>>693300326

>>693303770
Dirty politics is the only kind of politics that Republicans now.

They can't win on issues alone, so that is why they do it.

Good troll, you do realize she wasn't cleared right? They literally just said "well we confirmed these are all the illegal things she did, we just don't care enough to go after her". Not a republican but saying she was "cleared of all wrong doing" and that everything was lies is just ignorant. Just means that the U.S. government and justice system doesn't actually work anymore.

>>693304068
>national review
>credible news source

pick only one.

>>693303770
You know what this does actually? It sets a precedent. Now anyone who fucks up as bad as she did, they can't be held accountable for it, unless the FBI wants to back track and actually indict her. Her negligence was all that was required for prison time or a fine. It's in their fucking guidelines.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

>>693303770

fbi didn't actually clear her. They suggested no charges, but they don't get to make that decision.

>>693304221
Saying "she did this, this, and this" without a proper indictment or court which allows her to defend herself, doesn't make the claims valid.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty. So far there is no real proof, or they would have recommended prosecuting her.

>>693304328
statute of limitations on this stuff is only 5 years, so it would have to happen within the next 5 years in order for them to go back and indict her.

>>693304338
Loretta Lynch already said that "I will go with the FBI's recommendation".

>>693304439
Basically, they said a precursor would have a hard time actually getting a conviction, so they didn't recommend wasting time. They admitted what she did was wrong.

>>693304605
Right, but my point is more on the precedent they set by not indicting her.

>>693304677
But that's just it. They can't validly make that claim without giving her, her day in court.

German fag here. This whole incident makes the U.S. justice system look very bad to the entire world.

>>693303770
OP is proof that it is easier to find a nigger with a job then it is to find a millennial with a brain.

do a little research before starting a bait thread summer friend.

>>693304806

What part of "what she did was wrong" says "she didn't actually do anything wrong"?

>>693303770
And this post proves that hard core Democrats can justify anything, no matter how reprehensible it is.

I'll tell you this plain: I don't believe in trump or his wall. But I won't vote Democrat and I won't support liberal causes no matter how much you morons rage and froth at the mouth.

>>693303770
BEngazi was no lie you fucking retard. GOOD people died because of these democraps. I hope she rots in hell and all you liberal fuck tards that believe your doing any good aside from lining the elite douch bags pockets. Seriously you love paying for niggers to have babies and protect those that have no tolerance for anything but whining on the internets. Shut up and listen when people talk you will better understand the world instead of spewing out your democratic garbage all over the place. ALSO fact check before you think you know something. Truth is you probably don't.

>>693303770
That's why the director of the FBI said what she did was basically extremely careless. Basically the FBI wanted to do something but with Obama backing Hillary they had to bite their tongues and couldn't say what they really wanted to say. Democrats are the kings of corruption.

>>693303770
Is it any surprise that the hilldawg shills are out big today?

>>693305247
ALSO the GOP has plenty to throw at her and anyone else wanting to run considering that it makes up about 65% of the electoral college right now.

AND how is that Charlie Rangal working out for you folks...?

>>693305057

Amerifag here....

In the immortal words of Walter White:

You're goddamn right.


This basically says that the Clintons are above the law, and basically proves that they will be back in the white house regardless of voter turnout.

File: trump-train.png (3 MB, 2100x1185) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 2100x1185

TRUMP TRAIN!!!! OBAMA WERE GONNA BUILD THAT WALL!!!!

>>693305124
Dude, he has been shilling/trolling for the past few hours; all he can say is "innocent until prove guilty" over and over despite the fbi director even saying if this was anyone else they would be charged.

>>693304439
>there is no real proof, or they would have recommended prosecuting her.

Being this naive and incorrect.

Actually they matter of factly stated that she lied to the FBI and everyone else about almost everything. And that she did both recieve and send email with classified caviats including Top Secret.

She has committed both perjury and violation of federal law regarding handling of classified information and she's not even trying to lie about it anymore. She's just saying "Oh, my bad... Whoops."

The rigged system works. Just not for you... Welcome to the Clinton third world corruption olympics.

>>693304120
sure kid. always play the victim

>>693304439
sure kid

>>693303770
agreed. i really would like to hear some specific details from trump on what he wants to do. there have been none so far.

>>693304120
it's true and in the past it has worked for them. they need to adapt to the new age. the internet is fucking up their old ways of doing shit. they need to adapt or die off.

>>693305641
This. OP is a fag and should find the basement door and get some sun.

File: 1464358164535.jpg (410 KB, 2000x2000) Image search: [Google]

410 KB, 2000x2000

Well placed bait OP

>>693305641

I know. I hate that this country has turned into career politicians ruling everything. I might just take my family and gtfo....

>>693304662
>Loretta Lynch already said that "I will go with the FBI's recommendation".

The fix was in before that. Obviously she was safe in saying that because there was no risk of the FBI indicting Clinton while democrats are in control.

Welcome to third world America. Almost as if everything that conservatives said about blacks running things came true.

>>693304120
>>693306024
Enjoying the circlejerk?

>>693303770
right, right...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iid4cgR4xVE

>>693303770
>what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick.
>Republicans=FBI
This demonstrates corruption, it doesn't prove that a group having nothing to do with it is lying tardo
I'm a Democrat. Don't you find the tarmac social visit and the FBI suddenly going lukewarm pussy on us a bit strange?

>>693305247
reagan killed 300 people after 60 were killed IN THE SAME PLACE a month before. fuck you. people die all the time. it happens. get the fuck over it and stop using it for political purposes. those were real human beings, not pegs to be used in some shit game.

>>693305931
Lol, he hasn't put out details?

He's put out just as many specific details as hillary has.

>>693306225
i didn't watch this but who cares what some fatty thinks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itmNiTwHOsM

I HHHHHHHHHHHHHHillaryAMMMMMM THE LAWWWWWW

>>693306223
Only if he's in the middle.

>>693303770
How much do they pay you to shill like this?

>>693303770
Fucking republicans and liberals.
Fucking up the whole damn country with your stupidity.
Trump is a retard who isn't addresing america's problems.
Hillary is a bitch who isn't addressing america's problems.

>>693304605
Tried to confirm statute of limitations for Washington D.C.:

>its not 5 years
>its 3

Which just makes it worse. All of our politicians can't be touched 3 years after they break the law while the rest of us can be charged up to 10 years after we commit a crime.

>>693306245
This. Republicans very, very bad.

Democrats good.

>>693304439
>proof only exists when a judge confirms it
So gravity also isn't something we should be sure about? They said she was neglectful, and a national leader ignoring everything from her classified training is illegal whether they pursue it or not you tard

>>693306296
not at all. he has zero details about what he actually intends to do. build a wall, ok, but that's it. better trade deals? with who exactly? what will these new deals look like? shit like that is so vague it only appeals to idiots like you.

>>693303770
>not charged
>cleared of any wrongdoing
That you think these are the same thing is why you are what's wrong with this country.
Try to think for yourself.

>>693306088
No where to go man. Sorry to say.

>>693306235
>Don't you find the tarmac social visit and the FBI suddenly going lukewarm pussy on us a bit strange?

The Democrats have been working on America becoming a third world banana republic for my entire lifetime, why would they suddenly find the spine to enforce an implicitly white concept like rule of law?

This is the real appeal of Trump, he forces everyone involved to throw back the curtain and expose who they really are.

>>693306455
the statute of limitations vary from state to state, genius.

>>693304439
They said she was guilty of recklessly handling classified information. Fuck, for all we know it could have been the lunch schedule for thr pentagon. Of course they dont want us to know we are paying for their 5 star meals. Niggas be tearing shit up if that were the case

>>693306568
ramblings of an idiot

>>693304662
Yeah. That's probably what Bill's tarmac visit was about
>Now don't you sweat longtime friend, you won't have to do anything

>>693306507
Have a read here champ.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/tax-reform

This is just tax reform, but it's pretty detailed. You can find his plans for other shit at the bottom of the page.

>>693303770
Of course she was cleared, she got rid of all the evidence. Cant convict someone that big w/o evidence.

>>693306751
Compelling. Informative. Creative. You must work for NPR.

File: 1465419933292.jpg (41 KB, 492x800) Image search: [Google]

41 KB, 492x800

>>693306625
>Tried to look up the statute of limitations for each state
>which told me that its 3 years for the district of colombia
>and up to 10 years in other states by contrast

Jesus christ, it's like you didn't even read the post. But I know you can't be THAT autistic. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking.

>faggot

>>693306821
i've seen it. there are no details there

presidents don't set taxes fool. at best it can be considered what trump would like to see, not what he intends to do.

>>693306625
Federal law.

File: $hillary.png (120 KB, 1350x647) Image search: [Google]

120 KB, 1350x647

>>693303770
$

>>693306735
>Fuck, for all we know it could have been the lunch schedule for thr pentagon.

Her emails (Including the ones marked classified) are on wikileaks. They are actual emails dealing with relations with foreign countries and military decisions that display the intent and direction of one of the highest offices in the country.

Reckless is putting it mildly. Utterly incompetent and belligerent about it is more accurate.

She has lost the opportunity to say anything about Trump being a national security risk, she was practically handing over her personal correspondence as Secretary of State to other countries intelligence services.

>>693306958
for what crime? every crime is different. what crime are you talking abuot?

the fact that i even have to ask this question means you're an idiot.

>>693305109
Sure kid.

How many threads are you gonna copy/pasta that reply in?

>>693306455
This doesn't surprise me.

They fuck a lot of escorts and buy a lot of cocaine there

>>693306999
But they set proposals. You should just stop.

>>693306999
>presidents don't set taxes fool
This.

Its not like Bush did things that got people iled, right?

His making Brown the FEMA head certainly got people in the 9th ward killed, not just people who were already in a risky overseas posting

>>693307116
see
>>693304328
section (f)

File: muh tinfoil hat.jpg (8 KB, 214x236) Image search: [Google]

8 KB, 214x236

>>693306761

File: menopause moodswings.jpg (29 KB, 600x338) Image search: [Google]

29 KB, 600x338

>>693306751

It makes sense when you actually look at it. Democrats are going to use this in the future as evidence that the system is rigged at the highest levels in favor of the politically connected and wealthy. And so is Trump.

People who continue to support Clinton are literally supporting someone whose political machine operates outside the rule of law and with dictatorial aplomb. Well the gig is up now, the curtain has been pulled back and America is no longer a country under the rule of law.

You won leftists, we Brazil now.

>>693307150
In 2008, almost 80% of the white house admitted to using cocaine in the past 5 years.

>>693305124
The part where she didn't INTENTIONALLY gave away Top Secret info.

>>693306999
Yeah, I thought you'd say that. But I'll bet that Hillary's page, whom I'm sure you support and will vote for, has no more detail.

Perhaps you can enlighten the board what details your interested in?

>>693303770
>Yesterday proved that no matter what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick.
What we know is that Hillary is an unindicted criminal who broke the espionage laws and got away with it. Failure to prosecute does not mean she's innocent.

>>693307309
how can "the rest of us" ever be involved in that crime? man you're a fucking idiot.

here's the key section fag lord:

"with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States..."

with intent or reason to believe.

the FBI has concluded she did NOT act with that belief or intent.

the end

>>693307461
There is no law for intent. Just negligence. Again, see >>693304328

>>693307446
>so is Trump

I can guarantee it that if it were Trump facing these same charges, he would be sitting in jail today. Hillary and Bill are so heavily politically connected in DC, that they basically get whatever they want.

>>693306568
>This is the real appeal of Trump, he forces everyone involved to throw back the curtain and expose who they really are.
Not at all. Dems and Reps are stonewalling him together. He hasn't exposed anything. If he did care he would be supporting wikileaks, hiring investigators to track corruption across states and departments from every party, and his lawyers would be promoting pro-rights, pro-citizen class action lawsuits. He's just new money the establishment finds irritating, as do most people. He doesn't care but you think he does, and that's what's wrong with both pro-Trumpers and pro-Shillers

>>693307461
Oh, i'm sorry i ran over your child. It wasn't my intention
Oh, i'm sorry your kid put a knife in the toaster, it wasn't my intention.
Oh i'm sorry i left the gas on and burnt your house down, it wasn't my intention.
Oh i'm sorry downloaded 30 terrabytes of porn on your computer, it wasn't my intention.

>>693307599
i already asked for them. instead, knowing, i suppose, that you coudn't find any, you gave me some nonsense tax shit instead.

>>693307664
Intent a factor.

>>693307684
Nah man they're both bad, Trump might even be slightly worse too.

>>693305247
Dude fuck you racist bitch. As if whities dont abuse the same welfare system. You are no better than the "libtards" you try to bash. Your lord and savior complimented Sadam. The same fucking prick that had no WMDs and wasnt funding al quida. Yet another republican falsely accused and waged war upon wasting tax payers dollars. "But obama raised the debt two fold." Well thays kind of easy to do when half the fucking debt is already there from that retard Bush. Id rather line the pockets of the greedy jews at a chance ill get something back than to watch some racist, pompous, hypocritcal piece of white trash run start the next world war and watch the country fucking burn. Fuck republicans

>>693307789
Proof that she INTENTIONALLY gave TS's away?

>oh you don't have any

>>693307684
trump would have to be involved int he goverment somehow to lose or gather or transmit defense information.

he's not.

no one woudl hire the guy. his only possibility having access to this stuff is if he gets elected by idiots like you.

which thankfully looks to be a long shot

>>693307433
It's not even a conspiracy you dumb faggot. Intern or work at a political or government position when you're old enough and you'll probably learn a lot of basic political manuverng. Your grandmother could tell you this basic shit

>>693303770
Nearly 30 years of political insider of course this fucking bitch is going to be protected by insiders. Election is going to be rigged by electoral college again, Hillary won't actually win the popular vote come the end of the summer, but she will probably still get in office, because we know she's being protected.

>>693307664
What's your goal here, faggot? What are you even fighting for?

>shitposting for the sake of shitposting
>not that anon but jesus christ your posts are a shitshow

>>693307461
The statute doesn't say anything about intent, but does say "gross negligence", which the FBI directory basically said that she was "Extremely Careless" is the same thing legally by definition.

>>693307956
Intent isn't a factor in the law.

>>693303770
she wasnt cleared, it was recomended not to prosecute her. why? either because she is female, or it looks bad trying to charge a presidential candidate.
I hate to say it, but if privilege exists, hilary has a whole hell of alot of it

>>693307988
i'm just showing you the key points of the thing YOU told me to look at.

you can't deal with facts i guess.

fuck off then

>>693308076
>NOT THAT ANON

Oh okay, I get it. You legitimately can't read.

>>693307433
How is that even a conspiracy? It's basic legal ethics. Would a defendant's husband meet with a judge or investigator before the trial 'for a social visit'?

>>693305801

No one's playing the victim. We're laughing at failed disingenuous Republican efforts to fuck Clinton. Republicans don't give a rat's ass about email security breaches or disclosure of confidential information. The only motivation for this costly bullshit was to fuck Hillary Clinton, nothing else. It was the same with Benghazi, which involved not even a whiff of wrongdoing on Clinton's part. It's fun to watch you guys unravel over your constant failures. You always seem so surprised.

>>693306245
aww, somebody need a diaper change?
nice non comparison shit for brains.

>>693308076
Intent isn't a factor in the law.

>>693308128
i just don't believe your bullshit, that's all. you were found out and you're trying to backpedal.

>>693308148
Under normal circumstances probably not, but when he knows her, and worked with her, then certainly.

>>693306499
American education right here folks.

>>693308016
>>693308035
Tell it to the FBI/DOJ.

<install Preparation H>

>>693308176
here you go.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/ronald-reagans-benghazi

try doing some research before looking like an idiot.

>>693308302
I don't have to. It's their law.

>>693307956
I don't think intent is the problem cousin.
You know how some schools give awards for effort to all the kids. Hillary wouldn't even get one.

>>693308279
Flies into airport, gets off his plane and goes onto her plane. Meet for 45 minutes. Gets back on his plane, flies away.

No, nothing to see here...... not suspicious at all.

>>693308182
Exactly, but I guess we need to free all those people who got jailed for involuntary manslaughter, the intent wasn't there so they are free to go right?

>>693307149
not pasta retardo.

>>693308016
sure it does. it's right int he motherfucking first line faggot

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

>>693307927
Lol you worthless Fucking Nigger.

Hillary doesn't give a shit about you

>>693308035
Mens rea? Literally a foundation of many Western countries' legal system

File: stoppostinganytime.jpg (57 KB, 361x691) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 361x691

>>693308255
>found out
>literally not the same person you were talking to

Sure thing, kiddo. You must be new here.

File: 1467742107589.jpg (2 MB, 1349x3391) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 1349x3391

The Shilling here is real.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxf1XmVZ9qY

>>693308401
That's so very different. You're grasping at straws.

>>693307741

You're not actually paying attention over there in 'spergland.

Trump calls out hillary for her support of globalist causes like NAFTA, TPP, etc.

He forces her to confront her hawkishness on the middle east and it's results. He states explicitly that she does these things. and by doing so the media is forced to respond or acknowledge these things.

He says that Bernie is right that the financial system is rigged and he will soon be on the stump stating that the democratic party's corruption is literally eroding the rule of law in front of our eyes.

He destroyed the globalists by forcing them to confront these unpleasant truths that their compliant media, fearful of losing their access to these people hide every day.

It doesn't matter if he cares, that's some faggot shit. results are what matters and he is the only real engine of reform that exists. He's a traitor to their class and that's why they hate him. If it takes feeding the ego of a narcissist in order to break the foundations of the cathedral, then that's what needs to be done.

>>693307308
not a comparison shit head.

>>693307956
>proof that the drunk driver intended to do anything but get home? The fact that family on vacation is now in the hospital means nothing!

>>693308442
Bullshit.
I've been reading that since yesterday.

Come up with something new Faggo.

>>693308398
Sure he did.

>autist

>>693308498
In this particular instance, for this very specific law, intent is not a factor. Please read and try to understand.

>>693308520
he is pandering to faggots like you who believe in conspiracy theories, that's all. it's a valid strategy but it doesn't prove shit.

i.e. ted cruz's father killed JFK

not stop pretending it means anything. it doesn't.

>>693307792
>hurr durr give me details I suck cock

What the fuck are you blabbering about? What the fuck details do you want buddy? Would you like Trump to tell you, step by step, what he's going to do? That's unprecedented fucko. And shilliary isn't doing that shit either. That bitch barely answers questions as it is.

So, in short, you're a fucking waste of space.

Fuck I hate you people. I'm so sick of faggots who can't think on their own and grovel at the feet of their favorite politician, hoping to get a taste of their fucking nutsack. Trump and bernie fuckos are the same way. You asshats literally fall over yourselves to worship people that are lying and stealing from you openly.

Fuck man.

>>693308640
prove to me that it isn't.

here is the link again

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

>>693308498

Intent is not always a factor. posession of child porn for example does not require intent to be illegal.

Clinton also perjured herself on numerous points throughout the investigation before congress. This is also a crime for which her husband was disbarred.

File: youlookridiculous.gif (299 KB, 250x188) Image search: [Google]

299 KB, 250x188

>>693308640

>>693308696
still no details. i figured as much.
lots of hot air but still you couldn't find any of trump's details

thanks for proving me right.

>>693303770

First it was Benghazi ???

This Bitches scandals go way back to fucking Watergate motherfucker..

You rubes really are some uneducated simple mother fuckers aren't you.

This entire thread showcases your stupidity. Then there's that pesky little fact that you guys nominated Drumpf. You people are everything wrong with this country.

>>693307927
nothing right in this post. enjoy paying that debt goy.

>>693308721
>(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

>>693303770
OP I really want to find you irl so I can smash your stupid fucking head in

>>693308590
And you still have no proof that the emails did any harm.

>tears
>sweet delicious tears

>>693308640
>>693308515

>>693308499
>>693308721
>>693308792
>that's something like 3 people calling you out for being retarded

>>693308800
Thanks for the informative rebuttal

>>693306443
Thank you, someones finally saying the right shit.

>>693308792
the intent is not written into the law for child porn. it's not the same thing genius.

this law was purposefully designed so that people who inadvertently lost data wouldn't go to jail.

otherwise a lot of people would have by now.

File: 1454463565490.jpg (136 KB, 640x625) Image search: [Google]

136 KB, 640x625

>>693303770
>First it was Benghazi, then it was the alleged email scandal. She was cleared in both, and the GOP literally has nothing else left to throw at her.


Republicans should watch this and take Officer George Green's lesson to heart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3yQqWNv91o

>>693308515
Fine, how about all the other people who have been indicted in the past for leaking classified information without intent? I still think if you can argue intent is needed for you to be guilty of anything my example is good. Not to mention she did have intent, she knowingly ignored repeated warnings that it was illegal to run private servers with classified information and that it posed a monumental security risk. That is like saying to any company that creates an unsafe product that they aren't accountable if someone is hurt because they didn't intend for it to happen it just did.

>>693308903
There is literally no proof that emails were even marked classified.

>>693308682
>he is pandering to faggots like you who believe in conspiracy theories, that's all. it's a valid strategy but it doesn't prove shit.

Yeah conspiracy theories like those WMD in Iraq, or the LIBOR scandal, or the MBS crisis on wall street and the selective bailing out of financial institutions.

File: wouldja just look at it.png (20 KB, 741x255) Image search: [Google]

20 KB, 741x255

>>693308946
What an adventure you had today. It must've been exhausting.

>>693303770
100 emails contained classified information at the time she sent them. grossly incompetent. had to rewrite the laws to get her off the hook. Petraeus was not so lucky and was charged for his mistakes. Hillary is ABOVE THE LAW!

>>693308946
Translation: My candidate sucks balls, so I'll just say that they all do.....

>>693308721
Look at (f.

File: cpth.jpg (142 KB, 1600x901) Image search: [Google]

142 KB, 1600x901

>>693303770
Can't pillory the Hillary

>>693308938

Samefag samefagging.

Intent is not always a factor in criminal culpability. Saying that it is is flat out wrong.

>>693309018
I'm not arguing you need intent! What is wrong with you people?!

>>693309021
nigger you retarded. 100 emails had classified information.

>>693309037
and JFK assassination, the riculous idea that hillary is a murderer, the birther nonsense and so many others

here:

http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide

fuck you're dumb

>>693309092
110

>>693308903
And you still dont have any proof that harm will not come from this?

>trolling
>poor, badly written trolling

>>693309101
Okay

>>693308279
>Under normal circumstances probably not, but
There is no but there. They should not have communicated. At all. I had to take multiple ethics courses and trainings; I know they did too. Ethics don't disappear just because you're rich and powerful.

I don't get why there are all these newfags that are pro-oligarchy, pro-paryisan and make excuses for them. You are literally a part of the problem.

>>693309092
>>693309173
>>693309180

ZERO.

>tryharder / 10

>>693308802
Yup I sure proved you right. How about this: give me some details on Shilliary.

I'm sure you won't deliver. But if you do, I'll be sure to tell you that "I've read that already" and "those aren't details".

Faggot.

>>693309021
>There is literally no proof that emails were even marked classified.

Better tell the FBI director that then, because he enumerated by classification level the number of email threads containing marked classified information on live T.V.

I'm sure he just misspoke...

>>693308339
oh look a story written 30 years after the fact by a bias liberal rag.
still a non comparison and shitty diaper kid.

>>693303770
Why are you excited a criminal isn't being charged?

>>693309018
>how about all the other people who have been indicted in the past for leaking classified information without intent

like who? give us some credible sources on who was prosecuted under title 18, Chapter 37 seciton 793 without intent.

>>693308520
>Trump hasn't pointed out anything new
>posts obvious shit even underagefags would know
Wow you really Trumped me

File: 1463596905339.png (160 KB, 568x1023) Image search: [Google]

160 KB, 568x1023

>>693309129

ITT: people who don't have a clue as to how the criminal justice system works in the U.S.

>>693309332
>Why are you excited a criminal isn't being charged?

Because if Hillary doesn't win then something something racist.

File: oj.jpg (64 KB, 529x352) Image search: [Google]

64 KB, 529x352

>>693303770
Yes. In if you are rich and found innocent in America it means you dindu nuffin.

File: tumblr_n81tl3xTxt1qf24ngo8_1280.jpg (124 KB, 650x768) Image search: [Google]

124 KB, 650x768

>implying you have to be republican to not agree with a war criminal
She's cleared so that she can increase funding for the FBI, this is all bullshit and you've all lost already. You keep relying on your corrupt system, hoping for change. It won't come.

>>693309474
So you're saying that OP is...

A paid faggot?

>>693309271
youre an idiot. 110 emails contained classified information no one is debating that fact anymore. She just wont be charged because they don't think she intended to do any harm. which is not what the law states. If you are incompetent you will be charged unless your Hillary the "goddamned" Clinton

The only reason they refused to prosecute her is because there was no way they could have filtered all the information enough to only damage her. These emails, coupled with the Clinton foundations sketchy business, condemn nearly the entire U.S. Government.

>>693309245
Ohhh..

Something MIGHT happen.

There's nothing there Nigger.

Get over it. Quit wasting $$$ on these stupid investigating hearings.

>>693309622
here's the law again and it DOES state that

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

File: 1466549886883.jpg (13 KB, 361x330) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 361x330

>>693309554
too soon.

>and half these faggots don't get the reference anyways

>>693309474
>no mention of 4chan
>peddles same conspiracy theory in every single hillary thread

>>693303770
still shows she's too stupid to be president

and just what were in those 30,000 emails? we will never know

>>693309677
This is the first time dubs have lied.

What's happening to this place?

>>693309245
doesn't matter if harm will come of it, the FBI detemined there was no intent.

>>693309693
that's my point. the law states if you are grossly incompetent then you will be charged.

>>693309506

Point is that these are things that the compliant media will not talk about. Trump shines a flashlight on the system and how it operates through glad-handing media.

The net result of this arrangement is results that cause liberals no end of buttpain, and ending it is universally a good thing as is disrupting those relationships.

But nevermind that. MUH FEELS TRUMP R RACIST!!!!

The left is too stupid to be effective, but given enough power, they can shit things up properly.

The idea of America as a nation under the rule of law is over.

Welcome to Columbia Norte.

>>693309777
it doesn't state that. it says yuo need to have intent. read it again faglord

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

you must be a paid shill

>>693303770
You fucking dumbass who was campaigning with her yesterday? The same person whose the head of the executive branch, or the branch that enforces the laws. Stfu and go retake 5th grade US history

>>693309769
the law states you just have to be a fucking retard and send classified information on unsecured systems.

>>693309769
Intent isn't a factor in the law

>>693304289
>written by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy
>not reliable

>>693308640
Faggot how are you telling me the bedrock of U.S. law doesn't apply to U.S. law?

Is it because of the Patriot Act? Which would give her supporters the say?

>>693309677
>laughs at MIGHT
Lol, you are an awful shill man. So we shouldnt be proactive? We shouldnt send a message to people that they shouldnt do what she did, because something bad could happen? Guess we should just forget it, and hope the next person who does it is also named Clinton.

>>693309746
>This is the first time dubs have lied.
It must be a conspiracy, Anon!

>>693309867
yes, it makes people look at the dumb things that people like you actually believe. it's kind of sad really.

>>693309777
It states that there has to be deliberate intent to cause harm to the USA

Hillary did not, hence the dropped case.

>>693309913
sure it is

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

>>693309622
>youre an idiot. 110 emails contained classified information no one is debating that fact anymore

Some of the paid shills didn't read the talking points this morning. Got to adjust their narrative.

>>693309919
Because this specific law for this specific instance does not in any way shape or form state that intent is a factor in prison time

>>693309870
Petraeus had no intent and they busted his ass.

>>693303770
Suprise suprise. The executive branch that runs the FBI taking orders from Obama who endorses her, says that she did nothing wrong. This just in, I think mussolini still likes fascism and bears still like honey. Use your brain before blaming the other party.

File: 1467738846588.jpg (430 KB, 1660x1033) Image search: [Google]

430 KB, 1660x1033

>>693309585
More than likely.

>>693310046
well show some proof of that. because here's the alw

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

and it does require intent

File: Screenshot_20160706-131157.png (376 KB, 1440x2560) Image search: [Google]

376 KB, 1440x2560

>>693309769
Look at section f of the law
>gross negligence
>not intent
Hurrr

>>693309919
>the bedrock of U.S. law

Intent is not in ANY law, unless it is so stated.

Ignorance of the law (no bad intent) is no excuse.

This is true of all laws, unless intent is part of the verbiage.

>>693310010
Section F. That is the section that applies to this case

>>693310157
READ SECTION F

>>693309973
If there was no intent than at the very least she is a moron and shouldn't be in charge of anything.

>>693309870
how about you reread it.

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

>>693310089
what are you talking about? he intentionally showed his biographer. she didn't rifle through his garbage and find it. if she had, if he was smart about it, there be no jail time.

>yes, it makes people look at the dumb things that people like you actually believe. it's kind of sad really.

>>693309969

So you still believe there are WMD in Iraq then?

You still believe the financial markets aren't simply being rigged to the benefit of major institutions?

You believe that Hillary Clinton isn't going to just be George W. Bush plus higher taxes and gun bans?

>>693309777

It refers to gross negligence, which is a legal term with a definition and history.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/gross_negligence

>>693309018
Who? I'm not saying you're wrong but I would need proof

>>693310256
Intent isn't a factor in this case

>>693310258
>through gross negligence

There you go shills.....

>>693310364
see
>>693310258
she took classified information and shared it with people that shouldn't have seen it.

>>693310258
you don't understand how it works.

a) is the thing that determines whether the rest of it is even relevant.

>>693310256
>gross negligence
Dont let the shill get to you

>>693310312
i can name 100 conspiracy theories, and 2 of them may turn out to be true. so what?

>>693303770
>shill
>bait
>standing up for a criminal
>thinking the fact that the FBI let her go absolves her of her evil

File: 1467382892946.jpg (81 KB, 514x904) Image search: [Google]

81 KB, 514x904

>>693310364
>It refers to gross negligence, which is a legal term with a definition and history.

What a useful post.

Hey guys, words have meanings!

Fucking faggot leftists are so dictatorial they demand control over language.

She didn't lie, she misspoke.

It's not Gross Negligence, it's just lack of due care.

It's not theft, it's redistribution.

Day of the rope can't come fast enough.

>>693310524
You have no idea what you're talking about. Then why bother having the other sections?

>>693309389
One of the more recent ones is James Hitselberger, then there was a general can't remember his name though that was more recent as well, and I mean there are tons over time, they didn't even get reminded a million times that what they were doing was potentially illegal

>>693310524
keep moving those goalposts.

>>693310503
she didn't "take" it and she didn't share it. but that is what patreus did

>>693310643
more recent? it was 1917 and the espionage act. not the same thing at all faggot

>>693310588
>i can name 100 conspiracy theories, and 2 of them may turn out to be true. so what?

Trying to discredit conspiracies that are real because they are politically inconvenient is Alex Jones' job. Though it does pay well.

>>693310503
>she took classified information and shared it with people that shouldn't have seen it.

That doesn't necessarily make it gross negligence.

This is why they should teach law in high school. It really seems like you think you're making a point, but you're failing to understand what the law actually says and why the FBI said they can't pin a crime on her. The FBI is right, and you're wrong. Stop presuming you know better when you can't even grasp what gross negligence involves, jesus.

>>693310524
Wrong.

Lawfag here, and that is incorrect. Any entire subpart of a statute can be used in its entirety, and doesn't have to use the others unless stated.

>>693310176
>Intent is not in ANY law, unless it is so stated.
Go to China or India and return to the US. I think you will find your knowledge of legal intent a bit small

File: 1461292038667.jpg (6 KB, 144x174) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 144x174

>>693310478
>there you go
>quoting from a law directly
>SHILLS SHILLS OMG ZOZZEL

wow, at this point I'm lurking just to see the shit that pours out of your mouth next.

>watch this faggot link back to me about how hes not speaking but typing and how i need to read a fucking book "kek omg zozzle"
>itll be a hoot

>>693310730
my bad, 2 with the same exact name. fucked up.

"Hitselberger printed a couple of documents classified "secret" off of a classified computer system, stuffed them in his backpack, and attempted to walk out of the secure work area."

this is very clear intent. sorry.

>>693310802

Basically your argument is "The FBI is always right, even when the facts show otherwise."

Where did you get your GED in law?

>>693310524
Really, i guess those or(s) at the end mean nothing right
>confirmed shill

>>693308486
Thats your best? Way to show just how fucking retarded republicans are

>>693308836
Bush even addmited he was wrong, dumbass. Why the fuck do you think we gave him back yo Iraq to fucking be killed? We had nothing on him. Get off your knees and stop sucking so much cock, faggot

>>693303770
Just like that time the Bush administration "lost" 5 million emails. Except when it's a democrat is the only time it gets any attention.

>>693310630
>It's not Gross Negligence, it's just lack of due care.

Legal terms have meanings that apply in the context of law enforcement. "Gross negligence" doesn't just mean "careless". It really, really is just that simple. This isn't a left wing/right wing thing. It's a lawyer/law enforcement thing.

File: hah!.jpg (46 KB, 448x564) Image search: [Google]

46 KB, 448x564

ITT: trumpies being so butthurt, because they got caught up in a GOP fantasy, and actually believed that it was true.

>topKek

>>693310176
Intent is a HUGE portion of Western legal philosophy that effects the largest even when it's not specifically written out
>min./max. sentencing
>sentencing guidelines
>prosecutor judging what to push for
Not that it applies to everything but it's there in the fucking legal framework

>>693311016
>deflect deflect all day long....

lost =/= intentionally deleted from a "private email server"

>>693311062
>plausible deniability is a word too.

how stupid do they think people are really? she's been investigated 6 times now for tampering with evidence and racketeering.

>>693310649
keep crying

>>693311062
>Legal terms have meanings that apply in the context of law enforcement. "Gross negligence" doesn't just mean "careless". It really, really is just that simple. This isn't a left wing/right wing thing. It's a lawyer/law enforcement thing

There is a time tested method of determining which interpretation of facts holds up to scrutiny...

It's called a trial.

>>693309973
it literally doesn't. do you not know the definition of gross negligence?

>>693311127
Also ITT: faggot leftists with delusions.

>>693311219
"Lost"= excuse for deleting incriminating evidence.

>>693311260
this tbh. no trial? no justice was served.

>>693310950
>Basically your argument is "The FBI is always right, even when the facts show otherwise."

No, it's that they're probably right not to charge her in this case because there's no evidence she behaved with gross negligence.

> Where did you get your GED in law?

The University of Toronto.

>>693311199
>Intent is a HUGE portion of Western legal philosophy that effects the largest even when it's not specifically written out


How does someone show Intent to display Gross Negligence?

Hilariously enough that is exactly what Hillary did, but the terms are literal contradictions.

>>693310730
Read the damn story faggot it is recent, he was indicted by the Obama administration and the initial charges were breaking the Espionage Act OF 1917 it didn't happen back then

>>693311226
Nigger it has been proven you are incorrect in your knowledge of the law.
Section A doesnt have to apply when that oh so nice word "or" is there, fuck off and shill on leddit, they are dumb enough to believe you

>>693311221
Obviously you are stupid as fuck. Plausible Deniability is two words, dumb fuck

>>693311327
ITT one faggots first troll ride.

>you're doing fine kid
>just keep yelling "shill" at the top of your lungs

I'm done. You people defending Hillary have no argument. Read section F of the law link posted throughout the thread. Be an adult for one moment in your life and admit you're wrong. You might become a better person for it.

I love how conservatives think literally everything that doesn't go their way is rigged, or some grand conspiracy.

Have you ever stopped to think about how stupid your theory sounds?

>>693311504
here's someone that cant make a point.

>>693310950
>GED in law
>people don't get degrees in high school

ITT liars

>>693311260
>There is a time tested method of determining which interpretation of facts holds up to scrutiny..

First you need probably cause.

TL;DR:
She broke the law but not in such a flagrant way that usually brings prosecution because prosecutors can do whatever the fuck they want.
Comey didn't kill the rule of law, he just read it's death certificate.

>>693311608
that's a very nice strawman you have there.

>>693311686
>probably

*probable

>>693311599
Yeah okay anon..... You're right, and the entire FBI and DOJ got it all wrong....

>autism

>>693311409
>there's no evidence she behaved with gross negligence.

As an I.T. security professional, my expert testimony would contradict this claim.