I still find it ironic that one of CN most timeless shows has got a reboot that will age horribly
Why do Cartoon Network shows nowadays rely so heavily on modern technology as a plot device? I think Steven universe is the only one that though it does reference current trends it doesn't rely on it as a focal plot point. Will cartoons every go back to just telling a story?
Also what cartoon do you think will age like milk? My money is on we bare bears
>>81887199
Clarence is actually pretty timeless. I can't think of any time explicitly referenced current media.
The only reason it's "timeless" is because it's using the same awful art style Hanna Barbera used in the 60s.
Gumball has heavy modern references, but in a way The Simpsons does, where it'll still age well, I think
>>81887247
Definitely, I totally forgot about Clarence I really hope it gains a following after the show has its course. The shows really good at capturing that sense of wonder everyone has as a kid, it's nice to that it promotes going outside something kids don't do nearly as much
>>81887199
AT is set in post apocalyptic times and RS is mostly 80s references. So those probably won't age too bad.
Over the Garden Wall will age pretty well, but I guess that's cheating since it's set in a fantasy world and in the past.
>>81887518
I'm pretty sure OTGA will be GOAT for a long time.
>>81887247
This.
I hear so much "CAL ARTS CAL ARTS NOODLE ARMS TUMBLR" shit about the show, but it's one of the few cartoons where the kids actually act like, well, kids.
Most cartoons have a 12, 13, whatever year old protag who acts like a late teen, Hell aren't Mordecai and Rigby, like 23 or something?
My point is, I remember doing shit that the kids on Clarence do when I was a youngin.
>>81888075
I'm so sorry.
>>81888075
>I hear so much "CAL ARTS CAL ARTS NOODLE ARMS TUMBLR" shit about the show,
Every modern show gets called that. Even Gumball.
