>they actually retroactively changed the "offensive dialogue" in the Comixology version
New age censorship is scary, m8s
>>80880502
Original for comparison
The image in the OP is from my Comixology "copy". Noticed it during a reread.
>>80880502
>>80880544
I know Reddit likes to say this a lot, but this is some Orwellian shit.
Not a big deal, but the implications are shady as fuck.
>>80880570
and there's nothing we can do about it. it's set up so that no sane person would think it was a big deal (To change it) and thus they see no reason not to let another person think it's a big enough deal to change.
and they will continue
until there's nothing left.
Most changes made for trades get updated in the digital version. Only difference is something like Batman Inc where entire pages were redrawn.
oh no the writers felt bad they offended someone and changed a definite article to an indefinite article
Is the bad guy supposed to be a lesbo or something
>>80880502
What am I missing here. I can't see any difference
Who cares
>>80880615
I remember they updated the trade and Comixology version of parts of the Death of the Family arc because, and I kid you not, some of the Batman-Joker dialogue had some of that classic homo subtext.
>>80880544
>>80880502
Meh. A little scooby doo for my taste but it doesn't really change any thing.
>>80880656
changed "a" to "The"
Implicitly changes her statement from "a drag queen" to "The imposter"
>>80880656
>But you're a---
>So you're the--
Third pannel. Presumably 'but you're a BOY!' was triggering or some shit.
>>80880631
It's just the implications of being able to retroactively change something like this on a scale not possible before.
Doesn't that, I dunno, rub anyone else the wrong way?
>>80880631
>be so much of a faggot that you rewrite your work to appease total strangers
>>80880670
"They" my ass, it was Snyder himself, you can even ask him on twitter if you don't believe me.
>>80880649
He's a been crossdressing as Batgirl and causing havoc around Burnside.
>>80880705
Subtle.
>>80880708
>on a scale not possible before.
If you don't like it don't buy a digital version. Creators are pretty open about the fact that things can be updated like this. Busiek tweeted about an error in the last Astro City that was fixed in the digital version. It's no secret that digital allows them fix things as they see fit and I don't really see the issue in a publisher (or whatever Comixology is) going along with authorial wishes.
>>80880702
Who cares
>>80880708
that train left the station a while ago bro
>>80880708
>on a scale not possible before
Are you serious right now?
>>80880656
they changed "you're a..." to "you're the..."
>>80880715
Does it really matter who's idea it was? They still retroactively changed digital copies.
>>80880615
>Only difference is something like Batman Inc where entire pages were redrawn.
Examples?
>>80880772
Burnham redrew some flashbacks to give Batman his real costume (Blue and Grey with the yellow oval Batsymbol)
>>80880708
Not really? Books get revisions all the time. I don't think this is 'on a scale not possible before' since it's basically the equivalent of releasing a new print run.
If this was a newspaper or some sort of legitimate journalism, retroactively changing it would be some unsettling shit, but for a novel it's literally 'who the fuck cares' tier. There are paper copies with the original dialogue and I'm confident that DC has the equivalent of 'patch notes' somewhere that details all the changes.
>>80880772
>>80880787
He redrew some pages that fill-in artists did too
>>80880756
Fuck everything else.
This is a travesty. The new coloration just makes it look like every other comic from the 2000s.
>>80880772
>>80880787
and I think he drew pages that were fill ins in the floppies
>>80880544
>>80880502
Wow they changed one article to another article.
Boo fucking hoo. The big bad tranny agenda is coming to get us.
>>80880759
Are you a dumbass? If a publisher or author wants to change something in a book that's already been printed and sold, it wouldn't be possible with a physical copy. It wasn't until digital books came along that retroactively changing a purchased book became possible.
>>80880762
Honestly, the change of 'but' to 'so' is more disrupting. The 'original' makes it seems like she's shocked at this revelation and that there's some sort of quality that had made it impossible for the guy to be Batgirl. 'So' seems less shocking and takes away some of the impact (for lack of a better term) of the reveal. 'So you were the masked killer all along!' versus 'But you COULDN'T have been the masked killer!'
>>80880769
And? It's his comic, he can do as he pleases with it.
>>80880827
Holy shit, you're fucking dumb. It's not about the scenario in the comic at all. It's the fact that works are being retroactively changed.
>>80880756
>>80880796
This is more akin to a George Lucas type situation than a "let's not offend anyone" situation.
Bolland -- the original penciller -- redid the coloring and was actually pretty mad at the original coloring.
>>80880858
>>80880895
When you buy digital you are not buying an issue. You are buying a license to view the version that Comixology has uploaded at that time. Their copy can change. If you view that as an ethical issue, don't buy from Comixology or only buy from companies on Comixology that allow you to download backups so that you have the ability to save a copy of the exact version at a specific point.
This is like bitching that some show you like got taken off Netflix. Like, no fucking shit. What did you think you were paying for?
>>80880888
Right! Maybe we should make it illegal to own copies of the unaltered, unshitty CGI'd Star Wars trilogy. It's George's movie. He can do whatever he wants with it.
There's a difference between changing something in a rerelease and changing the original work.
>>80880860
Agreed, would drop the so and have dagger shoot her in the middle of saying imposter
>YOU'RE the IMPOS--?!?
>gunshot
>>80880953
You can still get the original copies, senpai.
>>80880926
Was the wrong suit used in the original or something?
Remember when they changed the digital version of Lil Gotham because there was a kid dressed as Stephbatgirl in the Halloween issue ?
>>80880794
>releasing a new print run
No? It's basically changing a copy of the original work.
>>80880708
If the original artists/writers have no problem with the changes, I don't see the issue here. Besides, they're work-for-hire; DC owns the final product and can do what it wants.
>>80880895
Did you know that several works are "retroactively changed" after they've been written, often before publication but also afterwards? Which is why several books, including novels, have multiple editions of the same story?
Seriously, are you twelve?
4th panel
>>80880967
Not by your logic! By your logic, all unaltered copies should be returned to Mr. Lucas so he can change them. It's his movie, after all!
>>80881012
He never said "solid dick", that was an edit. A very obvious one at that.
>>80880927
Does the motivation matter? It's still a creator choosing to not allow people new access to the old version. If you own an old one they aren't changing it. Comixology is not ownership.
>>80881012
No. I know what you're referring to. And it's no.
At no point was it ever "solid dick". That was a stupid Facebook edit.
>>80881034
I never said anything like that. Nice strawman tho.
Also, I was talking about the original Batman floppies, do try to keep up.
>>80881012
Hey wait what is going on? Where's my dick joke?
>>80881012
What a boner.
>>80881098
It was never real.
>>80881054
Okay, here's the real question: why are you so fucking offended that they changed one minor line of dialogue that doesn't really affect the story in any meaningful way? I mean, shit, I could understand if this was Lucas-level changes - that was an abomination, what he did - but this is like someone digitally cleaning up a minor CGI mistake in a film before the DVD/BD release.
Books are edited all the time before and after publication. The only difference is that this time you saw a version before it got edited, and because it's an online format, then it doesn't leave physical copies of the old versions.
Surely you have better things to worry about, OP.
It makes the expression make less sense.
![[Frostii]_K-On!!_B-Side_Theater_-_Uraon!!_-_2_[680139CA].mkv_snapshot_01.08_[2016.03.08_23.06.06].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Zeiorzj.jpg "[Frostii]_K-On!!_B-Side_Theater_-_Uraon!!_-_2_[680139CA].mkv_snapshot_01.08_[2016.03.08_23.06.06].jpg")
>>80881048
>>80881065
Um, what about Santa?
>>80881075
I was using an example. But that might've gone over your head. You seem a bit dense.
>>80881110
Still where's my dick joke?
>>80881136
Not really. Dagger Type is a celebrity so she's expressing surprise that he's the imposter.
>>80881075
>>80881142
MMM, KEEP GOING BOYS!
I'M GOING TO STRIP THIS SALT MINE CLEAN!
>>80881142
Ah, ad hominem! Going for the fallacies now, are we? Truly the resource of the genuinely enlightened!
>>80881113
No, I actually agree with you. I just think it's dumb to suggest that it matters why a creator changes something.
Anyone who wants the original version can buy it. A purchase on Comixology is not a purchase of the original version though. If that's what OP wanted he should have bought floppies instead of digital. It's his own fault.
>>80880926
which is the original, I'd guess right but something is off about that knee. Could someone confirm which is which
>>80881113
By all fairness it does cause a minor hiccup in the dialogue but yeah the scene still plays out the same.
>>80881154
For some reason the "So" makes me think she should be angry. If it's just about him being a celebrity the original still works fine.
>>80881191
Left is the original.
>>80880985
>>80881191
I think what it was is that they made him draw the new 52 suit in a flashback but that was dumb so he fixed it
>>80881196
So now you've given up on debating the original point and just want to indulge in a saltfest. Alright. Well, it's pretty late so I think I'll just check out for today rather than keep wasting my time.
>>80881226
Everyone on 4chan is male until proven otherwise. It's the Tits or GTFO rule.
>>80880998
It's effectively the same thing as purchasing a digital copy of a game. If you don't want it to change ever you should play it offline.
Your problem is that you are viewing Comixology as ownership when that is not the case. When you use a library you don't own the books you check out, you borrow them and they remain the sole property of the library. Comixology is similar, you are paying for the ability to read comics using their service. If Comixology (the 'library') wants to change or update the books that you are 'allowed' to check out, they are completely within their rights to do so and you are an idiot who doesn't understand the difference between a 'good' and a 'service' if you think otherwise.
Would you be crying about revisionist history if Netflix removed or changed some of the movies that it offers?
>>80881219
No it doesn't, because the original doesn't work the same way as the edit. The original isn't "So you're the imposter", the original is "But you're a-" and it wouldn't really work. But you're a celebrity? It's stupid redundant because you already yelled out his celebrity name in surprise.
Her saying he's the imposter out loud is contextually redundant but at least it doesn't make her sound like she's tripping herself on her own words.
>>80881265
And DC - who owns the copyrights to the original comics - has every right to alter the comics, too.
>>80880687
>but it doesn't really change any thing.
It changes everything
>>80881197
It might actually play into Babs favor. makes her appear deductive, like it was almost on the tip of her tongue.
>>80880502
I remember people (And by people, I mean hardcore lefty's) getting seriously offended by this. For some reason. I couldn't even tell Dagger Type was supposed to be trans or a crossdresser or whatever thanks to the terribly vague writing and the fact that he/she/whatever looked like every other quirky 20-something girl in the book.
>>80880888
>>80880953
>>80880967
>>80881034
>>80881075
>>80881142
>>80881196
>>80881260
Proof that people really go on the internet to get angry about cartoons
>>80880744
a lot of autistic anons
>>80880985
No quite. The story was being written and drawn before the New 52 got started, so it referenced pre-Crisis Bat-continuity the way Morrison usually does. When it finally came time to publish, it had to be changed to reflect the new universe.
Ironically, it's recently been shown Bruce did have a suit with a yellow oval emblem at some point.
>>80880502
>>80880544
This doesn't seem too drastic, to be fair. Only two words were changed, and ultimately it helps clarify the overall direction of the dialogue.
The whole "controversy" was still stupid in the first place.
>>80881311
It's like when the Unbeatable Squirrel Girl team had to confirm one of their characters wasn't trans because the artist draws everyone with the same beaten-with-an-ugly-stick face.
>>80881260
you didn't realize that when he used random dialog to bitch and not actual bad changes like any random recolor example?
>>80881348
Holy shit, that shitty "realistic" recoloring.
>>80881348
Oh fuck, get that shit out of my face. Goddamn, I'm still mad.
>>80881260
You weren't debating. At no point did you present an actual argument for retroactive censorship other than IT'S HIS BOOK HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS and then storked your disproportionately high ego.
>>80881287
Yes that is correct. However, when you buy a physical comic book you are purchasing a 'good', that is a physical object, the ownership of which is passed to you from the vendor (who in turn obtained ownership from the distributor). At that point, DC still has the rights to the storyline and any future comics they produce, but that individual copy of the comic that you purchased is yours and nothing DC says or does can change that (assuming you purchased it legally obviously).
Comixology provides a 'service' in which you pay for the ability to read comics that Comixology provides. At no point do you own the comic you are reading (I assume that Comixology doesn't have a 'download this comic to your hardrive' feature). When you sign up for Comixology there is probably a long wall of text you have to hit 'I agree' to. If you actually read it, you'd probably see that it says that you as a consumer do not own anything and that your subscription, as well as the titles on it can be changed, removed, or terminated at any time.
I was actually just being facetious when I suggested that you didn't know the difference between a 'good' and a 'service' earlier but if you legitimately don't you should read up on it. It's pretty important stuff to know in this digital age.
>>80881260
>>80881415
Just kiss already.
>>80881346
Oh. Yeah. The black, uh, "chick" with the sidecut, broad shoulders and no tits.
Like, it's not hard to draw women that look like women and dudes that look like dudes.
I mean, I like traps as much as the next straight-acting Republican, but damn. It doesn't count when it's just a lack of detail on the art.
This thread fucking sucks.
Barney fags, or Spider-Man shitposters, it doesn't really matter who, do your thing.
>>80881427
>I assume that Comixology doesn't have a 'download this comic to your hardrive' feature
Some companies do offer this service actually, like some Image titles (probably depends on the creative team).
>>80881427
>(I assume that Comixology doesn't have a 'download this comic to your hardrive' feature)
They do for some publishers. It's mainly Marvel and DC who don't provide a backup service.
>>80881260
>>80881415
>>80881478
>Crossdressing is a different thing than transgenderism.
You know, and I know, and we all know what the change was really about. Don't be coy.
I think we are all ignoring the greater point here which is that dagger type actually does have a nice ass. I can see how he coukd pass off as Batgirl.
>>80881473
That's interesting. I don't really care for digital distribution (don't own a tablet and reading comics on a desktop gives me eyestrain after about an hour) so I'm not familiar with online comic reading services.
I assumed that Comixology didn't have this feature because iff you download the comic as a bunch of image files (or a pdf or whatever) then obviously that couldn't be retroactively changed and OP wouldn't have a reason to make this thread.
>>80881549
His ass wasn't that great, and neither is Barbara's.
>>80881559
>>80881597
>>80881610
We could actually turn this thread good though.
Like discussing how if OP wasn't a complete retard he'd realize the actual bullshit is that Comixology could one day actually just pull every issue that he paid for from their site and he wouldn't be able to do anything about it. There was even a rumor that Marvel or DC was thinking of doing that like a year ago.
I NEED PICTURES, /CO/!
PICTURES OF SPIDER-MAN!
>>80881544
I actually haven't read the issue in question, outside the two versions of the page posted in this thread.
I legitimately have no idea whether or not the fake batgirl is supposed to be a transgendered individual, a run of the mill crazy person, or a glamrock wearing drag queen (I had assumed the latter since I can't imagine DC having a trans villain because 'muh diversity!!!').
I agree that in this particular context it is strange to have Batgirl not show any surprise considering that even --if-- transgendered individuals are treated as good/normal, statistically there are still far fewer of them than normal people. It would be like if the fake batgirl took off his costume and it was a 110 year old man, sure old people exist, but the odds of any one person being that old are pretty low.
>>80881647
Better to just start a new thread for that, at this point.
This thread is a salt mine.
>>80880649
No. Batgirl was originally surprised because her impersonator turned out to be a man, but some people complained that it was offensive to say that "male" or "female" is something outwardly visible.
>>80880926
It's like I'm seeing Superboy-Prime time ripples.
>>80881647
>Like discussing how if OP wasn't a complete retard he'd realize the actual bullshit is that Comixology could one day actually just pull every issue that he paid for from their site and he wouldn't be able to do anything about it. There was even a rumor that Marvel or DC was thinking of doing that like a year ago.
This. Funny that one anon used libraries as an example. It's actually more like a video rental service. Not that he would be old enough to remember what those are.
>>80880888
It was a product that people already paid for.
>>80881011
Yes, but they don't edit the previous copies that people bought.
We really are /tv/, aren't we? This thread, these replies. We have become the very thing we fought against.
>>80881768
it's literally not a product by any definition
>>80880502
I'd be more concerned but modern Batgirl is shit so who really gives a fuck? If they want to change their retarded plot twist because they found out it offended their target audience and don't have the guts to stand by their terrible decision then by all means let them change it.
>>80881799
WHEN YOU PAY ON COMIXOLOGY YOU ARE NOT BUYING A COPY
What's even going on in this thread?
People fighting about censorship, digital media, transgenders, but most pointless name calling.
This is a fucking board for cartoons. Do you guys not have anything better to do?
>>80881872
>cartoonfags
Worse than the live action posters tbqh
>>80881759
>Video rental services somehow predate libraries
Pardon?
Video rental services weren't as apt an analogy because most, if not all of them were set up on a 'pay money, get movie for a week' basis. Many of them did not require membership and didn't have any sort of explicit agreement between the business and the consumer outlining the responsibilities and rights of each party.
As I mentioned in my original post (the same one I mentioned libraries in), the best analogy is to Steam or other online game distributors. That also bypasses the 'owning' vs renting issue that both libraries and movie rentals brings up.
good thread
i am so glad i browse this mexican fm radio fan club photo sharing site
>>80881904
>Video rental services weren't as apt an analogy because most, if not all of them were set up on a 'pay money, get movie for a week' basis. Many of them did not require membership and didn't have any sort of explicit agreement between the business and the consumer outlining the responsibilities and rights of each party.
LOLwut. Every video rental business I ever patronized had customers sign up for memberships that had legal agreements and such. Even my local video stores did that shit.
Nice thread on this Canadian lamp shade collecting fourm
>>80880502
>>80880544
I don't get it.
>>80881647
>Like discussing how if OP wasn't a complete retard he'd realize the actual bullshit is that Comixology could one day actually just pull every issue that he paid for from their site and he wouldn't be able to do anything about it. There was even a rumor that Marvel or DC was thinking of doing that like a year ago.
Amazon, Apple, and Google can all do that with any of your digital purchases.
>>80881995
Yeah and it's bullshit. Never pay money for something you can't actually get a copy of.
>>80881884
And yet a step above comic fags apparently.
>>80881943
Really? I know that Blockbuster and similar chains used membership cards and what not, but my family used one of two little cornerstore/video rental places that both just asked for ID, an address and a phone number. If this is not the case for the majority of people, I will concede that I was operating under a false assumption.
>>80882228
No, I'm sure there were small-town places that didn't keep membership rolls and such. But every one I ever went to did that - to the best of my memory, anyway. Been a long time since I've even gone to a Blockbuster, and even longer since I had a local video store that wasn't a Blockbuster.
Basic google search proves this guy wrong.
>>80882286
Huh, interesting. I take it back then, video rental stores are at least as good a comparison as libraries are (though both are worse comparisons than Steam).
I've got a fever, /co/. And the only cure is more salt.
![[Movie] [Clerks] I Don't Care - Randal.png](https://i.imgur.com/gFxBUqS.png "[Movie] [Clerks] I Don't Care - Randal.png")
>>80882433
That isn't actually censorship
>>80881799
I didn't realise someone came to your house and physically edited your floppy. Wait, what's that, you bought DIGITAL and thought that meant you OWNED it?
How fucking stupid are you? Video games you buy on steam will regularly get patched too, is that "censorship'?
Man. I wish Comixology censored the Harley book with better writting
>>80882515
Actually, it's about ethics in digital comics distribution
>>80882524
>>80882515
While the thread obviously took a pretty sharp turn, I believe the original intention of the thread was to illustrate how easy it would be to censor something by retroactively changing it.
With that said, I think that most censorship probably effects the book before it even gets it's initial printing so it's mostly a moot point.
>>80882520
Not him but please explain to me how bugfixes, new content, "balancing" and all that jazz is at all related to changing dialogue in a comic book.
>>80882515
It's the very definition of censorship you delusional fuck.
>>80883529
No it's revision.
>>80883560
The two are not mutually exclusive. It's a revision that censors the original dialogue.
>>80883106
When you "buy" a game on steam, you're buying the license to play it. The developer/publisher can still go in and change whatever they want, including lines of dialogue if they so choose. Buying comics from Comixology and other digital retailers works the same way.
Is it also changed in the physical TPB?
>>80883607
yes
>>80881338
agreed. people getting mad because barbara was surprised a dude was dressing as her, when she assumed it was a woman, is so incredibly stupid. anyone in the shock of the moment would have the same surprise thought, especially when he's a violent psycho pointing a gun right at her.
>>80880502
So what ever happened to Daggertype? I imagine they wrapped up this plot as quickly and quietly as possible seeing the villain was a very delicate subject?
>>80881338
>ultimately it helps clarify the overall direction of the dialogue.
But it doesn't. The original dialogue implied that Barbara was surprised that the villain with tits was a man. The new dialogue suggests she's not really surprised that Daggertype was the villain, or ya know, cross dressing. It's true the scene doesn't really change in any drastic way, but it is altered.
>>80881265
eh I would half agree on this. it's comixology's right to decide what it is they provide in terms of their library. however i wouldn't compare it to Netflix. With Netflix you purchase the right to stream the content provided, but Netflix does not guarantee what content they will offer. Some shows may be there for a very long time, some may go away because the companies pull distribution rights. In that case, Netflix is definitely like a library - you purchase the right to go to the library and take stuff out to watch, but you have no ownership in regards to that content.
Comixology isn't really like that. You actively pay for books digitally and Comixology provides a means of viewing those books, be it on your computer or on another device. Once a book is published onto Comixology, they can't really just go in and revise it, not unless the company themselves requests the digital file gets updated. They provide the service, but they don't alter the files, they distribute them.
So as far as this "censored" version goes (which it isn't), it's DC that would have given Comixology the new file which then got updated. Comixology doesn't produce the comics, it distributes them. It doesn't even decide the prices of the books, aside from marking down newer books after they've been out for a few months and sales (which are normally done with approval from the distributing company)
>>80883597
And guess what else. If Steam ever goes bellyup for some reason you lose all your games.
If Valve says "Let's charge them to use Steam." you're gonna have to pay to play those games.
Man fuck everyone who helps make digital media the standard. It's convenient at a pretty big risk.
>>80880544
I legitimately cannot believe Americans got buttmad about this shit.
>>80883573
It's not really censoring though. It's clearing the original dialogue up a bit.
Personally I think the new dialogue flows like shit.
Revisions are only an issue when they actually diminish a work, like The Killing Joke's recoloring, or when the original is refused to the public in favor of a drastically altered version like Star Wars.
This is just a non-issue.
>>80884157
>It's clearing the original dialogue up a bit.
No it's not The original had the clear meaning of "Woah, my impersonator is a DUDE?". This new one has a much more nebulous meaning.
>>80884250
Exactly, the dialogue makes her seem so blase about the reveal, like the fact that chasing around a feminine figure with tits suddenly being revealed as a man isn't a surprise at all. Or even that it's Dagger Type.
Compare the dialogue in the new collected versions of Final Crisis to the dialogue in the originals. This shit happens. Digital distribution just lets them update the corrections like a Steam game instead of just changing it for rereleases.
>>80880600
>it's set up so that no sane person would think it was a big deal
/thread
>>80882533
>Actually, it's about ethics in digital comics distribution
Oh my God, are you serious? This is akin to fixing a typo that somehow slipped through the editing process.
>>80880756
Anon, please point me to an online store I can purchase TKJ with the original coloring.
Oh my God, did you know the original hobbit had gollum giving Bilbo the ring, and then they retroactively changed it in late printings? We live in Nazi Germany, man! Big brother! Big brother!
>>80884250
she never makes any comment on his gender, it's implied perhaps but it's up to the reader. She could just be stupid enough to be shocked an artist is running around doing this shit. But since the writers have been crucified for this issue since it's release, they might have asked Comixology to make the change so they won't get hassled again
>>80880756
The recolor is superior.
>>80881981
Took me 3 reads to notice. They chaned "But you're a" to "So you're the". Wowitsfuckingnothing.jpg
>>80885817
>the fact that they changed this is nothig
>not the reason for the change
Hi, Tumblr.
>>80881107
Why is Joker such a sexual deviant?
>>80881807
/tv/ has invaded in 2013 and they neve left.
>>80881872
>What's even going on in this thread?
/tv/ and /pol/ retards bringing their stupidity.
>bohoo they changed an article the WORLD IS ENDING
>>80883717
>that Barbara was surprised that the villain with tits was a man
which doesn't make a lick of sense.
yeah a bit or surprise maybe, but acting like it blew her mind and she couldn't believe it was possible is just out of character for her. She's not captain america a week after being unfrozen
>>80885910
Isn't that exactly what's happening though?
It's a panel's worth of shock probably a literal split second.
>Oh shit it's a drag queen
It's not like Babs went home and was like "if he has a dick how does he fake the tits?
>>80885776
It's extremely obvious to anyone what word was going to follow "But you're a-". It wasn't ambiguous at all.
>for-profit company adjusts its product in response to the tastes of its audience
>GODDAMN SJW ILLUMINATI!
This is your fault, /co/.
>>80886390
>BOOGEYMAN BOOGEYMAN
>But you're a-- = she just finds out that that character was--
>So you're the-- = she already knew that a character was--, and she found out who exactly
No change at all, no sir.
Fuck trannies.
Seriously.
Do the world a favor and kill yourselves you precious degenerates.
>>80886390
>Openly whined and demanded change
>Illuminati
I don't think anyone thinks there's an SJW cabal, those faggots are pretty open about wanting to run shit.
>>80880502
>>80880544
I will never ever understand why that was considered so upsetting and no one blinked a damn eye at this.
>>80886791
I mean, doesn't Harley Quinn sell better than Batgirl?
I mean, you had one comic where a character was startled and then you have one where a character is misgendered, drawn like this, and smacked in the crotch (because that ONLY hurts if you have testicles, amIrite).
And you will not find ONE SINGLE comic site complaining about it.
>>80886428
So the latter makes her seem like she's preceptive and higly deductive.
>>80880570
>but the implications are shady as fuck.
When the President lied to start a war that destroyed two nations and threw a chunk of the globe into chaos I said nothing...
But when a company censored my shitty non-sequitur fantasy wrestling comics, they crossed a fucking line.
>>80886791
>>80886819
I really don't get it, what are the implications of that small change?
>>80887052
I really don't get it, why are you commenting without reading at least a few posts to see if your question was already answered a million times?
>>80887048
If you click the image, it gets bigger.
Crazy, no?
>>80887616
>527x810
>not antsize
Phonebrowsing pleb spotted.
>>80887683
Maybe get glasses.
>>80887048
>>80887683
Seriously, see your optometrist asap.
>>80887770
>>80887751
I have.
Now hold your phone ~3 feet away and try to read that image without zooming. 527x810 would be plenty for a single panel, but not a whole page.
>>80887770
>>80887782
1000 pix width is fine.
>>80887820
Maybe don't read from your phone when it's across the room?
Or actually click on the image and not resort to reading the thumbnail?
I seriously am worried about your eyes, anon.
>>80887870
2/10 for the (you)s you managed to get.
There's no way you can be this dense and still manage the captcha.
>>80886979
one thing doesnt affect me, the other does
>>80887947
I literally don't get how you can't read it though, on my monitor, it's twice the size of a comic page.
Not even trolling, just confused as fuck.
>muh censorship, muh censorship!
I want /v/ to leave.
>>80886047
>Isn't that exactly what's happening though?
in the revised version yes.
in the first she doesn't just sound surprised, she looks like she can't believe that such a thing could be even possible.
>>80880502
Damage Control
a
m
a
g
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
>>80881290
It changes very little.
>>80888296
Nah she looks surprised her impersonator is a drag queen to me
>>80888555
Yeah, anyone would be surprised that the person who wants to take over being Batgirl is a dude.
>>80888657
really? in 2016?
>>80888792
Well, it was 2015 when that issue of Batgirl came out.
>>80888792
Well this back in the dark ages of 2014. Thank god it's the current year.
>>80882286
As an old neckbeard who used video rental stores, both local and chain, I can tell you that those "memberships" was nothing other than marketing research. They wanted to know which mailbox was yours so they could sell that off to junk mail advertisers, and so they could track your movie rentals so they could build up a profile and figure out what kind of coupons to offer you to get you back in the store.
