what do you guys think about this book ? is it still best book about investing ?
Replace the word "stock" with "etf" and you have an updated version of that book
>>1048291
it's not necessarily relevant anymore, however, if you're beginning to invest, it's the best place to start, and continue from there.
>>1048291
it was never the best book about investing
it contains almost zero actual practical advice
>>1048291
I'm reading it right now and it's pretty solid so far. I don't get the people saying this is outdated, most of the things you learn from this book are timeless.
>>1048436
>reading it right now and it's pretty solid so far
I just started chapter 4 and 1-3 were horrible.
In the intro it even said how Graham scammed people to make a lot of money.
>>1048444
>In the intro it even said how Graham scammed people to make a lot of money.
Where does it say that?
Also what did you find horrible?
>"In April 1919, he earned a 250% return on the first day of trading for Savold Tire, a new offering in the booming automotive business; by October, the company had been exposed as a fraud and the stock was worthless."
Also I just started 3, not 4. The commentary is not matching up with the text and the chapters so far seem too old to matter, like inflation. Also Graham is going into a tantrum about definitions of works like investor that means nothing.
>>1048477
>works
words
The book virtually says nothing besides, "don't be an idiot"
>>1048485
that's why it's so good
> 2016
> Not fully committed to technical analysis and binary options trading.
Stay pleb.
>>1048477
>stock was worthless
