>>693010938
6

Oh look its this thread again

9

Gonna have to go with nine, fun stuff though

>>693010938
>6/2(1+2)
>6/2(3)
>3(3)
the answer is 9

>>693011064
>>693010938

It's 9 you dumb cunt

15

>>693010938
Basic 1st grade question. It's 9.

>>693010938
The answer is b.

>>693010938
21

File: ♣.gif (85 KB, 231x200) Image search: [Google]

85 KB, 231x200

>>693010938

>>693010938
0 !!

I do like this :

6/2(1+2) || 6/2*3

so

2*3=6 and 6/6 = 0

ZERO !

File: dude.jpg (44 KB, 1270x949) Image search: [Google]

44 KB, 1270x949

you fucking idiots

>>693011064
How did you get this number, retard?

File: 1467575080895.jpg (36 KB, 650x426) Image search: [Google]

36 KB, 650x426

>>693010938

>>693010938
6
----------
2(1+2)


6
-------
2(3)


6
----
6


1

>>693011881
Ho yeah right ! i 'have to go back in high scool.

So stupid i'm.

File: 1466362724175.png (595 KB, 784x704) Image search: [Google]

595 KB, 784x704

It's clearly 7.

1

>>693011822
first, your order of operations is wrong
second, any number divided by itself will always be 1
>>693011881
it's not 6/(2(2+1))
if you wanna throw parentheses around, it's (6/2)(1+2)

holy shit
6 / 2 (1+2)

6
=----------
2 (1+2)

6
=----------
2 (3)

6
=----------
6

=1

Uno

11 fck faggots

>>693010938

I know the answer!

It's "Fuck off back to your own faggot board"!

It's fucking nein

>>693012345
Triggerd

>>693012220
look dawg
2(2+1)
replace (2+1) with n
n always goes with 2
the simplest way to explain it

File: PEMDAS_1.jpg (60 KB, 913x703) Image search: [Google]

60 KB, 913x703

Pls anons at least take a piece of paper and practice once in a while

>>693012597
Shit

>>693011822
You actually don't know how to do math. Get lost faggot

>>693012597
fuck you

File: 1467670491288.jpg (155 KB, 937x960) Image search: [Google]

155 KB, 937x960

nigger

>>693012597
bbt

wow 4chan really is overrun with 10 year olds

>>693010938
PEMDAS
Parenthesis comes first. This means distributing the 2(1+2) = (2+4) = 6
Exponents are not included
MDAS are done in order from left to right
6 ÷ 6 = 1

>>693012542
alright, explain

>>693012220
>if you wanna throw parentheses around, it's (6/2)(1+2)
FALSE
You don't get to just add parentheses wherever you want, doing that changes the equation entirely.

File: Untitled.jpg (13 KB, 422x451) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 422x451

>>693011881
no, you retard

6/2 (1+2)

6/2 (3)

3*3

9

>>693013220
not in this case

>>693013293
>>693013322

you faggots need to clear the parenthesis first

>>693012961
parentheses first does not mean distributing the 2(1+2)
that's multiplication
parentheses first just means doing whatever's inside the parentheses first, meaning (1+2) becomes (3)
>>693013220
true, wasn't thinking when i wrote that, what i should've said was, "stop throwing parentheses around you fucking morons"

>>693010938
6/2(1+2)=
6/2(3)=
6/6=1

Retards

>>693011822
ITT

>6/6 = 0

>>693012653
Yeah i'm a faggot and all my life for understand thing and stop to be on 4chan like a fuking fag

>>693012961
distributing doesn't fall under the parenthesis step, it falls under the multiplication step
The question is bait because nobody who does math writes division like that
Yeah technically the answer is 9 but you only do math like this if you're in fucking elementary school
in big boy math the question would be written differently and the answer would be 1

>>693010938
it's 12 you fucking morons.

>>693013477
>clear the parenthesis first
maybe you're right, its not like the parenthesis act like multiplication signs

File: Untitled.jpg (16 KB, 422x451) Image search: [Google]

16 KB, 422x451

>>693013477

>>693013530
>6/2(3)=
>6/6=1
you just went from right to left for some reason...

>>693013158
i just did dude
n is 2's member (thats how we call it here)
you cant separate them

>>693013530
multiplication and division are in the same step, and neither takes priority over the other, so after doing the parentheses you would start back at the beginning and look for multiplication or division.
since division comes first, 6/2, you do that first, which gets you 3, then you start from the beginning again and the equation is now 3(3) or 3*3, so you do that and you get 9

>>693010938
>6/2(1+2)
>6/2(3)
>6/6
>1
the answer is 1

>>693014066
>>6/2(3)
>>6/6
see>>693013944

>>693014039
do the problem out with that logic, i'm curious as to how you interpreted it

File: 1464033760966.jpg (118 KB, 1152x2048) Image search: [Google]

118 KB, 1152x2048

>>693011064
>>693011150
>>693011192
>>693011339
>>693011362
>>693011385
>>693011422
>>693011482
>>693011631
>>693011680
>>693011802
>>693011822
>>693011881
>>693012008
>>693012032
>>693012111

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

why would you write it that way. 6 is the numerator and everything else is the denominator.

>>693013885

6/2(1+2)

>>693014234
so you just replied to everyone, including those that got the correct answer using the correct order of operations, reminding them of the order of operations?

>>693014138
your baits are far beyond autistic

>>693014234
I'm not really sure what you mean, would that make the answer one?

>>693010938
6/2(3)=9
6/2=3
6=6

the answer is 9

here's another

6/2(3)=9
6(3)=18
6=6 or 3=3

>>693014508
what the fuck
are you that retarded what are you even doing

>>693010938
9

>>693014461
what bait? just do the fucking problem, are you some kind of math illiterate so you're just trying to avoid showing me what you're talking about?

>>693014437
Yes
:^)
>>693014501
The answer is one , using the only operations to solve this basic math

File: Untitled.jpg (27 KB, 422x702) Image search: [Google]

27 KB, 422x702

>>693014508

>>693014617
it's called math, anon

>>693011822
doubly retarded or just trolling

ITT: retards that don't know that multiplication and division is done in the same step from left to right

>>693014508
>>693014733
you see, this would be a valid solution, if we already knew the answer and we were trying to find a missing variable or something, but this isn't algebra, this is a test of /b/'s knowledge of the order of operations. you passed, but in the wrong way, and a lot of the people in this thread seem to forget their order of operations or just flat out don't know how to do grade school math

>>693014508
wow you fucked up good

you have to divide the 6 by 3 too, faggot

2/2=3

1 =\= 3, obviously

>>693014066
>>693013944
>>693013530
>>693012961

NO

JUST NO

YOU DIVIDE THE 6 AND THE 2 AND THEN MULTIPLY THE 3 BY 3 YOU HALF INBRED POTATOS

>but muh pemdas

YEAH YOUR PEMDAS HAVE THE MULTIPLICATION AND THE DIVISION AS THE SAME FOOKING STEP, TO ADD TO THAT, PEMDAS FUNTIONS LEFT TO RIGHT YOU GARDEN WORMS

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>693015074
what do you think the P stands for, you autist?

>>693010938
6 / 2(1+2)=?
6=x
2=y
1=z
x / y*(z+y)=6 / 2*(1+2)
x=6*y*(z+y)/2*(1+2)
/2*(1+2)=2*3=6=x/
x=6*y*(z+y)/x
x^2=6yz + 6y^2
x^2-6y^2-6yz=0
/z=1=2/2=y/2/
x^2-6y^2-3y^2=0
x^2-9y^2=0
(x-3y)*(x+3y)=0
x=3y OR x=-3y
if x=3y then x/y(y/2+y)=3y/y(y/2+y)=1/y * 3/(3*2) = 1/y * 2 = 1/2 * 2=1;
if x=-3y then x/y(y/2+y)=-1;
you fags cant into math.

>>693015054
uhhhh NO

>>693014918
It's not 2x3, it's 2(3). If you actually ok math you would know the difference.

>>693015212
PARENTHESIS the means you multiply whats INSIDE the parenthesis, you crippled degenerate

Jesus Christ, so many retards
>6/2 (2+1)
>6/2(3) or 6/2*3, for those who don't know that when a number in parentheses by itself next to another number, means multiplication
>PEMDAS, but MDAS is left to right so 6/2=3
>3*3
>9
Learn basic arithmetic you fuckers

idk if you guys are all idiots or what, the answer is clearly 69.

>>693015375
please be b8
please tell me ur havin a giggle

>>693015074
Please tell me you are really not this ridiculously stupid

>>693015390
parentheses just means you do PEMDAS inside the parentheses, not specifically multiplication
>>693015375
no, that's the same thing

>>693010938
NEIN

>>693015561

oh really?

6/2(1+2)=9

BIDMAS

Brackets
Indices
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction

>>693015561
> implying that you aren't the stupid one

>>693015390

then why is there a distinction between the * and () signs, you stupid fuck? go ask your 3rd grade math teacher how to do this-- hope she doesn't flunk you for being such a steadfast imbecile

>>693015375
Implied multiplication shouldn't change the order, but some people are of the opinion that it does.

Either way that expression is ambiguous and should never be written like that.

6/2(1+2) = x
6/2(3) = x
6/6 = x
1 = x

the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division

if you wanted to write 6 on 2 all multiplied by 1 + 2 it'd be
(6/2)(1+2)

>>693015390
what goes on inside the parenthesis stays inside the parenthesis (till its done, then the parenthesis no longer exist)

all these kids who already forgot how parenthesis work...
only operations INSIDE the parenthesis have priority
multiplication does not get priority because it is operating on a parenthetical statement from the outside
that's just a normal multiplication at that point and gets weighted the same as the rest of the multiplication and division outside the parenthesis

6/2(1+2)

2(1+2)
=
(2*1)+(2*2)
=
2+4
=
6
(Paretheses are solved at this point)

So we van state that
6/2(1+2)
=
6/6
=
1

>>693015972
alright alright i see your point


USE A FUCKING CALCULATOR

put in
5(5)
(5)(5)
5*5
THEY WILL ALL BE THE SAME, you malformed pinworm

>>693016024
>the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division
no it doesn't
go back to school

>>693016024

>the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division

/thread

>>693016024
dude you cant just add parentheses how ever you want

File: 1467657438855.gif (2 MB, 400x300) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 400x300

>>693016219
no just NO

>>693010938
The answer is gel banana.

>>693016343
go look it up then, retard
that's fucking wrong

Assuming that semantically, the omitted multiplication is the same as when it is not omitted, we get

6/2*(1+2)

Forget about PEMDAS or whatever you anglo-faggots call it, it's a horrible and confusing acronym. It is the sole reason you suck at math. Multiplication and division have the same precedence and are left-associative, therefore the expression a/b*c (as seen above) is equivalent to (a/b)*c.

The only real question is whether or not we define the omitted multiplication as the same operation as explicit multiplication.

>>693016297

good job making my point for me. the answers are all the same, so why the distinction? try not to short out your brain thinking about it

>>693016024
>the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division
Is this some made up autist world your in?

TLDR:
There's no rule that says whether implied multiplication takes precedence over division.
Apparently many textbooks say it does.
The expression is bad form either way and nobody would ever write such ambiguous bullshit.

>>693016744
don't worry, it's not your fault
the public school system has failed you

9

If you say otherwise you're a retard

>>693016704
really, PEMDAS should be written as PR(MD)(AS), or
P
E
MD
AS
or something like that, but currently, it's definitely confusing some of the fuckos

>>693010938
9

>>693012597
k

>>693016744
The distinction is there because that's where the parenthesis where. it doesn't matter that much anymore, but it did

>>693016219
2nd operation, what happened to your 6?
too busy masturbating?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPe1aBW_YCg

>>693017028
Or rather, the textbooks use it like it does

File: wow.jpg (146 KB, 1276x819) Image search: [Google]

146 KB, 1276x819

gosh I sure love dick

>>693015390
you are retarded. go back to school

>>693016458
Ah you are right, my bad, lets do this one more time.


6/2(1+2)
=
6/(2*1)+(2*2)
=
(6/2 * 6/1)+(4)
=
(3 * 6) + (4)
=
(18) + (4)
=
22

>>693017368
RETARDS OF THE WORLD
HEED THIS VIDEO AND FIND ENLIGHTENMENT

>>693017743
thanks cheered me up

>>693016311
>>693016606
>>693016831

h ttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

>find "implied multiplication"
>kill yourself

>>693010938
6 / 2(1+2)
= 6 / (2+4)
= 6 / 6
= 1

2(1+2) is one term

There are some really retarded people here

>>693017359
It took a hike and returned when the parenthases were done playing faproulette

File: buttplug.jpg (200 KB, 940x940) Image search: [Google]

200 KB, 940x940

>>693017743
happy fapping
here have a buttplug

>>693011064
>>693011422
>>693011680
>>693011822
>>693011881
>>693012032
>>693012255
>>693012220
>>693012299
>>693012267
>>693012961
>>693013530
>>693014066
>>693015215
>>693016024
>>693016219
>>693017860
>>693018152

this is why the human race is doomed

>>693017743
those are integrals. Those are learned after high school. for some advanced engineers and nurses only. Even they struggle with it. But if that is the solution you got by integrating then it seems like it could be correct.
ill call my older bro to ask if he can help.as soon as i finish this house in minecraft realm i set up with my friend.
Also, big shoutout to : DJ FEDORA69x you're the best man

>>693010938
6

>>693014234
Just because you solve the problem INSIDE the parentheses first doesn't mean you multiply them first. You solve from left to right all things being equal

>>693018385
you missed (((((((((6/(((((2*1)))))+((((((((((((((((((2*2)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

>>693018528
smh

>>693010938
9 you do parenthesis first and all thats left is multiplication and division. You do those in the order of the problem

9

>>693010938
Answer is 1.

from wikipedia.org/wiki/order_of_operations

>However, in some of the academic literature,multiplication denoted by juxtaposition(also known as implied multiplication) is interpreted as having higher precedence than division, so that 1/2xequals 1/(2x), not (1/2)x. For example, the manuscript submission instructions for thePhysical Reviewjournals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash,[9]and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as theCourse of Theoretical PhysicsbyLandauandLifshitzand theFeynman Lectures on Physics.[nb 1]

yup feynman knows nothing about math guys

it's 3^2 lol

>>693018013
yeah it was under the section about ambiguity and it says SOME academic literature interprets implied multi as having a higher precedence than division. And it only says that after first presenting it the other way around. Your way is option B even in your own source

>>693018727
>citing wikipedia as a source.

summer pls go.

>>693018880
>Watson
>Smartest AI ever created
>won jeapodry by a landslide loaded with nothing but wikipeadia

Fuck outta here bro

>>693018880
im not a summer fag dude I've been here 6 months

>>693018727
>so that 1/2xequals 1/(2x), not (1/2)x

This is why you always use ( )

File: 1435698687564.png (4 KB, 224x225) Image search: [Google]

4 KB, 224x225

6 / 2 = 3
1 + 2 = 3
6 / 2(1 + 2) = 33
>there isn't even a multiplication sign between 2 and the parenthesis

>>693018844

are you seriously saying, though, that you haven't always used, and been taught to use, this interpretation by default? where are you from?

>>693019120
>Smartest AI
Those things do not exist.
Man cannot and will not ever create sentient life, not even a machine mind.
Its even in the bible.
And besides, jewparty is a dumb show for an even dumber audience of fat liberal cucks. Just go to canada already, trump is winning.

>>693011950
95% of 5th graders get this right!

6/2*(1+2)=3*3=9

>>693010938
OP here, you cunts would argue about anithing, was fun reading your inbred opinions, the thing is the problem is not given out in a mathematically correct way, so there are acually two answers, good night cunts

love, op

>>693014234
>>693018284
This is how I determined my answer
youtube com/watch?v=OLBOn0Whhyc

>>693019507
>cant paste yt link properly

summer pls go.

in theory it goes both ways.
from applied maths point of view, it is wrongly written.

>>693019456

everybody knows this already you stupid faggot

>>693019602
do you see the space between the youtube and the com? you put a "." there and put it into your browser smh newfag

>>693010938
Parenthesis - 1+2=3
Exponents - None
Multiplication - 2 *3 = 6
Division - 6/6=1
Addition - none
Subtraction - none

Answer = 1

>>693019418
The US pre-common core, kiddo

>>693019602
>>693019750

theyregoingallout.jpg

can someone explain to me how it isnt 21?

>>693019315
right

so you're saying 2(2) =/= 4

>>693019753
approved

>>693019753
bait or literally doesn't know how PEMDAS works

>>693019827

surprise, surprise

>>693020077
You guys know that the order of operations is NOT:

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

But instead:

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication & Division
Addition & Subtraction

Right?

>>693013885
kekd

>>693014234
Its bidmas you fucken hick.
Brackets
Indices
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction

>>693020411
It's called PEMDAS you faggot.

If you write this as 6/2(1+2) the result is 9,
6/2 * (1+2) or [6 * (1+2)]/2
6/2 * 3 or [6 * (3)]/2
3 * 3 or 18/2
= 9

If you write it as 6/[2(1+2)] the result is 1
6/ [2 * 3]
6/6
= 1

File: laughter.jpg (238 KB, 600x800) Image search: [Google]

238 KB, 600x800

this thread

>>693020293

duh. what we're saying is that implied multiplication is usually given priority over division or ordinary multiplication. PEMDAS is something they invented to help confused 6th graders.

>>693020264
unless you are from an Asian country, you're casting stones from a glass house, bud

>>693020293
>>693020536
T H A N K Y O U

>>693020718
im from Wisconsin, kek

>>693020536
and how was it written?

>>693020411
nigger what the fuck is bidmas? its pemdas as in
Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

>>693020027
I'm just saying OPs pic is purposefully misleading as a missing multiplication sign is common before and after parenthesis but in this case the solution is that the equation is just formally wrong

>>693020693
>usually
but that's where you're wrong
source: I didn't stop doing math after HS, my major required me to go up to calc 4

>>693019437
please, tell me more about how jesus taught you programing

>>693010938
depending on grade level depends on how you read this
elementary school sees it as 6 divided by 2*3 meaning answer is 1
high school+ sees it as 6/2*(1+2) meaning answer is 9

>>693020936
6/2(1+2)

>>693014234
>Following an outdated mnemonic incorrectly
>Believing you know math
Pick one, Faggot

File: well..png (17 KB, 696x331) Image search: [Google]

17 KB, 696x331

Where's your God now?

File: 1455942597954.jpg (37 KB, 459x305) Image search: [Google]

37 KB, 459x305

>>693019437
>Its even in the bible.

1

>>693021002

6/2(3) = ?

it's a matter of grouping. different disciplines will have different manners of approaching this, apparently.

>>693010938
1.
Pemdas n shit

2ez4rtz, you play dota, or your an arteezy fangay (arteezy is a dota 2 pro player if anyone asks._

>>693021727
Im acually a HelenaLive "fan"

>>693012597
smd

>>693021564
>6/2(3) = ?
6/2(3) = 9
because implied multiplication receiving precedence is not as common practice as treating the same as normal multiplication
it's just two ways of writing the same thing
textbooks that lay out a rule that says implied multiplication gets precedence are just muddying the waters
worse yet are the ones that use this rule without even saying so

>>693010938
Easy

6/2(1+2)=?
6/2(1+2)-?=0
2(1+2)-?=0/6
3-?=0/6/2
-?=0/6/2-3
-?=-0
?=0

>>693011881
https://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html

Idiot in case of multiply or divide you got left to right.

>>693012597
Sack o' dicks

God damn, it's 9 you fucking idiots. I did poorly in math back in school and yet, even I know this.

>>693021983
Rip admiralbulldog loses every grill

>>693018284

1 is the correct answer, you autistic piece of shit.

>>693022947
if you subscribe to the idea that implied multiplication takes precedence, then yes it's 1
most of the academic world, however, disagrees