it shoud be a rule that "stock pickers" have a transparent track record with both successes and failures before they can be taken seriously

I recall recently reading he's only right like 45% of the time.

>>1246177
That's pretty fucking good when it comes to trading. If you use stops correctly, even being right 10% of the time is good enough to make some decent money.

>>1246177
he made his name in the 2000's dot com craze, he was even quoted for "if it makes money, I don't give a fuck how it works". the bubble teared him a new asshole when it collapsed, so he went after 2004 to CNBC and become a cuck.

we know

>>1246130
he's a hater, op. fuck him

let him keep shorting tsla second-guessing Elonbro while we make money off this mad money fag.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/04/cramer-tesla-is-a-phenomenon.html

Whatever Cramer says, do the opposite