![1463781038038[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/mK5YEzP.png "1463781038038[1].png")
Where were you when Family Guy OWNED the shit out of Youtube?
>>82968722
wait Fox took the clip from YouTube then claimed infringement on the same clip? the fuck?
>>82968722
For what purpose fox
Maybe the person who made the claim didnt know the footage was stolen in the first place?
YouTube is so broken what the hell
>>82968857
Can you imagine if there was actually a downside with making false claims? Like if you actually had to pay for it?
>>82968722
I hope the person that made the clips sues Fox since they used it in his show without his permission
Because now he has PROOF that it was his clip they stole
>>82968857
That's the thing, a person never made the claim, a machine did. The system is fucked up.
>>82968920
Fucking this. Worst part is if you make a false claim and monetize it, even if you're proven wrong you still get to keep the money.
>>82968722
the youtube robot did it, there were no people or actual decesion making behind this. the robot just scans videos for stuff, found the clip matched family guys and banned it. thats all, youtubes robot is stupid and should be replaced with a better system is all.
Here's a clip from the show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm84_r5s7qA
>>82968857
Basically after the episode was aired, it got uploaded into the copyrighted video database thing that gets used to automatically scan Youtube for content violations, and so the original video they lifted the footage from got hit by a bot.
Fox didn't take down the original video on purpose, but I'm fucking baffled that Family Guy had a segment that was just the VAs talking over someone's youtube video.
>OWNED
>>>/facebook/
>>82969027
>It's literally fucking Game Grumps
There's nothing I don't hate about this
>>82969225
>literally fucking Game Grumps
Heheh
Peter
I want my egg
Peter
I want my eggPeter
>>82969027
>zero curry jokes
Why do they even try?
>>82969225
Game Grumps? Not really. Peter wasn't constantly burping and farting while his friends complain about the horrible smell.
>>82969027
>"hey peter no cheating"
>proceeds to cheat for the whole gag
>HAHA ITS FUNNY BECAUSE HES STILL CHEATING EVEN THOUGH CLEVELAND TOLD HIM NOT TO AT THE BEGINNING OF THE GAG
>>82968982
Replace it with fucking PEOPLE.
>>82969806
I second this anons proposed solution
>>82970456
Auctualy scratch that I just came up with a better solution
DONT INCLUDE VIDEOS FROM BEFORE THE AIRING IN THE CHECKS.
>Stealing a video from YouTube and having characters commentate over it for a solid minute
Family Guy has reached a new level of lazy.
>>82969027
>Basically after the episode was aired, it got uploaded into the copyrighted video database thing that gets used to automatically scan Youtube for content violations, and so the original video they lifted the footage from got hit by a bot.
What I don't get is why hits from a bot lead to an automatic takedown.
Surely it should merely flag up the 'offending' video, and have a human decide whether it actually does violate copyright BEFORE any action is taken?
>>82970700
Hey, they literally included all of the video for the Jagger/Bowie Dancing in the Street in one episode just to shit on it at the end.for no reason, too, that video is entertaining as fuck
>>82970720
Maybe if there were consequences to bogus take-down notices
But all that shit's passed on to the company taking the complaint, so just keep sending false-positives. It's not our problem
>>82970700
it's slightly more effort than when they'd throw in conway twitty for half the episode, jesus christ
Youtube really gives me cancer.
the Youtube copyright is fucked up, even the Youtube comments gives me cancer.
Youtube was so awesome when Google had not bought it.
>>82971272
I usualy defend Google but I have to agree the place started to decline after Google brought it
Well if I recall correctly the comment sections were always shitty (better then the ones on pornhub though)
>>82971799
In my country it's literally became a new type of reality TV, the popular podcasters are the new idols and models of the underage youth with their shitty videos.
it's just normie tier humor X999999
Well?
What are you going to do to stop them?
>>82968722
>OWNED
>>>/2006/
>>82969027
They don't even bother to actually write jokes or stories anymore. Are you really that surprised?
>>82972433OMG PWNED XDDDD
>>82971139
Holy shit this, it was pure anger inducing.
>>82969225
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hloHkOpNRs
>>82974874
Holy Shit. No Joke.
>>82969027
So then logically, shouldn't Fox's bots also be taking down videos of Mr. Conway Twitty?
>>82969285
hey peter
>>82968976
Proving bad faith in takedown claim is next to impossible too. All the guy has to do is say "Well I thought it was a legit claim" or "the robot did it" and it's done. No wonder everyone thinks copyright laws are a joke.
>>82975191
A lot of Conway videos are probably uploaded by corporate accounts, though.
I've never known a major corporate account get a copyright strike
>>82970720
You can't seriously imagine big competitive companies actually hire people? That's some fucking public sector big doublemint communism talk, you goddamned hippy. The private sector is lean, the private sector is right. If there's a problem with the system then the market will correct itself.
>>82968722
>automatic YouTube bot takes down vid
>"fox demanded vid taken down"
Is this fuckwit a video games journalist or something?
>>82968779
it's automated. this is why automation is illegal. this exact reason. but as long as lawyers have the legal system by the balls, nothing will change
Would you watch Family Guy Lets Plays?
>>82976344
I don't even watch real people let's plays.
>>82968982
>>82969806
Just remove it. Make companies actually work to protect their own copyrights by hand, instead of sucking their dicks.
>>82976344
No but I would bang the fuck out of Meg
>>82968722
"OWNED" implies that YouTube was in some way ripped off or embarrassed. This is just confusing.
>>82968920
I thought making false copyright claims was illegal.
>"If you send a DMCA takedown notice that is both false and meant in bad faith (such as to harass, or doesn’t state a real claim), you have committed perjury. Though unlikely, if the party you sent the takedown notice to decided to pursue this in court, you could face all of the consequences that your state imposes on people who lie in court."
http://www.newmediarights.org/business_models/artist/what_are_penalties_false_copyright_infringement_claims
>>82976777
Nobody who's getting a strike against them can afford to go to court to prove it.
That's why giant megacorps who have slush funds expressly for this thing can get away with it every time.
>>82975308
>the robot did it
Using an automated system should be flat out illegal.
These automated DMCA machines commit libel every single day against thousand of people, but someone no-one in power seems to give a shit.
Imagine if I programmed a computer to do nothing but commit libel, to procedurally generate articles that accused politicians of being rapists and paedophiles then e-mail them to the police.
>Oh, I'm sorry officer. I didn't defame anyone! It was all the machine's fault!
How long until a politician gets a fraudulent DMCA strike and the government starts to pay attention to the issue?
>>82976925
Damn, there should be some kind of law where the government provides you with a lawyer and they pay for it when you're going against a big company so they can't get away with shady shit like this. Only criminals get this luxury I think.
>>82976777
>making false copyright claims was illegal
It is.
>>82976925
YouTube takedowns are not DMCA takedowns but their own system agreed with the major IP holders.
>>82976326
>why automation is illegal
Butlerian jihad anyone?
>>82976344
M-Meow
>>82977174
My word... that's nice
>>82977048
>Imagine if I programmed a computer to do nothing but commit libel, to procedurally generate articles that accused politicians of being rapists and paedophiles then e-mail them to the police.
You could sell that idea to Drudge Report or Buzzfeed for a ton of money, anon.
>>82976746
Both parties have been caught with their pants down, YouTube's incompetency has shone more though.
>>82977113
To be honest, I've never gotten why people get to pay for better lawyers. I'm pretty libertarian for the most part, but in the court of law people should get equal prosecution/defence.
Otherwise the whole 'impartial' system just works in favour of those with the money.
>>82968722
So now is Nintendo going to try to sue Fox? Does the clip belong to Nintendo?
>>82968722
>>>/news/
Give this to them too.
>>82977326
Well I guess the better lawyers are just people who win more in cases. The more cases you've won, the more money you can charge. They don't have to charge more but they know people will want to work with them more so that's why they charge more. Cheap lawyers can be just as good but if they don't have a good winning streak then they probably suck at their job. Can't really outlaw more talented lawyers competing against less talented lawyers.
>>82969731
>"Hey peter don't choose this OP broken character"
>Proceeds to choose OP broken character
>Two fucking minutes of this shit
It happened twice anon. They did this exact same gag twice in the episode. It's five minutes or so in total, of a twenty minute show.
>>82977561
Well yeah, that's why I'm saying that lawyers should probably be public servants rather than independent business.
That, healthcare, and maybe schools. Maybe.
The rest should be private, probably.
>>82977326
It's not just good lawyers dude. It's paying for the fucking army of researchers, people to file briefs and hold up the proceedings. No matter how good a single lawyer is, odds are you can't pay enough to be their only client and they only have so many hours in the day.
It's not just about oratory, but about fucking people over on technicalities and the more people who specialize in that the better.
>>82977326
>Otherwise the whole 'impartial' system just works in favour of those with the money.
Welcome to capitalism.
>>82977705
>maybe schools
Education should be a service.
>>82969027
What the fuck is this shit? I haven't watched Family Guy in years. Is this what it's like now?
>>82977756
>Welcome to capitalism.
Hey, don't get me wrong, I'm fine with pretty much everything else being dependent on money.
Just, maybe in cases of the law and life or death, don't let it depend on market forces and how much money someone has?
>>82977843
you aren't a libertarian then
>>82972433
Wouldcuckedbe the proper term?
>>82977174
R-Ronnie?
>>82977873
Maybe not, I don't know, labels are a shit place to start a discussion from anyway.
WHAT?!
>>82969027
There was another Family Guy skit where they were playing an old football game and Peter won because the player he was could outrun everyone else.
Pointing out the shitty design of old games seems to be the new hot thing for them to do.
>>82969027
that was pretty funny
>>82977873
Not him, but I myself am a moderate right of center progressive libertarian. I am fairly extreme with personal liberties, but believe in sensible regulation of big business to keep the market fair.
>>82978340
I am him, and if I had to label myself I'd call my personal philosophy more pro-individual/anti-authoritarian than anything else.
I believe that both the state and business interest can be incredibly harmful to individual liberties.
>>82977247
That's Ronnie from "Whomp".
>>82974874
I was thinking that exact same thing.
It's not like it's some unique joke, but still. Did they steal the joke too?
>>82978615
Thats fine. We all know Ronnie makes a better girl.
