Does expensive food really tastes better than cheap food?
>generalizations made by nobody, ever
Yes, thanks to the placebo effect
it's true when it comes to meat.
expensive cuts are expensive because they're in high-demand due to tastiness.
Stands to reason that good tasting food takes more time and effort to produce, and thus more money.
post-purchase rationalization
>>7122257
That's why the least tasty part of the chicken is the most expensive, right?
>>7122263
It's lean that's why, fat tastes good, get the thighs.
>>7122257
>expensive cuts are expensive because they're in high-demand due to tastiness.
Confirmed to not know shit about shit
>>7122278
The thighs are marginally more calorie dense
>>7122247
Not always dumbtard. But can happens sometimes
>>7122247
Sometimes it tastes really unlike anything else, but not necessarily better. Its just refreshing to taste something thats different.
Depends..
Meat: Almost always.
Veggies: If price is tied to freshness, yes, if tied to how much poison it was grown in, no.
Spices: Sometimes (cheaper dried spices tend to have more stalk/filler).
Restaurant food: Depends greatly on the place. Cost of meal is usually a mixture of actual food / skill used to prepare it and other non-food related stuff (fancier shit, snootier waiters, whatever). Generally pricier places have better food, but there is certainly a point of diminishing return.
