
Aware I guess
fuck yes
the aforementioned thing about footslaves, get your goddamn s&m foot shit out of my big people
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Somewhere between meaningful interaction and hardly noticeable.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Gentle.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
I could probably enjoy a shrunken woman, but generally no.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Footfags are the cancer of this fetish.
>>5837963
>>Growth or Shrink?
Both are fine. You can get really meta with the two so at that point there's no difference.
>>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful, although microbe unaware can be awesome if done right.
>>Gentle or Sadistic?
Gentle. Teasing is fine too.
>>Aware/ or non-aware?
Mostly aware, although unaware works too.
>>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
I prefer to be the one shrunk. Reality tends to assert itself if i think of getting bigger or having someone smaller than me.
>>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
A lot, but i just shrug and roll with it, and if it's really grates then i just close it/quit it/ turn it off. It's a fantasy, and that usually reveals the depths of one's depravity, so seeing someone go the whole hog should be expected.
>>5837963
Shrink, though growth is okay sometimes
Both are good, it depends on the situation
Really cuddly and really cruel sadism are great.
Both are good, though I dislike unaware that isn't fatal and only involves one micro
Yeah, I'm kind of a microphile as well as macrophile.
Lack of sneakers, school slippers, and similar footwear in crush content. Also, lack of pure gentle content that just involves some nice cuddly stuff.
>>5838719
I like you
>>5837963
Both I guess
Microbe
Both
Aware
Nope
Lack of male content
>>5838777
>lack of male content
I like you as well, anon. You understand my pain.
Did anyone get this? Is it any good?
>>5838800
It's okay. Very lewd.
>>5837963
Growth, always growth
Meaningful interaction
Gentle
Aware
Sure
Unaware, I just don't understand why some people really like unaware
>>5838465
Would a fart on this scale smell any worse?
>>5838886
Yeah, because honestly you'd get noticeable bits of shit blowing into you.
Also, it wouldn't end. It would be a haze that wouldn't disperse for hours.
>>5837963
I lean towards shrink more, but both have their merits.
Meaningful size
Gentle, though I see the upside of sadism as well
Aware
I used to be really into it at first. Though I was drawn to sizefaggotry as a concept since I was a kid, it wasn't until I stumbled upon The Minimizer's site that it actually took off. Now I'm more drawn to this side of the spectrum.
I would like to see less instances of women who are confronted with tiny people that automatically go nuts and demand goddess worship/destruction/sexual satisfaction. Maybe it would lead to the situation of too much plot in porn, but I'd like to see someone like that at least mull over the merits of her going down the sadistic route before acting. Especially if she starts off the story as a fellow human being of normal size.
>>5837963
Always Shrink
Always 1.5~2.5 inches
Sometimes Gentle, but I prefer Apathetic, or the girl treating the tiny like a normal person
Aware
No, but I find tinies cute regardless of gender. I just wish I could be a cute tiny
Why aren't there many realistic pics that aren't shitty photoshops? Pic related, this is a fantastic realistic image.
And I've seen countless girls online into male giants but none into male tinies. Why?
>>5837963
Growth
Both
Gentle
Aware
No
Focus on gore, scat/farts, Futa, autism, other people's taste.
>>5837963
Growth, I want to be fucking enormous
Meaningful interaction
>sadistic, I want to crush fucking everything
>aware
Growing
I'd also turn into a busty babe in this whole process
>>5837963
Shrink.
Meaningful interaction.
Unaware.
No.
Planetary-scale GTS.
>>5838028
This was the only page I liked out of the volume two. Seems like volume one may take long but it will most likely be worth it.
>>5839155
I would love to get in between Leafa or Sinon's toes.
>>5838793
>dat video preview
Now, I may be a simple anon, and I may be familiar with some of the weird shit that flies out of our fetish every once in a while.
But is that game offering panties as a pre-order bonus, or is it just me?
>>5838544
I think that's from Microne Magazine 4
>>5839165
>Leafa
Yes plea-
>Sinon
Shit tastes confirmed
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
I prefer shrink, but I'd be up for growth too.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Kind of depends on the situation.
For fap material, I prefer it when the shrunken parties (mainly fap to shrinking stuff) are about as tall as an average fingernail. This way it's easier for them to be swept under unassuming butts and the like.
For pathetic escapist fantasies, I'd prefer a height of about 4-6 inches. Small enough for fun stuff, large enough to be heard and felt.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Again, depends.
Right away, I don't like outright sadistic stuff.
If not because most stories can't write sadistic people worth a dime, then because the attitude doesn't appeal to me.
Playful maybe, or slightly rough, but not all out sadistic.
Again with sorry ass self insert, I'd go for gentle, or tomboyish.
Where they never actually mean to hurt you, and even when they do, it's never serious. Nothing to go to the hospital over.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
This kind of ties in with the above question.
Like the ones above, whether I'm fapping to it depends on the answer.
For fap, unaware, because it allows the girl to maintain a certain innocence while simultaneously gobbling her friends or trapping her boyfriend in her underwear.
For >tfw you will never times, unaware, then chase, then aware.
I think my favourite part in stories like that is when the shrunken has been found, cornered, and isn't sure whether to come out, or stay hidden.
Guilty pleasure I guess.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Not even a little.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
>Obligatory your tastes
But seriously, I actually like some 3DPD renders, but I'm annoyed the overwhelming majority of them are the same fucking generic "foot crush" picture from the same fucking perspective with the same fucking scale.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink. It's more personal. More intimate. Growth turns one into a spectacle, an oddity or attraction. Shrinking can be kept private, hidden like an affair or some other indiscretion. The secrecy involved in shrink scenarios is also a turn on for me.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Action figure/doll sized. Roughly 4in - 12in
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Gentle, if somewhat teasing.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware and consenting. Even if they didn't consent to whatever misfortune shrunk them, that they consent to be taken under the protection of their big is enough. Consent is important to me.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Not particularly, no. But I've had dreams involving tiny naked faeries so I suppose I'm at least a little bisizual.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Where to start? The cliche'd plots? The hackneyed performances and monotonous line readings from some of the "actors" in content videos. Feet? Vore? Crush? Furries? The self-loathing? The stupid factionalism between all the different subcultures?
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink, though i am not opposed to growth as it still appeals to my tastes at times. I just prefer shrink more.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful interactions, though once again i can go the other way if it is done the right way (to my taste).
>Gentle or Sadistic?
I can go ether way here so long as its nothing really graphic or gory (i don't mind the odd "red stain" thing or similar, but i absolutely hate the really graphic like ripping off body parts or extreme blood and guts shit).
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Ether one can be good, but i lean more toward aware.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Kind of, but I would more so like to be in the shrunken position or someone else growing, though i can get the appeal of the other side (just not my cup of tea. It feels weird thinking of myself dealing with tiny people, i think its more so an awkward situation like "if they knew what i fap to..." thing. It would just make me feel awkward as hell though i would be gentle and try to help them as much as possible. On the growth side i would just try to be a super hero or try to make as much use of my size as possible, but id be quite embarrassed).
>Thing you don't like that is common in GTS
Futa, scat/ piss/ any bodily fluids really, things like going in the ear or nose and dealing with the icky things inside, gore, stank smells and the like, same as >>5838206 about vore/ insertion and foot slave (i like feet but only to a point).
>Things you don't understand that is common in GTS
One thing i dont understand in general is futa things, to each their own though with that. Another is extreme gore shit, that's the point where i say screw to each their own, that's like people who like to watch lobsters or big bugs or animals get stomped out, you can just fuck right the hell off you mentally unstable excuse for a person.
>>5839102
>Planetary-scale GTS.
Fucking THIS.
>>5839442
i dislike giantesses standing next to buildings for the same reason i dislike planet scale. "standing next to gray boxes or blue circles doesnt count as stimulating interaction" says my penis.
>>5838240
Please save us from the economic sanctions of doujin circles. It's only a matter of time before we become the Cuba of the internet.
>>5837963
shrink
meaningful interaction
gentle/clumsy
yeah
lack of actual porn in this fetish "fully clothed giantess walk around" wow who cares, shove a guy in your crotch or something
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful interaction
>Gentle or Sadistic?
More towards gentle, but how about playful?
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Usually aware
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Nah. I'd resent both.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Girls who whiplash into genocidal monster the second they grow/ see shrunken people. Also footfingers. Japs need to learn to draw feet.
>>5838028
I don't even know what this this is from. Link please?
>>5838484
If you can find a Japanese version you may have some luck, I don't think we have any Chinese speakers, or at least none willing to translate that visit here often.
>>5839228
This this a billion times this
>>5838298
Do you have a link to that giantess Sonico video without the credits scrolling up the side?
>>5839623
I got it from a rip of the German Blu-rays that was on Nyaa. Actually, it looks like there's a torrent of the Japanese release there now too which also includes the creditless endings.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink if a "modern' setting, growth if a fantasy setting
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
meaningful interaction
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Playfully cruel
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
No
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Feet
>>5838629
I wonder if like, women lean more towards one answer for these and men towards another. Like do women prefer gentle stuff, or sadistic? What about men?
mite b neet
>>5839649
Do any women even browse these threads or have a size fetish?
>>5837963
Shrink
As small as possible that still allows for interaction so about an inch/half an inch.
Toughest question. I love it when the girl is forceful and demanding, but in a kind of gentle way where they treat the shrunken person like a toy or a servant. Pic related is what I mean. The idea of a girl getting a tiny guy to do things like feed her or do other simple tasks that she could do in seconds while she watches in amusement gets me diamonds.
Aware
Only if it's giant couple stuff. Never on my own.
Confusing tiny people for bugs. It's just stupid when you can easily recognize the humanoid shape even when they're super small. Also when a girl thinks they're bugs then she starts standing on them with bare feet and eating them.
>>5839653
Yes and yes, though not as frequent in number. Also a great majority of women, just like men, seem to be macrophiles as opposed to microphiles. You could chalk it up to female tastes or whatever, but I honestly think macro is simply way more common in both sexes. I know if a girl wanted me to play giant, I'd be a little uncomfortable.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Growth
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Anything from mini-GTS to giga. Planet-sized OK.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Either.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Nope.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Feet, fart, furry and futa.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
GROWTH!!
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
prefer microbe to interaction.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
for sadistic, 90% of faptime.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Both. I Just want to see her trampling down that lil' city!
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Meh. HELL NO.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
none. I think everything is worthy fapping.
>>5839841
>hell no
>not wanting to BE the giantess
You're doing your fetish wrong
>sexual dimorphism of insects and arachnids makes females many times larger than males
>meanwhile in the human race
where did we go wrong, /d/?
>>5840082
For me it was when I discovered I had a giantess fetish.
>>5840082
>Insects and arachnids
>sizefags and vorefags
>what went wrong?
Nothing.
>>5840082
Yeah but female spiders usually eat male spiders by tearing them apart afterwards.
>>5840090
>complaining about sizefags in a size thread
livin on the edge
>>5840096
Bingo. This should have been super-obvious.
>>5840098
No, i am complaining about sizefags who are also vorefags.
>>5839532
>Girls who whiplash into genocidal monster the second they grow/ see shrunken people.
For me it depends how the story is and what the personality of the girl is to begin with. I usually like the girl to already be messed up in the head. Just as long as they don't turn into Katelyn Brooks 'YOU LIKE THAT LITTLE MAN'. Alternatively, a sort of slow corruption works for me too.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Both
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful. Sometimes microbe is fine, but I strongly prefer meaningful
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Depends on the mood.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Early size thoughts were me kidnapping girls i had crushes on and covering them in cum. I prefer to be the non giant though.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Scat, piss. I don't mind anal vore, but I don't understand the thrill of being shat on. I have masturbated to it, but I don't really get the appeal.
>>5840102
Get back to giantesscity.
>>5840102
Then why didn't you just say vorefags?
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Both are great, but shrink is preferred as there's intimacy.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
If it were me, a tad bit smaller than a qt's foot, so the former. If it's just in general, then microbe.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Depends on mood, but gentle for meaningful shrink and sadistic for 1cm and below. Sadistic works best for growth IMO.
>Aware/ non-aware?
Both. Aware is good for feelsy interactions, but unaware is ridiculously hot too.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Sometimes, but rarely.
>Things you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Cringeworthy art/dialogue. But for the most part, anything goes.
>>5837963
Growth
Microbe
Gentle
Aware
I love the idea of becoming a giantess so sure I guess
Gore and killing people is bluuugh.. Just 'cause you're big, why did you start murdering people??
>>5840258
what the hell is wrong with her toes?
>>5840266
footfingeratus
>>5840102
>>>/GiantessCity/
>>5840258
I'll bet you love this story
http://www.giantessworld.net/viewstory.php?sid=4319
>>5840258
>Just 'cause you're big, why did you start murdering people??
It's not about realism, anon, it's about being hot
Though I notice that in a lot of newer gts stories they now stress that the girl already had the fetish and was totally into murder
>>5840281
Thats not new, is so cliche like the tiny man hidding inside a shoe.
And i fucking hate it.
Can someone list the most cliche things to appear in giantess stories?
>>5840293
bitch can't fell 1+ inch man crawling on her body.
I jump sometime when ant do that.
>>5840301
Depends. Generally, it's your body hair that allows you to feel such small stimuli. Also, some parts of the body are more sensitive than others. Furthermore, some people are more sensitive than others in general, so it's a various thing. Personally, if an ant is crawling on my hand, I don't notice it unless it's brushing against my arm hairs or whatever. YMMV, but what you described isn't really beyond reality.
>>5840318
>1+ inch man
Oh, scratch that, then. I zeroed in on the word "ant." Yeah, pretty much anyone with a working nervous system would feel something an inch long.
>>5840279
yo
yooooo
>>5840029
You're a god amongst men anon
>>5838028
>Disgusting trap shit
Lol, we get like one trap doujin every year, get over yourself straightfag.
>>5840352
>Stop not liking what I like!
>>5839826
Thirded, my courier service can't pick it up and it's the only one I really want from C86 I can't find for sale online.
>>5840352
This kinda looks like the Boogie's work but I'm not sure. Source?
>>5837963
Shrink
Meaningful interaction
Gentle
non-aware
No
Feet
>>5840388
it's kononiko, check macrochan
>>5840388
KonoNiko
>>5840266
>>5840270
>/d/ hates foot fingers
Is pic related foot fingers? Because mine are almost identical to these.
>>5840417
i have no idea, i guess people in size threads are too retarded to know what toes look like
>>5840426
Well thank you for the assurance anon. I wonder if Ochiko draws them like his own or something.
>>5837963
>Shrink
>Meaningful interaction
>Sadistic
>Aware
>Yes
>Fucking multisize
>Growth or Shrink?
I love the shrinks, makes things much more intimate.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Definitely meaning full interaction..Sweet spot is between four and ten inches.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
A mix of both.. playful I would say.. Not sweet and nice by any means, but not ultra over the top nasty either.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware every time.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Little bit, not super into shrinking other people, but I imagine it could be a lot of fun.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Splats.. ultra macros mashing cities or more under their feet.. Never got into death with this.
>>5840355
>ignoring the "Stop liking what I don't like!"
![daibijin4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/A2h0DRs.jpg "daibijin4[1].jpg")
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Growth will always be first in my heart I think. Slightly more exotic for lack of a better word. And as it's been said around here before, a big part of the appeal is having this powerful giantess who, for the power that size brings her, chooses to share her affection with you in particular.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful. Too small or too big just doesn't do it for me. I think it's partially autism that giga sizes ruin the narrative I mentioned above.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
I've found myself to be a dom by nature so you can imagine how this clashes with the giantess fetish. I know I'm in a big minority but 'dominant tiny' makes my dick diamonds. Though if I had to pick between the two it would be gentle with light to heavy teasing. Sadistic ranks pretty low.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Again, unaware clashes with my main draw to the fetish though I can understand it's appeal. Aware all the way for me.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
There was a time long ago. I think part of the fetish evolved from, when I was younger, thinking how fucking cool it would be to be giant. But as far as the fetish is concerned, nah.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
How crazy people go for feet and how they can ignore every other single aspect so fervently. I have and understanding of foot fetishes though I don't have one myself. But it just seems so ... boring. Also giant lolis and fart. And loli farts.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Enjoy both, prefer shrink.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Both. I even like some crazy stuff where the tiny is a microbe in comparison, but they're still able to communicate somehow, like Gigamite by HIK.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Gentle
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Yes. In fact I self-insert as the giantess most of the time.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Incest. Why are there so many mom/sister pictures and stories?
>>5838963
Sounds like fun!
>>5837963
Growth
Microbe in comparison
Sadistic
Aware
Only if I was female
Bad quality stuff
>>5840352
wtf is going on in his pants
https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/cgl/thread/S7940155#p7940397
lol, which one of you guys was this
>>5840699
it was me
>>5840710
i fucking knew it
>>5840352
hey at least people of your preferred gender actually have this fetish. We get zip.
>>5840699
>https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/cgl/thread/S7940155#p7940822
tellin it like it is
>>5840744
>More men enjoy this fetish
>Most are 21-35yo autistic neckbeards
No thx.
>>5840754
I was a size porn browsing shota at one point, 19 now though, started at like 11.
>>5840758
I don't know how to respond to this
Cool I guess.
Wanna travel back in time and shove me in your 11yo self's socks?
How the fuck do you respond to this.
>>5840764
>How the fuck do you respond to this.
Yes.
>>5840764
I'm just saying not everyone who has this fetish is an old neckbeard. Gotta have more hope in the community.
>>5840754
Even within that demographic you're still 1000000X more likely to find normal, chill, well adjusted people with the complimentary side to you're fetishes than me. You'll never have to endure the crushing despair of tfw no giant gf.
>>5840818
isn't that what RP is for?
>>5840794
Nigga thats hot
Where the hell can one go to find some 3DP size shit besides livefetish (hasn't been any new content in a while).
Yes i know its bad and yes i want to shame fap.
>>5840796
Can't say I blame him.
2% of the people in this fetish aren't spergs.
>>5840821
But even if you play pretend, the reality is still there that they're all still men. Gay macrofags never has this problem thats my point. Its never "fuck this, all these niggas in chat are a bunch of women"
>>5838202
anonfiles,com/file/a2990f5fcd48906912b3e4138b58a460
>>5840826
This pastebin has links to a bunch of 3dpd size vore stuff.
http://pastebin.com/Y7AavRhs
>>5840029
You are awesome!
>>5838028
Sorry, out of the loop here - volume 2/1 of what?
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Either is fine with me, but I guess I like growth more.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful about 95% of the time.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Always gentle.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Either is fine, but aware is slightly better for me.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
I'd prefer to be tiny to a giant male or female for all things, to be honest.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Farts, scat/piss, breast vore, and any hard. gory, fatal stuff. I don't mind the fatal stuff for giga settings, which I like, but not with so much gory detail, I guess.
>>5839653
I'm a girl that goes through this thread, even though I much prefer giant male things (since I'm straight). These pictures may not necessarily be sexually or romantically appealing for me in particular, but more aesthetically appealing, I guess.
>>5837963
>Growth
>Meaningful interaction
>Sadistic
>aware
>Yes
>farting, pissing, etc. I also don't understand unaware at all
>>5837963
>growth
>both
>both
>both
>hell no, ruins the fetish aspect for me
>loli, scat, giant guys, futa, giantess wearing shoes, LACK OF POV PICTURES FOR CHRIST'S SAKE STUFF LIKE PIC RELATED IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS FETISH
What is the best type of unaware scenario?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSD9fzYkXhw
>>5837963
Shrink
Meaningful interaction size
Gentle
Non-aware
Yes
Murder
>>5841289
In that image, anon, who's POV are we viewing from? Unknown third party's?
>>5841340
When is best girl and level getting new content?
>>5837922
Thats unfortunate and hot at the same time.
>>5841311
When a girl's loved ones get shrunked and she just goes about her day without knowing that she's crushing/eating all of them.
>>5837963
>Growth or Shrink?
Shrink.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful. Somewhere around the size of the girls little finger is good.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
Sadistic as fuck.
>Aware/ or non-aware?
Aware, only because it allows for greater sadism. Unaware crush is pretty hot though.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Nope. I'm a masochist, as are 90% of sizefags I'm sure.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Extreme scales like giga/microscopic.
>>5841311
When sadistic sexually frustrated milfs mistake their children for pests/insects and take pleasure in slowly tormenting/torturing, or brutally crushing them to death.
>>5841894
26/m/US. Total social hermit, legit neckbeard (honestly, I'm just lazy, but No-shave November gives me a good excuse).
>>5841894
I am a gorilla named flappers that is self taught in the using of the computer machine and am fond of size things.
>Inb4 bananas
>>5841894
im a 9 year old loli, also about 2000feet tall
why are people in this fetish so fucking retarded, including myself
>watching an mmd video on youtube
>finish fapping
>think 'golly gee, i'll have a look at the comments section and see if anything said anything worthwhile!'
>first comment includes '... but in my opinion, planetary sized GTSs don't usually count because there's no real possible interaction.'
>next several lines are people explaining that that isn't an opinion statement and him getting angry at them
i wanna call the fetish hotline i don't like mine
>>5841894
I am the one who knocks, the one who waits behind the wall
>>5841956
That's kind of tame compared to some of the shit I've seen. That just seems like general close-mindedness and ignorance. You can find that anywhere.
Still agree with your sentiment, though.
>>5837963
>Grow or Shrink?
To be honest both have their appeal, depends on context I suppose
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
HAS to be meaningful. If it's "microbe" comparison it ultimately becomes a case of "Why does this even matter any more." Plus, at those scales my suspension of disbelief gets shattered.
>Gentle or Sadistic?
If I can be honest, both? I just don't like how sadistic seems to innately lead to wholesale murder and manslaughter. Stuff like tormenting and teasing is great if handled well.
>Aware or Non-Aware?
Eh? If the girl is aware that lead to more interesting interactions. If she is not that makes her more an event to be experienced.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if it is a part of a different fantasy?
Sure why not?
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
Vore/Foot/Crush sub-fetishes. At the end of the day the size change itself and how people react to that is the most appealing, so it's painful for people to turn the quick buck with some easily pounded out POV foot or vore picture and not really doing anything unique for a giantess.
>>5841894
19-year-old male that has no intentions of ever growing a beard again after that disastrous one in high-school. Ugh. But when I did have it, it was basically full-on neckbeard slapped on a generic image of a hippie.
>>5838704
That pic is too perfect. I came and still have a boner.
>>5842022
all three pics from that set are top-tier
>>5841894
26/m/US, programmer by vocation. Somewhat neckbeard.
>>5842026
Can I burden you for the other 2?
Are there any people who enjoy giant males?
I know the motto of this board is
>tfw no giant gf
and as someone who enjoys a 'dominant' role it kinda kills me that I wasn't born female. I'd cream my knickers to think that there are people who would happily let me plant my feet on their face while I watch tv.
But yeah, in short it's more
>tfw no mini bf/gf
for me.
I dunno. Please say if you'd be happy to have a guy roleplay giant scenarios with you irl. It'd make my day to know you actually exist
>>5842080
no
>>5842080
go away
Does anyone know where I can find Just A Little Bit Part 2 and 3? I was able to view them for free in the past but now the writer went full Jew.
>>5841894
19 year old CS major.
I make an effort to shave because muh facial hair looks awful.
I'd say I do a good job not standing out as a sperg. I'm pretty unassuming.
>>5841894
25yo/M/TX. Openly Communist long haired Latino. General artsy fartsy type. Cartoonist, playwright, actor, director, sound designer, carpenter. Jack of all trades, master of none.
Work a shitty dayjob as a wageslave in a gas station where I sell the working class everything that's killing them (literally everything; big gulp sodas, cartons of cigarettes, malt liquor, lotto tickets, energy drinks, etc.), then live a bohemian life with actors, artists, writers, dancers, and the like by night drinking heavily and doing all the drugs to help numb the dichotomy of my existence. Shameless propagandist and passionate political activist.
My apartment is small, but there's always a party in it. I garden in my back yard to try and be as independent from the system I and my comrades are trying to topple as possible and I practice kung fu for health and sanity.
Neatly trimmed mustache and goatee. Sometimes sideburns when I don't feel like shaving them off.
Also poster of: >>5839228 I have two deviantart accounts which I keep seperate, the public one is more active, the private one hasn't been updated in a while but here it is: socialistfreakboy.deviantart.com/gallery
>>5842118
yes
>>5841894
No-shave November has turned me into a mexican Alan Moore, does that count as a neckbeard?
>>5841894
24/m/US CS Degree, shave regularly.
>>5841956
Dude that's me with like every Youtube video. I finish watching then start reading the comments and 99% of the time it's filled with ignorant retards arguing about something, half the time it's religion. I don't know why I read the comments section honestly. It's like an impulse.
>>5842088
hell yeah I swing both ways with this fetish
>>5841894
21/m/US femgay
One of the few who'd love to be the bigger party in some of these pics.
>>5841056
How so? Like, to me there ain't nothin appealing about a giant man (unless he's fucking an equally giant woman)
>>5842088
I love me some big guys. I actually like male more than female.
>>5841894
18/m/US
Not a neckbeard (stick thin and clean-shaven) but I am a virginal social hermit
>>5837963
>Growth
>first one
>sadistic
>aware
>no
>futa shit
>>5841894
Fine, 23/m/IT
Get compliments on beard often. Gotta maintain that shit.
>>5841894
19/m/US CS Major
>>5841894
19/m/CS Major. Fairly introverted but need some social contact(at the very least online) with friends in order to not get depressed, too much and I want to be alone for awhile.
>>5841894
20/m/Canada I've been blowing my money on various first year college courses trying to get an idea of what I might enjoy pursuing and an excuse to not work full time at my monotonous job.
Shave regularly, I guess I'm a sperg since I don't have any social contact outside of going to work/school.
>>5837963
Growth
Size that allows for meaningful interaction.
Gentle
Aware
Yes
Vore.
I want /soc/ to leave.
>>5842335
There's nothing /soc/ going on, here. Nobody's reaching out or anything, we're just sharing a bit about ourselves. Hardly the worst thing that's gone on in these threads.
>>5842348
>we're just sharing a bit about ourselves
>There's nothing /soc/ going on
I want reddit to leave. We are anonymous for a reason.
>>5842348
>reaction images
Fuck off newfag
why would I want to hear about faggots mundane life's in a size thread?
>>5842088
Yes.
>>5842413
Just fuck off already
>>5840082
>Imagine a world where males were finger sized and females were normal
>Mating worked like sort of the way an angler fish does. When you want to make a baby the female stuffs the male up her vagina where he's digested for his semen and DNA
>Unsolved murders are endemic due to the females ability to just swallow a male and reduce them to bones
>>5841894
18/m/UK
Currently taking a degree in nursing.
Despite my forced academics (my mum's a real Hitler when it came to school and college) I'd much rather sit and play games/smoke weed all day with my friends. Very musically orientated, played guitar since the age of 5. Very close to my small circle of friends (They know about my size fetishes through drunken inquisitiveness)
I am a complete nutcase around them and get called a fucking weirdo a lot (We've been friends for almost a decade now) but round my uni friends I act like a completely normal social robot.
>>5841894
27/M/US/ ABD in Computer Science, getting married next fall.
>>5842088
It's weird. In most things, men are an instant turnoff for me. I am not interested in other men even a little bit. Except when it comes to macro/microphilia stuff. Giant/tiny men are every bit as much of a turn-on as women are.
I guess it's more the idea itself than anything? Or maybe I'm just circumstantially bisexual.
Either way, I'd totally be your tiny bf. :3
>>5841894
27/m/west coast US
I'm a professional pilot.
>>5842515
I hate all these youngfags. Show some gumption, make your own fetish. Giantess was brand new when I was a whippersnapper...
How the fuck do microphiles keep getting made?
Is it your parents divorce?
Is it because your mom primarily raised you because your father left/worked all the time?
It can't be television anymore because that "Let's shrink down and get swallowed by this little girl" went out of style with the magic schoolbus.
>>5841894
23/m/"engineer" in "government" work. Single and live alone in apartment.
Also my genes have me literally incapable of growing a neckbeard.
>>5842514
Dude your mom is your subconcious giantess. You said it yourself.
>>5842585
What was your childhood like? Which parent raised you the most?
>>5842584
Hold it there Kemosabe. Are you saying that microphiles raised by their fathers or older brothers will dream of giant men?
>>5837922
Why the shit can /y/ have a giant man thread but Size general can't have a giantess thread in /h/
Discrimination.
>>>/y/2093154
>>5842584
>make your own fetish
How the hell does one even do that?
>>5842443
This is why giant females should never happen. I wouldn't trust a female with that much power. The only real size scenario i'd be okay with is shrinking a girl down.
>>5842616
What if you needed heart surgery and the only surgeon available is a woman? Same stakes.
>>5842621
I think at that point they'd just write you off as dead and ram you up some woman's cunt so your life wouldn't go to waste.
>>5842621
Depends, we are talking real life right? Then again i'm as good as dead anyways right? That's not really power as much as it is doing your damn job.
>>5842592
I lived with my mother, who acted like she was a queen and requested everything with an immediate response or there would be consequences. Who here thinks the fetish started with dominant mothers?
>>5842632
Yeah but your life is in her hands, she could open up an artery, put skittles in there, and sew you up then leave the country.
Or being convicted before a female judge is when a man is really at the mercy of a woman infinitely more powerful and willing to fuck him over in this life.
>>5842639
I do!
Dad wasn't around at all, and I had a slew of predictably female babysitters and female teachers growing up. If I acted out or did something awesome, the person to punish me was probably a woman.
I think this is evidence for this fetish being a response to trauma and finding a sexy way of overcoming it.
>>5841894
>>5842256
Are you me?
24/M/IT
Long lumberjack-tier beard but trimmed daily.
>>5842659
Is there a translation for this?
>>5842640
Well yeah that's abusing your power. This has nothing to do with women becoming giantess besides cementing my idea that they should never become giant.
>>5842639
I think it's horseshit. I think it's waaaay more complicated than just resorting to Freudian mom crap.
My mother was short, submissive, almost let others walk all over her (hue), and was very soft spoken.
I think our theory of giants in TV shows we watched as kids causing the fetish has more credence.
>>5842661
If there is, I don't have it. Sorry anon.
>>5842667
This right here alright. All this let us look deep into your childhood blah blah shit is dumb. In general the strangest part of this fetish to me is why people care as in at all as to why they have it in the first place. It changes nothing and informs you in no meaningful way.
It would be like asking my girlfriend why she likes to keep her hair short even though most girls like it long. She just feels its more comfy, but instead of taking that as an answer I went into how no its how she wants to be long her dad since men have short hair commonly.
It is needless and in my opinion rather annoying to see so much self pity and self diagnosis about what you like to jerk off to.
To be blunt there are worst things in the world then jerking the gerkin to really big girls.
I worry about my taxes or my heating bill during the winter. My dick can worry about my jerk off material.
Also, boobs are sorta great. So making them bigger via shrinking or growth is sorta great.
>>5841001
how do you install/run these games?
Mimosa runs, but instead of character sprites, it shows chopped up backgrounds, and I have no idea how to install middle of eternity.
>>5842705
Agreed, although I like to think about how I got the fetish just even if it's purely academic.
This post makes me feel like you'd be a kickass person to talk to irl though.
>tfw no short-haired giant gf
>>5842705
Yo, where did you get this translation?
>>5842650
Them babysitters man. I think a lot of posters here were raised by women.
