Give me one scientific evidence showing that an economy must grow to be solid and healthy.
>>995525
>one scientific evidence
Okay, I'll let that slide. But basically,
>population is constantly growing
>if the economy doesn't grow too people will starve
There's your "one scientific evidence" you commie dumbass.
>>995527
>Population is constantly growing
False. Many developed countries are losing population actually.
>if the economy doesn't grow too people will starve
False. Food supply chain can improve its efficiency.
>>995542
>FALSE
COUNTRIES DONT LIVE IN CONTAINMENT YOU DUMBASS PIECE OF SHIT! WHY ARE COMMUNISTS SUCH BLOCKHEADS!
>FALSE
THE GOVERNMENT SECTOR HAS A RECORD OF INEFFECIENCY AS SEEN IN THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION
>>995527
Why do people think this? Shit is by definition unsustainable. Why can there never be a plateu?
>>995545
Countries can close their borders to immigration if they wanted to.
Who's talking about the government sector?
Even more, why are you talking about communism?
How about you define
"scientific evidence"
"economy"
"solid"
and "healthy"
before you demand answers.
>>995542
>False. Many developed countries are losing population actually.
False. From 2010 to 2015, the UN collected population data. Out of the 241 sovereign nations, dependents, and regions surveyed, only 25 saw any population decline, or 10%. That's also including "underdeveloped nations" such as island states and territories. 10% isn't "many" of anything.
>False. Food supply chain can improve its efficiency.
In what way. Saying is not doing.
Putting false in front of vague statements does not make a point. It just ousts you as autistic.
>>995567
Oh gosh what book is that. I need to give it to my gf
>>995593
http://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Educational-Establishments-Wakefield-Handbooks/dp/098411551X
>>995595
Ty
