ITT: undervalued stocks and why they're undervalued
NVDA
>>1267667
why?
>>1267655
I think BRK-B and AAPL are both good value plays and have good risk/reward.
>>1267667
It's hilarious to read the finance dudes on SA trying to make sense of tech companies, Nvidia, AMD, Intel, and so on. It's so clear they're 100% clueless on what they actually make, what the market is like, all they do is look at the financial numbers and extrapolate from there.
e.g. company is coming out with new product, SA is universally predicting good future, whereas the techies know it's all shit and hot air. Many laughs were had.
>>1267655
CERU
It's a pharmaceutical research company, you wouldn't understand.
>>1268191
We understand alright. Pharma is overhyped shit.
>>1268197
Ding ding.
.... and pop.
TTNP is about to get approval. Maybe double or triple by friday
Big revenue bonus and FDA in talks with co. About labels
CHK
VRX
GoPro check the balance sheet and income statement
>>1267655
AMD of course,
They should realistically be $99< (what they were in the 2000's), as they are a multi billion dollar that makes billions (it's stupid how small their their market cap is). ZEN is likely to remove maybe %80-%90 of their debt, whilst generating enough revenue to start paying dividends again. They'll be at least $35< by 2020, VR is going to be more disruptive than the printing press. The only thing that's damaged AMD is Intel's extremely aggressive marketing, they've confused the market into thinking they are better to invest in despite having a smaller CPU market share (70-30).
>>1267655
GM & bank stocks.
>>1268316
Oops, reason why is because they are priced for a credit crunch, which may or may not happen. You can hedge and have a good risk/reward on them.
>>1268314
Lmao AMD makes processors which, yeah, in 2000 was a very high margin business but even Intel is moving away from that business. You're an idiot if you think they make more than a couple peanuts per unit.
>>1268314
Aren't they taking over apple's macs instead of Intel now?
>long term traders with less than a few hundred million dollars
Rofl, you scrubs may as well just throw your money into an etf
>>1267655
CERU my nigga
>>1268542
the video cards are but not processors
>>1267706
You have a point man...most of the articles I read are like here's a bunch of charts, here's some more charts.
>>1268314
>VR is going to be more disruptive than the printing press
Insurance company PN (patriot national) in short the owner said he was going to dilute from $16 to fund massive expansion during the time of the last market dip. Stock tanked, and CEO Steven Mariano filled a form which reversed the dilution.
Stock is undervalued because everyone dumped and moved on, but dilution never happened.
Company crashed, and is now at $7-8 but has made advancements and smaller acquisitions. It will be a slow steady ride back up.
Company is buying back 10m shares, and is hoping to sell itself off soon.
Definitely AAPL
$SAKL isn't necessarily undervalued, but has huge upside at the current price. Be careful as it is pink sheet.
They're all over valued you big dumb idiots
We 2007 now.
>>1267655
MGT
