[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
So can /b/ tell me why americunts still believe having guns is
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Thread replies: 86
Thread images: 6
File: image.jpg (130 KB, 750x735) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
130 KB, 750x735
So can /b/ tell me why americunts still believe having guns is normal and acceptable?

You all think you're the greatest but just look lmao you're all killing each other.
>>
File: 1332179950837.gif (1 MB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]
1332179950837.gif
1 MB, 250x250
>>
>>693611399
Fubs
>>
>>693611399
Dying is normal.
>>
That country known as United States is only 300 years old, but the fags that live there are even thought very proud of their lil' shit country full of mentally ill people Killing their mothers and fucking dogs in the ass
>>
>>693611399
To be fair we kill more innocents with drone strikes than guns.
>>
>>693611399

>I like guns
>don't care if others use guns to kill other people because I'm not a crybaby fgt

I guess you can keep crying, cucks.
>>
>>693612382

>Muslims
>innocents

Pick one
>>
>>693611399
The UK is not 13% nigger.

/thread
>>
>>693611399
Atleast the receiving end was correct this time around.
>>
>>693612560

>b8 this hard

R8 8/8
>>
>>693612644
Not b8, sorry.
>>
>>693611399
Blacks are only 13% of the US population yet they account for over 50% of all murders. Source: fbi.gov

America has a nigger problem.
>>
I'm pretty sure guns were invented in the first place to kill other people. Leave it to a stupid ape species like us to perpetrate our own downfall.
>>
>>693611399
Because Chicago you dumb cunt.
>>
>>693612560
So you are a nigger?
>>
>>693611399
Our niggers are better at catching bullets than yours. Jealous?
>>
>>693612893
Whiter than you, I'd guess.
>>
>>693612810
Bullshit. /pol/ is your source of that m8
>>
population of niggers in U.S.>population of niggers in U.K.
>>
>>693613061
I'm pretty sure he's right.
>>
>>693613021

>being an sjw cuck degenerate embarrassment wishing death on innocent people

Smh.
>>
>>693613061
fbi.gov, look it up
>>
>>693613162
The amount of triggerhappy cops is obviously higher, aswell.
>>
File: image.jpg (51 KB, 433x472) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
51 KB, 433x472
>>693611399
U.S - 318 million
U.K - 64.1 million

Real nice comparable numbers eurofag, how's your knife crimes holding up? Maybe one day when you pussies are man enough to handle real weapons, and get tired of all the Muslims raping your women while you all jack of to the queen, you can be cool like your big brothers in the U.S

>USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA
>>
>>693613231
>Innocent

They made their choice when they started blindly serving an entity that takes the peoples' freedom into their own hands to dictate upon.
>>
>>693611399
>ignoring the population difference
>ignoring the lack of the ABILITY of the police to kill people due to not having guns - even if a thug with a machete charged them
>ignoring the higher crimerate
>ignoring the percentage of guns within the population meaning a generally higher threat to the officers
>ignoring the higher percentage of low life nignogs ans spics
>ignoring the higher percentage of gangs and crime syndicates
FUCK
EVERYTHING
ok, i was trolled
>>
>>693613162
funny thing is that as the pop of sand niggers increases in europe they get a taste of everything we have been saying. They criticized America for the border issues. Now they have their own. They criticized gun rights. Now they are discovering that Terrorists can still get guns and they are left helpless because they can't. But they will just wait for the next massacre and then walk around with signs saying "Je suis Charlie" Which I think translates to "I am an idiot"
>>
>>693613402
>kel-tech garbage
preferring a blunt stick m8
>>
>>693613563
How could guns possibly be the solution then? Why not just deport all sand niggers from western countries? Seems like a good idea to me.
>>
>>693613467

>implying the threat of force and an agency responsible for carrying out that force is not necessary in order to prevent total anarchy

Necessary evil, nigger. Unless ur 14 and "muh anarchy so kewl"
>>
File: 1302191159702.gif (2 MB, 379x216) Image search: [Google]
1302191159702.gif
2 MB, 379x216
>>
>>693611399
This is yet another proof that there are no honest liberals. They are a pack of fucking liars and fags
>>
>>693611399
I'll take the bait.
>You all think you're the greatest but just look lmao you're all killing each other.
People are shit, and there are way too many of them in this country and this world. I don't see the killings as a bad thing, gets rid of those who cannot be a decent human being and find their way in life.
>>
>>693613680
>Necessary evil, nigger.

It would be, if its only purpose was enforcing a few, simple laws about human impunity, instead of the mile of small print that we have nowadays, which mostly serves the interests of money and those with it.
>>
>>693613636
Muslims are not the only issue. Take northern europe as another. In some of those countries there are roving gangs of thieves who break into homes and steal and rape. Of course these gangs know that they won't encounter any weapons so they run free. The stats don't lie. Every time an area (such as Chicago) takes guns away from the law abiding citizens the crime rate goes up. Now to you at a distance that is just a number, but what if you were living on those streets and it was your sister who got raped or your home that got broke in to. Would you appreciate being told that you have no right to own a gun? Gun control is for rich snotty girls who live in a bubble.
>>
>>693611399

>>693611399

as long as niggers and gangsters have guns, you HAVE TO HAVE GUNS.
>>
>>693614170
At the core of the issue is a person's perception of evil. The reason libs want gun control is that they don't see gangsters and "niggers" as a threat. You are the threat. You gun and Bible carrying nuts scare them... even though you haven't don't squat to them. Even after a Democrat Muslim terrorist killed many in a bar they marched with signs accusing Republican's of killing gays. They live in an irrational world that ignores the facts. Stats don't matter, neither does reason. All that matters is what makes them feel good.
>>
>>693613944

This is true, but not your average cops fault. It's politicians fault as always.
>>
>>693613944
BS. It serves the purpose of special interests. Money is only one of the special interest groups. Take the EPA as an example. They should exist to protect the environment. This should require a few simple laws. Instead miles of laws have been written to give them the power to steal land, write their own laws, imprison, and run a small army of soldiers against citizens. It is for tree huggers, who are not known for being rich, just militantly vocal. I can't stand idiots who spout "blame the corporations" all the time. Fucking idiot Bernie Sanders supporters
>>
>>693614650
Both are at fault. Everyone who stands idly by is at fault, but even more so those that actually act for those injustices, aka. cops.

If the law said every person who walks outside after 8pm is breaking the law and should be shot, I think it's very justifiable to blame the one doing the shooting. Not 'only' the one who decided on the law.
>>
>>693615065
Money = resources and is what gives power to every single "special interest group" on this planet.
>>
>>693615164
It's not just the cops. The whole system is structured to allow every official to hide behind the skirts of his job. "I am just doing my duty" say the prosecutors who imprison people who they know don't deserve it. Of course every prosecuting attorney has had cases where he knew the person was innocent. In fact part of their job is to inflate the charges above the crime and then bargain with the defense for a reduced charge. This is their job. It isn't good. It is fucking evil what they do. The poor and the poorly defended end up getting much more severe sentences. The rich pay powerful attorneys to get them off. And the prosecutor goes home happy that he has done his job and feeling no guilt for the people he has harmed. This is just one example. I could go on to so many other officials, like the jack asses we vote for to write our laws. They are mostly lawyers and know that many of the laws they write are unconstitutional, but they don't care. They say they are just representing their people. They pretend that they are not responsible for their actions. "Let the courts decide if it is legal"

But then I suspect that everyone reading this is the same. You to do terrible things but pretend that you are not responsible. You vote for whoever promises you something for free. You turn away when you see a crime. You are responsible too.
>>
>>693613402
U.S - 318 million
>people incarcerated 2,220,300 as of 2013

China- 1.4 billion
>people incarcerated 1,649,804 as of 2015

its almost like the US made it profitable to have people in prison, i guess yous really are the most "free" nation on earth on account of you being able to own a gun. or just maybr accessibility to firearms statistically causes crime rates to rise in certain impoverished areas thus creating more profitable felons? doesn't seem like america has its shit together to me.
>>
>>693615312
BS. The anti-war effort during Vietnam was not driven by money. It was driven by activist professors. Sure, you could trace it back to the rich daddies who funded the college for their spoiled hippie children, but that is a stretch. In a democracy shouting mobs get their way. Voice is a power that requires no money. Many leftists drive agendas without money, or worse, they force all America to pay for their agenda. They arent backed by money, they just take it.
>>
>>693616332
>blaming liberals rather than the top 1 of 1%, the real villain.

Fuck off please, Bill O'Reilly
>>
>>693615857
You're right. But even if it's just a one-man resistance, I will do my part within my capabilities as a human being and you should, too. The more people that turn away from the societal norms, the better. You lead by example.

This may sound quite egoistical, but I don't intend for it to be that way. In real life I live a quiet life where I don't talk about this stuff. I just live my life the way I choose to, and let others do the same.
>>
>>693616569
Libs always resort to anger when they cant find an excuse to justify their views. Actually I don't care for Bill O'Reilly I think he is an arrogant prick. You might not like it but my words are true. Money doesn't always control power, at least not in America. There are places where that is true.
>>
>>693616332
>Many leftists drive agendas without money, or worse, they force all America to pay for their agenda. They arent backed by money, they just take it.
And when they do, they make no progress, or barely any progress. A lot of these "leftists" also have the backing of the media, so they're definately not driving their agenda by shouting from treetops and the media isn't doing it with no agenda of their own either.
>>
>>693617022
America IS money, you twat. Politicians are bought and sold. Lobbyists are bought and sold. Sponsors are bought and sold. Wall Street speculation pretty much controls the direction the middle class will head towards in the next 5+ years.

You're really fucking ignorant. Capitalism is failing us, and you want to sit back and polish your gun. Fuck you.
>>
File: 1442325228604.jpg (208 KB, 1500x1088) Image search: [Google]
1442325228604.jpg
208 KB, 1500x1088
>>693612560
>>
>>693616576
I agree. Change is done by individuals living right, standing for their principles, voting with their conscience, not pocket in mind. But an idiot standing for his principles is not productive. That is actually the description of the hippie movements of the 60s. Those morons did the world so much harm. They banned DDT which, it turns out, does not do environmental damage and they falsified evidence (the end justifies the means). Millions have died from Malaria. They got us out of Vietnam saying that the Viet Kong were good guys and wouldn't butcher the people. Millions died in the blood bath after we left. They pretended it didn't happen. A moron standing for his principles is a dangerous thing. I am not saying they are never right. I am saying that it is far better when good people stand for their principles... but there are few good people left
>>
>>693617431
Murrica
>>
The UK also has 62.1 million in pop.

The US has 318.9 mil ...

Works out to aboutr the same % yea?
>>
>>693617211
One example is unions. They have laws that force all employees to pay union fees whither they want to be a member or not. Then the union uses that money to give it back to the same representatives who passed the laws.
>>
>>693611399
Good Job, well done, pls continue.-
>>
>>693617662
I'm not sure you know what you're talking about.

>They have laws
Who has laws? The unions? Union fees for the benefit of collective bargaining rights are not mandatory.
>The money goes back to those same representatives
Most unions in America actually have very little power, which is why they ask for donations, without enough money to get into boards or events, unions do little or nothing besides guarantee your salary.

I've worked in the same Union in WA state for 10 years. It's not that bad, and we have very little power.
>>
>>693617303
Capitalism? Since when is this capitalism? So Obamacare is capitalism? How about Obama's refusal to deport illegal immigrants. Is that driven by greedy corporations? How about Clinton's promise to raise the minimum wage? Is that driven by big money? America has gone to the left and capitalism is dying. We are on the verge of completely losing capitalism but you blame it. 90% of the laws that have been passed have been pushing us away from capitalism but you blame the rich. Yes, there are corporations driving agendas, but is is a strawman to say that all agendas are driven by money. Liberals like to say this because it makes them feel ok about redistribution. It vilifies the wealthy.
>>
>>693618198
It seems you don't know what capitalism actually is. Everything you listed is simply changing policy within the capitalist system.
>>
>>693618119
Who has laws? States, the Feds. Who do you think passes laws? Not all unions are subject to collective bargaining laws, but they would all like to be. Unions have little power? How much money did unions donate to democrats this year? That isn't power? Where did that money come from? My point was simply to say that unions are an example of special interests receiving money from people who don't support them. If your union gives to terrorist groups, would you support it? I suppose not. But you don't complain that they give to democrats because you like that. There are many members of your union who don't want that, but they are forced to give. That is not money controlling power. That is power controlling money.
>>
>>693611399
Listen, euro trash. Incase you don't know, its called thinning the herd. Eventually, the US will be too overwhelmed by overpopulation to sustain itself. Every seen Soylent Green? Watch it. What the cops are doing is sacraficing those few for the many. Think of the purge but everyday and very minute and spread nation wide. Guns don't kill, people kill. Take away guns, knife related crimes will go up. Go fuck off with your "progressive" way of life, you fucking limey or swed cunt. What did your progressiveness get you? Bomb or pwned by Germany that WE Americunts had to bail you out and being invaded by the mudslimes, giving your soft white daughters and wives to them. One huge region of cucks and hipsterfags
>>
>>693618687
>That is power controlling money.
Which is given to them due to money and resources. It's an endless circle.
>>
>owning a gun is illegal in Chicago
>Chicago has highest murder rate of all US cities
>Gun control is working as intended
>>
>>693618198
You still think your countries problems are caused by the lower classes. This is an ignorant and dangerous line of thought. Stop watching the news.
>>
>>693617582
are you retarded? are you just going to ignore the time scale entirely?
>>
>>693618664
So you think Obama is a capitalist? And I am the one who doesn't understand capitalism? I could give a long response about how crony capitalism is not real capitalism, but you wont get it. You want socialism. That is far more interesting to me. I am often puzzled by socialists who think they will be happy in a dictatorship. If they think this why don't they move to one? The doors are open... one way at least.
>>
>>693618847
given? They take it by force! What happens to union members who refuse to pay?
>>
File: Earth-apocalypse.jpg (361 KB, 1440x900) Image search: [Google]
Earth-apocalypse.jpg
361 KB, 1440x900
>>
>be american
>Wear Diapers
>So dont shat muhself when shot
>get shot in diaper
>kek :^)
>>
>>693619214
I do not want socialism. Never said that I do.

There are many forms of capitalism, and there isn't one exact definition for what it is due to differing policies, yet the main-points remain. Just read up wikipedia or something.
>>
>>693619311
True enough.
>>
>>693618959
The countries problems are caused by the immoral classes. It doesn't matter what the side is, when people are driven by selfish interests and not by good principles then good looses. Trump is an example of this. Do you think it is good and decent people who follow him? They are morons, drooling masses of sheep who want to feel good about their hate and ignorance. There are few good people left, but this cycle the good will be the people who don't vote. The evil have 2 good representatives.
>>
>>693619462
I know you didn't say it. I was attempting to read between the lines. I may have misread but I don't think so. You perhaps use a different term but I think it probably amounts to the same. You want a totalitarian government to save you from the bastard corporations... and somehow you think that a totalitarian government will be a good thing... because giving that much power to government always works out for the best.
>>
>>693612427
>>I like guns
>>don't care if others use guns to kill other people because I'm a sociopath

>I guess you can keep crying, sane people.

there fixed it for you
>>
>>693612552
true, but it is about 7% nigger. So why haven't we had the same problems? Possibly because your society is broken?
>>
>>693611399
Yet you wonder why terrorists live and attack you limey cum-rags.
>>
>>693611399
>i'm a coward so everyone else should be too,
>>
ITT: we blame guns for problems caused by people being assholes.
>>
>>693620086
DING DING DING, WINRAR!
>>
>>693613563
yeah, but since the Hebdo attack we have seen one more attack in France - you have had more people killed in mass shootings this month, and every month in the year between attacks. And that is just mass shootings. you have had more people killed in Chicago this week than in all France in ten years, if you take out the terrorist shootings. there is no comparison. your society is sick. you live in fear - fear of each other and fear of your government and fear of strangers and fear of your own children with the guns you bought them for birthday presents.
>>
>>693611399
Police in the UK sit and watch while gangs of immigrants rape hundreds of little girls, then arrest those girls' fathers when they try to save them.

Fuck the UK.
>>
>>693620086
So USA just has more assholes then most of the western world?

I could agree.
>>
>UK Pop. = 64 million
>7% = 448,000 niggers

>US Pop. = 330 million
>14% = 46,200,000 niggers

Could the problem be that we have 100 times more niggers? Not the 2x that you tried to twist it into. 1.5/10 try harder.
>>
>>693613061
Are you really that fucking retarded
>>
>>693620344
meant for
>>693619945
you pussy crybaby
>>
>>693613402
yes, but you are ignoring the time scale again - days and years, you know? in proportional terms using your figures, the UK should have killed 74 people in the last 115 DAYS, but has only killed 52 in the last 115 YEARS.
Thread replies: 86
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.