Name an instance where beating up a highly dangerous criminally that's very likely to re-offend and sending them to an institution that has paper thin security and frequent breakouts is a good idea.
>>83236331
When you're desperately afraid of crossing the line and finally raping him like the Commissioner keeps telling you to do.
You are a company who wants to use the character of the dangerous criminal again in the near future.
Good to see you're finally coming around, Batman. We can proceed with my plan immediately.
>>83236331
Why doesn't Batman just rape the Joker?
>>83236331
Arkham doesn't actually have breakouts that much anymore.
>>83236373
Why not just make more dangerous criminals instead of reusing the same ones over and over which ends up making the supposed 'hero' look incompetent for not putting him away for good?
>>83236432
Because if you make the criminals more and more dangerous eventually everyone is going to be a universe-destroying street thug.
>>83236432
It turns out the people who buy your product REALLY like criminal A, B and C more than D, E and F and whenever you make a new one everyone forgets about them really fast.
When it keeps your job going?
>>83236502
Wayne Enterprises funds Arkhamfollow the money
