they both look fake to me

>>77684251
of course it's fake, it's a fucking animation, retard

>>77684242
Disney looks like jelly, Dreamworks looks like Smoke

Disney is more to realism, Dreamworks is more to details

>>77684242
Having never seen snow I can't tell you but Let me tell you what I'd think if it was CUM
Disney's looks crusty like a girl is taking a shower washing it off her pubes at a super zoom in
and DreamWorks looks like it just got shot into a liquid filled uterus and made contact with the egg

I wouldn't say either is particularly better as there are different types of snow.

eg Dragon there is going for a more powdery feel

>>77684242
Disney snow is that wet clumpy snow that comes with freezing rain mixed in.

Dreamworks snow is that loose powdery snow you get when its really cold. It usually falls slowly over many hours.

Both are good representations of snow. Disney snow is a little too...heavy? I am not sure how to describe it but it seems a bit to solid for what it is. Dreamworks snow is a bit too powdery for what it is. That type of snow doesn't hang in the air like a dust trail. It gets lifted up and quickly falls away.

Source: I lived in both Canada and Colorado for many years each.

>>77684445
>Canada and Colorado
South Park made a song about both of those places
Boogers and Cum but which is which

>>77684445
This
However, dreamwork's snow is a bit more like a dirt/dust effect because their whole movie wasn't built around snow, only this little sequence of shots, so they're probably adapting tools rather than making them

>>77684242
Disney's looks more like actual snow, but Dreamworks' looks better.

>>77684242
Neither of those are animations. They are simulated.