>>693352399
>Lesson
>Would have to be large scale regime change to incriminate her
Only reason she's not in gitmo.

File: 1456934285098.jpg (188 KB, 800x1000) Image search: [Google]

188 KB, 800x1000

When you see a pleb so willing to trust his government.

>>693352399
>cleared of all wrongdoing.

That's not what happened here. He even explicitly stated that she was in fact guilty of wrongdoing. But he doesn't wanna end up dying mysteriously. So he's not gonna be the one to pull that handle.

>>693353032
>>693353533
Bush appointed life time republican, you ignorant faggets want it both ways. World don't work like that bitches

>>693353032
>gitmo

well at least we know you are retarded

>>693353533
or as he said, she made a mistake doing this and it was careless, but it was not criminal and no laws were broken. Only rules.

>>693353229
Ya best not to trust in books either
Anime and tv are def the best solution, allows you to rationalize a 1%er born rich represents non establishment.

>>693353795
>World doesn't work
You're damn straight it doesn't, faggot.

>>693353833
What? Bitch could use some waterboarding.

Even anarchist security culture is better than putting a foia-immune server in your fucking basement and using a commercial email in two thousand and fucking nine.

I can't imagine how someone with no understanding of Intel is going to become president. Her inability to grasp simple rules becomes a lot more dangerous when we're talking about information systems.

>>693354012
Bullshit. If you or I would have done the exact same thing we would have already been in jail for years.

>>693354012
When I break the rules, I get punished for it. At the very least she should lose her position in government, maybe even lose her pension with it.

>>693354012
No. He made it clear that she was criminally negligent. Just that she didn't "seem" to have "meant" to break the law. She did. He knows it. She knows it. The guy assigned to kill the FBI director if he had suggested indictment knows it. It's just better if we're all on the same page.

>>693355656
She should lose her tits and have her vagina glued shut. Because all of that is gonna make more vote and wind up destroying this country.

File: image.jpg (82 KB, 475x476) Image search: [Google]

82 KB, 475x476

>>693355749
Retartded she has not motive and neither does he, bitch already has money and power and wants more; how could someone that clever commit crimes to go against her fucking life goal.

This is just an old woman tech fail, if she knew this was gonna happen she would never have paid for a home server.

>>693356060
That just shows that 1) she doesn't care about anything and B) she is far too incompetent to hold and political office much less the highest office in the land.

>>693356281
Any* not and.

>>693355749
>He made it clear that she was criminally negligent.

You don't understand negligence or the criminal law, then.

>>693352399
look everyone another retarded millennial who doesn't understand what happened.
what is this second shift or something. assholes have been at it all day.
they done goofed. this is going to backfire on the democrats.

File: 1427720588617.gif (119 KB, 320x600) Image search: [Google]

119 KB, 320x600

>>693352399
>maximum b8

The FBI director actually outlined the crimes she committed but then decided not to press charges. She was blatantly in the wrong, she's just above the law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc&index=1&list=FL8XvoBEcHI9HEr5SiRkivLQ

Also: fuck you for making me reply to this bullshit bait

>>693356492
No I do. And I understand "intent". I get that she may or may have not had the "intent" necessary to indict. But the fact remains. Intent or not. Any of us. You, me, or the guy assigned with killing the FBI director of he suggests indictment, would face the harshest punishments imaginable as this is the first time in history that the justice department has decided not to indict on breach of secrecy law and confidentiality.

>>693352399
She will be your Angela Merkel. Prepare your Arnus. Good luck America, your Germany (Last EU Member in 2030)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Rcc7xgD2dM

>>693353795
try complete and informative sentences if you want to get paid shill.

>>693356959
>arnus

Kek

>>693352399
it is an example of why you should of felt the bern instead of that crooked bitch

>>693354012
learning ain't your strong point is it boy.
then you think Trump is a racist.

>>693356060
>retartded

It is actually illegal to send top secret information to and from government employees over a non-secured, non-government email. A lot of the shit she sent was retroactively classified as top secret, which wasn't her fault, but some emails (regarding North Korean nukes and such) were top secret from the get-go. Anyone who has worked in the government for that long knows that's a big fucking deal. The only real reason she wanted a private server was so that she could hide what she's sending, and who she's sending it to, from the FBI. Which she did try to do.

The part i liked best was when the director of the FBI flat out said

"if someone else did this there would be consequences"

Hillary is above the law. How dose this make you feel Bernouts and Trumptards?

The next president of the US is unfucking touchable and you know it!

>>693356060
sure kid. damage control

>>693356879
>The FBI director actually outlined the crimes she committed

You forgot the part where he said there weren't grounds for criminal charges. He literally refutes you in the video you posted. It's like you guys are incapable of grasping English and reality.

>>693357159
Someone should do... A thing.

>>693357065
upsi

File: tumblr_o6tifdcKtM1rmtwl0o1_540.jpg (44 KB, 523x372) Image search: [Google]

44 KB, 523x372

"Oh, I didn't know I was potentially exposing top secret information. I don't like having two emails. I only like to carry this one thing around. I don't even know how to work the whosy-whatsit. My daughter set it up for me.

Encryption? No hon I don't speak French."

Tech illiterate grandma for president 2016

>>693357268
See>>693357159

>>693357159
>"if someone else did this there would be consequences"

Yeah, an underling might have gotten fired. That's what he's talking about. He didn't say anyone would go to jail.

File: image.jpg (21 KB, 336x322) Image search: [Google]

21 KB, 336x322

>>693356281
How you can think she is incompetent when she could buy sell, inprison then free and lift you up to upper middle class and cut her teeth when sexism was actually real gangster level politician is beyond me.

How it not more likely that she wanted a blackberry like every other old person with power and for IT to have fairy dust fix her problems resulting in the equivalent of a compliance violation than whatever the fuck your morons are trying to imply she did by having that sever.

>>693357357
Backtrack to the deflection zone!!!! Srsly. This is the first time this has happened that heads didn't roll

>>693357268

Intent retard, lack of intent. They do not have enough evidence she KNOWINGLY committed the crime.

It still happened.

>>693357159
Do you think that is a good idea? What do you enjoy that she wants to make illegal or hard to obtain? Weed? Stupid fucking children.

>>693357133
WHICH IS WHAT TO WHO?!?!?! You can't tell me because your story has no fucking end, just a moron talking shit!

>>693357408
Holy shit what the fucking fuck shit damn nigga learn how to into engrish

File: 145651.jpg (59 KB, 730x416) Image search: [Google]

59 KB, 730x416

>>693357268
Seems like someone needs a remedial criminal law 101 class

>I really hope you being well compensated for making these posts on behalf of a fucking scumbag piece of shit.

>>693357229
What damage? lol what are you implying she did?

File: Enough.jpg (25 KB, 471x346) Image search: [Google]

25 KB, 471x346

>>693357159
Nobody is untouchable when using a .905 caliber

>>693357586
What and who are unimportant. It's the method used that is absolutely a law broken.

>>693357613
/thread

>>693357495
>This is the first time this has happened that heads didn't roll

He literally says in the video that there was no case supporting the proposition that criminal charges were appropriate. He says that in the fucking video. The FBI director, in the very video you posted, says there is no antecedent case that supports bringing charges in these circumstances. What part aren't you understanding?

>>693357613
>Seems like someone needs a remedial criminal law 101 class

Actually you're not understanding what gross negligence involves. I know that because I actually do have a law degree, and the FBI director agrees with me.

>>693357586
It's fucking barely 5 sentences, are you illiterate?

>>693357613
Boggles the mind how fucked we are as a culture hat you think this is the case with the Secratary of State.

I can't argue with this bullshit if you already gotten this fucking lost.

...and your thinking "how can this not apply to her, got her!"

Yes your smarter and more versed in the law than the FBI.

Oh ya I forgot the lizard people are paying to keep their secrect board that controls all. Not the obvious money and power

>>693358008
The gross negligence came in the form of the unsecured server itself, of which she knew full well was unsecured because it was used on a daily basis. Go spout your nonsensical "knowledge of the law" elsewhere.

>>693358008
>I actually do have a law degree
Just like Hillary before she was threatened with being disbarred for unethical behavior during the Nixon watergate hearings. Just because you have a law degree, doesn't mean you get to use your liberal bias to defend her. There was more than enough proof to ring her up, the FBI director just didn't want to die unexpectedly.

>>693357849
I'm not that guy and I know what the fuck he said. It still doesn't change the fact that he essentially said "she didn't know she was breaking the law, but she totes was breaking the law. see>>693357613. This guys pic is right. She broke the shit outta that law. But she's really REALLY sorry and this guy with a gun to my head(or a briefcase full of cash) says she'll never do it again. She is essentially getting off on a technicality and it's so blatantly obvious that it's not even worth arguing. All you have to say is "it's cool that she's a criminal"

>>693357834

Yup.

They can slap her with a fine that she will not notice missing from he account and everyone can be happy.

File: killary.jpg (157 KB, 600x291) Image search: [Google]

157 KB, 600x291

>>693358439
>...and your thinking "how can this not apply to her, got her!"

>>693356060
>old woman tech fail
Sure, but then again: she should know taking certain intel home is actually a serious security breach - paper or digital. And she has most likely been briefed on that, also pretty likely a lot of fucking times. The shit job I do has a strict code regarding confidentiality, I'm pretty sure the US gov is a bit more strict there.
She willfully ignored this. Enough to get fired, enough to get sued and when it's about stuff like this enough to get arrested. Seriously, this would ruin any other person but Hillary.

>>693358403
Are you?

Let me be more clear: what was Clinton doing? What are you implying she could be doing? Or the pure compliance and oversight violation which she is not 100% responsible for is enough for what?

An audit of every politicians this applies for would fill the prison so bet, you ever work in tech for he government?

>>693357613
>>I really hope you being well compensated for making these posts on behalf of a fucking scumbag piece of shit.

I'm a Canadian and doing it Pro Bono! I just like seeing you idiots froth and to point out how stupid you all are.

You post a video that details the "crimes" where the FBI director says, out loud and explicitly that no crime was committed. You paste the law she supposedly broke without actually understanding what the words mean and why she didn't break it. You bitch and you whine disingenuously, hysterical over the fact she's gonna bury your party in the fall. You've been trying for decades to get this woman on something, and it infuriates you that she keeps outsmarting you. It's hilarious.

Bring up Benghazi next. Go on. Do it.

>>693358664
BRB posting this on Fagbook

File: 16549874.gif (986 KB, 450x338) Image search: [Google]

986 KB, 450x338

>>693352399
>Just another fucking shill getting paid to post this stupid shit on the interwebs

>>693357541

I enjoy drinking republican tears.

And if she gets elected i will have an unlimited supply of them for 8 years (pro tip she will win, and get reelected)

Then i will still have a steady flow of republican tears after she is gone because she will appoint a left leaning justice(s) and swings the court to the left and rules on sensible gun laws and make republicans assblasted ever more!

>>693358825
He never said no crime was committed. He said there were crimes committed but no intent to commit the crime. And intent is 90% of the crime. But she knew what the fuck she was doing. And FBI director knows that there's a guy with a gun waiting for this mess to blow over

>>693352399
>>693353795
>>693356060
>>693357268
>>693357159
>>693358008
>>693358439
>>693354012

*$0.50 has been wired to your account*

>>693358720
No way, I did compliance and IT for a top law firm and lawyers don't understand how data moves, that is why I exist and so do compliance officers.

She asked for it they said yes, she checked with who knew and they stamped it, bank rolled it and had IT build it out - that is a whole team and she is just saying do this do that. CEO doesn't do the job of th COO

>>693358825
>Canadian
>Somehow knows our country's laws better than it's citizens
Damn, they gotta go outside the country to find tech support now? Fuck off, northern exposure.

File: 1388076373767.png (122 KB, 625x626) Image search: [Google]

122 KB, 625x626

>>693359000

nice post, friend. you get a whole dollar for that one.

File: 145654186545.jpg (43 KB, 300x375) Image search: [Google]

43 KB, 300x375

>>693358825
>I'm a Canadian
Holy fuck. I'm arguing U.S. law in relation to the U.S. presidential election and you're a fucking foreign faggot? Jesus Christ man. Fuck off

>>693358825

> a fucking leaf

into the trash it goes.

>>693359000
>wasting trips on shilling

File: 1403243872142.gif (3 MB, 240x180) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 240x180

>>693356060

>motive
this is not murder. Motive is only relevant to murder

>tech fail
Would someone computer illiterate ever think sending information classified Top Secret via email is a good idea?
>no

Besides, ignorance is not a defense.

If anyone besides her did this, especially someone in the private sector (i.e. DoD contractor), they'd be convicted and in jail in a week

File: 1395338569696.jpg (9 KB, 261x175) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 261x175

>>693358825

>A

>FUCKING

>LEAF

>>693358825
lol can't wait till Trump takes away your miserable excuse for a country. Best part is your army will probably be half trannies by then so casualties should be minimum.

>>693359000
The guns are already out there dipshit. Your gun laws won't accomplish shit. Actually, I hope they lead to people like you at the bottom of a mass grave, and before you say.....I'm not a republican. Far right....far left....both are mindless cunts.

>>693359000
>sensible gun laws
The left has yet to unveil a single sensible gun law. blow it out your ass

>>693359143
No see what happened as it is with all women is she got the briefings and couldn't be fucked to do it right so she nagged her people"hey guys can I just get it here" and they were all like "but dude you guys shits totes illegal" and she said "I don't give a fuck I want my shit!"

>>693358792
I don't have to imply anything, she already did it. She sent classified emails over a non secure server. That's illegal because the government (FBI, DOJ, etc) doesn't have access to what she is sending, or who she is sending it to, because Hillary could simply delete incriminating emails rather than turn them over to the FBI.

No, I don't do tech support for the US government, but I am a government employee. And it is absolutely illegal for me to simply discuss work-related details (or names) without using my government -issued email. The same even goes for school teachers, and they don't exactly handle government secrets.

>>693359084
>He said there were crimes committed but no intent to commit the crime.

That's not what he said at all. He says "We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

"Gross negligence" has a technical meaning in the law, and the facts of the case do not show she did something grossly negligent. In other words, she didn't violate section 793(f).

>>693359392
>If anyone besides her did this, especially someone in the private sector (i.e. DoD contractor), they'd be convicted and in jail in a week

pic related

File: snowden.png (13 KB, 503x233) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 503x233

>>693359392
>>693359961
oops forgot pic

>>693359200

Lots of you idiots are disagreeing with the republican director of the FBI, as if you know more about the law than he does.

>>693359773
Ya so if your tech department built a sever for your boss it would have to be total corruption from top to bottom right? Just to get it paid for would require everyone's hands to touch it, no?

>>693359214
>Holy fuck. I'm arguing U.S. law in relation to the U.S. presidential election and you're a fucking foreign faggot?

And you're losing. You don't even understand why your own FBI director didn't lay charges. I understand why and I'm a foreigner. Why don't you?

File: 2013.png (62 KB, 662x231) Image search: [Google]

62 KB, 662x231

>>693360056
>disagreeing with the republican director of the FBI
>republican
Are you people really this retarded? Sure he's really a republican..

>>693360056
The director of the FBI said she broke the law, we just aint doing shit about it. You'd have to be profoundly ignorant to think that some how means she is innocent. So basically you would have to be a democrat.

File: 1465160055658.gif (183 KB, 214x200) Image search: [Google]

183 KB, 214x200

>OP IS A FUCKING CANADIAN

>ABANDON THREAD

>B8

>SHILL

>NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR OPINION FOREIGNER

>EAT A BAG OF DICKS

>ABANDON THREAD
>ABANDON THREAD
>ABANDON THREAD
>ABANDON THREAD
>ABANDON THREAD
>ABANDON THREAD

>>693360400
To add to your point he was suggesting openly that to bring the charges forward is useless because she is who she is and she is above the law.

>>693360400
>The director of the FBI said she broke the law,

No, he didn't. Watch the video. Do you understand that there is a difference between guidelines, policies, suggestions, standard operating procedure on the one hand, and the criminal law on the other? The FBI director didn't make the mistake you're saying he made.

As long as the alternative is Trump, it wouldn't matter if she was Charles Manson's disciple, she's still the least bad choice.

File: 13600301_1757624564455451_8111051420218731941_n.jpg (32 KB, 479x296) Image search: [Google]

32 KB, 479x296

>>693359924

>>693361029
This.

But there is no penatrating the thick dermis of these Drumpft supporters.

File: 1446659273116.jpg (49 KB, 625x626) Image search: [Google]

49 KB, 625x626

>>693361155

File: Capture.png (14 KB, 389x221) Image search: [Google]

14 KB, 389x221

>>693360288
> D'ARRRRRRR

Also from wikipedia: Comey is a registered Republican who donated to U.S. Senator John McCain’s campaign in the 2008 presidential election and to Governor Mitt Romney’s campaign in the 2012 presidential election.

But he's just Manchurian candidating the shit out of America, right?

File: 13397910646.jpg (64 KB, 800x722) Image search: [Google]

64 KB, 800x722

>>693361029
>>693361155
>>693361251

>>693361029
Why yes I do unlike yourself and criminal law is precisely what she violated. The FBI agrees with me and says he would have brought charges against anyone else but since its a Clinton...

File: hillary-clinton-shoreline-montage.jpg (47 KB, 620x310) Image search: [Google]

47 KB, 620x310

>>693352399
These are the same type of assholes that said the FBI were all crooks when they were rooting out communist.

>>693361251
Also samefagging is pathetic

>>693361510

Where? Where did he say that? It's not in the video dude posted, is it?

>>693361510
That's exactly what he said. Don't misunderstand. I'm not him and I am stating fact.

>>693361353
>Comey
>John McCain
>Mitt Romney
But none of those are liberals or at most, RINO's right? Learn politics before you sound any more stupid.

File: nope.png (50 KB, 565x277) Image search: [Google]

50 KB, 565x277

>>693361447
Your detector is broken.

>>693361628
"If someone else did this there would be consequences." Not even that guy faggot nigger

File: Capture.png (135 KB, 813x281) Image search: [Google]

135 KB, 813x281

>>693361728

Yep.

File: fucking plebs.jpg (32 KB, 400x462) Image search: [Google]

32 KB, 400x462

>>693352399

>>693361628
When did "HE" say that? It's the "same type of asshole". Learn English moron.

File: 1449330271440.jpg (50 KB, 400x504) Image search: [Google]

50 KB, 400x504

>>693356060

>>693361728
>>693361886
That just makes you guys part of a faggot "brigade"

>>693361865

Right, but those might not be criminal charges. Like I said above, most likely if an underling or nobody had done what Hillary did, they'd be fired. He didn't say they would have been indicted. If he thought they could have been indicted, he'd have said so, because he's a law enforcement guy who is careful with words.

The best part of this is the FBI basically just handed Trump the election by making Clintons corruption so blatantly obvious even Bernie supporters can't tolerate her anymore. Can't wait to watch MSNBC meltdown on election night. It will be even better than the Scott Walker recall and Brexit combined.

File: flat,800x800,075,f.u2.jpg (90 KB, 800x522) Image search: [Google]

90 KB, 800x522

>>693356492
He also made it clear that her getting away with no charges shouldn't be used as precident when someone else does the exact same thing. We all, Comey included, know that the law was broken. Charges weren't filed because you'd wind up with a kangaroo court because Hillary owns DC.

File: 1465342566611.jpg (8 KB, 252x240) Image search: [Google]

8 KB, 252x240

>>693362048
>even Bernie supporters can't tolerate her anymore
>Can't wait to watch MSNBC meltdown on election night
This. It's going to make America great again

>>693362038
Then you admit Clinton's corruption is obvious either she got away with a crime or a fire able offense. Either way it doesn't matter. She got away with it for no reason other than that her last name is Clinton.

Face it dude, no one is buying your bullshit

>>693362038
They would most definitely be criminal charges. Don't even fucking act like they wouldn't. To say that if I broke company policy and it was found out after I quit is fine. But if breaking company policy was a federal offense(as it is in this case) I or you or the guy holding the FBI directors children hostage until this all blows over would most definitely already be convicted and in prison as long as our name isn't Hillary Clinton

>>693357613
>HIS superior
Lern 2 reeding comprehension. This is feminist America,nigga.

>>693362048
God I hope so

>>693362048
Ha! Meaningless manufactured "scandals" won't make up for the sad dickless cheeto colored failure the Repugs have as a candidate.

>>693356831
Replied

File: trump.jpg (6 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 225x225

>>693362502

>>693362387
>a fire able offense.

Maybe; I dunno. We're talking about criminal charges.

> She got away with it for no reason other than that her last name is Clinton.

That, or she was the boss.

>>693362502
She can't sneakily murder everyone that doesn't want her to ruin America.

>>693362502
And yet he's still the better option. How shit do you have to be to make Trump look competent and honest?

>>693362673
I'm not voting for Trump, but I am voting for the ferret who lives on his head.

>>693362048

You guys are beyond delusional. All this looks like to any casual observer is that it's another nonsensical witch hunt.

>>693362502
You can tell anon is a basement dweller cuz his mind immediately goes to cheetos.

>>693352399
ITT: Liberals explaining why they are going to vote for a criminal dedicated to advancing the anti-freedom agenda put forth by Bush and Obama, but not understanding the word "hypocrite" when confronted with any criticism.

>>693357159
Unless I assassinate her with no ties or apparent motive.

>>693362901
Do they pay you, or are you just blind and retarded? Her career is like a greatest hits of corruption album

>>693362776
Trump is survivable. Hillary will have the constitution destroyed and trample over Americans rights. She isn't the better option unless you're a PBR chugging Pall Mall smoking millennial hipster faggot with white guilt and $40k in student loan debt

>>693362437
>But if breaking company policy was a federal offense(as it is in this case)

It wasn't; and that's the whole point. You're still not understand what the crime was supposed to be. You seem to think that the crime was merely exposing the emails to disclosure. But that's not what the statute says.

>>693362776
>And yet he's still the better option.
Not even close.

>How shit do you have to be to make Trump look competent and honest?
No idea, I've never seen anything that would do that.

>>693363069

Or a series of Republican witch hunts that made me compare them them to Officer Jim Lahey crying shitwolf.

>>693363071
The election of Trump would be the death knell for the country. Hillary is just a bog-standard politician. Just as corrupt as every other one.

File: 1465866420993.png (295 KB, 581x692) Image search: [Google]

295 KB, 581x692

>>693352399
The FBI specifically said that Hillary was reckless, incompetent and would have lost her security clearance if she was caught in the act.

File: 1596748412.jpg (65 KB, 684x781) Image search: [Google]

65 KB, 684x781

>>693352399
>leaf gets btfo on /pol/
>no one listens to a fucking leaf
>leaf comes to /b/ for help
>leaf gets btfo on /b/
What a gigantic douche

>>693352399
everyone is thinking about this wrong
>if AG Lynch filed charges he could then drop them before trial giving Hillary double-jeopardy protection
>by not filing charges, if she is elected, congress can impeach her
if congress remains Republican controlled (which looks likely), he term as president may be the shortest one ever
and one of the presidents died less than 2 weeks after being sworn in

>>693362901
Dude they already have tons of polling proving americans don't trust her. At best the Sanders ppl were holding out hope for an indictment, now they're gonna either stay home or vote green. Either way your fucked and you know it. Thats why your here anyway. Your lashing out at the obvious future hurtling towards you. Its kinda sad really.

>>693363126
She sent and received top secret emails on a private server. That's all it takes. She committed a federal offense. Literally ALL IT TAKES. sent. Recieved. Top secret. Private server. All elements are there except the unprovable intent. They played the little old incompetent lady card. And that(even tho it's not true) is enough to disqualify her for being the mayor of whore island. Much less the highest electable position in the land.

>>693363294
You don't pay attention anymore. You like to think you do. But the last 16 years has worn you out. Understandable. But be glad in the future that some of us are paying attention and won't let your rights be taken from you without a fight

>>693352399
no matter what you do your country will continue being shit.

>>693363519
>She sent and received top secret emails on a private server. That's all it takes.

No. The statute says it's only a violation if it's done with gross negligence. No gross negligence, no violating the law as written. This isn't a mens rea issue, except insofar as it pertains to the criterion of gross negligence mentioned in the statute itself. So no, she didn't break the law. If it merely required "negligence" it might be different. But it doesn't. That's why they couldn't charge her.

>>693363071
>have the constitution destroyed
Oh no. A 200 year old document that's already been changed 27 times in the past?

>>693363241
Really? Let me lay this out for you. If you're a politician and you have one corruption scandal, maybe it's bad luck or one time poor judgement. Two, shitty luck or a slight trend. Three, maybe you have enemes. Four to Six, maybe you have powerfull enemies. More than 10 (which hillary absolutely does) the accusers almost certainly have a point. At this point she is guilty by the same logic that Bill Cosby is. You don't rack up so many accusations by being clean.

>>693352399
But, but, Benghazi!

>>693363941
The simple fact that it happens proves gross negligence. He literally said if anyone else did it there would be consequences with a gun to his head. Why are you defending this piece of shit?

>>693355050
Yeah because Trump knows how a computer works? Lol get fucking real

>>693364012
And you need to leave. Don't like America? Go fuck yourself and join the EU. And you don't just change the bill of rights.

>>693363941
Actually, the bought off FBI hack spent 90% of his press conference detailing "gross negligence" without saying the word. Additionally, this whole thing was about prosecution of crimes. They didn't recommend that she should be prosecuted, but that doesn't mean she is innocent either.

>>693362754
>>a fire able offense.
>Maybe; I dunno. We're talking about criminal charges.
the applicable US code clearly states that anyone convicted of the offense can not hold public office
that includes elected and appointed, she can't even be a member of the military (if she were young enough) or a postal carrier

>>693364074
Great, so now you have two pieces of utter shite running for leader of your country. You have a turd sandwich and a giant douche. Yer fucked both ways. Congrats, way to be exceptional 'murika!

>>693356906
No it isn't, and now you're just plain making shit up. Need some bandages for your ravaged anus?

"gross Negligence" is acting with extreme carelessness, the FBI director quoted her as doing exactly that. look up the legal definition. He even made the direct claim that "anyone else acting in the same manner, may face charges" she was not brought up on charges ONLY because who she is. That's outrageous no matter what political party you are. If this does not bother you, you don't get to complain when the next republican slimball gets a get out of jail free card. Pull your nose out of you political parties ass and get on the side of freedom..not the ruling elite.

File: 1467849737766.jpg (158 KB, 1254x1238) Image search: [Google]

158 KB, 1254x1238

>>693352399

File: 1467838574907.gif (833 KB, 350x497) Image search: [Google]

833 KB, 350x497

>>693364557
Nobody cares about your opinion foreigner

>>693364162
>The simple fact that it happens proves gross negligence. He literally said if anyone else did it there would be consequences with a gun to his head.

You're still not exerting any effort to grasp what gross negligence requires in a statute like the one at issue. And if the consequences he had in mind were criminal charges, he would have said so. It's not like he doesn't know the difference.

>Why are you defending this piece of shit?

I don't really give a shit about Clinton, though the importance of future Supreme Court nominations is a great reason to vote for her. I mostly enjoy fucking with the hysterical morons on /b/. Keeps me sharp and makes me smile.

>>693364356
Fucking moron. The country is broke. The solution is fixing it, not fleeing.

>>693364653
But tell us how you really feel. Don't hold back /b/ro

>>693364495
>but that doesn't mean she is innocent either.

Well no; maybe she was super grossly negligent. Maybe she intentionally transmitted emails to the Borg Bin Laden in the Delta Quadrant. It's just that there's no evidence of that.

>>693362754
>That or she's a kike serving, shit stirring criminal
Kek

>>693364150
Oh, wait, she was exonerated for that too. Oops. Sorry shitpublicans

>>693364653
>"anyone else acting in the same manner, may face charges"

Where? Where did he make that claim in the words you stated?

>>693364780
>The solution is fixing it
so your solution is throwing out the one document that this country was founded on? No thanks, like the other anon said, get the fuck out if you don't like the constitution

File: Get_out_of_jail_free.gif (12 KB, 220x140) Image search: [Google]

12 KB, 220x140

>hillary card

>>693364568
>I said a thing
>you don't agree

You're wrong and bootyblasted!!!!
Water tight argument you've got there friendo

>>693365129
Many of the problems come from slavish adherence to a flawed document written by fallible men. Do better.

>>693365083
Oh, that didn't happen. I can't believe someone would make that up!

>>693364726
So the extreme left leaning Supreme Court that would shred the constitution and only reason this country is still a country at all is a great reason to vote for Clinton? It's time to move friendo. The EU would suit you best.

>>693365380
It's not a matter of agreement. You're making claims that are flat untrue. And your "guy assigned with killing the FBI guy" meme isn't funny. Kill yourself repubtard.

>>693358986
Where do I go to sign up for this? I'll gladly shill for Hillary, or even Trump. As long as I'm getting paid, bitches.

>>693364780
Yeah. What he said. I was the guy you responded to btw.

>>693365714
Hahahahahaha!
Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh harder.

File: image.jpg (93 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]

93 KB, 960x960

>>693359392
This is what happens when you argue about shit you don know. How did that server get bought and paid for smart guy?

This is a compliance/policy fail - it has no teeth.

Arguing the boss gets treated differently - what fuckin planet do you live on?

People like her don't go down for shit like this, Hilaary doesn't need to do that shit - she is already above the law. It would be beyond stupid.

>>693363332
I would like to believe that justice will be served to this arrogant cunt eventually but at this point I am highly skeptical. I seriously doubt the Pubs would have the balls to impeach her even though it would be hilarious to have a husband/wife combo both impeached as president. Only thing that really keeps me going is when one of the dindu criminals is killed by cops.

>>693365402
It's a living document that is infallible. Get better yourself. And the bill of rights only states inherent human rights. So fuck yoursef if you don't like it

>>693363494
I think Bernie searches his black jew soul and determines she is the worst thing for america and continues on as an indy.

>>693366036
>It's a living document that is infallible.
The utter stupidity contained within that sentence is breathtaking. You aren't worth speaking to.

>>693352399
I'm independent but you would have to be blind to not see Hilary is corrupt.

>>693365714
>So the extreme left leaning Supreme Court that would shred the constitution and only reason this country is still a country at all

No, rather a Supreme Court that acknowledges that laws which unnecessarily subject innocent people to inferior and unfair treatment are unconstitutional .

File: 1448214391878.webm (3 MB, 638x360) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 638x360

>>693365380
Tbh, were a mistake of that magnitude to be made by someone with less influence, they wouldn't be making minor stipulations to cover for them. A breach of security and therefore breach of contract as Secretary of State was made because she failed to uphold her oath of office. She should have been made to step down from office because this same offense in the military would warrant courts martial at the very least. Go fuck yourself.

>>693365793
The meme you're talking about is just another body to the count of regular guys that would be in federal prison right now had we been in the same situation. It was merely an attempt at humor thinly veiled in conspiratorial tinfoil friendo.

>>693366247
>I'm independent but you would have to be blind to not see Hilary is corrupt.

Someone ought to investigate her then.

File: johncuckiver.png (262 KB, 590x309) Image search: [Google]

262 KB, 590x309

Er...you really want a president that sends top secret data to her girlfriends and shit over unsecured email? She's obviously got a complete lack of respect and that complete lack of respect fits better with her ciminal persona instead of this activist fairy-tale you believe in. The FBI doesn't want to decide the election, they're rightly scared to do so, if the FBI ended up on the bad side of the presidency most of them would lose their jobs. This is aside from the political violence this would obviously cause, probably most of it coming from your side as you scream that the FBI is a conservative organization and it's illegal for them to effectively decide an election. Basically the FBI doesn't have the actual power to say anything besides what it said.

Every time you people launch into this "crying wolf" narrative it makes her look more and more guilty, especially when it's just the FBI saying "she did it but we decided it's not a crime" when pretty much anyone else on the entire earth besides Donald Trump would have had to face those charges regardless of if they intended any harm. There are people who mishandled information with no ill intent sitting in federal prison right now being treated as a traitor and this is a complete insult to those people. Shouldn't we let them all off, now? But we'll never hear anything about that, will we?

Anyway, Vox was right in it's article about "The Smug style of American Liberalism", the more you treat Republicans like they're stupid the less they will respect you. 8 years of Obama getting nothing done in the bi-partisan sphere is completely the fault of your culture calling everyone from culture hicks and idiots and never, ever listing to anything we have to say. Things I say about liberals as a joke are equivalent to what you believe about republicans.

>>693366202
If you don't believe in the Constitution, you're not an American and your opinions are discarded.

>>693364557
I bet this year's voter turnout is an all time low. I know I am about tired of trying to convince myself we live in a democratic republic of laws and justice.

>>693366036
Its somehow "infallible" yet also needed to be fixed 27 times. How does that work?

>>693366261
Did you make my argument for me then tell me to kebab self?!?

>>693366504
Vote independent

>>693365402
Explain

>>693356492
You cant simpily plea ignorance to the law. So if i drink and drive and kill someone because of my negligence i should cleared of all wrong doing because i "omg didnt know that was a law"!

>>693366704
Yes and you're welcome.

>Forgot to greentext

>>693366494
This

>>693366786
>vote Hillary
FTFY.

>>693366910

No, but in this case there was no evidence she acted with gross negligence, and gross negligence is one of the elements of the offense.

>>693366510
The bill of rights hasn't been fixed ever. And the 27 times weren't changes(cept for that time we tried to quit drinking and failed Kek) they were additions and more freedom added. Get fucked britbong(even if you're not you are now with that kinda god damn commie bullshit)

>>693365793
While I doubt she has anyone assigned to kill the head of the FBI, her political enemies have certainly died "mysteriously" in the past. The FBI declined to prosecuted because they knew it would be a kangaroo trial that would waste time and public money on a pretty much gauranteed failed prosecution. This isn't due to faulty evidence, but because of who she is. Hillary Clinton could murder a baby on national television while raping a witnessing notary public and she wouldn't be charged. She is totally untouchable.

>>693366918
c:

>>693366891
See this >>693366494
This attitude is the root of the problem. Anything written by people contains errors. The world has changed drastically, in ways unimaginable to those who wrote that. Take the good ideas, discard the bad, and make a better constitution for the current world.

>>693366248
Name one instance in the past decade where the court hasn't done that?

>>693358439
Yeah because corruption never happens. Courruption is just a thing conspiracy theorist talk about, courruption doesent actually exist.

>>693367468
Ok, point to one needed fix. You have my interest.

>>693367205
>the magic word "gross negligence" wasn't used
>extreme carelessness isn't the same

There were zero investigations of Powell or Rice, two secretaries of state that had private email servers that the DoJ said had classified emails in it.

>>693367468
It's not the constitution for he world you useless piece of trash. It's the American constitution. Don't like it? Leave. Simple as that. We made it. We are the standard. It still holds true. If you want it gone then you're ok with no freedom of speech. No freedom of religion. No freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. No freedom to incriminate yourself. No freedom of the press. Do freedom to defend yourself from a violent threat be it a crackhead or a tyrannical govt. no states rights. Yeah. That's all shit. Time to rewrite the constitution cuz this guy thinks he knows what's best for the world when what we're talking about is the best god damn country in the world already.

>>693367205
She used her own private server unlawfully, sent information unprotected unlawfully, lied about giving all evidence to the FBI also unlawfully. What part of this isnt gross negligence?

Furthermore why are people so hot to defend her when she is clearly wrong. Hypothetically even if law breaking didnt happen here she still jeopardized classified information, we want this as a leader?

>>693352399
0/10 gtfo shill. hope your clickfarm boss is paying you well for this shit

>>693367999
Sorry for all the typos. I got passionate. Lot more than these Europoors would get over their shitholes

>>693367916
>>>the magic word "gross negligence" wasn't used
>>extreme carelessness isn't the same

Fuck you guys are stupid. They literally are not the same thing as far as the law is concerned. You are straightforwardly misunderstanding how the law works and how legal terms operate. Homicide isn't the same thing as murder, battery is not the same as assault, robbery is not the same as theft, and gross negligence isn't the same thing as negligence or carelessness.

>>693367999
Behold the voice of stupidity. Congrats everyone, mind-numbing idiocy is our biggest export to the world.

>>693367999
>It's not the constitution for he world you useless piece of trash. It's the American constitution. Don't like it? Leave.

So you think constitutional amendments should be constitutionally banned? Is that what you're saying. You might need an amendment for that...

>>693368514
>cantrefute/10
>resortingtoinsults.jpg
>blackguywithchicken.gif

>>693367037
>Bitching when you can't be bothered to join in on the voting process
FTFY

>>693368600
Im not the anon who posted this, but i dont understand your reponse to the green text. How would he want constitutional rights to be banned? How did you get that?

>>693367999
>best god damn country in the world
You lost any claim to that title a loooooong time ago. Its like watching a crippled old man brag about his high school football glory days.

>>693368600
You can't just amend the bill of rights. And it's not the constitution for the world. What's your point exactly?

>>693358825
In this economy, even useful idiots are freelancing

>>693368807

Amendments. Not rights.

>>693368748
Oh I'm joining. But we can't afford Hillary this time. And Johnson is a slam dunk for her. Maybe next time.