Why shouldn't we nationalise the nation's banks?
>Eliminate massive CEO pay that goes straight to offshore accounts, keep that money in the system
>Government overwatch stops risky investing (IE Bad Mortgages) from happening again
The only downside I can think of is that the bankers wont go quietly and have lots of power. Your position?
Yeah because government systems are so efficient. Banking would essentially be like a trip to the DMV
ATMs would have 3 hour TSA line for security.
>>1247643
http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21698062-groups-funded-bank-gave-grants-pro-government-journalists-and-more-besides-how
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-25/hungarian-central-banker-faces-scrutiny-over-foundation-spending
http://hungarianfreepress.com/2016/04/26/fidesz-expels-journalists-from-parliament-for-asking-questions-on-central-bank-corruption-scandal/
>>1247643
Because that would be what the communist want.
Just kill them if they wont go quietly desu senpai
>>1247643
They have other ways to move money
We already have the fed
>>1247643
Lolbertarians would be so mad kek
I think we should nationalise all monopolized essential services. It's silly that we let a few powerful individuals monopolize telecommunications and internet service to the point where the service is objectively shit and were paying a ton for it and we cant do anything about it. Wouldn't it be better if elected officials were in control of that?
The west, so afraid of strong government, now has no government- only financial power
>>1248130
>government controlled internet service
oh god
ohhhhhhh god
>>1248134
>government controls internet
>internet service sucks
>get mad and elect someone will put internet improvement in the budget
>monopolies control internet
>internet service sucks
>get mad
>get told le free market will fix it :^)
>stay cucked
Your move
See why the fed is private
