If ETH moves to PoS, do you think it will become irrelevant?

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-05-21 23:28:29 Post No. 1260628
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: bullshit.png (106 KB, 500x417) Image search: [Google]

106 KB, 500x417

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:28:29 Post No. 1260628 [Report]

If ETH moves to PoS, do you think it will become irrelevant?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:30:31 Post No.1260630
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:30:31 Post No.1260630 [Report]

No it wont. But miners will be butthurt. Next question

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:31:38 Post No.1260634
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:31:38 Post No.1260634 [Report]

https://youtu.be/V_3rcP2Duv0

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:33:44 Post No.1260638
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:33:44 Post No.1260638 [Report]

>>1260628
I thought eth already was a Piece of Shit...

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:41:26 Post No.1260651
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:41:26 Post No.1260651 [Report]

>>1260630

What's the difference between Lisk & ETH?

How would one earn from a PoS type system?

Is PoS for ETH a definite?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:45:17 Post No.1260658
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-21 23:45:17 Post No.1260658 [Report]

File: banks suck.jpg (2 MB, 1901x2800) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 1901x2800

>>1260628

no, the ethereum development team seems capable enough to innovate around issues that threaten widespread adoption of the cryptocurrency. If PoS is a failure for some reason, I trust them more than bitcoin developers to implement a solution quickly. It should then remain relevant because as a whole, cryptocurrency has a ton of potential that should have been realized years ago.