What are the potential problems with choosing a company name that is two fake surnames, so as to appear more trustworthy?
>>1249732
nobody gives a flying fuck. why would someone focus on the name? this is not high school anymore
>>1249739
it has to be a cool name. some companies spend millions researching a company name.
>>1249773
What companies. Nane one and post a source
>>1249773
do you mean apple or amazon? exxon or wells fargo? maybe facebook or is it johnson & johnson? oh i see now, it's fucking general electrics or cisco probably.
>some companies spend millions researching a company name.
name one of those who spend 1$ into the name please. make the name worth it, no matter the name
unless u'r selling some trendy juice of faggot clothing, the name don't matter
>>1249790
Aviato
>>1249796
>and post a source
>>1249804
because fags like you exist anon
please provide S&P500 compagnies who used that
>>1249804
>https://www.brandbucket.com/
I couldn't imagine being so uncreative that you would spend 50k for a brand image.
>>1249739
no one focuses on the name, but the subconscious does. Decisions are often made there before they can be brought to the conscious minds awareness.
>>1249732
I dont see nothing wrong with it
>>1250144
I don't get it
>>1249790
I don't know about names but there's plenty of startups who started as say: getdropbox.com because they couldn't afford dropbox.com and later bought dropbox.com for a shit load of money.
>>1250376
>our reputation is erecting
