Star Trek Thread

File: T1FI6ZFjNdXXXXXXXX_!!0-item_pic.jpg (71KB, 379x555px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

71KB, 379x555px

imo, the TOS cast is hotter and has more chemistry but to each their own.

>>3010804
TOS is much better, in my opinion. Meine liebe. The actors look and act so much more like people, which is a main theme of the show. The movies are just "look at these pretty actors move and talk!"

File: tumblr_nqvkj1fbXA1ts1epqo1_500.png (216KB, 500x462px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

216KB, 500x462px

>>3010816

Yeah, Star Trek benefits a lot from being a show rather than just movies.

Into the Darkness fell flat for me because it tried to do what 3 seasons + The Wrath of Khan did for TOS in the span of two hours.

File: gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay.jpg (161KB, 880x660px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

161KB, 880x660px

>>3010804
>>3010816
>>3010832

Same. I only catch the new movies because friends want to see them and I like having the context for all of the new Kirk/Spock fanfics.

IMO Star Trek simply does not lend itself to being condensed into movies without the presence of a series to develop its cast. The "tell don't show" nature of the movies gets old fast.

File: 130413088769.jpg (424KB, 899x992px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

424KB, 899x992px

Is next gen okay too?

File: pavel_chekov_by_peivi-d66nq52.jpg (2MB, 1000x1207px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

2MB, 1000x1207px

Anyone have more Chekov?