>>82005568
Oh yeah, there's also Amazing Spider-Man 4.

>>82005568
>So was killing the superhero movie market via oversaturation and bankrupting themselves part of Sony's plan?
I hope so.

What the fuck is all this? I remember ASM 3 and 4, the Sinister Six and sequel, the Untitled Spidey girl movie, the Venom/Carnage movie and the Aunt May spinoff (you forgot to list that).

What the hell is all that?

Didn't they bin all this after the MCU Spoderman deal?

>>82005700
>>82005714
It's not real.

>>82005700
He's being facetious.

Also, people forget that most of the more ludiocrous ideas proposed, such as the Aunt May spin-off, only came about after the Amazing Spider-Man series collapse.

Sony's plan for it always was

>The Amazing Spider-Man
>The Amazing Spider-Man 2
>The Amazing Spider-Man 3
>Sinister Six
>The Amazing Spider-Man 4
>Venom
>Female-led movie (Spider-Woman, Black Cat or Silver Sable).

>>82005700
This is from Sony's leaked emails.

The Aunt May thing wasn't true, though.

>>82005822
I'm not being facetious at all, these are from their emails.

Aunt May spinoff wasn't ever in development, though, it was just a rumor.

>>82005714
Yes, hence the past-tense in the OP.

>>82005700
It's just ideas tossed around in the leaked emails.

Nothing aside from Sinister Six and Venom were concrete.

/co/, and I guess most of 4chan is, is just unable to think critically and the OP assumed they were actually going to make all of these. Probably go this info from a clickbait article.

As for the OP's question, yes. Even though Marvel has creative control of Spidey, Sony still intends to go ahead with an alternative universe Venom spin-off. If that ever gets made and is successful, then expect an onslaught of shitty superhero films. Not just Age of Ultron or Thor 2 shitty, I'm talking Fant4stic and Green Lantern shitty.