Should they get their own comic?
>>83718415
Fuck no. But the Ghostbuster comics like to include everything ever so they will.
They should get their own cell in Guantanamo
>>83718415
I don't see how you could even draw Leslie Jones without it looking like a racist caricature from the 40s.
>>83718415
Who fucking cares.
>comic is released
>cancelled due to poor sales
>men are chastized and accused of racist misogyny for not supporting this superior femme work of art
>women are given a free pass since only pathetic nerd boys read comics
God I fucking hope not.
>>83718415
Aww hell naw
>DA DEBIL IS DA LIIIIIAAAAHHHHH
Beautiful acting and screenplay right here. This is what happens when a few of us feminists come together to right a story, genius happens.
>It was in /every/ crack.
LOL 10/10!!!! This is some great shit right here! Can you believe those evil men thumbs downed the video?!?
>Is it the wig? I think it's the wig.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Soooooo true.
>>83718467
Fuck off. If I wanted to read a comic about a bunch of are-they-arent-they lesbians fighting mythical creatures I'd buy that god awful Hellcat series Marvel won't let die. Just because a premise is bad doesn't mean people are bad for not liking it.
>>83718415
I honestly feel bad for the black woman. This is her first major role and she's already being typecast into "That black lady" doesn't help that she's not very attractive.
>>83718950
Every black woman who works in comedy is typecast in to that role. Unfortunately this movie is about empowering woman, not blacks, so no one is allowed to bring up how the racist it is to have the only black woman on the team be a fucking trope from the 1980s
maybe they'll find a funny writer that way.
>>83718950
She is also the only one that is trying.
>>83718741
ohh i cant wait to see this in the headlines
>>83718415
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
I really want this movie to succeed and be funny, just to prove the sexists wrong once and for all. Unfortunately it smells like a complete turd, and I can't even mention that under my own name because it'd make me a misogynist goobergobber etc. etc.
You know what? I'd totally be willing to read a comic with them with some good and actually funny writing. The movie is bad because it's poorly made, poorly cast and poorly written, not because the concept is impossible to do well.
>>83719065
>sexists
The nay saying over this movie has nothing to do with sexism. It's was a bad idea to bring back a beloved franchise with none of the original cast as even a fucking cameo coupled with a god awful writer and three of the most unfunny woman in comedy. All it needed was Amy Schumer and it would be dead in the fucking water.
Ghostbusters characters
>Lackadaisical front-man with street smarts and a deadpan approach to the supernatural
>Enormously enthusiastic believer in the paranormal who quotes the bible despite being agnostic
>Laconic, serious and systematic researcher unused to social interaction
>Strong, capable former marine who will believe in anything for a paycheck
All-Female Ghostbusters characters
>The wacky one
>The wacky one
>The wacky one
>The blacky one
Realistically, how much do you think this movie will make?
>>83719108
>It's was a bad idea to bring back a beloved franchise with none of the original cast as even a fucking cameo
Supposedly the surviving original cast DOES cameo just not as their characters.
>>83718415
We already have a Ghostbuster comic with a mostly female team that is waaaay better so no.
>>83719243
>original cast DOES cameo
>just not as their characters.
>>83719238
Bout three-fiddy in pity bux from castrated nu-males who go because they think they're supporting feminism.
>>83719108
The loudest people when it was announced and before it was confirmed to be bad were the sexists so they get used as a shield against all criticism. Only the biggest nerds like you actually care about cameos and shit, that doesn't matter at all if it's good. But most people after seeing the trailers now do agree that it's just another shitty remake not worth watching though so it will fail.
>>83719270
The loudest people in anything are the group no one should listen to.
>>83718950
Don't feel bad for her, that's her actual personality
>>83718415
is the 'Janine' character a dude at least?
>>83718741
Nice victim complex bro
>>83719304
are you living under a rock? He's Thor
>>83719108
>The nay saying over this movie has nothing to do with sexism.
Is this motherfucker serious? It started the moment the movie was announced, before even the cast and story was known, just "all-female Ghostbusters remake." It had EVERYTHING to do with sexism.
And then when details started coming out, people who would ordinarily naysay kept quiet, while the roar of the sexists mounted and is now deafening. And the internet echoed and amplified everything, so now if you're a Decent Human Being you'll agree that anyone who doesn't praise this movie as superior to the original wants to turn society into the Handmaid's Tale. All of this before anyone outside of Sony has even SEEN the fucking movie.
Yes, I mad.
>>83719270
>The loudest people when it was announced and before it was confirmed to be bad were the sexists
Honestly I'm starting to wonder if that was even real pushback or if it was manufactured because of how concentrated and organized the defense of the movie is.
>>83719270
Nah senpai. The loudest were the Ghostbuster fans who hated the idea of a reboot. If this was a sequel or spinoff nobody would care.
>>83719065
>>83719270
>Ayy' remember this franchise you loved? We replaced the everything, you're a stupid fucking sexist man-pig if you don't like it though :^)
>>83719304
Yes. Played by Chris Hemsworth who is their air-headed blonde secretary who takes his shirt off several times for no reason.
You know, exactly like Janine Melnitz used to do, because she was an idiot made to ridicule women.
>>83719315
I've never actually watched the trailer, and I will not watch the movie, I'm not even going to torrent it when it comes out on dvd
>>83719342
Sony was caught red-handed deleting negative comments from the trailer but leaving all the ones that were 'sexist'
>>83718415
should get their own gas chamber
>>83719342
I wouldn't be surprised. Still, it won't make any money so it was wasted effort in the end.
>>83719323
Okay then let me rephrase it for all the shitlords.
Since the trailer was released, legitimate complaints about this movie have more ground to stand on while sexist complaints seem less prevalent.
>>83719376
>sexist complaints
No such thing, buttercup.
>>83719323
>>83719065
>>83719270
hi Tumblr
>>83719323
>just "all-female Ghostbusters remake."
When that's how the studio itself is marketing the thing from the second of announcement it smacks of them engineering this exact response.
And if they're willing to do that why not just false flag it themselves? The fact that Cracked, Buzzfeed, and Gawker continue to exist prove that you can monetize outrage culture. Why not make the outrage yourself?
>>83719295
And yet people do. We have assholes who go around digging up niche and sometimes outright false comments on tumblr and twitter to post to 4chan and get mad about.
>>83719343
>Ghostbusters
>fans
let's not go crazy here
>>83719304
Yes. A very smexy dude.
>>83718741
>pathetic nerd boys read comics
But this is true. And i am one of them
>>83719384
see
>>83719323
>>83719270
was just rewording my stance to be more accurate, didn't mean to trigger you.
>>83719395
>Gawker
>continue to exist
They're filing Chapter 11 and selling the company to pay for Hogan's lawsuit settlement.
They had their own comic from idw for years now.
But wait, the All-Female Ghostbusters film deliberately made sure no men would get leading roles, and the only man in the cast is a hypersexualized idiot.
So this movie is actually much more sexist than the original film.
That's pretty fucking disgusting in the current year.
It should be banned, sexism like that is on the wrong side of history.
>>83719402
Man, I really wish James hadn't put his face out there, this was all these people were needing, a very public face to take aim at, and he gave himself to them in a silver plate.
>>83719462
This is wrong. The best way to overcome oversexualising woman is to sexualise men just as much. Although putting an insanely sexy man in a movie with four complete dumpster fires is a step backwards.
>>83719462
Can't be sexist agaist males senpai
>>83718882
/tv/ actually had a heated debate over whether she said "Da debil is alive" or "Da debil is a liar"
>>83719402
>Tantrum
>Rage
>Hissy-fit
AVGN was calm and collected through the entire video, he didn't even change his tone of voice, you're supposed to be journalists, you have to know the meaning of words to do that.
>>83719473
I'm glad he did because he set an example of how to really address these issues: vote with your wallet and don't stoop to acknowledging the enraged outcry.
>>83719429
They're not dead until I can't even get cached pages.
>>83719402
>All this because the Angry Video Game Nerd doesn't want to see the film
jesus fucking christ
>>83718415
What I read was
>Should they get their shitty own comic?
>>83719503
And yet they managed.
>>83719515
Rule one of "journalism" is 'Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story."
>>83719564
he gained at least 8K subs too
>>83719564
Anon that one person is like 5% of their audience. They can't afford to have anyone drop out like that.
>>83719564
What I don't get is if they wanted a Ghostbusters with a new and diverse cast why not do Extreme Ghostbusters?
The characters were great and it's actually more diverse then this.
>>83719564
It's an obvious smear campaign, James has 2 million subscribers and a good chunk of them are Ghostbusters fans, they can't have him saying 'don't pay for this garbage' and let him get away with it. Literally within hours if even of him posting that video ALL those clickbait sites went berserk. Sony isn't even bothering to hide their schemes.
>>83719402
>WHINY DIAPER-WEARING SISSY BABY MAN-CHILD POOPOO BOTTOM GOOGAGAS
Jesus christ, female "journalism" is something to behold alright.
>>83719323
Pssssst, hey, look. The movie sucks. We've known it sucks for months. It's not funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB8XGhQXMC8
YOOO GET A CAAAARRR!
>>83719610
Nah, man. People might have actually liked that. How can we get that sweet outrage exposure out of that?
>>83719394
How is it tumblr to suggest that people are using sexism as a shield against criticism when the movie is legitimately bad?
>>83719700
He didn't read anyone he quoted.
>>83718415
nah, we already have enough toilet paper.
>>83719652
Am I sad over a manufactured controversy, or am I sad that someone took time to compile and screencap dozens of articles and tweets about it?
>>83719515
He's still "the Angry Video Game Nerd" which to a certain subset of the population connotes all they need to know, without even watching the video. Probably one of those fuckers who tried to murder Zoe Quinn, never mind that none of that happened the way they remember it either.
It's bad enough when 4chan does it, now everyone does it, and truth is dead.
>>83719734
You can tuck it in as much as you want dude, I'm not calling you a girl.
You know, a comic wouldn't have to deal with a shitty script. They'd probably work fine there, the people working on the comics now do good stuff.
>>83719652
You can pinpoint the part where Bill Murray wishes he was dead so he couldn't see that shit.
>>83718465
Get the artist from Unbeatable Squirrel Girl, she's good at drawing particularly unattractive and mannish black women
>>83719210
>All-Female Ghostbusters characters
>>The wacky one
>>The wacky one
>>The wacky one
>>The blacky one
Now hang on, maybe we're just not looking at it the right way.
We need to find a woman, possibly either a teenage girl or a soccer mom, to provide insight on these characters.
Perhaps, in the eyes of women, they truly are unique individuals.
>>83719097
Well there was already a Ghostbusters comic with a 3/4 female roster, so you could just read that instead.
>>83718882
>debil
>>83719108
Why do people hate Amy Schumer? I found her stand up to be really funny. Is it just because she got popular? Or did she actually become less funny after becoming popular?
>>83719758
>muh childhood
That's also a shitty reason to act shitty.
The only reason to hate this film should be because it looks like shit. That's reason enough to hate it.
Your childhood is always going to have happened. Crying that it's getting raped is super faggy.
>>83719758
People gotta stop saying bad reboots ruin your childhood. If anything shitty reboots that crash and burn only make the original thing shine all the brighter because now in addition to being great on it's own merits it's even better compared to the shitty new thing. Look at how many people watched the original Robocop when that shitty reboot came out.
>>83719402
>>83719933
I've never seen her show, but every week it's on there are like 15 articles on NYMag about how she DESTROYED the patriarchy with a comedy sketch last week. Which leads me to wonder how the patriarchy still exists after being destroyed so often.
>>83719323
I made a list.
Annie (2014), based on Annie (1982), 27% on Rotten Tomatoes, 134 million box office on a 65 mill budget
Arthur (2011), based on Arthur (1981), 26% on RT, almost 46 mill BO on a 40 mill budget
Carrie (2013), based on Carrie (1976), 48% on RT, 85 mill BO on a 30 mill budget
Clash of the Titans (2010), based on Clash of the Titans (1981), 28% on RT, 493 mill BO on a 125 mill budget
Evil Dead (2013), based on Evil Dead (1981), 62% on RT, 97 mill BO on a 17 mill budget
The Mechanic (2011), based on The Mechanic (1972), 53% on RT, between 62 mill and 76 mill BO depending on who you ask on a 40 mill budget
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010), based on A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), 15% on RT, 115 mill BO on a 35 mill budget
Point Break (2015), based on Point Break (1991), a whole whopping 9% on RT, 134 mill BO on a 105 mill budget
Red Dawn (2012), based on Red Dawn (1984), 12% on RT, 48 mill BO on a 65 mill budget (making it a certified flop)
Robocop (2014), based on Robocop (1987), 49% on RT, 243 mill BO on a 100 mill budget
The Thing (2011), based on and a "prequel" to The Thing (1981), 36% on RT, 27 mill BO on a 38 mill budget, certified flop no. 2
Total Recall (2012), based on Total Recall (1990), 30% on RT, 198 mill BO on a 125 mill budget
The Wolfman (2010), based on The Wolfman (1941), 34% on RT, 140 mill BO on a 150 mill budget, another certified flop
Now, I ain't saying every remake is bad, but we've got a dozen shitty, cash-grabby remakes since the turn of the decade, averaging to about one every half a year.
One of the problems that plague today's Hollywood is the lack of fresh ideas - not for lack of trying, though. It's just cheaper to re-use the ideas they already paid for - be it in the form of remakes, or movie adaptations of books/comic books/games. And, if one really wishes to save some money, they could even go for myths or public domain books.
>>83720062
Another problem is marketing - the costs of that one have been skyrocketing recently.
But if you take a beloved franchise from the days of yore, your audience will do your marketing for you - be it positive or negative, because there is no bad publicity. And if there is no bad publivity, you might as well save some more money on production. People will still go to see the movie, right?
Except the audience has started to prove the studios wrong. Especially since social media became a thing, word of mouth began to gain more and more importance, and if the movie is shit, people will know and they will NOT go see it. Making shitty cash-grab remakes is getting less and less profitable.
That won't do. So what's a studio to do? Work harder and make sure they make quality entertainemnt? Pffft, yeah, right.
Thankfully, social media that fucked them over gave them a way to fuck the audience over right back, and that's with third-wave feminism and other slacktivists, the masters in busting down open doors. The studios can now go full-on tokenism and use the SJWs to attack anyone who criticizes their product on the grounds of sexism, racism or any other -ism applicable, regardless of the nature of the criticism. Negative word of mouth will therefore be done away with, and the slactivists will provide the positive word of mouth, because they're to stupid to know when they're being used.
>>83720062
>Red Dawn (2012), based on Red Dawn (1984)
This fucking happened? Jesus christ they pump so many of these shitty movies out I can't even keep up
Why are feminists so quick to use "manchild" and similar slurs that insinuates infantile behavior when they themselves revel in acting like kids, being "quirky" and use kindergarten name-calling as their chief attack against those who don't agree with them?
people who hate the new Ghostbusters are literally Drumpf
>>83720062
>Evil Dead is the best of the list
Groovy, though still below the original.
>>83720085
You say that but it mostly hasn't worked. We'll see with ghostbusters but Fant4stic failed. If ghost busters doesn't fail, I'll honestly be surprised. SJW's for all their bullshit don't actually pay for shit.
>>83720062
yeah and none of those got the huge pre-release hate that Ghostbusters is getting
well i guess red dawn if you count chinese reaction
SUMMERTIME /TV/ INVASION OF /CO/?
YOU'RE CRAZY!
>>83720085
But calling people sexist WILL MAKE PEOPLE SEE THE MOVIE?
I kind of don't think so. Have this being attempted before on this scale?
>>83720179
>Raise 20K for a children's hospital charity
>"TRUMP! SEXIST!"
>>83720150
Lack of self-awareness.
Maybe projecting.
>>83719048
Why? It's happened so many times now there's no novelty any more.
>>83720043
I don't watch her show either but I can't imagine her being very feminist or political at all. So I assume they just mean that she parodied some social norm about women and men, or talked about being a gross chronically masturbating shut-in or something, and feminist bloggers hailed it as groundbreaking.
It kinda sucks because when she was small-time I was planning on trying to meet her and see if we could become gross moderately ugly yet observant social rejects together.
>>83719850
That would say a lot about women and none it good
>>83719402
Did any of them actually watch his video?
He was just a guy being sick of the eternal soulless reboots.
post yfw Bill Murray is being forced to promote this under threat of litigation and prison
>>83720368
>feminist bloggers hailed it as groundbreaking
well the skits were also really fucking funny
>>83720142
It did, and get this: In the remake, the invading forces are Chinese instead of Soviet, but when the studio realized China was a huge market for movies and maybe it wasn't a good idea to get on their bad side, the movie was altered in post production to be about North Korea invading America. North Korea. Invading. America.
>>83719484
I don't get the message it's trying to send by having this man meat secretary. The original didn't have a bimbo secretary but instead a goofy looking sarcastic woman with a thick and nasally Brooklyn accent. She has a character while this guys gives off the "I'm here solely just to be looked at." The original wasn't like this at all in how it portrayed women.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/741729134502498304
She's making fun of all you comic book readers too.
>>83719552
what would be the best way to achieve this?
I'm from Buenos Aires and I say kill all Gawker pages!
>>83719473
I highly doubt James realized there would be a public shitstorm regarding his video.
>>83718415
They shouldn't get their own movie but its far too late for that
>>83720372
good
bad
if it's truth, we gotta know it
>>83720433
Fatso also started spitting venom saying people who hate the movie are 45 years old and live with their moms in the basement
>>83720179
>happily married man with kids
>will never have consensual sex again
>>83718415
magilla gorilla on the right
ehh
>>83720062
I actually liked total recall and clash of the titans despite growing up with the first movies.
I hear the evil dead remake is quite decent too.
The rest are shit though.
>>83720433
Is this what the death throes of an aborted career looks like?
>>83720273
>summertime
They've had a full occupation of this board for at least two years now.
>>83720467
James' wife a cute. And holy shit, that's a large fucking newborn.
>>83720484
Hey it worked for Josh Trank, right?
>>83720467
somebody maaaaaaaaarried dat manbabby!!
>>83719402
>>83720179
glorious
>>83720439
If you'd seen a single mention of this on social media, you knew that anything remotely related to GB'16 was going to be a Category 5 shitcyclone. "I don't want to talk about it" is all he needed to say.
>>83720546
Are these comments ACTUALLY on that tweet about the auction? Are this people REALLY that tone deaf? Well, I shouldn't be that surprised, than man in a yellow top hat and mustache is calling others man-babies and being salty about their marriage.
>>83718980
People tried the black lady said who gives a shit.
so did he review Bridesmaids, The Heat, or Spy?
>>83720600
i don't think they are. i follow some of those people and don't remember them linking to avgn with the snark
>>83720546
Dude, this is just so despicable.
>>83719402
Since when was he an Influential Film Critic?
I guess you could say he helped pioneer and popularize the "angry Reviewer" video.
But since when was James Rolfe compared to guys like Roger Ebert or Robert Christgau?
Also that line about Masturbating if we can see both his hands or whatever makes no sense.
>>83720546
Damn you Devin! First you turn Steeve into a lesbian, then you diss a charity event?
are the IDW ghostbusters comics any good? I'm wondering if I should buy the humble bundle
>>83720703
YES
I don't understand why people hate this movie so much. It looks like the perfect remake of the Ghostbusters we grew up with.
>>83720624
It's a shoop, you idiot. The original image was a link to his video or a stupid article about it tweeted by someone else.
>>83719758
What the fuck is wrong with his hand?
>>83719065
Oh, don't worry. Critics nowadays love to give high ratings to awful/mediocre pieces of shit simply because they have female leads, so that will happen.
Just look at shit like The Descent or Jessica Jones.
>>83720746
Man, I remember loving the toys from that cartoon. I had the car, too. I think I had them crossover with my Real Ghostbusters.
>>83720142
Yeah. Thor was Patrick Swayze.
I'm going to buy a ticket for this so that it may make enough money to make right wingers angry enough to do some crazy violent shit. Good idea?
>>83720743
can i read them if i've only seen the movies and not the animated series?
>>83720800
He's being Calvinized.
>>83719323
>It had EVERYTHING to do with sexism.
You're fucking retarded. Most people didn't care that they were women. They didn't want a fucking reboot. They wanted Ghostbusters 3.
And Sony is the one pushing the female angle hard as fuck making this movie into a political agenda.
I bet you think all the women shit-talking the movie are sexist too
>>83720895
I wanna buy one so I can boo at the screen throughout the film to see if I piss off any feminists or SJWs.
>>83720913
you wanna talk disrespectful
>>83720592
James doesn't deal with social media. Besides he was solely addressing his fans. The fact that it even blew up was because SJW's tried to make an example out of him. Luckily it blew up in their faces because most of the people who watched the video realized those schmucks were talking out their ass and James is even more popular now.
>>83720937
>And Sony is the one pushing the female angle hard as fuck making this movie into a political agenda.
It's because they need money, really fucking badly. Sony is making flop after flop, and controversy creates more money than making a genuinely good product in today's society, unless you're a monolith like Disney.
Don't hate the player, hate the game. Hate the shitty fucking society full of stupid assholes that enable this garbage behaviour.
>>83720937
>I bet you think all the women shit-talking the movie are sexist too
I think it's REALLY telling that the female youtube celebs trashing this movie are being swept under the rug.
>>83719210
All-Female Ghostbusters Characters
> the film hasn't been released yet so we don't yet know if there is actual nuance to the characters
> the film hasn't been released yet so we don't yet know if there is actual nuance to the characters
> the film hasn't been released yet so we don't yet know if there is actual nuance to the characters
> the film hasn't been released yet so we don't yet know if there is actual nuance to the characters
>>83720895
Throwing away money to make someone mad is usually pretty dumb
>>83721104
Oh Sony...
>>83721104
I like how you're completely ignoring the trailers and them showing exactly what these idiots are doing.
>>83718467
You blithering fucking retard
>>83721104
The script has been leaked for months Sonygger.
>>83720895
I'm afraid you have the political sides confused
>>83721169
>>83721172
Pretty dumb to assume anything about McCarthys character when she has maybe one line in the trailers combined.
Wiig is very much the straight man.
>>83719065
>I really want this movie to succeed and be funny, just to prove the sexists wrong once and for all.
>>83718882
>It was in /every/ crack.
>>83721206
Okay, now I know you're just trolling.
>>83719323
The only sexists I saw were feminists shrieking MEN EVIL MEN FUCKING MEN HATING THIS MOVIE. But feminists being sexists is nothing new or interesting.
>>83721206
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB8XGhQXMC8
>>83720625
>Since when was he an Influential Film Critic?
Build your enemies up in the eyes of onlookers so you can be a more convincing victim. Feminists are professional victims.
>>83719342
Given the shitstorm from minor celebs and movie reviewers when the AVGN said he wasn't gonna watch it, I'd say it was manufactured.
y'know what's even worse about how James was getting treated is that he made a video back in 2000 fucking 7 about the possibility of GB3 and brought up how Ben Stiller was in talks to appear and he wasn't happy about that either because he wants the actual Ghostbusters. These SJW cucks though can only focus on him hating women.
>>83721664
Let's not kid ourselves, the possibility of a real GB3 died with Harold Ramis.
>>83721876
>video back in 2000 fucking 7
>>83718415
if the movie doesnt suck.It will suck.
You "durr sexists" idiots are fucking retarded.
The fact that it's a "remake but with an all-female cast" is the fucking problem. Why? Because it's not for any practical fucking purpose. It's not because it is an interesting concept. It's not because of any story-related reasoning. It's because WOMYN POWAR.
Taking a classic movie and shitting all over it because some retard wanted to forcibly inject their stupid feminist bullshit is disgusting.
These fucking "oh no misogyny/racism" baitshit movies are social garbage from the lowest tier of filth-peddling scum. Was the new Fantastic 4 secretly a good movie but all that RACISM ruined it? No, you fucking idiot, the movie was shit, but they wanted some controversy.
Deadshot's not black but is anyone pissing and moaning about the casting? No? Where are all the racists? Where's the movie crying victim?
Shitty retards who think they're "progressive" are just ignorant SJWs who would rather have an agenda than see a good movie. I won't see the movie because it looks like a steaming pile of disgusting shit.
I can't tell if it's closer to being Tyler Perry's Ghostbusters or Ghostbusters written and directed by Adam Sandler, with the toilet humor and wit and writing about as subtle as a thermonuclear detonation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLzz_hxzxo
>>83719402
its funny considering that tumblr and femnazi are just reverse 4chan.
>>83722269
>>83720043
The patriarchy DOESN'T exist. They're fighting windmills.
>>83722246
>Deadshot's not black but is anyone pissing and moaning about the casting? No? Where are all the racists?
Because the average person doesn't know how Deadshot is you retard.
>>83720518
Woah, Mrs.Nerd is looking alright.
>>83722535
I'd say they're worse. 4chan at least admits to being filled with assholes. Those fucks will ruin lives then pat themselves on the back for enacting "justice"
>>83720546
Funniest bit about this is, that the comment chain had someone, I think it was faraci, call AVGN a mysogynist. Then another guy comes in and calls Mrs. AVGN a gold digger. Remind me who had the soggy knees?
>>83722659
thats what i meant by reverse:fake justice and media kissing their asses.
>>83722535
Can we invadefuckTumblr again?
It's been a while.We haven't even called.
You know what should get a comic?The Real Ghostbusters.It's pretty fucking good for being a movie tie-in cartoon.
>>83723003
That's IDW GBs. They are treated as a different continuity going forth from the movies and had an explicit run-in with the Real GB.
>>83722845
it did and even got a crossover with the teenage mutant ninja turtles
>>83721233
>finally start watching star trek
>get the gif.
>>83722845
they had an old one that was pretty fun
