[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
I know that the FDA is allowed a certain amount of leeway in
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /ck/ - Food & Cooking

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1
File: pillar-rock-pink-salmon-166904.jpg (29 KB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]
pillar-rock-pink-salmon-166904.jpg
29 KB, 200x200
I know that the FDA is allowed a certain amount of leeway in terms of calories on food labels--that is, they may round up or down within a 5 actual calorie range.

But how do you explain SIGNIFICANT rounding? For example, a couple different brands of canned salmon (pic related) I purchase have macronutrients listed that add up to 83 calories, but 90 calories are listed. What gives?

>Calories: 90
>Fat: 3
>Carb: 0g
>Protein: 14g

3 x 9 = 27
14 x 4 =56
56 + 27 = 83

Why are they
a.) legally permitted to round up to the nearest 10th with a 7 calorie difference
b.) Not just rounding down, as most food manufacturers do?
>>
The calories are the only thing subject to rounding. For example:

3.4 x 9 = 30.6

14.4 x 4 = 57.6

30.6 + 57.6 = 88.2 ≈ 90
>>
>>7418754
Ah, good point.
>>
Reminds me of the whole trans fat thing for nutrition labels, where if it has under 0.5 grams of trans fat, it can be labeled as 0 grams. Fucking bullshit.

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm053479.htm

http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/HealthyLiving/HealthyEating/Nutrition/Trans-Fats_UCM_301120_Article.jsp#.VtFGLuYwCec

>You can also spot trans fats by reading ingredient lists and looking for the ingredients referred to as “partially hydrogenated oils.”
>>
>>7418791
Still true of many things.

I learned sugar-free products almost always have sugar in them when I became diabetic.
Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.