>>693269162
Is what?

No. The movie legit looks bad and pays no respect to its forefather.

No. It's mainly because the jokes went from being stupidly clever to just stupid.

It's like if Airplane was remade and they just replaced it with a Markiplier video.

>>693269162
i saw a trailer for it while i was in theater the other day, i think it was intended to be funny? honestly i was a little upset by the whole thing

File: 1427819989005.jpg (29 KB, 300x260) Image search: [Google]

29 KB, 300x260

A brilliant movie like Ghostbusters never needed a reboot of any kind. They should have made it into a sequel and no one would have lost their mind about it.

It looks like shit.
It's not funny.
The new theme song causes severe brain damage.
It's not funny.
The ghosts in this look way WORSE than the ghosts in the original Ghostbusters.
It's not funny.
There's a song and dance number at the end.
It's just not fucking funny.

File: are you being retarded on purpose.jpg (202 KB, 1224x1445) Image search: [Google]

202 KB, 1224x1445

>>693269162
>it is literary
>their woman

>>693269246
hows your sexism going?

>>693269162
Wait what? Which one is a woman

File: 1467028094907.gif (1 MB, 250x208) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 250x208

>>693269162
>bad writing
>SJW appeasing movie
>Destroying the integrity of creative movie design
>Didn't even need a reboot, the old one is still better, by interuniversal means.
Yeah man it was totally because they're women.

>>693270060
>hasnt seen it

>>693269735
definitely not the black one...

File: 2aQOX4Q.jpg (270 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]

270 KB, 960x960

>>693269162
https://discord.gg/zShGPDW

come visit b porn eneral.

>>693269162
i never fully watched the old ghostbusters.
I have no reason to watch a reboot with actors that i find disgusting

im going to watch it for a 1 reason

i think it looks really cool (visually) and i want to watch it stoned as fuck. if i can sit through all 3 purge movies then im sure i can deal with women trying to act.

>>693269162
Nah, the movie is generally bad. But it would be fucking funny if it's just because they're women wouldn't it?

>>693270702
have you seen it?

This movie is going to get good reviews and the Internet is going to implode. It's going to be marvellous.

What if it's just got the worst bits in the trailers and the movie is actually rad as fuck

>>693270060
>bad writing
You haven't seen it
>destroying the integrity of creative movie design
You haven't seen it so this critique is false
>didn't even need a raboot, the old one is still better, by interuniversal means
Agan, you haven't seen it. And also, there's reboots every year that haven't received nearly the same amount of hate.

File: baitodesu.png (79 KB, 901x500) Image search: [Google]

79 KB, 901x500

>>693269599
retard

I don't care to see it because I was fan of the original which was Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd humor. Now it's just modern day fat chick humor.

>>693271301
>implying you've seen it

They're

>>693271785
I haven't, and aren't claiming to. Unlike the OP who is making critiques like 'bad writing', implying they've seen it, which the obviously haven't.

>>693272066
I'm OP and I never claimed to have seen it.

>>693270684
lol the purge was a bad movie?

>>693272066
you dont need to see a movie to judge its trailer like were doing were not saying its a bad movie were saying it looks like a bad movie idiot

>>693271301
>also, there's reboots every year that haven't received nearly the same amount of hate.

They have from me
Conan
Total Recall
Robocop

They were all garbage and I was vocal about it.

But if I'm apprehensive about the Ghostbusters movie apparently that makes me misogynist

it's because there are two fatties and that's fucking with the formula

>>693270486
Shit I'd use that as album art looks like four separate pics.

>>693272629
Ok, fine, you're the one person on the internet saying it looks like a bad movie. Everyone else has already made up their mind on the finished product.

>>693272633
Strange how none of those reboots received the excessive amount of hate as the Ghostbusters reboot has. I wonder how the reception would have went if they were female reboots?

>>693272872
no everyones saying it looks like a bad movie your just too stupid to pick up on that so you assume there saying its bad like theyve seen it

>>693272933
most people would get pissed at gender swaping a well known character or characters a female robocop would piss me off if its a reboot

>>693269162
1 Fatass.
1 Dyke
1 SJW
1 Nigger

Those are to be our new Ghostbusters? No thank you.

>>693269162
How this movie came to be:
Studio Exec: Hey, you know what's big right now? Grrrlpower! Let's make a movie about feminism! That should broaden the market and make millions!
Rational Voice: But sir, every movie about feminism tends to be preachy and man-hatey.
Studio Exec: Then lets not make it about Feminism - lets take an old movie and make it an all female cast to rope the man-haters in and still keep the cucks! Lets pick a movie nobody remembers and nobody cares about... like... say... Ghostbusters!
Rational Voice: But sir... Ghostbusters has a cult status and following, it even had a video game a few years ago, and everyone loved the cartoon
Studio Exec: yeah yeah but if it fails we can blame it on Patriarchy and misogyny! We literally won't be at fault at all!

>>693272950
Go check out the YouTube comments. Go look at a reddit post. People have already decided this is the worst movie ever made. The trailer wasn't any less generic then any other trailer ever made. Don't be so obtuse.

>>693269162
Just saw the trailer. They turned it into a movie for tweens. This sucks balls

>>693272933
nothing to do with female, the only noise about it is defending a very badly made trailer with no appeal what so ever and jokes that do not pass the bar by blaming anyone who hated it as misogynist/enabler/racist whatever the fuck you want

the defense is making it about women as a lame excuse.

>>693273059
the robocop reboot was so awful they didn\t need to change anything else to piss off the fans.

>>693273140
you could read all the leaked emails, and the leaked script but i guess that doesn't count?

>>693272933
I don't care about the level of hate.

I'm going to be critical of every 80s remake.

If you love all this trash then I just feel sorry for you

>>693273140
maby you should stop being so stupid and get your head out of the sjw tumblr society

>>693271242
Punching ghosts and grabbing them in bear traps seems pretty rad to me, anon. I'll see and judge it for myself, but I agree it never needed a reboot.

Omg the grammer

You can tell immediately by the trailer the awful pandering sense of humor thud film has going for it.
That typical Melissa McCarthy humor. It just looks shit. I'll probably watch it, but fuck I ain't gonna pay to see it. Then if you really want to know I'll tell you how shit it actually was.
Also, the fucking theme song. I wasn't sure whether to laugh or feel bad.

>>693273225
Don't love it. Just reserving judgment until I see the actual fucking movie.

>I'm going to be critical of every 80s remake
Didn't realise 12 years were so versed in 1980s filmography.

>>693273514
You're screeching on an anonymous image board about how great this movie is so yes, you're obviously in love with it and I pity you.

>>693273514
>muh ad hominem
I respected your point until then

File: 1464464089718.jpg (25 KB, 400x367) Image search: [Google]

25 KB, 400x367

My favorite part is the mainstream reception.
>cast women
>get praised for equality
>black one still uneducated, street-smart, non-scientist
>nobody gives a shit

>>693273681
Not once have I said this movie is great. I'm just waiting for the actual release of the film. If it gets good reviews, I'll see it and make up my own mind, if it gets shitty reviews I probably won't watch it and will just forget about it.

What I really don't like is the fact that, judging from the trailers, the writing is subpar and the jokes are just fucking terrible. I'm probably gonna go see it anyways, tho.

I really don't give a fuck about the main cast being women, Ghostbusters just is something that in my opinion didn't need a reboot. You don't have to do a shitty modern reboot of EVERYTHING.

Paul Feig is an absolute fucking hack, for starters

>>693273809
Ahh I see. So we're not allowed to have our own opinions but you'll mindlessly obey some reviewer.

I can't tell if you're trolling.

>>693269162
Because
R E B O O T
E
B
O
O
T

>directed by the same person who directed bridesmaids
Why not give him airplane too? Why not give him the naked gun? Why not let him remake every witty comedy?

File: Go-eat-a-bag-of-dicks.jpg (61 KB, 533x524) Image search: [Google]

61 KB, 533x524

>>693269162
First: This movie will be garbage. The trailer was terrible. The CG was terrible. The actresses will continue to be terrible.

Second:The Infiltrator comes out on the same day and looks a hell of a lot more enthralling.

Third:For making a thread about this shit you can eat a bag of dicks. The whole thing. By yourself. No sharing. You're apparently an illiterate feminist SJW cuck, so anything you have input on is to be disregarded.

>>693273140
so if hitler hates it, I can't hate it too, even if it is for extremely different reasons?

shit, better find out what hitler liked and hate it and what hitler hated and love it.

If i got all the MRA fuckwits to start hating something you hated, could I then call you a misogynist shitlord when you express your disapproval of the same thing?

The thing is, I'm not under some moral imperative to like something just because it has progressive themes or values or passes the bechdel test. I don't have to fucking like frozen, I'm an adult and don't watch fucking musical animated children's movies, and If I hate it because it has dull humour is childish and all the things that make it a good kids movie, I shouldn't have to defend myself for not liking something that isn't made for me anyway.

>>693274881
>being this retarded

>>693269162
Remaking movies from the 80s is just retarded. The 80s were a time when you could make cringe worthy jokes and be a little racist and sexiest. Just doesn't work like that anymore. Everyone is far to offended. That being said, trying to make a movie that worked perfectly well back then in today's world is set for failure.

because their woman what?

File: coolstory.jpg (213 KB, 801x823) Image search: [Google]

213 KB, 801x823

>>693275031

>>693274881
How the fuck does this movie have progressive themes? Just because the cast is women? I can guarantee literally no producer said 'let's remake ghostbusters with women because it's progressive". This whole "they're pandering to women" garbage is mental.

>>693275271
lol being this retarded should be a profession you'd make millions

File: e5c.jpg (57 KB, 750x500) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 750x500

>>693275031

>>693275271
Not really my point, I am a progressive, but that was more under the idea that "IF" it does, doesn't mean I have to like it in order to be progressive. It's why frozen was used as the example.

But yeah, I would say that higher female representation in films is a reflection of progressive values.

>>693269379
this

File: 4f75b978e2d8.jpg (194 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]

194 KB, 1920x1080

They should reboot Fortress w/ a female cast. It could be in a women's prison, with skimpy uniforms, and sex machine torture and make it a porno.

>>693269162
yes and no , its because it was created only using women in mind . if it was mixed no-one would care

>>693276152
Not true! The sexy, dimwitted blonde eye-candy secretary is man.
It's like sooooo subversive. It would be unique and shocking in the 1970s.

>>693269162
Yes. In a time so crazed with girl power that all positive male role models must be replaced with females, why would anyone want to go see this shit movie. Oh, that's right, literally because they are female. If it is a good enough reason for you to want to go see it, it is damn sure good enough reason for anyone not to go see it. Hows about a wonder woman remake, except now she is a he. He is now the king of the Amazons, he rules of all the ladies of the Amazon tribe. Yeah. Sounds like a movie you would watch right? Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up. An amazing franchise was destroyed, you defend them cause they are women. Disgusting. Sexism. Cunt.

They really should have made an Extreme Ghostbusters movie. Right off the bat you got, puerto rican, gothic jew woman, crippled guy, smart black guy. use murray or akroyd for the professor and bam!

I would have much rather seen a continuation after ghostbusters 2 instead of rehashing the same shit.

>>693276997
All sequels need either a gothic jew woman or a gypsy scene chick

>>693270632
this is the big problem with it
even it was a complete trainwreck in every other way
fans of the original dont want a reboot
and those who arent fans dont care

because they're women who overact everything and have a polarising sense of humour, personally i think they're all absolute shit

>>693272066
the script had already leaked online from the whole Sony/N.K. debacle, and everything that was in that script has been vindicated from the toys and the adverts.


and from all of that.....it looks like shit