So have there been any tits busted over this yet?
>>71201211
>inb4 MUH DAUGHTER tweets and much laughter by all
>>71201211
Shit this is an awesome cover.
Is this a female artist?
>>71201211
This is fucking disgusting I can't believe someone did this seriously, Like put this much work into it andDIDN'T GIVE GWEN BLACK AND BLUE CONVERSE.What a waste of paper.
>>71201211
B R A V O M A R V E L
R
A
V
O
M
A
R
V
E
L E V R A M O V A R B
Also your filename is wrong.
>>71201211
Dated reference, but a nice cover thanks to the web cables holding the ball up.
I don't even know if I like or hate this cover.
Miley Cyrus is awful and it doesn't fit the book at all. But look at that Gwen.
I don't know about busting tits, but it sure is doing something to my dick.
>>71201256
It seems so. witta . deviantart
>March 27th I posted a SpiderGwen sketchcover here
The client said I could do whatever I wanted so I made a little homage to the controversial Manara cover. (you know, for fun?)
>A week later, Frank Cho posts his SpiderGwen/Manara cover and Robbi Rodriguez voiced his opinion on it, ala The Mary Sue. Which has really sparked some debate across news blogs and social media. Actually, I think Rob Liefeld just joined the fray as I'm posting this.
>Well, as a female comic artist who also illustrates sexy, cute pinup art, I had to follow up with another sketchcover.
LOVE AND PEACE!
>...hahaha... double standards.
>>71201256
Mikey Cyrus wrecking ball reference
>>71201281
It could be because of the Anne Hathaway thing bringing it up again.
Thread needs more sexy Gwen.
>>71201357
oh my god, I knew that artist since she was working on a webcomic and then I totally forgot about her
>>71201411
Ok.
>>71201357
Haha, wow
>>71201430
>>71201211
>>71201357
I like her.
Suck another dick Robbi.
God I couldn't possibly care less.
>>71201430
Anyone have a link to the big thread about Cho's Spider-Gwen cover?
What's up the incredibly dated reference?
>>71201469
It's only been like two years, People still reference Back to the Future, it's not that preposterous is it?
>>71201508
This.
> read comic books about characters that were hip and fresh in the 60s
> complain about dated references
>>71201211
People please, there is an easy solution to outrage from over-sexualized female characters. And it's called the Hawkeye Initiative.
Won't you please donate some Male Smut to the cause?
>>71201602
If I didn't know better, I'd think this was all just an excuse to look at dude butts.
>>71201429
Gwen Stacy, not Gwen Tennyson.
Although I suppose all Gwen's should be welcome.
>>71201613
Oh no!
It's a celebration of male empowerment.
Just as much as the depiction of female characters in comics is a celebration of female empowerment.
Nothing's more empowering to people, than butt-shots and skimpy outfits. I look forward to a future where all comic book costumes meet a standard requirement of sexiness.
>>71201602
>And it's called the Hawkeye Initiative.
But the HI has been around for a long ass while, and people still bitch about sexualised female characters
>>71201508
I dislike silk but I cannot deny she gets my dick hard almost everytime.
>>71201256
>Is this a female artist?
yes
>>71201211
Man, that sucks.
First an asian dude, now a woman. Good thing Rob Liefeld or Patrick Zircher are supporting Cho, otherwise western talibans wouldn't have any "white men" to blame for that.
>>71201643
Being passive-aggressive and ironic isn't funny or smart, it just makes you look like a tool, which you are.
You know where you should go back to by now, buckle up and go.
>>71201645
That's cause it's a fan driven initiative, not an actually habit among the industry.
Let's face it, there is a difference in the level of female costume sexiness and the level of male costume sexiness.
Now there are 2 solutions:
1 - Make all costumes equally unsexy. (Boo, boring!)
2 - Make all costumes equally sexy. (YAY)
Now anybody with tech armor or the like can probably stay the same, but I fully expect everyone else to be rocking at least a banana hammock.
>>71201508
>>71201565
Those are beloved classics, the other is a trashy product for stupid people.
If you concentrate hard enough I bet you can see the difference.
>>71201357
This bitch seems okay. Is she hot? Cause that's all that really matters.
>>71201734
Damn anon, chill out. Regardless it's still not all that incredulous for people to reference something they remember.
>>71201739
She looks like Gwen. Go to her dA.
>>71201710
>>71201710
>Let's face it, there is a difference in the level of female costume sexiness and the level of male costume sexiness.
No.
>>71201710
It's distresing that so many people seem to wish 1
>>71201748
>Said nothing about body type
>Was talking about costume
How come Superman's still wearing a shirt?
Point of order, MCU's Thor definitely has the right idea.
>>71201746
>She looks like Gwen. Go to her dA.
Just post a picture, asshole.
>>71201748
That pic is correct, we need more beefcake.
>>71201758
Prudes. What are you gonna do?
>>71201710
The problem with your thinking is that the complainers don't want things for themselves so much as they want the people they dislike to not have things.
So more sexy costumes for everyone isn't going to stop the complaining. There aren't enough "dudebro tears" with that route.
>>71201748
Let's not forget the false equivalencies, like:
Female in bikini = male with sock on penis
>>71201761
I'm not comfortable crossing that bridge of creeper, you lazy fiend.
>>71201357
>Rob Liefeld
W-What
>>71201768
read more mangas, I guess
as long as amerifags keep reading them on mangapanda instead of buying them, they are quite safe
>>71201759
>How come Superman's still wearing a shirt?
Why shoudn't he? Wondy doesn't go around barechested.
I would fug the shit out of this skeet meat.
>>71201778
>A picture available to all on the internet
>reposting it in another site makes you a creep
I hope you are a woman at least, it'd be embarassing if this level of pussyfication came from a man.
>>71201779
He made a FB post defending Cho and Manara.
>>71201775
The Penis Sock is a classic design.
Don't knock it till you tried it.
>>71201811
Then why isn't Superman rocking the Panties and Bustier?
>>71201820
Well, I blame my own laziness, anon. Back to the discussion
>>71201829
That show was clumsy and awkward in a lot of ways, but when it hit, it hit.
Aside from cool artwork, there isnt anything going for the comic that we havent already seen in some form.
This is nothing but a cash grab on trending social justice bullshit. I sincerely hope this along with fem thor bomb financially so we can make room for stories that writers actually want to tell and can take seriously.
Worst thing to happen to thor since thunderstrike and donald blake. And this is coming from a jason aaron fanboy..
>>71201841
He already has a costume.
No famous DC hero goes around particulary exposed, except for Power Girl maybe. But she had a male counterpart and they tried to change that anyway.
>>71201859
You do realize Donald Blake was there at the inception of Marvel Thor right?
Spider gwen has the thickest dick
>>71201864
>>71201864
>No famous DC hero goes around particulary exposed, except for Power Girl maybe. But she had a male counterpart and they tried to change that anyway.
>Completely ignoring Wonder Woman, whom you brought up
For the record, I liked Power Girl's New 52 costume, but what you gonna do?
>>71201859
>Worst thing to happen to thor since thunderstrike
motherfucker you better take that back
>>71201874
This is my fetish.
>>71201866
Classic marvel thor is literally ass. Thor didnt get depth until worldengine. The last jason aaron run of thor, the god killer, was the best thing we have gotten in fucking years. Fem thor is literally taking us multiple steps back.
>>71201469
idk my bff jill
>>71201905
>worldengine
>implying Walt Simonson's Thor run isn't among the top 10 cape runs of all time
>>71202039
>implying that moron has even read it
>>71201905
Lol even Fraction/Gillen are better than pleb Aaron
>>71201739
Yes.
>>71201211
Nah Miley Cyrus is the feminists Avatar so this gets a pass.
![Favim.com-8240[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/C7kEwHn.jpg "Favim.com-8240[1].jpg")
>>71201211
>Marvel thinks pissing people off attracts customers
>The whole Cho ordeal that happened lately
>Mfw Marvel will go out of their way to piss off SJW because off better sales
god yes
>>71202039
>beta ray pony
>talking frogs
Nigga please. It wasnt nearly as bad as most golden age shitw but the cheese was as real as the villain of the week structure it relied on.
>>71202074
Say guh.
>>71201710
While making everyone's costumes equally sexy would be pretty great, that won't stop people from complaining. Modern feminists just like to complain about sexualised female characters, even in works which have sexualised male characters
>>71202072
Aaron has been one of the only writers to actually write thor as "a god". It was one of the only redeeming arcs he got since richards used him as a meat puppet.
>>71201883
I thought her weird wedge heels being built into the costume and half-assed logo were lame, but liked the blue stripe. Made her poses stand out.
>>71201748
People tend to forget the important thing: The dude on the right has a sexuality while the dude on the left is only occasionally a sexual being, mostly during stories when his lover ends up getting killed.
Now I dunno about you, but most people don't dream about getting killed so that their former lover can now starr in a story about superhumans fucking up the planet.
>>71201602
But a sexy male is nothing but a power fantasy!
The HI ridicules male sexuality, just read jojo, man!
Someone just needs to draw her having Angry sex with Norman already.
>>71202296
What's Norman's role in that alternate universe of hers?
They could've made him his love interest, just for fun
>>71203391
>>71202296
This is next level cucking holy shit.I'm not sure if cucking is the accurate term anymore.
>>71201430
BASED
A
S
E
D
>>71201211
Hot
>>71201778
Show your face.
>>71201211
So exactly why fags and sjw hate sexy women?
I don't get that part.
>>71201748
> on the right the woman is covered head to toe while the man is naked
> on the left the woman is wearing a miniskirt while superman is covered head to toe
I like how conservatards are often intentionally shooting themselves in the foot argument-wise.
>>71203539
>fags
Because sexy women aren't men.
>sjw
Because sjw's aren't sexy, but they're jealous of the sexy women.
Anon pls, it's not rocket surgery.
>>71201710
or 3 do what every you want and fuck anyone who says other wise
>>71203539
>So exactly why fags and sjw hate sexy women?
They don't. You don't understand their issues because you're an idiot.
>>71203539
>>71203574
Fag here. We dont hate sexy woman. We actually dont give a fuck. Blame SJW landwhales though.
>>71201759
Because for some weird reason that sort of thing went out of fashion with the artists. Martian Manhunter was one of the last holdouts until nu52 hit.
>>71203443
It would be some strange form of cucking. True Peter is dead in that world, but muliversally speaking his is alive and it's pretty much true in most of them that she's one of his great loves.
>>71203615
Would you care to explain in a calm and reasonable manner on behalf of your fellow compatriots?
>>71201602
The Hawkeye initiative is retarded.
A) Agile comic characters do those poses all the time to begin with so you aren't making some great change. Aka see if spider-man can go 5 seconds without a provocative pose or showing off of the spideybutt.
B) Hawkeye would do all of the poses to begin with while being completely in character .When the Avengers get bored they probably bet that he can make X shot while cartwheeling off the side of Stark Tower in a pink tutu and doing a plie.
>>71203782
>The Hawkeye initiative is retarded.
I think it's useful when applied to moments like the genderswapped thor 5 (hell, gender swapping the entire thor would be a lulz mine, including having odin slap the shit out of freyja) or gender swapping that wonder woman page complaining about mansplaining
>>71203574
Fag here. We don't hate sexy women.
And we like "muh male power fantasies". Sexuallly
>>71204002
And I can also speak for a couple of lipstick lesbians I know that love cheese cake
>>71202074
More importantly, Devils Due are still publishing shit? I thought they went broke
Nice Cover but.....who is she?
There's a slight difference since Frank is bigger.
There may be a sexual double standard but I'd say there's also the fact nobody probably saw it in the first place.
Is this nontroversy not dead yet? Last I heard Frank Cho linked to some GGer's article and they're getting pissy about that.
>>71203539
because all sjw's are Jewish, conservative, pro-life, born-again, overweight, Asian Lesbian broads who cuts herself.
>>71204002
>>71204140
I am sorry for our
>muh evil sjwfemuhnazigayagenda
4chan idiots. Have a nice day .
>>71204846
I went through his FB, he linked to something called Reaxxion. They don't really seem to be GG, just anti-SJW. Which I guess nowadays does mean GG
>>71205123
Wait no I take that back they have a whole section dedicated to GG, I just missed it
DISREGARD EVERYTHING I SUCK COCKS
>>71205054
No one cares retard.
>>71205137
At least you admit it.
>>71205148
I gotta admit my faults
I also checked out his Twitter, he retweeted a picture of him and Liana K's ass. She was doing some GG shit months ago right? I can't keep track anymore. But on the other hand, Liana K's ass and Frank Cho
>>71201643
Mike Grell era Legion is calling your name right now.
>>71205186
>Liana K
>super model
no Frank. She's just a model
>>71205054
what a faggot
the gay guy can stay. you're too much of a faggot to be here, gtfo
>>71203558
>Superman
Skin tight suit that leaves little to the imagination
>Lois Lane
Dressed like a mom going to work
Are Americans so anti-sex even their left are against it? It's kinda hilarious.
>>71205267
He seems to think that gays aren't extremely common on 4chan.
>>71205282
Horseshoe theory
>>71201253
Why ISN'T that dude freaking out? Look how sexual that is
>>71205282
anon, her skirt is way above the knee. And her tits are covered, but you can still tell she has them. And...are those black pumps?
She's dressed like a whore. Complete and total whore.
>>71205335
Probably hasn't seen it yet.Cause he's blind and whatnot
>>71205335
Well he's going to have to come to terms with the fact that he had a daughter, and if she's even mildly attractive, she's going to have at least 20 dicks in her lifetime
>>71202074
>ugly tmblr landwhales throw hissyfits about female objectification while hot cuties celebrate feminine beauty
Shocking
>>71205338
Yea I read that article too. Pretty funny.
>>71205355
>37! My daughter's sucked 37 dicks!
>>71205529I don't know the article. link.
>>71205540
In a row?
>>71205566
Simultaneously.
>>71201602
>the Hawkeye Initiative
You mean unhappy, untalented artists who barely read comics and are solely looking for asspats?
>>71205267
Oh, i am sorry, Mr. internetwarrior.
Did i insult your laughable, tiny worldview?
>>71205290
What happens on /co/ on every Nightwing thread boarders to a Sodom-situation.
>>71201469
Same decade m8.
>>71205630
That Miles one is always exceptionally lewd.
>>71205714
In this time of day referencing something more the a year old might as well be referencing the Magna Carta.
>>71205551
I don't have a link, but it was a fake article about a senator named "Richard Head" trying to get a bill passed that requires a dress code for the children of the president, citing that "their skirts were too short; you can clearly see above their knees!" and "only gogo dancers wear the boots they were wearing!".
>>71205684
okay baitmaster, here's your reply
>>71205684
*Tips hormones*
>>71205630
that boner on Miles though
>>71205786
>>71205810
Samefagging so obviously. Jesus, you are pathetic.
And then being so retarded to use the fedora-meme, while YOU are the the frustrated, fat teenies, that go
>Muhfemuhnazis
>MuhSJWeverywhere
in every thread.
What a loser.
>>71206416
or its that you're a faggot, and nobody likes you?
>>71206430
Ah, im quite fine with my social life and my family, mr. teen angst. Could you get any more edgy, pathetic loser?
Come on, be honest: How many posts whining about
>muh femuhnusts
did you do today to feel better? Loser.
Spider-Gwen is apparently one of Marvel's top sellers right now. Is it just because of MUH GWEN? Because personally I find it a boring, dull, uninteresting experience. There just aren't enough differences between Gwen's universe and 616 to make for interesting new stories. It's just the same shit retread again.
>>71206484
then why are you crying so hard on the internet?
>>71205338
These puritanical values are really starting to become annoying.
>>71205630
The difference is that one is objectification. The other is a male power fantasy.
>>71201691
And that is the answer for the thread. She could have obvious nipples and toe but hey its drawn by a woman so its okay.
>>71201211
It needs Spider-Man in the corner going "damn baby, nice ass"
>>71206514
its puritanical values for guys, whatever you want for women
>>71206492
>It's just the same shit retread again.
Maybe the majority of people buying it haven't read them before? Maybe between Spider-Gwen and femThor the old adage of "SJWs don't buy comics" isn't strictly true any more?
>>71205254
Yea not skinny enough to be a "super" model.
>>71206518
I dunno, I've never had a fantasy about spreading eagle in a tight suit for all to see. But I mean, maybe someone has.
>>71206492
Hyped up, tons of variants, tied to a big name, and yeah pretty teenage girl is a thing to be right now.
>>71206416
I'm gay.
Stop being an annoying faggot.
>>71206578
It's a bit of both. Thanks to the Nolan Batman trilogy and the series of Avengers movies more people are getting into comics, a bunch of which are women. They aren't the ones complaining because some sexy girl drawing isn't enough to piss off most level-headed people.
>>71205368
>miley cyrus
>feminine beaity
>>71206600
try not famous enough
why are you being such a faggot today?
>>71206484
Haha you are fucking MAD.
>>71206645
Eh, I would.
If she went back to long hair and dropped the wigger schtick.
>>71206691
>wigger schtick
she's a redneck
its not a schtick
I kind of want to read Spider-Man but I stopped after issue 300.
How do I get back in? Issue 700?
>>71201256
I'm getting bored with girls being the only ones in comics allowed to draw sexy girls
Male artists need to grow their dicks back and draw bangin' sluts the way Cho does and laugh it off when the feminazi mob turns up to bitch
>>71205186
>Liana K
Fuck that disingenuous pandering cunt is no better than Anita Sarkeesian.
>>71206827
To be fair it's not like guys aren't still constantly drawing hot chicks, this is just a case of tumblrtards trying to flex their muscles for no reason.
>>71201469
>dated reference
>September 2013
Kids these days
>>71206663
Said while you rage at women for not giving a shit about you, buddy? :^)
>>71206762
>desperate twerk attempts
>not a wigger thing
I suppose the redneck genes could be a part of the problem but still.
>>71205566
I like you buddy.
>>71206827
What's truly appalling is that Cho draws banging sluts AND they're anatomically correct, one of the biggest issues actual feminists have with cheesecake covers. It's just these false feminists that care more about being offended.
>>71207607
Hasn't that always been the case? People just going out of their way to get offended? Sounds just like tumblr...
>>71206910
>made of rape
Why? Because "Sephiroth-with-scars-and-stubble" Geralt ploughs women who want him? Yeah. Sure.
>>71207237
>she admits women are terrible people
>>71207452
The point the previous anon was making is that redneck and wigger go together like shit and flies
>>71207741
She means the game is made of rape.
The development team was very green that way.
>>71207607
What's really appalling is when SJWs are given the chance to make comics and the comics look like this, proving SJWs never even slightly gave a shit about anatomical correctness
>>71206484
Does calling people a loser on the internet make you feel better about the problems in your own life?
>>71207741She has zero history with games and made those tweets around the time of The Witcher 3's E3 trailer or something, she panders to GG and now writes for The Escapist.
>>71206827
I wish I was that guy. I totally like sexy characters, but for some reason I like to draw meek girls with cloths and small breasts. And it's not even sexual, It's just what I like. Portal, Korra, stuff like that.
I suppose if I was into drawing sexy women, I probably would try to do it without fear of SJW. I would just keep doing it and ignore them. A lot of issues people have is that they keep logging into social media sites. No respectable artist or writer should be on twitter or tumblr. Maybe facebook since that seems to be somewhat good for promotion.
But I really wish most of these guys would stay off tumblr and ignore bullshit bloggers like salon.
>>71207838
Wow don't be such a shitlord pissbaby, you just hate Squirrel Girl because you can't jerk off to it!
>>71206518
>objectification
The hawkeye redraw is closer to objectification than the Spider-woman one.
Spiderwoman isn't arching her back with her ass sticking out while making a kissy face. That is a decent pose and the focus of the picture isn't her ass.
>>71207741
A lot of women get raped in the Witcher books and games, but there's nothing wrong with that. Some people have some weird thing about how you shouldn't write about rape ever because women are emotionally children or something.
>>71207838
>>71208008
It's because she's badly drawn and fat.
If she was badly drawn and skinny then that would be like 8000 rapes on the oppression scale.
>>71208008
>muh strawmen
those whores don't know shit.
>>71206762
Yes it is.
>>71208033
Is it used cheaply?
>>71208033
most SJW's haven't heard of the Witcher, because most of them don't play games.
Once the handfull that DO tell the rest to get pissy about it, you'll see the outrage. Not before then though
>>71208033
Can you imagine how much classic literature would be banned and censored if these SJWs had their way?
People like them hold back the progress of society and thought.
>>71208196
It's a matter-of-fact part of the setting along with other kinds of violence.
>>71208351
>People like them hold back the progress of society and thought.
I think arguing that rape is an overly-used narrative cliche for hack writers who can't figure can't figure out more interesting or complex way to show defeat or trauma is a perfectly legitimate grevience.
I think it has less to to with MUH SOGYNY then just being a shit writer in general. I mean Christ women do it too, there was that whole shitfit about Mary getting raped on Reign and that has a female showrunner.
>>71208008
>because you can't jerk off to it!
You don't know shit about men do you? I've jerked to stupider, uglier shit than this.Like your mom
>>71208618I jerked it to Moon Over June once
>>71208638
The machine right?
>>71207747
>for not giving a shit about fat, teeny losers.
>>71208638
If I ever read MoJ I'd probably end up rubbing one out to that chink that does self fisting.
>>71208638
Liar
>>71208638
>once
step yo game up playa.
>>71208699
I did it just to see if I could.
I could
It hurt like shit, had to go at it for like two hours
who cares
>>71201211
She's not sticking her ass out like on the cho/minara cover
Girls sticking their asses out = feminazi rage
>>71208729
Does it still update? I suppose I could try it again. Not like I have anything better to do right now
>>71208231
To be fair to SJWs (And I may actually vomit from typing that), the Witcher 1's attitude toward sex is incredibly juvenile. You collect women as trading cards for fuck's sake. Not that being juvenile is a bad thing, necessarily, as long as you cop to it.
>>71208744
>not edging for at least 2 hours per fap session
Get a load of this pleb.
>>71206827
trust me, i'm trying.
i'd be drawing huge tits 24/7 when i get good enough.
>>71206492
>There just aren't enough differences between Gwen's universe and 616 to make for interesting new stories.
There are enough. Matt and Kingpin working together, Stacy being alive and having his own daughter be a costumed vigilante and Punisher working for NYPD.
The only weak thing about Spider-Gwen is Spider-Gwen herself.
>>71208784
and there was literally no complaining about that because like I said: they don't play those games. Just like they don't read these comics. They only get pissed off when one of the few that DOES says "hey guys lets rev up those outrage machines"
>>71208793
This was more of an angry fap. Kinda trying to beat it into my penis that this would work even though everything kept fighting it. I think I raped myself
>>71208826
I've been wondering for the longest time how they find out about this shit when they don't even play/read the relevant material.
>>71206827
I'd love Frank Cho so much more if he didn't have such a terrifyingly irrational hatred for Superman and everything about him.
>>71208862
the handful that do fire it off to their twitter and tumblr leaders, the leaders get pissed, and the unwashed crowds of dyed hair, fedoras, and desperation follows
>>71208862
Because some of them DO play/read/watch this stuff. And nowadays more and more probably do play/read/watch just to look for stuff to shit themselves about.
>>71208797
>Black Cat swaps minds with Spider-Women, and we get a Superior Spider-Gwen arc
>>71208901
>liking amerijesus unironically
No.
>>71208901
are you really demanding that he like everything that you like? so you're not 100 percent alike anon, what does that have to do with you enjoying his art?
>>71208952
yes
So back to the OP question. Did anyone tweet this? I want to see if sjws reacted to the artist's double standard comment.
>>71208929
Going out of their way to get offended as usual I see.
Great.
>>71208995
They would claim she has internalized misogyny or something.
>>71208901
Agreed. It's not easy have these torn feelings toward Cho. I want to be on his side, but Superman is my favorite hero.
>>71208952
Congratulations, you outed yourself as a tremendous faggot. I'm sure your parents are very proud of you.
There's nothing wrong with liking or disliking a character, you dumb little puddle of wasted brain matter. The problem is when people like Cho develop an unhealthy obsession with their hatred of a character, and make it taint everything else they do. That picture up there? It wasn't something Cho did for shits and giggles, a fan commissioned it. And it didn't ask for that at all, it just said something with Batman and Superman. And Cho decided to turn that into a two-page, prolonged rant on why he absolutely DESPISES a character for having a decent moral center. It's the most juvenile shit you can imagine, and it comes from a "professional" in the industry. If you can't see the problem there, you're retarded.
>>71208949
That sounds really good actually.
>>71208966
My problem isn't that Cho dislikes Superman, it's that he's so fucking crazy about it. It's autism on a scale that would make /r9k/ balk.
>>71209023
The old stand-by. Works for any woman who doesn't agree with them.
>>71209026
You can think he's an asshole for hating his views on Superman but think it's dumb that he's getting hassled for fan art.
>>71209029
Cho can draw what ever he likes.
>>71209067
I really want some white knight sjw to cry interalized misogyny to a woman just so she can fire back that he has externalized beta faggotry.
>>71209163
Yeah, and I can call him a gigantic sperg for being a gigantic sperg about fictional characters he has rage issues towards. Welcome to freedom of expression, numbnuts.
>>71209195
and we can all laugh at you for being upset enough to call him anything for not liking a fictional character
>>71209029
>getting this mad because anon doesn't like your favorite mary sue(perman)
There is literally zero appeal in a character with a powerset that can be summarized as Godmode.
>>71208008
Is that travesty cancelled yet?
>>71209190
I want this to happen. What would the traditional white knight response be, though?
>>71209029
i smell a new copypasta.
>>71209195
>Welcome to freedom of expression, numbnuts.
If that's the case, why are you so mad?
>>71209190
>>71209257
you have to understand the SJW hierarchy. Only a woman is allowed to say internalized misogyny to another woman.
Also, the woman making that claim better be a minority of some kind or she's still in trouble
>>71209238
Not yetits sales went up a little
>>71209305
>better be a minority
Or if she's famous for doing something retarded, right
>>71209236
>thinking superman is godmode
>being this casual
Just stop.
>>71209320
Brb, going to my LCS
>>71201211
Is she going to come on top of people like a wrecking ball?
>>71208437
Rape is no different than murder and war and other negative aspects of people as far as writing goes why should it be held in a different category?
It is regularly used in warfare in Africa as a weapon of fear, it happens trying to create this barrier or aversion to sexual violence in fiction that really does not exist in to regular violence its unnecessary and merely used for political ammunition for social issues like "rape culture" and other such nonsense.
>>71209305
>you have to understand the SJW hierarchy. Only a woman is allowed to say internalized misogyny to another woman.
I sorta realized this before I posted, but I couldn't pass up an excuse to post "externalized beta faggotry". I guess if it were a woman crying it to another woman, she could shoot back "you have externalized cuntiness" or something.
>>71209286
Because there's nothing wrong with being mad over someone being such a faggot they let it taint their work.
>>71209361
#1 41,693
#2 24,621
#3 26,586
>>71209350
Then how come any Superman vs. X thread always ends up becoming a circlejerk over how hard superman would win?
inb4
>vs threads
>relevant
>>71209403
>let it taint their work.
How?
>>71209458
my schadenfreude is going into overdrive.
>>71203743
Not a SJW and I'm like 90% sure they don't exist, but Male characters get to be sexy without sexy being their only redeeming quality.
For some reason though you end up with stuff like that ugly as shit she hulk run, or people tracing pornstar poses everytime a girl is on panel. It's getting better but there wasn't much inbetween for a while.
No one is against the sex appeal, just keep it out of the forefront until we get some good stories in and you can justify a character as something that isn't eye candy.
>>71209458
Are those considered good sales in American comics?
>>71209458
I have no idea how anyone can like that travesty.
>>71209591
>, or people tracing pornstar poses everytime a girl is on panel.
Not every artist is Greg Land, and most people hate Land.
>>71209610
not really. for Marvel, most books that drop bellow 20k are in danger of cancellation
>>71206910
"Cause it means unfairly bashing someone as the price of inclusion"
Completely lacking in a sense of irony.
>>71209591
>Wasn't much inbetween for a while
I'll agree there was a lot of shit art in the past but I don't think there was apoint EVERY artist was Greg Land.
>90% sure they don't exist
Really people flipping their shit over Frank Cho's fan art doesn't count as SJW?
>>71209610
Not especially but not cancellation tier plus it may be one of those "we want this here" books like Captain Marvel so.....
>>71209591
Not the same anon but I have issue with that, the male characters who's only redeeming quality is sexiness absolutely exists but in women's fiction like romcoms, romance novels, erotica and such.
No one gives a shit though because that doesn't create a problem for anyone no one is actually harmed or affected negatively by these things other than those that like to bitch about made up shit aka feminists, there is no harm in having some characters like that and don't give me that objectification bullshit, or people can't tell the difference between pure fiction and reality and therefore it influences real life in negative and problematic ways even though I have no proof crap.
>>71205368
That's all this ever was
>>71208008
I'm a chubby, ugly guy I wouldn't read a comic about a chubby weirdly drawn guy. There's always an unconscious appeal with comics where I'd like to see a good looking guy. And I ain't gayhopefully
At least deadpool is drawn with a healthy build even when he's obviously a slob.
>>71207838
I feel the insane need of redrawing this shit.
>>71209591
>but Male characters get to be sexy without sexy being their only redeeming quality.
So do female characters. It's just that you don't realize when they have depth because *you* as an individual can't look past their cleavage.
Objectification is an action done by the observer.
>>71209970
>I'm a chubby, ugly guy I wouldn't read a comic about a chubby weirdly drawn guy.
>i am insecure as fuck
Fixed, no need to thank me.
>>71210303
Please name one female character that ever had any character depth beyond look at my tits before last year.
Thought as much.
>>71210416
Wonder Woman.
>>71210416
Polaris.
>>71210416
Batwoman
>>71210416
Jackie Chan.
>>71210425
Bull shit
>>71210433
Who?
>>71210462
Why do you pretend to know about comics when you talk about them when you don't know about comics?
>>71210462
>Bull shit
Then she doesn't need a movie.
