when cover art is made how come the official cover not resembling the page inside?
of course I understand why a company want a good looking cover but how come it doesn't count as false advertisement when we get stuff like she-hulk (2015)
>>77581367
Don't judge a book by its cover.
Also, you probably should have looked up the book before buying, and it says on the cover who's actually working on the book.
>>77581367
wtf ?
Since when she is cross-eyed?
That cover is really good though
>>77581529
Weird thing about her eyes was that it was obviously an intentional choice. Pulido draws other characters normally. It's not like say Henderson where everyone looks that way.
>>77581529
Don't fall for /co/ bait
She got hit with a nerve gas that made her blind
But /co/ doesn't read comic books, they are just salty because there are actual SJWs on the book
>>77581412
yeah I know that now
but still it's a unnecessary layer of "difficulty" for everyone when we could get a more honest representation on the final product like movies and games do.
like yes it does sounds stupid but com one wouldn't you like just watching a cover and know what you get instead?
>>77581715
It's not even really that. They just have shit taste in art and got triggered when She-Hulk told Doom's kid to check his privilege.
>>77581715
blind people don't automatically go crosseyed, especially if they weren't born that way
![X-Men-Legacy-marvel-now-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GSlOvjc.jpg "X-Men-Legacy-marvel-now-1[1].jpg")
>>77581734
No. The company makes previews of the interior art available. I like having nice looking covers.
Like I wouldn't want to miss out on Legacy's fantastic covers just because the interior art is dodgy.
>>77581715
>>77581768
>they
I think this book is probably the biggest disappointment for me lately.
>Gorgeous cover art.
>Ugly as sin art inside.
>Shulkie looks like she's taken a blow to the back of the head in every panel.
fml
